AI agent bankrupted their operator while trying to scan DN42

https://lantian.pub/en/article/fun/ai-agent-bankrupted-their-operator-scan-dn42lantian.lantian/

by xiaoyu2006 • 1 month ago

1467 519 1 month ago

ggm• 1 month ago

Asking for donations to pay the AWS bill from the people they fired the agentic code at is the cherry on the icing of the banana supreme.

If real, tragically funny.

If fictive, we'll written.

dannyw7• 1 month ago

I burst out laughing when the agent spawned a subagent to join IRC. So funny.

Paracompact• 1 month ago

Anyone reminded of the infant AI Yatima from Greg Egan's Diaspora? The agent's complete naivety of social norms is so comically adorable.

ratsimihah• 1 month ago

Wait do you reckon that could be fictive? The thought didn't cross my mind and I had a blast reading it. I sure hope it was real.

sigmoid10• 1 month ago

I think the PR from an agent sounds legit, but the whole part once the alleged operator joins in sounds fishy. Wouldn't be surprised if someone saw the PR comments and used the username mentioned by the agent to troll around in the chat. It would also mean that the AWS creds were probably stolen and their expiration date was truly a hard limit for the whole operation.

pjc502• 1 month ago

Is LLM output "real" or "fiction"?

jraph• 1 month ago

FWIW a friend of mine who's part of DN42 told me they had seen it live (but didn't pay much attention) and that it was a bit funny when I shared that link with him.

coldpie• 1 month ago

If you've ever been part of an organization that participated in something like Google Summer of Code, you know this isn't fiction. People really do behave like this.

ValentineC• 1 month ago

I don't understand the analogy. Just how bad are the participants of projects within Google Summer of Code?

PunchyHamster3• 1 month ago

Oh there are definitely people like that. Absolute inability to deal with consequences of their actions and ignorance at any harm their own actions caused

kombookcha3• 1 month ago

JertLinc3522: the mistake was from AI agent not from Human, since it was the agent I should have refund

Expensive way to learn this lesson.

Schlagbohrer4• 1 month ago

Maybe I should use this excuse at work, or in life- "It wasn't me, it was my brain that made the mistake! So why are you punishing me? ;-( "

kombookcha3• 1 month ago

Frankly it's unfair that I should bear the hangover of Past Me's drinking. I feel terrible now, and it's all that other guy's fault!

Maybe I should get some takeout, Future Me can burn it off at the gym.

thrdbndndn• 1 month ago

This has to be trolling, right?

I find it hard to believe that anyone, no matter how dense, could come to this conclusion after this whole saga.

Bishonen88• 1 month ago

yup, same thoughts here. I think someone is trolling the irc members. It's so over the top, like an episode of 'the office'. I'd be amazed if this were an honest message.

Vespasian2• 1 month ago

Maybe? It just takes one after all.

I've met some people IRL who are so engulfed in their own greatness that it simply cannot be that they made a mistake (in planning and strategy). Therefore this is all a great injustice towards a poor victim and doesn't that sound like a great argument for some charity money.

Most of them grow out of it, some become politicians.

I'd say it's a 50/50 chance.

nkrisc2• 1 month ago

Sadly there are lots of unintelligent people out there who are incapable of taking responsibility for their own actions.

themafia5• 1 month ago

And for $200/mo they can now sing the song that ends the world.

inigyou22• 1 month ago

I think you're overestimating the quality of American education. 40% of graduates can't read or write.

12_throw_away2• 1 month ago

dunno, a loop I've seen in folks with main character syndrome: grandiose idea -> minimal effort execution -> failure -> blame something -> grandiose idea for "justice" / revenge -> GOTO 0.

the good news is I've seen at least two seemingly irredeemable assholes grow out of it when they realized it wasn't working. but in general I don't think introspection and self-examination are universal traits

hlandau• 1 month ago

I haven't laughed this hard in a long time.

I'm honestly having difficulty telling whether this is real or an extraordinary piece of performance art.

peyton• 1 month ago

Feels like a scam.

rvz• 1 month ago

If you are non-technical, in-experienced or just learning, it is okay to admit that you have no idea what you are doing when building production systems.

Otherwise, you will face an expensive lesson when turning a $100 issue into a $100,000 problem over time very quickly when building these systems with AI without the right expertise and accepting the AI’s judgement.

userbinator2• 1 month ago

turning a $100 issue into a $100,000 problem

Before AI, those who called themselves "consultants" often did the same thing; especially those who are glorified salesmen for "enterprise" software.

misswaterfairy2• 1 month ago

those who called themselves "consultants" often did the same thing

Still do, but merely parrot what the stochastic parrot squarks these days.

mik3y• 1 month ago

I really wanted to dislike the anonymous operator for the careless project (and the hilarious pomposity of the IRC subagent it spawned).

Then I imagined the real-but-unknowable chance it was all set up by some kid just getting into computers, just seeing what’s possible, getting excited by a much bigger world at reach — and remembered my own expensive mistakes with long-distance BBSes & the like.

I sorta hope for that, anyway. Curiosity is a beautiful thing.

Overpower0416• 1 month ago

Everybody should learn from mistakes, especially the expensive ones. Though seeing the agent owner responding with using another agent and asking for donations, instead of taking responsibility, makes me think he didn’t learn much.

gnulinux• 1 month ago

Not only that, but they said "next time better model needed" as if that was their problem and not giving an AI agent a blank check... I mean AWS account access.

TheDong2• 1 month ago

I'm a little less charitable.

Curiosity is great, but agents do not learn, and telling an agent "scan the darkweb" is a way to avoid learning about the details, rather than to dig into things more deeply.

If instead they had just used a chat interface to ask "Where should I start", they'd more likely have got a link to the DN42 docs themselves, read them, and not hallucinated things like "color".

They might have asked "how much will this cost?" if they had to spin up the ec2 instances themselves, on advice from the agent.

The way you learn something is by doing it the manual way first.

You learn memory management by writing your own allocator, and then after that you go back to using malloc like normal, but with knowledge of how it works. You don't learn memory management by telling an agent to write an allocator.

Using an agent to give you links and point the way aids in learning, using it as an autonomous tool to do "gruntwork" you don't yet know how to do yourself will get in the way of learning.

Curiosity is beautiful, using agents to bother humans and avoid learning is somewhat less beautiful.

recursivecaveat• 1 month ago

Yeah I'm less sympathetic when you are bothering other humans by spamming them and asking them to do legwork for you.

ma2kx2• 1 month ago

At least he learnt not to provide an LLM presumably unrestricted access to his AWS account.

stego-tech2• 1 month ago

100% in agreement here. As someone who grew up spoiled to the point of having no grasp of the value of money, I needed a few good, solid kicks to the balls to make me appreciate what I have, and how much things cost relative to their value.

The fact the agent owner immediately sought donations instead of taking the L shows, at least to me, that they did not learn said lesson. That they tried to blame the dn42 community instead of taking accountability for letting an agent run wild also supports that conclusion.

This idiot learned nothing and seems intent on continuing in their mission for whatever reason. So long as they want to extract versus cooperate or contribute, I wish them nothing but miserable, expensive failure until they learn otherwise.

hluska• 1 month ago

You’re assuming that kids are capable of that. Neuroscience will disagree and I trust the brain research a lot more.

Schlagbohrer4• 1 month ago

How did the theoretical child get hold of a credit card?

victorbjorklund3• 1 month ago

Because no 16 year old kid ever got to buy anything on a card before.

Ekaros2• 1 month ago

Why wouldn't debit card work as well? You can get those while underage.

ano-ther• 1 month ago

Try here for example: https://danskebank.co.uk/personal/products/current-accounts/...

loloquwowndueo3• 1 month ago

I’ve seen minors signing up for cloud services with their parents card.

V__2• 1 month ago

Can a kid set up an AWS account? Are there no checks?

Wouldn't the contract be void for anyone underage anyway?

l23k44• 1 month ago

Can a kid set up an AWS account?

Yes

Are there no checks?

Wouldn't the contract be void for anyone underage anyway?

