If you have a short commute it might be worthwhile.
HN user
DonsDiscountGas
Many of the most valuable paintings in the world are out of copyright. It has not diminished their value, because people still value originality even if it's not enforced by the law.
And worse than them being recognized, they might even get accused of copying their own art if someone else became famous due to a copy.
This happens now all the time, and the winner is determined by who can afford the best lawyers.
Okay I know this is gonna sound rude but who in the world would want form controls that behave this way?
Neat. I work in life science. Will the classifiers actually allow me to use it?
People will just do anything to avoid building more housing
I rather doubt the folks at Berkshire are sitting on their thumbs or playing golf all day and just forgot to buy anything. It's a measure of discipline, they won't invest in something without a good margin of safety. They'd rather miss out on a lot of good opportunities than pile money into bad (or even mediocre) ones.
Also if they do subsidize it it should be in the form of public goods (libraries, publicly available research). There's some overlap there with loans to individuals but it's weak.
open explainer article
Uses a lot of acronyms without even saying what they stand for let alone an explanation
Article entirely unhelpful
Many such cases
I pay that much and don't even use Fable because everything I do involves biology
Maybe people read it as an endorsement rather than an observation. No biggy, just Internet points. Though you have apparently rescued me from -2 to +5 so thank you.
Not really. It's easy "content"for them and adds a veneer of quantitative rigor to what would otherwise be pure vibes.
I suspect a lot of this is resume driven design.
Midwits
I really hope they improve their guardrails. It's useless to me in life science.
There's usually a freelancer thread too you may have better luck there
"might" means pure speculation
I've always instructed Claude to check the policies first, frankly I'm surprised it's not smart enough to do that already. Would be easy to add to a system prompt. But usually it doesn't matter because many projects have no policies, or maybe they exist but only in hidden forum posts issues or something.
I could barely use Fable before (I work in life science) and now they're adding more restrictions? Well good thing Opus is solid
I haven't because I'm not made of money but maybe I will
The original announcement page mentioned this. It was very obvious. That's why so many people noticed it immediately, because it was announced.
I'd love if they would include speed (though I know there are difficulties involved). At this point the quality of Opus 4.8 is no longer my limiting factor, it's the speed, so a faster model would be great.
This isn't a problem which needs to be solved perfectly, at least in this context. If some electronic music creators (using 2015 level technology) get reduced play and some fully AI music gets through the filters it's really fine.
Median pay is $390k
Opus doesn't do that (at least it never has to me). I'm pretty sure codex doesn't either. It's just Fable
Current models are smart enough for me and don't present an existence risk. Good time to show down. Maybe make the models faster and cheaper while preserving performance.
People are allowed to destroy their own property. And anyway if you don't like this state of affairs blame the copyright holders and copyright law
This is like saying guns will be weaponized. The entire point of this is to be a NIMBY weapon.
At any given time, Claude content is like 1 or 2 links out of 30. Which is a lot for one product but I think you're exaggerating a bit.
Probably if we look apps used for work chat I would think slack represents a plurality (and maybe majority) of current Claude users. Teams is probably next (or maybe beats it in terms of raw usage) but I bet integration with slack is easier.
Yes the company should be spending that money but it's still an expense that somebody has to pay and should be counted if we're thinking about the system; it doesn't disappear just because you personally agent spending it. And that still leaves travel time which can't be literally reimbursed (only figuratively in money)