Dumb TVs deserve a comeback

https://www.makeuseof.com/reasons-why-dumb-tvs-deserve-a-comeback/

by znpy • 2 years ago

382 420 2 years ago

I WISH they would make a comeback. Smart TVs are the single worse piece of (shit) consumer electronics on the market. Any time you take anything electronic and connect it to the internet you're asking for trouble. Throw an operating system in it controlled by parasitic advertisers and that's where we are today.

2OEH8eoCRo03• 2 years ago

Thinking about it too much makes me furious. We have supercomputers in our pockets and TVs but it all spies on us and nobody gives a shit because everything is cheap. It's a Faustian deal that sucks! Nobody would actually choose this yet here we are.

g-b-r2• 2 years ago

It's not that nobody gives a shit, it's that the alternatives have been taken away

EvanAnderson• 2 years ago

I feel this same fury. It's nice to know I'm not alone.

sneak5• 2 years ago

Millions of people actually chose this over their other options.

Consumers regularly vote with their wallets against their best interests.

bdangubic2• 2 years ago

what about laptops? can we connect them to the internet? tablets? phones? :)

ghjfrdghibt5• 2 years ago

I don't get your point. Laptops, tablets, and phones are made for that.

imgabe3• 2 years ago

Yes, the ads infiltrating Windows, for example. Linux and Mac seem to be holding the line for now.

RGamma• 2 years ago

I only ever use mine as monitor ("PC mode") and have a different device drive it. It would take some major market dysfunction to lose large monitors with this feature.

immibis• 2 years ago

Smartphones are just as bad.

m4635• 2 years ago

and the bloat. Long boot times and cluttered menus / functions.

I don't need a tv home page.

godshatter• 2 years ago

A quick search for "Dumb TV" on amazon shows two Sceptre models, a 43-inch and a 50-inch. The 43-inch model says it's been ordered 500+ times in the last month and the 50-inch claims 50+. There is also a Pro Scan 40 inch that doesn't have ethernet connectivity. So they do exist, and it looks like there is at least some sales activity with them. I don't know if that's the last dying breath of the dumb tv as a product or if they are trying to make a comeback, though.

reginald785• 2 years ago

I think the smart car trend is worse, and much harder to work around. I can only buy old cars from the south for so long before that dries up as well.

laidoffamazon• 2 years ago

Let me defend smart TVs for a second

I own a smart TV that was at least partially subsidized by the mess of ads I see on the home page. But when manufacturers make a high quality panel, I’m not really convinced there’s a market for dumb TVs - people just use their own box if they want, and the marginal cost of the electronics required may even be negative now that Android/Google TV can also handle TV settings while providing a new revenue source.

blueflow• 2 years ago

Ads come with the spyware to target them.

ghjfrdghibt5• 2 years ago

This sounds like Stockholm syndrome.

I've an old dumb 1080p Samsung TV. Apart from the panel not being up to date everything about it is better than the smart version that I bought 8 years later.

nemomarx3• 2 years ago

the smart TV is probably cheaper, but let me buy some pro grade version of the panel without it and vote with my wallet right?

renewiltord• 2 years ago

I think I could probably sell you a 55” with no smart features for $4999. Let me know if interested and I can follow up.

toast02• 2 years ago

I've owned several lcd tvs and several tv boxes. A big problem with smart tvs is the difference in lifetimes between the two.

Tv boxes have a maybe 3 year lifetime before they get kind of junky. Lcd tvs go at least 5 years, sometimes much longer.

If you have a smart tv, around year 3 or 4, you're going to want to hook up a (new) tv box, but you're still going to have to fight the built in OS anyway, at least a bit.

Economics of ads subsidizing the tv aside, it makes more sense to have the tv firmware be focused on the essentials like responding to user input quickly and if it has a tuner not locking up on poor or malformed signals, and the user can choose between the tv box ecosystems they like.

Separately, it'd be nice if the tv box ecosystem got some more longevity... Maybe that will happen soon. 4k@60fps with dolby vision and/or hdr10+ seems like a likely plateau of streaming video for a while... if they'd start regularly putting in 1g ethernet to handle peak bandwidth of 4k BluRay rips, things would be pretty good. 8k seems unlikely to get mainstream adoption (but I could be wrong)

Terr_• 2 years ago

I would love to see this happen. In some ways, it's a story of the wrong system boundaries and modules. A mismatch between component age, manufacturer expertise, and how long software needs to keep being updated or patched.

You can see a similar phenomenon in car media systems, where the solution is an interface (e.g. Android Auto or Apple CarPlay) allowing the vehicle to be "dumber" but more reliable and robust over time. [0]

Televisions can be rescued even more easily, since we already have standards and conventions from the past to use.

[0] For folks unfamiliar with those systems, basically the car's touch-screen becomes an extension of your phone.

baxtr• 2 years ago

Please anyone in hardware: come up with a TV brand that features no built-in internet connectivity whatsoever.

We’d all buy it in a blink.

It’s also kinda urgent. I’m clinging onto my 2007 TV because I don’t want a smart TV. Not sure how long it will last.

teh_infallible2• 2 years ago

Get a short throw projector. You can plug anything into it. It’s the perfect “dumb” screen.

OrvalWintermute• 2 years ago

I would totally buy it.

CharlesW• 2 years ago

There are always many hundreds of options for "dumb TVs", the secret being that they're called "commercial [TVs|monitors|displays]". For example, B&H lists 2,105 so-called commercial displays as I type this (which you can easily filter to your specifications).

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?q=commercial%20display

crtasm• 2 years ago

I thought their size filter was missing the . but you really can get a 589" display there.

Good to see these have added multiple HDMI ports since I last looked.