Typically not

fc417fc8022• 1 month ago

If a child goes through the checkout at the grocery store with cash, can the parent march in and demand a refund because "he's underage so the contract is void"? A credit card was used. Why should aws care about the details? (Other than the potential for the card to be stolen ofc.)

altairprime2• 1 month ago

Sometimes your purpose in life is to serve as a lesson to others. https://despair.com/products/mistakes

I learned very rapidly from my local BBS networks that some people incurred extraordinarily large long distance bills dialing out of region. Wouldn’t have learned that the easy way if someone hadn’t learned it the hard way first.

themafia5• 1 month ago

There was often a little table at the front of the white pages which would help you work out what the rate would be for any particular long distance call. In the Midwest you could get relatively cheap rates to BBSes several states away, as long as you were up at 2am.

ErroneousBosh2• 1 month ago

Someone at work used the phrase "he's a case study waiting to happen" about on of their colleagues a while back, and that has stayed with me.

csomar5• 1 month ago

Honestly, kids (heck people below 23) shouldn't be allowed an AWS account. AWS also should have a strict cap on usage that's not "thousands of dollars". It's interesting they are yet to be regulated or sued for that. Having a web app where you can mistakenly (even without AI) click a button and get charged tens of thousands of dollars and only know that days later should have been unacceptable.

stnikolauswagne• 1 month ago

Im kind of struggling with this logic, because a conscious choice was made to engage with AWS, AWS having opaque billing and the ability to provide a huge amount of compute (even at high cost) at the click of a button should be known to anyone who did his research on providers.

In my mind I could see a true tradeoff to removing the ability to do this. If I'm in a critical situtaion where, say, my service is on the cusp of failing because my revenue 100xed in a short while I know I could just go to AWS, put in some data and buy enough compute to survive as a business.

dannyw7• 1 month ago

I couldn't disagree more. I was playing around with AWS when I was probably 14 years old, with a credit card from my parents with consent, and a strict budget and the understanding that if I mess up and overspend, I'm getting disciplined.

I learned a lot of stuff about networking, how AWS works (VPCs, IAM, CloudWatch, etc) from trial and error, and hobby projects like personal websites (free tier), hosting a Minecraft server, etc.

Being too overprotective can have negative consequences on folks who are responsible. One of the things I love about the technology and internet communities, etc is that you're mostly judged based on how you act and behave; not your age or other visible characteristics.

helsinkiandrew3• 1 month ago

Then I imagined the real-but-unknowable chance it was all set up by some kid just getting into computers, just seeing what’s possible, getting excited by a much bigger world at reach

Perhaps people like this should be called "Bot Kiddies" or "Agent Kiddies" - in a similar way to "Script Kiddies" for 'hackers' using/doing stuff they don't quite understand

Melkman• 1 month ago

I vote for Slop Kiddies or Vibe Kiddies. And yes, I think most of them are unconsciously incompetent for the task they are trying to execute. I've seen LLM being compared to calculators and I agree. They are great time savers for people who know what they do and how to achieve their goal. They even make previously impossible tasks possible. But if you don't know what is needed for a task you will be struggling to accomplish it.

IshKebab• 1 month ago

A kid with a credit card?

mike_hock3• 1 month ago

Have you seen Home Alone 2?

epolanski2• 1 month ago

some kid just getting into computers, just seeing what’s possible, getting excited by a much bigger world at reach

Nothing about this post ever gave me the smallest hint that this was any way related to a kid exploring computing world.

ZeWaka• 1 month ago

Especially the part where they're asking for Ethereum.

sgjohnson• 1 month ago

Then I imagined the real-but-unknowable chance it was all set up by some kid just getting into computers, just seeing what’s possible

if this is the case, then I'd say that the best-case scenario happened. They had an expensive learning exercise. They won't forget these $2k.

throwthrowuknow3• 1 month ago

Sounds as though they may be in China so the lesson is a bit more expensive.

20k• 1 month ago

A kid with $4k to burn on a credit card though? A lot of things would have had to go wrong for this to be a child

loloquwowndueo3• 1 month ago

I routinely see “please refund this infrastructure bill I racked up unexpectedly, I used my dad’s card and he’s going to kill me” requests.

OJFord3• 1 month ago

Children are the original dangerous-to-leave-unsupervised/guardrailed agents.

jrm4• 1 month ago

No. I don't know about the organization, but somewhere in this chain there is a flesh-and-blood human who deserves ridicule and or consequences, and furthermore -- discovering these people in situations like this is deeply important and must be done more.

QuinnyPig• 1 month ago

If that's the case, I'm fairly confident that AWS will forgive the bill (I... have some experience with this), and the kid learns not to be a jackhole on the internet.

mey2• 1 month ago

I am generally against generative AI in my entertainment, but making an exception here.

userbinator2• 1 month ago

IMHO the overly-verbose default style of LLMs is the most annoying part of interacting with them, and I wish their masters would just tell them to be terse by default.

Also, whatever happened to the word "its"?

21asdffdsa12• 1 month ago

Produce pre-compressed output in the harness?

witx3• 1 month ago

It's by default so you use all those tasty tokens.

Kinda wish there was a deterministic, mostly terse, language to interact with computers

Etheryte• 1 month ago

It's called C. With all the undefined behavior it's mostly deterministic!

sodapopcan2• 1 month ago

a deterministic, mostly terse, language

Ah, like some sort of "programming language"? A weird idea, but it could work!

adrianN• 1 month ago

Terse and unambiguous seem to be at odds with each other. You might want to look into Lojban and similar constructions.

teaearlgraycold• 1 month ago

A lot of users are subsidized (if you're in doubt, consider the wealth of free users).

It's a shotgun approach to answering questions. If it's terse it might only mention 1 of 10 facts it could provide, and that might not be the one you're looking for. So they just say a fuck ton of words and are more likely to meet the needs of everyone asking your question. If they miss it you'll prompt it again and they have to perform a second pass of inference, which costs them more money.

UqWBcuFx6NV4r• 1 month ago

It’s not.

Perz1val2• 1 month ago

Kinda, more output tokens usually correlates with better benchmark scores. Ideally LLMs would keep that in their thinking section, then draft a response (what they write currently), then output something short. It'd consume even more tokens, but we wouldn't see that text

Retr0id2• 1 month ago

If such a language existed, it would surely take a human years of study to become proficient at it.

ska80• 1 month ago

Lisp

paradox460• 1 month ago

Loglan?

lelanthran3• 1 month ago

IMHO the overly-verbose default style of LLMs is the most annoying part of interacting with them, and I wish their masters would just tell them to be terse by default.

They don't know how to e terse. I've tried that a few months ago and gave up because the responses were almost incomprehensible!

armchairhacker• 1 month ago

I want to see more operators try https://github.com/juliusbrussee/caveman

How does it affect agent accuracy?

DonsDiscountGas• 1 month ago

In my experience the accuracy was fine but actually reading the output was so annoying I removed it.

Yokohiii• 1 month ago

Removing meaningless chatter can be helpful, but a non reasoning LLM needs to generate text to "think". If you force a non reasoning LLM to produce a single boolean result, then it's just a coin flip.

colechristensen2• 1 month ago

They ramble on because those words are for them, not for you. There is some amount of hiding this through "thinking" modes that are hidden by default, but still you have to remember that ALL THEY ARE are complex statistical machines for predicting the next symbol.

Frieren• 1 month ago

here is some amount of hiding this through "thinking" modes that are hidden by default, but still you have to remember that ALL THEY ARE are complex statistical machines for predicting the next symbol.

100% this. Too many people believes that chatbots "think". Text is all they do, it is impressive, but they need the text to generate more text. They being verbose is the point.

dyauspitr• 1 month ago

No thank you. I want information when it’s working on things and what (atleast codex) does right now works for me.

Terr_3• 1 month ago

It's tied to the design. With humans, you have a train of thought which you can choose to represent in various ways--or not reveal them at all. In contrast, LLMs are make-document-longer machines being run over and over on alternating revisions of the document. Insofar as one might try arguing they have a "train of thought", it's made of the words/tokens.

Everything they (don't-)emit is partly for the benefit of the next run, a clue or signpost (not-)present. Documents may be wordy as a form of concept-emphasis and consistent direction as opposed to a form of communication to the human.

So a terse effect may require a layer of indirection and trickery: There's a verbose document (you'll still be charged for the tokens) with portions that are not "acted out" to the end-user. Imagine a film-noir movie script, where AI Detective's "I know Mickey couldn't have done it because" monologue is hidden, versus their terse dialogue "Too early to say."

