HN user

Overpower0416

103 karma
Posts1
Comments35
View on HN

It literally says this in the website your linked

Current actual throughput is significantly lower, estimated at around 300 TPS, because the network is still growing. However, Lightning's architecture scales horizontally: as more nodes and channels are added, capacity increases without any protocol changes. The network's total value locked has grown past $500 million, with over 15,000 active nodes and 50,000+ payment channels.

The layer 2 has been predicted by one of the first adopter in 2010 so it was always the plan

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2500.msg34211#msg342... It can scale without any changes and if there is demand it will surpass Visa and MC

BTC has the layer 2 lighting network that can process more transactions than Visa and MC combined with very cheap fees. I guess HN knowledge of Bitcoin does not go further than 2015

Claude Fable 5 1 month ago

Wouldn’t be surprised if there are marketing teams writing positive comments for more positive engagement

Claude Fable 5 1 month ago

I would expect a release from OpenAI soon. The battle for who can pump up their IPO the most

There are many articles with sources that a Bitcoin post-quantum algorithm is in development and running on a testnet. Your fear is irrational and premature on something that is not even close to being production ready.

The recent AI development and progress has fried everyone's brain that every new tech will take a financial quarter to develop.

Maybe I should sell my gold also because nuclear fusion will make it plentiful and obsolete as store of value?

Sorry, I meant a quantum computer that is actually built where these theories can actually be applied. Current quantum computers are as useful as current nuclear fusion reactors.

I am just over any sensational headlines from the past 10 years. They really need to drop a tweet like "Check out my quantum computer that is actually useful" like Sam Altman did with GPT to convince me.

Using guard clauses. Way more readable and easy to work with.

  export function extractSearchToken(completionToken: {
    token: string;
    isQuoted?: boolean;
  }): string {
    if (completionToken.isQuoted) {
      return completionToken.token.slice(2).replace(/"$/, '');
    }
    if (completionToken.token.startsWith('@')) {
      return completionToken.token.substring(1);
    }
    return completionToken.token;
  }
  export function extractSearchToken(completionToken: {
    token: string;
    isQuoted?: boolean;
  }): string {
    if (completionToken.isQuoted) {
      // Remove @" prefix and optional closing "
      return completionToken.token.slice(2).replace(/"$/, '');
    } else if (completionToken.token.startsWith('@')) {
      return completionToken.token.substring(1);
    } else {
      return completionToken.token;
    }
  }
Why even use else if with return...