Etheryte

Braun is the Boeing of appliances. A once great company that's now been hollowed out by beancounters.

I don't have any skin in the game here for Germany specifically, but I would point out that B1 is an incredibly low bar to clear. With concentrated effort, you can reach that level in under a year, I know because I've done it. Given you have kids and are otherwise preoccupied, maybe a few years. At six years in, it's purely a matter of whether you yourself actually want it or not.

I don't think this is a constructive way to look at life. You can't control what others say and do, what you can do is choose how you react and act on it.

That's not what exercise intensity means, clearly you're not even remotely familiar with the domain.

There is no correlation between exercise intensity and likelihood of injury, this is nonsense. You could e.g. just as well make one wrong move when going for a one rep max.

Isn't this is basically every webpage with a backend component, just displaced one more layer? I suspect the main reason this doesn't make sense is that it would take an order of magnitude more bandwidth as opposed to just sending data like we do right now. Data has repetitive patterns which means it's often well compressibile as well.

Probably one of the most reused and generic patterns in logos, you can find countless sites and businesses with something like that.

Also piranha: Brazilian Portugese slang for hooker.

Unfortunately it seems completely bugged out on mobile Safari.

russian is not a race.

Except regex, no matter how technologically advanced your company, somewhere someone is slapping regex on something that has no business being regexed.

This approach doesn't make much sense to me. Why supplement something when you don't even know that you need it? You could make the same argument about any and every supplement and eat the whole alphabet soup every day, but that's just putting extra strain on your body.

Honestly you don't even need to know the recommended number. In many countries you can get tested for free, and if that's not the case for you, getting tested usually costs in the ballpark of a box vitamin D supplements. Measure and only then supplement, then measure again later. You don't need to fly blind.

If you know anything at all about the Deutsche Bahn, you'll know that it's most likely self-sabotage, in other words, incompetence.

This doesn't really tell you anything useful. AI companies have both built huge datacenters and raised a colossal amount of money. Include caching, quantization and etc. All of those would allow them to undercut on price considerably, even more so if you count in all the users who don't actually cap out their plans. Prices going down doesn't really tell you anything about the production cost, especially in a market where every major participant is happy to burn money just for the marketshare.

Your mileage may vary, but I've never gotten reasonable performance out of Crossover. I have a decked out Mac for development and most of the games I've tried in Crossover still need you to turn the settings to damn near lowest possible.

How do you get the agent to stick to it without constantly rejecting tool calls with the same description? I've tried a similar setup a number of times and it tends to forget about this constraint very quickly.

It's called C. With all the undefined behavior it's mostly deterministic!

Cumin always shows up on these lists, whether it's with heavy metals or something else. It's to the point where I've more or less just stopped cooking with it because I don't trust it to be safe.

They more or less did that during the bombing of London, children were evacuated to foster families in the countryside en masse. Luckily they came to terms with the fact that this was an insanely traumatic experience pretty quickly and reverted. It's literally less traumatic for a child to be in an active war zone than to be separated from their parents.

I don't think this argument is logically sound. Your eating habits are something that you personally have fairly high control over and can change with reasonable ease/effort. Society at large does not have the same characteristics and unless you have the means to live outside of society, you do have to deal with its realities.

This is simply not true? Or maybe I misunderstand what you mean?

I don't know if there's a way to say this without coming off as rude, but if the hardest thing you can come up with is podcast hosting, then maybe you didn't spend too much time thinking about hard things? If it works for you, great, you do you, but I don't think it lines up with the title nor the premise of the article even remotely.

Emdashes don't really tell you much anything these days tbh. Many languages use them regularly and those people often bring the habit with them when they write in English — me included. Plus I would imagine every major model has tuned them way down at this point due to the backlash.

In broad strokes, learning leads to better life outcomes just like brushing your teeth leads to better health outcomes, or any other example you may prefer. Brushing teeth is a chore so a child won't generally pick it up all by themselves without some nudging. If you don't do the nudging you're essentially letting a child be free, yes, but also willingly letting them end up worse off when they're too young to know any better. Learning is the same.

Showing up in search results, or in this day and age LLM results, is still king. If your famous product is known as the ESP32, it doesn't hurt sales to spin other products off the same line. It might hurt clarity, glance value and many other things, but it will drive people to you.

Nearly every manufacturer does this though? It's often simply done in such a sleek way that customers don't even know it's there.

You would think so, at the same time we live in a world where the £80 million Louvre heist was made possible by the fact that their surveillance system's password was "Louvre" [0].

[0] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/louvre-secur...

As with anything in medicine, if it was that straightforward, someone would've already discovered that right now. Human physiology (and biology in general) is such a messy field that the simple act of using isolated facts very rarely gives useful insights.

No they're not? Also, it's AI slop.

This isn’t a dip. It’s a structural collapse