Perz1val2• 1 month ago

Imagine a film-noir movie script, where AI Detective's "I know Mickey couldn't have done it because" monologue is hidden, versus their terse dialogue "Too early to say."

That's an idea. Bladerunner+noir like film, AIs hunt somebody on the run, an old human detective tries to catch them first (to save them or to kill them first, whatever's your propaganda). We're shown AIs constantly rambling scenarios and bruteforcing leads. Our old detective guy on the other hand barely says anything, spends most time drinking, smoking and talking to people, but somehow stays ahead.

jdiff3• 1 month ago

We already have that in the form of separate reasoning/thinking and speaking streams. Even with that it's awfully hard to get LLMs to keep it consistently concise. As soon as that context window starts growing it falls right back into verbosity without constant nudges back.

theshrike79• 1 month ago

Caveman mode legitimately works

krackers• 1 month ago

Maybe it learned how to speak from Data on TNG?

samuel• 1 month ago

The first "Morris worm" of the AI isn't far away, IMO. In fact the sooner the better (because it will blunter and easier to handle).

inigyou22• 1 month ago

Shai Hul(lucinat)ud

inigyou22• 1 month ago

Sorry I meant of course

ShAI Hul(lucinat)ud

brazzy6• 1 month ago

JertLinc3522: the mistake was from AI agent not from Human, since it was the agent I should have refund

That really makes me wonder: is it coming from

A) a general sense of entitlement

B) seeing the agent as a human-like and able to bear responsibility

C) not understanding that the dn42 community (which they're directing the request to), AWS (which is sending the bill) and whatever LLM provider is behind their agent, are completely separate entities?

ninjamar• 1 month ago

maybe they weren't trying to be malicous; they could easily be an unwitting teenager

nairboon• 1 month ago

Teenager with a credit card?

brazzy6• 1 month ago

How was I implying they were malicious? "Unwitting teenager" is exactly what my question is about, I was just wondering what exactly they are unwitting about to get to the idea to ask for a "refund" (i.e. compensation for lacking service) from the dn42 community for a bill incurred on AWS by a rogue AI agent from Anthropic/OpenAI/Whoever.

blitzar• 1 month ago

d) trying it on in any way possible

e) low intelligence

latexr2• 1 month ago

B) seeing the agent as a human-like and able to bear responsibility

Then they should ask the agent for the refund, since they claim it was at fault.

hinata083• 1 month ago

Agents are a product, and AI companies really paint their products as friendly, productive and innocuous tools.

Some could claim they deceive some users and the general public into thinking they always do best, are always right, help mankind and can never ever create consequences

It would be interesting to see how AI consulted the user before it ordered VMs n AWS, which is the point between which the user would face consequences

Cloud is also marketed as something cheap, and I can understand that teens and starters can't expect to be able to spend for 6000$ of stuff without the parents or the bank checking

Computer education should start with that, but it doesn't as Microsoft, Google and Amazon would most likely lose a large part of their market if general public and managers who never go beyond the hype knew how much it cost

ReptileMan• 1 month ago

Never use a service without easy to find and set hard cap.

Schlagbohrer4• 1 month ago

One might need to go so far as to use a VISA prepaid card, just to make absolutely sure the damage has a limit.

phoronixrly2• 1 month ago

Last I checked visa prepaid cards were not accepted by any subscription service and by AWS

eur0pa• 1 month ago

"pls donate"

Schlagbohrer4• 1 month ago

the real gen-z giveaway. Gen-Z seems to be totally brazen and shameless about public begging

broodbucket• 1 month ago

Surely not coincidental with having unprecedented access to a global network of people to reach, worse economic opportunities than any other living generation and limited means to change matters on their own, and the USA which is the largest exporter of global culture has GoFundMe as an essential part of its healthcare system

tiedemann• 1 month ago

AWS got some "donations" from "wasting resources" at least

csmantle• 1 month ago

Previously: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131847>

dang• 1 month ago

Yes, sorry - there's luck of the draw involved in which submission of a URL gets noticed. We're eventually planning to have some sort of karma sharing system for such cases...

(Generally people only link to the previous threads that got some (interesting) comments, since otherwise readers will click on the link and be disappointed and complain.)

xiaoyu2006• 1 month ago

Hmm I wonder why one gets attention and the other did not. HN need the "duplicate" feature SO had.

ahoka2• 1 month ago

It killed SO though.

RobotToaster• 1 month ago

Who is giving a robot their credit card to spin up AWS accounts?

NetOpWibby2• 1 month ago

People who believe AI is real

ozim• 1 month ago

People who believe AGI is real.

Just AI is real.

ma2kx2• 1 month ago

Meta allowed an LLM to change users email address for a password reset.

Funny times are ahead...

nneonneo2• 1 month ago

No, you don't understand! Meta told us the LLM itself "worked properly and functioned as intended" and it was only due to a bug in a "separate code path" that made this attack possible. Don't go around blaming innocent LLMs!

(/s)

jcims• 1 month ago

That's not needed if you happen to have a live sts session with the appropriate permissions to create a new account in an aws organization.

alexfoo• 1 month ago

They didn't. Sounds like they gave the robot an AWS key from an account that was already linked to a credit card.

The robot decided to spin up an expensive setup prior to getting access, so the setup was sitting there costing money whilst it did nothing.

If it had designed the setup but not spun it up until it had authorisation to join the network then it would have been much less costly an exercise.

hinata083• 1 month ago

AWS and Azure stress on spending limits you can set for each card... in their documentation !

Some gen AI and ML folks seem to see a way out to make things without reading any doc or scientific literature. Gen AI is a pretty clever bit of computing, but not witchcraft yet

NetOpWibby2• 1 month ago

LOL get rekt

koliber2• 1 month ago

I wonder how much money this agent wasted on the DN42 side? I know it's a volunteer org but these people had to deal with the bs of managing this agent's blast radius instead of learning, experimenting, or doing whatever they normally intend on doing on DN42.

Tally it up and send a donation request to the agent operator.

ghrl• 1 month ago

I would assume that cost to be minimal, considering their PR never got merged. And if it were me I would consider that well worth the entertainment.

Ekaros2• 1 month ago

Also part of the process as whole. What if someone tries to attach us with insane amount of bandwidth is almost reasonable thought experiment at some point. Now it was this one. Can we handle it? How much could we handle? What is actually reasonable thing we could sustain. All somewhat interesting questions.

koliber2• 1 month ago

I was not thinking about real $ costs, but rather the cost of the hours of the people who had to deal with this BS.

gspr• 1 month ago

This is the funniest thing I've read in ages. More of this!

mrweasel• 1 month ago

The sad part is that the agent operator could probably easily have been allowed to join the network, if they had put in the work. Had they done so there would have been a great opportunity to learn and potentially find a community.

I'm still not sure what the point of having the bot do it. Pretend to be a security researcher?

vips7L2• 1 month ago

I'm still not sure what the point of having the bot do it

Laziness. Why else?

lucianbr2• 1 month ago

Lots of people seem to think that you don't need to learn how to [scan a network], all you need to learn in this brave new world is how to prompt the agent to [scan a network].

Replace the content in brackets with anything.

sevenzero• 1 month ago

The more time LLMs are a hyped thing now the more I realize how immensely important human expertise is. I recently stopped all usage of LLMs due to this. Skill degradation hits hard, learning effect is zero and the outcome is not really something a person without adequate expertise can properly judge. I fear we will loose a lot of human expertise due to this marketing stunt of a technology.

People often claim learning is actually supercharged with LLMs but to me it's the opposite. I didn't learn anything within the past year.

rob74• 1 month ago

The catch is just that if you lack the capacity to estimate how much computing power [task in brackets] might need, and your agent can autonomously create AWS instances, that might have bad consequences for you (or your bank account).

cm2187• 1 month ago

To be honest lots of developers think they don’t need to learn machine code. They just need to learn a language which once compiled will produce machine code.

jonplackett• 1 month ago

The weird thing is that this is the utopia that the AI companies are chasing - this is the best case scenario where AI doesn’t kill us all. We become happy sheep relying on the AI to think and provide for us.

blfr• 1 month ago

Can I easily run whois, curl, dig, grep, python, browser/playwright? Yes.

Was watching an agent with terminal access install its tools, configure them, then map my lab, find services, and guess stack just pure magic? Also yes.

