HN user
Another example of keyword driven policies https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/diversity-documen...
I wonder how many grants were cancelled because some keyword matched but it had completely nothing to do with DEI
Is being a paid product an assurance you do not also accept much better money from other sources?
Jack is invested in Nostr.
The implication that makes this study relevant is that an LLM is vastly more likely to have factual errors and possibly wildly hallucinate than a proper textbook. If people act the same with both, that IS the actual problem.
And I guess you have statistics about how much victimization happens over e2e?:)
Can't argue with that, fair.
That's just waituntilyouhearaboutism.
"use stricter"
Turns out I'm the only one. I realize that while others also have issues, they are in no way similar.
Not the only one. Well, maybe I'm luckier because I have a milder form of it, but having to test things thoroughly used to be absolutely mind crushing. I can see how a different personality would just skip over it for this reason. However, it may be possible to get over that, like I no longer find it so terrible. I'm not sure "making a plan and not making mistakes" is how it's done, maybe it's possible but I can't just follow a plan like that, to me it's more about switching myself to a bug hunting mode and feeling of shame if it doesn't work that overrides the tediousness of testing and doing it until it becomes a habit.
Agree with smuggler's comment though, don't take hn comments too seriously
These people should know that it's a type designer's website, not a software shop. The site works from here so I know;)
I genuinely don't know that this game would exist with a different business model, and I want it to be easy to make art
I think the guy did it on enthusiasm and if he used say Godot he could probably have a pretty good result too, if less impressive visually. But you have good points, sure.
Yep. continue regulation until abuse stops
Sure. But thing is a bare competent pagination implementation gets this by default while with infinite scroll it requires extra effort
I doubt they would do that, it's just weird. But even still knowing how many pages you went through is already good
Not only it's unnecessary, it also bad GUI. In apps with infinite scrolling your position doesn't get its own state, so if you eg. go view a post & return to Instagram timeline it opens at the beginning. If you use media more thoughtfully as opposed to mindless scrolling, it just doesn't work.
With pagination you could say return to IG after a week, go through 5 pages of whoever you're following, check out a post, go back knowing you stopped at 5th, and continue from there. You can also set a limit (I'll check 10 pages tops and then go to sleep), which is helpful even with algorithmic feed.
I'm sure they can screw up pagination too if they wanted, but typical implementations don't have this issue
I was replying to someone who said how fantastic it is that the guy was able to make it for free. I'm not saying it's all completely bad, again Adobe subscription model and past piracy tolerance allowed many people who couldn't afford their stuff to use it while paying less or nothing, just adding nuance about "free"
"Abduction against their will" is something that happens when a person is arrested. If you are done for crime I don't think freedoms apply to you anymore.
It doesn't imply kids (or napping). Nancy Guthrie is 84 https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/fbi-determine...
I don't think it's a good analogy. You don't have to "self publish" (go without a game engine). You can choose a game engine, just a different one that doesn't require you to report your income etc.
I don't know anything about Adobe's model
You do, becaude I explained... It's subscription based. It's fundamentally the same because in both cases you don't own it. Epic's is just with the added element of freebie at first
weird how HN is up with pitchforks against that but OK with Epic's.
Even those homes these days are all LED that flicker during saccades.
By that logic we should be OK with Adobe's subscription model. It makes it affordable to people who can't otherwise use it. Ultimately it means we can't own it (and just like we can't own UE, we owe Epic income reports for life).
I'm not saying it's a terrible model and it's great that games are made with it but let's be honest it's not all rainbows.
We don't hear from researchers who just decide not to work on something without making a fuss.
What are you trying to say? You can't even get the name of the company right. "unreal" won't give their work away for free. UE is a product, Epic is the company that develops UE.
If you are a fan of royalty based business models, you can be that. What are you so upset about?
If Adobe sold their suite as one time purchase many creatives who can just afford a monthly subscription couldn't use it. Does it make it a great business model.
For "the best train sim ever made" they probably reach it.
You're calling my argument insane, you're saying my comment is low quality, and imply I'm the one insulting. What is my argument then, in your opinion?
Should we also talk to dates using chatgpt? is a numbers game, play to win!