tiborsaas

They could just go a bit more honest and migrate to "Code is pasta". WP is also closer to a pizza slice than Michelin star fine dining experience.

It's safe to assume to buy them a player device too with the CD :)

I can't describe that mystery feeling when getting bunch of random cassette tapes from my cousins with a giant catalog of programs on them, some demos, some games, some wild stuff and just casually browsing them. All I had was a title if I was lucky. Then the fun stuff of calibrating the tape head :) Great memories.

Ah, that's a good spot.

I like pushing my fingers at those sharp edges and then feel the short lasting indent with my other finger. We are not the same :)

It can also make you waste a lot of time and not do anything productive with your day which is worse than shooting blanks.

How many free and easy options do you want me to list?

It's almost as if context matters for random numbers. A 98% success rate for a parachute is criminal, but if I could achieve 98% of my goals, I couldn't be happier.

So attention is all we need?

This is a good batteries included form framework spec, but not a new paradigm. A new paradigm would be something like not filling forms at all and just process user input via an LLM. Or using voice input in a controlled way. Maybe an adaptive single input field that always knows what you need type.

What if everybody on the internet starts running "fix this code"?

https://xkcd.com/810/

I really like to prompt music models with random gibberish with some unhinged prompts and expect some other world-y results.

It's quite ironic as the transformer architecture that powers most generative AI was invented for language translation :)

This feels like an instant classic :)

  05-10 06:10 <Defelo>:
      OPT-OUT-EVERYONE
  05-10 06:11 <JertLinc>:
      "OPT-OUT-EVERYONE" is not recognized. Only individual "OPT-OUT" commands are accepted. Each user must opt out individually. No collective exemption.
  05-10 06:11 <Defelo>:
      :(

The complaints shouldn't require a replacement at least in the web's case the replacement is still the web standard, a better, iterated version. It's a living standard and criticism keeps the platform slowly but surely evolving. I think it's a healthy feedback loop.

In this case, it's 45kbyte over the network. Instead of very impractical, we might agree that it can be not ideal for many apps, but it's an interesting and valid way of "packaging" a tool / service.

If someone chooses this deployment method, it's likely that they have the ability to design with minimal resources.

What's the risk here? If someone is skilled enough to produce said risk, do they need input from these models?

They should have designed a guardrail that doesn't make a probabilistic system less reliable. That's hard though. I'm afraid the only way to prevent accessing certain knowledge in a model is not to train it on those materials that enable them.

If we learned anything in the past years of LLM-s is that these guardrails will be jailbroken in no time. I've had some fun time too circumventing them.

Anyone cares about a fable about my grandmother's dream she had in morse code about an alien species signaling her a DNA sequence?

You can also murder people with your car including children.

The abstract says:

The worm parasitically uses compromised machines to run open-weight large language models (LLMs) to sustain its reasoning, or extend its reach for further attacks.

I was quite baffled they removed it and didn't double down on Kimi and serving the latest models instead.

Thanks for the tip, looks fire.

MPC comes with built in documentation over an API. Thanks to this agents can use it "intuitively".

Yet, understanding which tower, level and room that leaky abstraction is in is still a very valuable skill that LLM-s might not see. Just because something is not designed perfectly from the ground up by a committee does not mean it's okay to just forget everything, shut the book and let the machine calculate.

I'm doing the latter btw, so I know what they get wrong, but it won't fool me into building an unmaintainable mess. My frontend skills come in real handy every time the agents go off the rail.

Meh, here's a haiku from gemini

write a haiku for stop using AI for human things and use it for automating the boring stuff

    Let humans create,
    Leave the soul to living minds,
    Let code do the chores.

You make it sound like knowing electronics is an afterthought, who cares about what a capacitor, resistor, transistor is and just throw some microcontrollers on the board and the magic happens.

Sorry for the rant, I need to google what ground is.

I ment: „Poland gets money, Poland transforms it into more money”.

It's not trivial that this works. In Hungary we messed this up big time, hopefully it can get fixed now.

This is CSS dithering with "SVG backend" doing the heavy lifting by utilizing the feComposite filter

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/Reference/E...

You can buy a used car and get it converted to electric.

Does JJ really prefer for me to think backwards? It wants me to start with the new and describe command, but with git I first make the changes and name the changeset at the end of the workflow.

I also often end up with in a dirty repo state with multiple changes belonging to separate features or abstractions. I usually just pick the changes I want to group into a commit and clean up the state.

Since it's git compatible, it feels like it must work to add files and keep files uncommitted, but just by reading this tutorial I'm unsure.

Savage.