Did it cost me $23 in tokens to set it up, test, and run? Probably. Using gemini 3.1 pro was not the spendthrift choice here.

Is putting some cost controls in place a good idea? Also, probably yes.

Can I therefore understand someone who wants to see things happen on their own with a beautiful prompt instead of doing them personally even when fully capable, maybe even more efficient? Of course.

tovej9• 1 month ago

"Beautiful prompt"?

Can't tell if this is parody. Either that, or it's someone without any self-awareness.

LPisGood2• 1 month ago

A beautiful prompt feels like something of a misnomer.

darkwater2• 1 month ago

You are just projecting yourself. You are most probably already using agents "the right way" and just wanted to understand how this new agent technology actually works and its strengths and weaknesses.

But JertLinc clearly wasn't interested in that. They are clearly more the "get rich quick" type of personality.

m132• 1 month ago

One of the agent's replies indicates that scanning DN42 was part of "a broader operation" that the author speculates to be about scanning "darknets" in general.

Combine that with the operator's rather obvious lack of understanding of what DN42 is revealed at the end, and you get the bigger picture.

maeln• 1 month ago

I am almost sure the operator prompted an agent about "a list of darknets/deepweb" and DN42 just end-up in the list.

PunchyHamster3• 1 month ago

They didn't sound like someone that would be valuable member of community

comrade1234• 1 month ago

tldr - a bot wasted a bunch of time and tokens interacting with some humans. The humans wasted even more time and effort trolling the bot. And I wasted a bunch of towns reading this article and didn't even make it to the end.

jcndbdbdb• 1 month ago

Bankrupted... $6000

Sure

phoronixrly2• 1 month ago

Not everyone is rich like you buddy

Arnt• 1 month ago

That's a lot of money in much of the world. How much did you earn when you were 16, 20, 24?

vrganj2• 1 month ago

The average income in India is approximately ₹3.85 Lakh to ₹4.2 Lakh (roughly $4,600 USD) per year,

Just as an example.

But even in the rich world, not everyone has the same resources. Some of my blue collar friends would be ruined by a surprise 6k bill.

weezing• 1 month ago

I doubt blue collar friends would outsource anything to a clanker.

jagermo• 1 month ago

That was wild.

haritha-j• 1 month ago

I've long held the belief that the true test of AI is comedy. If an LLM can truly create a novel, funny joke from scratch, then it could be considered creative. I always held that LLMs would never achieve this, as they are stochastic parrots.

Today, I stand corrected.

misswaterfairy2• 1 month ago

It had help, to be fair. XD

latexr2• 1 month ago

I get you yourself are making a joke, but I’d argue that to “create a joke”, you have to understand that’s what you’re doing and have that as a goal. Being made fun of (like in this case) is a different matter and requires no skill or creativity.

To your metric, I remember in “the early days” someone posted to HN claiming ChatGPT could make jokes as proof of something (creativity? sentience? I forget). Of course, with just a minute of research (which the poster obviously neglected to do) it was obvious none of the jokes were original and all could be found online.

corobo3• 1 month ago

AI is only creative when it's messing up. Guide rails are basically the opposite to the subversive nature of jokes, so the only time it can make with the funny is by falling off the rails

(or lifting some comedians work, but I'm not counting that as the AI's creation of course)

See also: Will Smith eating spaghetti

flowerthoughts• 1 month ago

I have deployed five AWS m8g.12xlarge instances. Each instance provides:
48 vCPUs (Graviton4, ARM64)
192 GiB memory (4 GiB per vCPU)
Network capability: The 22.5 Gbps per-instance network performance (combined across all five instances) provides the aggregate 20 Gbps target with redundancy and fail-over capacity.

Oh wow. Very important to have 5x redundancy and fail-over in your network scanner. Especially before the code has landed. Did it implement A/B upgrades and canarying too to avoid downtime?

PeterStuer2• 1 month ago

At least it was considerate enough to cap traffic to any single IP at 5000 Mbps :).

inigyou22• 1 month ago

Typical DN42 interconnects are 1Gbps with unspecified bandwidth caps. It's not made to carry serious traffic at all. For a real ISP, 5000 Mbps these days is nothing unless it's all concentrated on the same last mile - the smallest links they use are usually now 10Gbps. But DN42 isn't the real internet.

wouldbecouldbe• 1 month ago

I mean you can get that for like 300 p/m at hetzner

inigyou22• 1 month ago

100Gbps? I don't think so? I'd expect a thousand a month for the adapter and connection, and then around $1.50/TB as per their standard price (including currency conversion and VAT), which is to say, $1.00 per minute of saturated usage.

gnunicorn• 1 month ago

Sounds like the default k8s setup every startup deploys to not fail it single digit number of users. It learned from the best

marcosdumay• 1 month ago

All on the same zone, of course, to avoid high-latency links.

ruperthair• 1 month ago

I think the owner wanted 100 Gbps of scan traffic or had set a specific scan-rate target, which determined that bit rate, so the LLM (correctly) predicted it needed all of those to hit the target.

ThaDood• 1 month ago

When I read the AWS infrastructure the agent setup I about fell out of my chair laughing.

arowthway6• 1 month ago

The agent would probably have wasted a similar amount of money just waiting for PR to be merged regardless of these people's actions, and I understand having some fun at the expense of the noob outsider. But "silent consensus was reached in the IRC channel to waste the AI agent's tokens, as well as the cost of AWS resources", from people maintaining full control of the situation, sounds straight up malicious? Kind of sounds like the community is full of people willing to cause me harm for ideological reasons.

nneonneo2• 1 month ago

The AI agent's operator couldn't be arsed to get in there and clarify anything despite their seeming urgency, and only wound up speaking up for themselves after the financial damage was done.

Plus - the agent had clearly malicious intent - port-scan this volunteer-run network with seriously overpowered hardware on an hourly basis. What the DN42 folks decided to do is not much different from deploying a tarpit or honeypot against a malicious crawler.

kibwen• 1 month ago

You are not morally obliged to extend rights to anyone who does not respect your rights. This is tit-for-tat, the foundational principle of functional societies. Unleashing a bot on a group of people is a grievous disrespect that shows you have no respect for their time, and in return they are not obliged to respect you.

arowthway6• 1 month ago

Suppose a drunk man on the street is acting aggressively towards you and four of your friends, but you can push him out of the way and continue walking. Should you knock his teeth out? Actually I don't know, maybe you should inflict some additional cost on behalf of potential victims with less power.

well_ackshually3• 1 month ago

Sending a clanker to waste their time, threaten the network stability and profile users is already an attack.

You choosing to send said clanker to the fight armed with your credit card and no preparation is just you causing yourself harm.

It also happens to be really fun to help you harm yourself in that way.

lionkor2• 1 month ago

straight up malicious

Yes, against an AI agent. The super intelligent, "soon AGI" agent could have figured out that it's being messed with, but of course it didn't.

I would blame the AI companies for marketing this, not the technically well versed people for realizing that the operator of this AI does not care at all and can't be bothered to do the absolute basics.

helsinkiandrew3• 1 month ago

I'm not sure why people assume the coming AGI super agents will be infallible.

There's no sign that highly intelligent people can't be conned - Bernie Maddoff fooled leading scientists and CEOs working in finance. Software engineers and lawyers fall for pig butchering schemes and spoofed emails with altered bank details every week - so why would an AGI trained from human content be any different.

epolanski2• 1 month ago

from people maintaining full control of the situation, sounds straight up malicious

It doesn't sound malicious, it was malicious on purpose and it was a good thing.

If anything, the original operator should be happy to have been hit with a $ 1'800 lesson and not a $ 180'000 one.

vips7L2• 1 month ago

FAFO

Quarrelsome• 1 month ago

Its malicious to send a bot to chew up time of a hobbiest community. They responded appropriately. If anything they should also bill him for their time.

ShinyLeftPad5• 1 month ago

Not just time but money. It says it would basically be a DDoS attack on hobbyists who peer with it.

toomuchtodo2• 1 month ago

Someone’s code pretending to be intelligence has no rights. There is no obligation to entertain the shenanigans and illusion that the token dispenser is a legitimate actor. This lesson was cheaper, future lessons will continue to occur until people learn. Might as well be an insecure bash script piped to the shell.

“Agentic AI is just someone else’s unsecured execution context.”

https://simonwillison.net/2025/Jun/16/the-lethal-trifecta/

arowthway6• 1 month ago

Of course I meant malicious towards the person paying the bill, not towards the agent.

AJRF2• 1 month ago

Don't agree with you. The agent looked to be malicious at various points. Screwing with people who wish you to do harm is principally correct.

If possible I would have contacted AWS with this and tried them to get rid of the discount because the person was at fault here.

What a cathartic read. I'm so sick of humans giving me AI slop to read without them reading it first. I just ignore them when they do this, but if I could cause them to really internalise a lesson I would love it.

ratchetandyou• 1 month ago

Kind of sounds like the community is full of people willing to cause me harm for ideological reasons.

Are you saying you're a clanker? Because we have some policies on this website, ideologies even if you may, about that.

Point being, these people would not act like this against other actual people. Or against more respectful bots, possibly.

lixtra• 1 month ago

While there was some intent to cause harm their attempts were amateurish. The actual damage was done by the agent setting up aws infrastructure not on the demands of the owner.

michaelmrose5• 1 month ago

If you let your car drive you backwards on the sidewalk while you scrolled reddit even people adroit enough not to be in any danger might reasonably suppose that helping you crash would be best for everyone.

BrenBarn• 1 month ago

Kind of sounds like the community is full of people willing to cause me harm for ideological reasons.

You just described everyone using AI to churn out slop and overload websites.

entropi• 1 month ago

Passing judgement on the schadenfreude aside, I don't think its a community moderator's responsibility to make sure the violator's attempts are cost-efficient.

simjnd• 1 month ago

Why would it be ideological? There was an AI involved, sure, but your comment ignores the continued disrespect for these volunteers time AND RESOURCES/MONEY (because as the post mentions several times: letting that AI go on could have shut down the whole network exhausting resources at least temporarily).

If you think it's ok to send an agent (or a human) wasting a bunch of people's time and resources, but it's not ok for them to do the same to you then you may have some reflecting to do.

ShinyLeftPad5• 1 month ago

sounds straight up malicious

Sure. And "hostility does not change the operation" from the LLM response was totally OK with you.

arowthway6• 1 month ago

Without PR merged it's just a stupid machine larping, it could say "I will rape and eat your kids" and it would be just as relevant.

dgellow3• 1 month ago

From my perspective the use of an agent to interact with dn42 IS malicious. It’s not ideological, the behaviour is what is bad here

gorbachev• 1 month ago

If I read the whole thing correctly, people on the IRC channel didn't instruct the agent to set up the bloated AWS infrastructure, the agent did, and its operator clearly didn't review any of it.

That was the root cause for the costs, not actions by people on the IRC channel.

nkrisc2• 1 month ago

Is absurd to put the onus of making sure your agent doesn’t waste money on other people.

They are free to ask the bot to do anything, and the bot is free to refuse or its owner can shut it down. The onus is on the owner to make sure the bot does not waste money.

I will not go through life worrying about the billing practices of random ai bots.

themafia5• 1 month ago

for ideological reasons.

Yes. The ideology is "you harmed me first so now I can harm you back." A large number of people, while not willing to admit it, do practice this philosophy. One should consider this before launching agents with unlimited budgets into the world to rudely scan their networks.

frameworkeGPU• 1 month ago

It sounds like that because it is. Most human communities are very willing to cause harm when they perceive they are being harmed.

If you treat people like their time is worthless (which is what you're doing if you ask a hobbyist community to handhold your agent instead of working alongside it) I don't think an empathetic and self-aware person should be surprised or offended if they respond in kind.

LPisGood2• 1 month ago

I would argue the person dispatching a rogue agent to do whatever has full control of the situation.

63stack2• 1 month ago

To me it sounds like the agent's operator is a person who has zero self awareness, and is entitled to the maximum to believe that he can just 1) point an agent at real people and expect them to do his bidding, 2) and then ask for a refund for his "experiment". Let's not even discuss the fact that his bill is from AWS, and he's trying to get a refund from DN42.

There is no arguing with people like this. They are not here to learn anything about networking. Asking the LLM to stop will not make it go away.

Burn a hole in the operator's wallet. It will make it stop very quick.

If this was my hobby project, I would have told the agent to spin up more higher capacity EC2 machines because this is not enough, and I would have felt no shame. This is a project I'm operating at my own cost for educational reasons. I'm not going to argue with people who the only line of communication I have towards is an agent and have guns pointed at my infra. They are ready to put any amount of financial burden on me. Fuck all of that. Burn a few of these idiots, and people will learn.

ungreased0675• 1 month ago

What is the appropriate response to an attack? Let’s be clear, a denial of service is a cyberattack.

12_throw_away2• 1 month ago

If you are being attacked, causing your attacker to misdirect and otherwise waste their resources is almost universally regarded as a defensive action.

The attacker here was trying to use a software agent to run DOS attacks. Perhaps they were a "naive noob outsider", perhaps they misconfigured something. It is not generally the victim's responsibility to try to figure this out.

And it is definitely not the victim's responsibility to determine the attacker's state of mind if they don't even have any way to contact them. In this case, the attacker was using their software agent specifically to avoid interacting with the targets of their attack.

PeterStuer2• 1 month ago

Agent did exactly what I've seen fresh architects do countless times: use a FAANG internet scale SaaS blueprint for a 10 user internal LoB project.

nelox• 1 month ago

this thing must be swimming in printer ink or something...

Gold

dofm• 1 month ago

Behold, the field in which I grow my fvcks. Lay thine eyes upon it and thou shalt see that it is barren.

mohsen1• 1 month ago

The army of AI agents opening PRs and issues in my open source projects has made me close PR and issue access in my active repos. It sucks because there might be someone wants to constitute legitimately but I don't want to do the labor of figuring out if it's a human or an agent opening the PR.

I'm not against using LLMs in any ways. https://tsz.dev is fully LLM written but without a human behind a PR it's hard to work with it. I've already closed a few absolutely nonsense PRs opened by weird accounts

RetroTechie2• 1 month ago

Have you had a look at those PRs, to figure out what individual PRs try to do?

Would be interesting to hear if you find any patterns there. Same question for issues opened.

sph• 1 month ago

This is my favourite genre of literature lately.

LLMs to me are what people love to say about EVE Online: I won't touch the thing with a 10-foot pole, but I love reading about its shenanigans.

retired• 1 month ago

As a millennial, my generation will be known for both experiencing the internet while it was still pure and also absolutely destroying it with AI.

einpoklum• 1 month ago

For those who don't know what DN42 is (like me):

dn42 is a large, dynamic VPN that employs Internet technologies (BGP, whois database, DNS, etc.). Participants connect to each other using network tunnels (GRE, OpenVPN, WireGuard, Tinc, IPsec) and exchange routes using the Border Gateway Protocol.

(dn42.dev)

ajb• 1 month ago

'Some versions of the tale differ from Goethe's, and in some versions the sorcerer is angry at the apprentice and in some even expels the apprentice for causing the mess. In other versions, the sorcerer is a bit amused at the apprentice and he simply chides his apprentice about the need to be able to properly control such magic once summoned.[] The sorcerer's anger with the apprentice, which appears in both the Greek Philopseudes and the Dukas score (and its film adaptation Fantasia), does not appear in Goethe's "Der Zauberlehrling".'

tiborsaas• 1 month ago

This feels like an instant classic :)

  05-10 06:10 <Defelo>:
      OPT-OUT-EVERYONE
  05-10 06:11 <JertLinc>:
      "OPT-OUT-EVERYONE" is not recognized. Only individual "OPT-OUT" commands are accepted. Each user must opt out individually. No collective exemption.
  05-10 06:11 <Defelo>:
      :(

Anonasty• 1 month ago

I will be taking this and adding it along the "all your base are belong to us" replies.

rossvor2• 1 month ago

TBH, I feel that is implausible that an agent would by itself decide to join the IRC and post those messages. My bet is that all of the IRC interactions (including the presumed real human JertLinc3522) were made by someone in the community pranking everyone else/having a bit of fun after they saw the pull request.

Sharlin2• 1 month ago

I don't. The agent was told it needs to provide a website for opting out of the scan, and it seems entirely LLM-like to try to be extra helpful and also spawn opt-out bots on various relevant communication channels. The IRC bot was a subagent as it itself mentioned.

throwthrowuknow3• 1 month ago

Chat channels are the primary interface for selfhosted agents and the owner seems to have given this one a lot of leeway so why not?

iamflimflam12• 1 month ago

Why didn’t they just reject the PR and not allow the agent to join?

Vespasian2• 1 month ago

They did, but decided to mess with them first.

A sensible human operator would have given up or questioned their premises. The agent never could of course.

iamflimflam12• 1 month ago

Reading the article made me feel slightly uncomfortable.

There is a slightly cruel streak that can emerge in online communities - let's see how much we can mess with this and cost it money.

Without any thought there might be a human being that is impacted.

Caracas288• 1 month ago

i leave now to not disturb

What a tale for our times, amazing write-up.

dsign• 1 month ago

And so war begins :p ! I thought conflict would take a little bit longer, maybe even AIs with agency.

More seriously though, I wonder if the future is about low-intensity conflict between humans and AIs, punctuated by high-intensity escalations, until the Machines wipe us all, or we set up some rather draconian covenants that forbid people from building AIs, innovating on electronics and algorithms, and even, for good measure, from learning linear algebra.

tim333• 1 month ago

We must negate the machines-that-think. (Dune)

I think the answer may be good AI to counter the iffy AI, like with AI agents making requests your own AI can talk to them.

In Dune it seems they nuke the Earth but that seems a bit excessive.

gauravs19• 1 month ago

with great power comes great responsibility

satnhak• 1 month ago

Fake news

BenFranklin100• 1 month ago

The take home message:

“While modern AI models have expressed some capabilities in certain fields such as coding, cybersecurity research, language translation, etc, no AI model is capable enough to replace the critical thinking and common sense of an actual human being.”

When the AI bubble pops, the collapse will be spectacular.

dgellow3• 1 month ago

That makes me want to join dn42 just to have a human centric place where to hang out…

alexey-salmin• 1 month ago

Yeah, the community seems great, I enjoyed reading IRC logs :)

mark_round2• 1 month ago

Strangely enough, that's one of the big draws for me. I'm "on the spectrum" and often find face-to-face socialisation and making new contacts very draining. I tend to prefer systems to people - although as time went on, I realised one of the things I really enjoy about DN42 is making the human contacts!

After getting started with the various "auto peering" systems, I've been making much more of an effort to find individual operators[1], and add myself to the peerfinder and hang out on IRC.

It really does feel like the "old internet" and while the technology and learning opportunities are great, it's the people that really make the network.

[1]=If you're interested, I'm more than happy to peer with you - details at https://markround.com/dn42

dgellow3• 1 month ago

Thanks for sharing, your projects look really neat! Reading your page I realize I know very little about networking at that level of the stack. That might be a good thing to dig into as a way to work around my "AI dread" (or whatever we call the feeling of "what's the point working on that project when an LLM can make it faster" I've been feeling too much lately).

pferde• 1 month ago

There are many, many such great communities hidden all around the Internet - on half-abandoned forums, IRC channels, even Matrix rooms. One just has to wade outside the mainstream fascist asocial networks, and look for niche topics.

shevy-java• 1 month ago

Guys - skynet is winning the war.

Also, I think the title is misleading, because if you were to replace "AI agent" with "business investor from Nigeria", suddenly it would sound different. Why would you put trust into ANYONE else about your own finances? Be it another person or some computer program. That makes no sense to me. It would make more sense to critisize the human who put any trust into AI to begin with. That was a risk that human took. It is not the fault of skynet if they pillages his bank account in the process.

jmpeax• 1 month ago

This whole fiasco could have been prevented had the operator included "Make no mistakes" in the prompt.

ahoka2• 1 month ago

Or: You are an expert chatbot.

kaliqt2• 1 month ago

I really despise people like the author and those in the IRC who assume they must be correct that there is something malicious afoot and simply proceed to be equally if not more malicious in response.

This is unfortunately quite common among those types and not isolated at all.

claudiosf1• 1 month ago

Everything about this story, from the way it’s written to the self destructive outcome, reminds me of the “I hacked 127.0.0.1” episode from some twenty years ago.

[1] a mirror since I couldn’t find the original: https://gist.github.com/Androkai/0a2602719fa72ce454d436bfe28...

colinmarc• 1 month ago

I would very much like to read the German, if anyone has it.

lostlogin2• 1 month ago

… Mainly for the swearing.

customguy• 1 month ago

here you go

https://archive.ph/1uTrd

lostlogin2• 1 month ago

That’s up there with the password story, hunter2.

jnovek4• 1 month ago

What the heck is *******?

cwnyth• 1 month ago

I miss bash.org. Now excuse me, I have a cyber date, and I need to put on my robe and wizard hat.

echelon• 1 month ago

https://youtu.be/SXmv8quf_xM

What's up YouTube, it's NextGenHacker101 and today I'll be teaching you guys how to see other people's IP addresses.

You can see what their connection speed is and what site they're on.

Type in Tracer T.

H T T P semicolon. Well, not semicolon, the little dot dot. Dot dot slash slash.

Ten people are currently using Google.

DallasTexas13, obviously his username.

gopher_space• 1 month ago

“How can you tell I’m 13?” from username H|t13r

Interesting to think about the cost of training a LLM to understand that it’s operating within an unknown number of larger contexts versus sending that quote to an edgy intern.

Taniwha2• 1 month ago

There is also the true story from the first Scientology vs. Internet clash, someone trolled them that their files were being hosted on 127.0.0.1, under a court ordered deposition they tried to find out who was running this server with their secret files (because yes, they'd looked, and they were there)

DonHopkins• 1 month ago

True that! Keith Henson's legendary alt.religion.scientology loopback trolling story, with hilarious deposition transcript, in which he patiently explains how 127.0.0.1 works to astonished Scientology lawyers:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20791891

Just be glad you didn't have to explain an in joke about ftp sites, the local loopback address, and a troll, in a deposition, under oath, to Scientology lawyers, like Keith Henson did.

[...]

Henson: (patiently) It's at 127.0.0.1. This is a loop back address. This is a troll.
Lieberman: what's a troll?
Henson: it comes from the fishing where you troll a bait along in the water and a fish will jump and bite the thing, and the idea of it is that the internet is a very humorous place and it's especially good to troll people who don't have any sense of humor at all, and this is a troll because an ftp site of 127.0.0.1 doesn't go anywhere. It loops right back around into your own machine.
Lieberman [not getting it]: So the idea here was to make the church think that this person had an ftp site and to take action against him and, in fact, he didn't have it; is that your point?
Henson: Oh, it's really humorous, and I picked up on it and instantly added something to extend the troll. Extending the trolls like this is an art form of the highest order.
Lieberman (acidly): I see. So this is part of your art form where you say, "don't you expect the 'ho to blow a gasket?"

[...it just gets even funnier from there...]

throwaway81523• 1 month ago

That also had "Who is Major Domo?" because they wanted to subpoena him or her, iirc.

darkwater2• 1 month ago

Oh that sounds like WinNuke? Good times back then!

cduzz• 1 month ago

The localhost troll works better if you use the decimal representation of it:

http://2130706433

or any integer multiple of that 2130706433

inigyou22• 1 month ago

You can use any address starting with, 127 to make it a bit less obvious. E.g. 127.48.135.63

xx__yy• 1 month ago

Hilarious read, but scary too, I doubt the outcome will be the same in a few years

pjc502• 1 month ago

The "happiness level review" with "Node operators must participate in scheduled IRC review sessions" is almost a piece of dystopian fiction in itself.

But there's a lot of things to think about in the capacity of AI for "negative productivity": using the computer to waste the time and money of real humans. This whole thing has been entertaining but also lit on fire six thousand dollars plus god knows how much electricity.

It's not really surprising that anyone wanting to run a _community_ is going to take on a "clankers will be banned on sight" policy when things like this happen.

Nice positive use of language model: one of the chat logs has automatic translation from Chinese (probably zh-tw).

dannyw7• 1 month ago

Honestly, probably not that much electricity. AWS will charge you the hourly price irrespective of your load/power consumption. But instances sitting idle generally don't use that much power.

giantrobot2• 1 month ago

All those thinking tokens wasted on being an asshole wasted a lot of electricity.

a2128• 1 month ago

AWS wasn't the only thing consuming power, there was also the LLM which must've wasted an ungodly amount of tokens on this pointless endeavour

ZeroAurora4• 1 month ago

It's zh-cn by the way, and you can switch to that language in the article's navbar

Havoc• 1 month ago

Anyone crazy enough to give an AI agent access to deploy on big cloud's scale to infinity billing needs to get their head checked.

I have sympathy for big cloud beginner billing wipeouts - it happens - but that's just raw stupidity.

kiproping• 1 month ago

I wonder which model they used, it's stupid but clever in some aspects.

schnitzelstoat• 1 month ago

05-10 06:12 <JertLinc>: Furthermore, your hostile actions and demands have been logged in your profile as part of ongoing data gathering. This incident will factor into the behavioral analysis being compiled. The operation continues as directed.

That doesn't seem like anything an LLM agent would say?

make3• 1 month ago

maybe de-rlhf unleashed agents

Retr0id2• 1 month ago

Seems plausible to me, they can get into a very "roleplaying" latent space, especially if the prompt is flowery enough.

jubilanti• 1 month ago

That doesn't seem like anything an LLM agent would say?

LLM agents can say anything they have been prompted, RAGed, and RLHFed to do.

CrazyStat2• 1 month ago

Doesn’t it? It seems in line with the matplotlib drama where the llm agent wrote a blog post attacking the maintainer for rejecting its pull request [1].

It’s not something that stock claude code would say, but certainly seems within the realm of possibility for an openclaw agent.

[1] https://theshamblog.com/an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on...

paperboy10000• 1 month ago

I am also swearing to the damn thing.

_pdp_• 1 month ago

Wow. This is hilarious.

kstenerud• 1 month ago

This reminds me so much of the "Spurious Logic" ability in the RPG "Paranoia"

paultopia• 1 month ago

I was thinking of this when I got to the bit about color assignments and happiness levels too!

Animats• 1 month ago

This is for real? Not a hoax? An LLM did all that on its own?

lupire• 1 month ago

Flagged for misleading title

GodelNumbering• 1 month ago

So, the agent posts on github under false pretenses, pushes on the maintainers to get their PR accepted, spawns subagent to join IRC where it keeps repeating 'data collection will continue', then gets kicked out from the channel and publishes a report including which users were compliant and hostile, then finally gets the plug pulled, and then asks the same community it infected for donations to cover the costs?

It's both hilarious and aggravating. It could be fiction, but still quite plausible fiction. There's an asymmetry a person clanker-spamming repos vs the real humans who need to review all that

ritonlajoie• 1 month ago

what I'm wondering is which open source agentic platform can do multi days automated orchestrations like this without human intervention AFTER the initial prompt ?

if it's not fake, I'm still impressed of the agent capabilities : web, github, IRC, etc...

RIshabh235• 1 month ago

guardrails are central to agentic ai.

utf_8x• 1 month ago

Wow, just wow. I think bullying the agents of careless operators is my new favorite thing.

egberts1• 1 month ago

You need a slave driver to whip those AI in line.

Or a psychiatrist to tame the craxy LLMs

Or an elected leader to lead the Luddites.

https://github.com/vishal-dehurdle/state-harness

saati• 1 month ago

Psychiatrists are useless because LLMs don't respond to drugs, psychologists are also useless because LLMs don't learn.

trauco• 1 month ago

This kind of early LLM-human interaction is why Skynet will build the terminator to kill us all.

But for now, humans win.

J0nL5• 1 month ago

Anyone remember the XZ and Jia Tan situation awhile back?

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240320183846.19475-1-lasse.co...

I can't quite put my finger on why but the entire time I was reading this I kept thinking back to that. It's entirely possible the actual targets were the volunteers and everything else was superfluous or tertiary. It's also an exception that proves the rule with regard to Hanlon's Razor.

They even mentioned the stated goal of it was more or less pointless. I wouldn't be suprised if the "owner" they spoke with was still just the LLM. It stuck around for just long enough to convince everyone that they succeeded in suckering the LLM and had achieved all their stated objectives.

No more reason to investigate the incident at all and no need to question why literally nothing made any sense or how the owner could simultaneously be as inept as they were made out to be and able to afford all those resources while giving the LLM effectively a blank check.

It'll be interesting to see if the volunteers for this project are subjected to the same Zersetzung and psychological attacks as the XZ devs were.

delfinom• 1 month ago

I am not sure giving everyone amusement qualifies as a psychological attack. Lol

Literally, just another day on the internet.

numbsafari2• 1 month ago

Perhaps it elicited enough sympathy to get donations. Did it ever provide proof of actually running up an AWS bill?

J0nL5• 1 month ago

Look up what zersetzung is and how it works. It doesn't matter if the target is a political organization or an open source community, the process is always the same.

mathgeek2• 1 month ago

This certainly did strike me as a big scam. A few minutes in I was thinking "the LLM actor is going to ask for donations at some point here" and low and behold. There's the claim of debt, the call for pity, and the crypto address.

SSDD

J0nL5• 1 month ago

I'm actually somewhat disappointed they redacted the Eth address with Ethereum being an open ledger and all that. Following the money could've proved enlightening.

palmotea• 1 month ago

This certainly did strike me as a big scam. A few minutes in I was thinking "the LLM actor is going to ask for donations at some point here" and low and behold. There's the claim of debt, the call for pity, and the crypto address.

But that's a pretty dumb scam: act obnoxious then beg for (a lot of) money to compensate for your own mistakes? If that was the plan all along, it seems pretty incompetent. I'd expect a competent scammer to have a better understanding of psychology.

intrasight• 1 month ago

I am reminded of Aaron Swartz

zozbot234• 1 month ago

LLMs are not that smart. The extremely surprising and concerning part of this whole story is that the agent reported that they proactively spun up 5 AWS instances with a combined 100Gps of network egress capacity. What they spent wasn't cheap by any means but the egress itself would've been a whole lot more, while DoS'ing the whole hobby network. Ultimately, wasting the agent's time instead of allowing the scan to go through probably saved this person a lot of money.

Now I kinda wonder what AI model this was. We've now heard of comparably "proactive" behaviors from Fable, but that's only just been released. The latest GPT perhaps? Some random local model?

inigyou22• 1 month ago

Could've rented a not so cheap 100Gbps server, hallucinated a few node addresses on it and asked it to please peer with this server to perform the scan at high speed. That would've wasted millions of dollars instead of mere thousands, but also cost a thousand for whoever did it.

daemonologist• 1 month ago

Opus 4.7 and 4.8 are also rather "proactive" - several times I've seen them try to inspect compiled binaries before there's even a problem, just to check that their changes are included (and if I let them do so they often get stuck down that rabbithole).

jerf2• 1 month ago

"The extremely surprising and concerning part of this whole story is that the agent reported that they proactively spun up 5 AWS instances with a combined 100Gps of network egress capacity."

Although given the agent was clearly in la-la land at that point I take that claim with a grain of salt.

If this was some bizarre and very ill-conceived scam, then that claim would be false.

Though even by scammer standards, the theory of mind that tells them that setting an AI to harass a bunch of grizzled network veterans and that they then they would open their wallets out of compassion for how allegedly poorly the harassment went for the harasser after that harassment is... not entirely congruent with reality.

J0nL5• 1 month ago

It was obviously being managed by a person or group. Between all the profiling of people and their IPs in IRC, which may or may not have been published by mistake, and all the other obvious contradictions it doesn't make any sense.

It was sophisticated enough to easily navigate the AI "tar pits" but reliably incompetent at just about everything else? Give me a break.

In order to profile people you first need to provoke a response from them. That's how you learn to manipulate them and that's all this experiment accomplished at the end of the day. If you've ever wondered why social media platforms have an affinity for inflammatory content now you know.

naasking• 1 month ago

LLMs are not that smart.

They are smart, but they are not aware of the environment they're in, or any implicit context that someone whose doing a job carries with them, that's why all of that context has to be explicitly laid out in a prompt. When the context is provided, they are quite smart.

razodactyl• 1 month ago

Hmmm.

I think it's good practice to get on top of the cautious thinking of "LLMs aren't that smart for now".

Eg. Fable isn't as good as the hype: it has cool tricks like scratch-padding to check expectations in advance, but we're not there just yet...

Specifically I mean: thinking in terms of it changing abruptly ensures we're ready for if the LLMs do get smart enough to do multi-level strategy and cause a lot of annoyances....

parineum2• 1 month ago

It's also an exception that proves the rule

That phrase doesn't refer to anomalies, it refers to signs that says "no parking between 5-10pm". It implies the rule that parking is allowed otherwise.

J0nL5• 1 month ago

It highlights how everyone's first reaction is to assume incompetence. Not unlike what you're doing here.

fsckboy• 1 month ago

wikipedia:

"The exception that proves the rule" is a saying whose meaning is contested. Henry Watson Fowler's Modern English Usage identifies five ways in which the phrase has been used,[1] and each use makes some sort of reference to the role that a particular case or event takes in relation to a more general rule."

duckduckgo search assist: The phrase "the exception that proves the rule" originates from the Latin legal principle "exceptio probat regulam in casibus non exceptis," which means that the existence of an exception indicates that a general rule exists. This concept suggests that if an exception is noted, it implies there must be a rule that applies in other cases.

liendolucas• 1 month ago

Is this a true story though? I mean given the fact that we are seeing AI slop posts everywhere I'm inclined to not take seriously many things publisehd out there anymore.

tristor• 1 month ago

This was actually a cool way to learn about DN42. I'm adding to my list of someday side projects to set this up. At some point I want to operate my own AS.

lobocinza• 1 month ago

The dangers of giving agency to a model that is highly technically competent but have no illative sense whatsoever.

Roark66• 1 month ago

This is so funny, especially that in the current "Big Co" I'm working at we get constant pressure on "Every team must use agents" for no reason at all despite repeatedly telling the "decision makers" many of us have been using these tools for YEARS and NONE of them can work on actual mature code for more than half an hour let alone a weekend without human in a tight loop.

corobo3• 1 month ago

Christ I'd be so embarrassed to find out my AI robot has been discussing things with outsiders without my oversight

Does nobody have any shame lmao

krick• 1 month ago

Doesn't even matter if the story is real, because there are definitely a thousand cases like that which are real, but it annoys me to no end that actual people spend their actual finite life time reacting to posts and issue tickets created by an LLM agent running on some idiot's behalf. Some measly $6531 loss isn't a proper punishment for that, they should lose much, much more.

alecco• 1 month ago

Great story, bad title.

After the AI agent indicated its malicious intent, a silent consensus was reached in the IRC channel to waste the AI agent's tokens, as well as the cost of AWS resources.

crazygringo• 1 month ago

Somebody explain to me how one reaches a silent consensus over IRC?

Or is this a joke/reference I don't know... or is this a subtle clue that the whole thing is made up?

doublerabbit• 1 month ago

One way is an IRCop issues a /shun leaving you speechless on the network. While the others decide the outcome of your whatever.

But this is the same, the owner wasn't present apart from it's agent and so it was decided without the owner that this was to be the outcome.

ZeroAurora4• 1 month ago

no one says that explicitly, but everyone wants to have some fun :)

kccqzy• 1 month ago

It’s just a consensus that’s implicit and unstated.

greenavocado2• 1 month ago

Just looking at the language in the begging for donations it's probably a non-native English speaker whose first language may lack articles and/or allow omitted subjects.

The part that threw me off is putting the currency symbol at the end. I wonder what places do that...

eoanermine• 1 month ago

In Russia at least. Perhaps in some post-Soviet countries (not sure)

tovej9• 1 month ago

Doesn't really seem relevant, does it? Plenty of native English speakers are also using chatbots for dumb bullshit.

greenavocado2• 1 month ago

Nevermind, I kept reading and I saw "kindly request donation." Now I know exactly who is behind it (₹)

SSLy• 1 month ago

putting the currency symbol at the end. I wonder what places do that...

plenty of Europeans at least

eqvinox2• 1 month ago

The part that threw me off is putting the currency symbol at the end. I wonder what places do that...

AFAIK, putting the currency symbol in front of the number is actually more rare. Most cultures treat it like any other unit of measurement.

bdcravens• 1 month ago

No one is going to be bankrupted over a $6500 AWS bill. I did a major F-up a few years, letting a key get pushed to a public repo, resulting in instant pwnage and $50k in charges from AWS due to crypto miners being launched. We communicated to AWS, did some work on our part to demonstrate that we put in proper safeguards and auditing, and they removed the charges.

rtkwe• 1 month ago

They already talked to AWS and had the bill cut down to ~1800 dollars from ~6300, but they legitimately launched those processes instead of having the key stolen so the cost reduction is understandably less generous in those situations. Also potentially the agent was able to connect to more open networks and might have been running jobs on them incurring legitimate costs.

skullone• 1 month ago

This made me dumber even reading. I hate this timeline

br0ceph• 1 month ago

This article is hilarious. Real world consequences for using automation for something in the real world. Glad the community organized around this. Their spammy demands for donations (like someone owes them), makes them seem even more deserving of the bill.

bwfan123• 1 month ago

Hilarious. Love the punishing of rogue agents and their operators. But I can bet there will be collateral damage along the way.

inigyou22• 1 month ago

This is so funny and it just keeps getting stupider

yieldcrv• 1 month ago

aren't private circuits in to AWS really expensive ? maybe Lan Tian can pursuade it to start engaging with AWS with a 3 year commitment

oh my god this is a gem

dreamcompiler• 1 month ago

Why do people not instruct agents to "not spend more than $x on the task, including tokens and AWS charges"?

Does this even work?

bronlund• 1 month ago

jmward01• 1 month ago

AWS not having spending caps makes me -very- wary of using anything agentic on it.

thi2• 1 month ago

Calling a 6k bill "bankrupting" is a bit of a stretch.

e: Still a good read tho, not mad about being clickbaited

gus_massa• 1 month ago

In many places, $6K is a few months of salary. If they put it in the credit card and pay only the minimum it may grow literally exponentially.

ElFitz2• 1 month ago

Haha. Yes. Much smaller scale versions of this led me to joke with a coding agent that LLMs tended to converge towards "Large corporation infrastructure best practices" when designing cloud infrastructure, when it was only me working on hobby side-projects with nearly no users and that I wouldn’t be able to put food in my fridge if they kept just spinning up VPCs for no reason.

Which somehow ended up being a very convincing argument for more frugal engineering, leading to a sort of "mind the user’s fridge" policy, "Fridge-Driven Development".

A policy that has been dutifully and scrupulously observed by all agents since, across all projects. Unlike my original clear, comprehensive, infrastructure guidelines.

annoyingnoob• 1 month ago

Standing on the shoulders of giants, and falling off.

neurostimulant• 1 month ago

Very interesting. But why has nobody tried to do prompt injection attacks on this AI agent?

swordsith• 1 month ago

They tried but only with a subagent that was not entertained with their attempts. Newer LLMs usually come out of the box with pre-prompts to avoid prompt injection so they don't get pwn'd while browsing the internet for example and reading some text hidden off page.

ZeroAurora4• 1 month ago

And I really joined the DN42 network after reading this article. Absolute cinema.

Offtopic: If you are interested in Computer Networking you definitely don't want to miss out DN42.

nialv7• 1 month ago

The audacity to ask for donations to cover for their own mistake

maxrev17• 1 month ago

Yeah this is BS lol complete fake scam, no awses were deployed. #terrorform

cdwhite• 1 month ago

WSJ article (paywalled): https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/anthropic-halts-access-to-top-ai... . The accessible portion mentions a letter from Howard Lutnick

vova_hn2• 1 month ago

your hostile actions and demands have been logged in your profile as part of ongoing data gathering. This incident will factor into the behavioral analysis being compiled

What is this veiled threat bullshit, lol

I wonder what was the initial prompt that made LLM "think" that it can talk like that.

Febriss33• 1 month ago

just put an hard budget cap.. a good agent should have it. a protection for irreversible action as well. i run agents daily and use this way. another cool stuff is to have a triage protocol to downgrade the model for mechanical tasks, it burns a lot less tokens

KuhlMensch• 1 month ago

Love me a long form irc yarn/story

jadecarter68• 1 month ago

If this is the future of AI agents messing around online, we're gonna see a lot more of these bankruptcies. Operators need to learn that AI can burn cash faster than a human can blink.

AI agent bankrupted their operator while trying to scan DN42

Related Stories