Animats• 2 years ago

Here's a dumb 43 inch screen. It's sold as a gamer monitor. It's a UHD TV display with HDMI in and no onboard smarts.[1]

Here's another Samsung dumb screen, at 55 inches.[2] This is supposed to be for digital signage, but it's really a UHD monitor with HDMI in. But the next size up has "Alexa built in".

Sceptre, which mostly supplies Walmart, has a whole line of dumb TVs, including some big ones.[3] They're a little company in City of Industry, CA, which seems to have found their niche in dumb TVs.

There are lots of "digital signage" displays available. They're usually very bright, reasonably rugged, OK for 24/7 operation, immune to burn-in (they may spend their whole working life displaying mostly the same fast food menu), but not that good

[1] https://www.bestbuy.com/site/samsung-m70d-43-led-4k-uhd-60hz...

[2] https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08651PB1J

[3] https://www.sceptre.com/TV/4K-UHD-TV/U750CV-UMRD-75-4K-UHD-T...

rpdillon• 2 years ago

I raise Sceptre every time I see this sentiment, but folks just don't seem to know about them. I got a humble 54" 4k from them a couple of years back for a few hundred bucks. Used it every day since, works great. Zero bullshit.

Slow startup, though. Can be like 10-15 seconds.

seydor• 2 years ago

Tv content is actually dumb nowadays it makes you dumb, not the tv.

My cheap smart tv has a youtube app and it's all i need

linker3000• 2 years ago

Well, if you are in the UK or some EU countries, Cello has a range;

https://celloelectronics.com/shop-televisions/?filter_produc...

mhandley• 2 years ago

Unfortunately the best of them is 1080p.

adrr• 2 years ago

Viewsonice, Benq, and even Samsung make dumb monitors for conference rooms and digital signage. They just are more expensive and people don’t want the added cost. Its like consumer grade laptops are loaded with adware that supplements the price paid, compared to enterprise line of laptops which are more expensive.

eximius• 2 years ago

Who is this article for? I don't disagree with it, but manufacturers aren't somehow unaware of any of it. They don't want to manufacture dumb TVs. They're the ones _currently_ manufacturing smart TVs.

Plus, there is the problem that the vast majority of consumers want smart TVs due to a combination of subsidized lower price and "simplicity" (e.g., they may be worse but they are simpler)

coin• 2 years ago

Just don’t use any of the smart TV’s “smart” functionality. Don’t even connect it to the Internet or give it your Wi-Fi password.

ghjfrdghibt5• 2 years ago

Until they come with their own connection embedded, which you know is what's going to happen. Just like cars.

jqpabc1239• 2 years ago

Just do your homework before purchasing to make sure this is possible.

In this vein, I just bought a Hisense QD6 series TV from Costco. I run it in "store" mode connected to a PC and it serves well as just a big, dumb 4K display.

lucasoshiro3• 2 years ago

This won't make the "smart" disappear, nor its problems (buggy software, bloatware slowing down everything), and you'll still need to pay more for it.

bee_rider2• 2 years ago

It is still creepy to have tech in my home that is trying to betray me, even if it isn’t successful. Also you never know if some well-intentioned person might connect it to wifi.

wpm• 2 years ago

That’s why you connect it to an IoT network that has no internet access.

mcbutterbunz2• 2 years ago

Or they start to require internet access before you can use the device. Even if it's periodic. Once a month you have to connect to the internet to validate your license and agreement, wherein it uploads your watch history and downloads new ads.

mikestew3• 2 years ago

The box will still be warm from the warm of the store I bought it from when I take it back for a return. How’s that thing going to work at my remote cabin?

StressedDev• 2 years ago

I did this with a Samsung TV I got recently. I works great. I am really not sure why everyone is upset. If you don't want to use the smart features, you don't have to. All you have to do is not connect the smart TV to the Internet.

jqpabc1239• 2 years ago

Why dumb TV's won't make a comeback --- price.

Manufacturers make recurring revenue by invading the privacy of "dumb" users with their "smart" TVs.

It's probably only a matter of time before TV manufacturers establish their own ad networks.

Why? Because they can. They have the ability to fully control *their* "smart TV" (that you paid for) and show you ads that they control --- independent of any programming.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/12/tcl-tvs-will-use-fil...

jszymborski• 2 years ago

Regulation could always fix this.

jqpabc1239• 2 years ago

Like regulation has fixed privacy invasion on the internet?

mcbutterbunz2• 2 years ago

Regulation can prevent the fix as well.

from-nibly• 2 years ago

So can a wish on a monkey's paw.

bluGill2• 2 years ago

There will always beeoptions without. Some tvs are used in industrial settings to show safety information. If someone dies and the tv was, showing ads instead of safety information there will be big lawsuits.

g-b-r2• 2 years ago

Yeah, they just cost a ten times more

NoMoreNicksLeft• 2 years ago

In some cases, those places buy non-retail "kiosk" televisions. They're hard to search for on the manufacturer sites.

akvadrako2• 2 years ago

Those usually have shit color accuracy and high black levels, but they are bright.

lazycouchpotato• 2 years ago

It's why Walmart purchased Vizio for $2.3 billion.

https://www.axios.com/2024/02/26/why-walmart-bought-vizio

bombcar4• 2 years ago

Amusingly enough, if you buy a Visio, reject the agreement during setup - it turns into a dumb TV.

DoingIsLearning2• 2 years ago

Why dumb TV's won't make a comeback --- price.

I'm cool with it provided I can use it as a very high quality HDMI display. Then I just got a nicely discounted product.

My worry is if they demand connectivity in order to work as a display. Or worse come with some kind of LTE transceiver to phone home then we're in trouble.

pixelatedindex• 2 years ago

Unfortunately, only a matter of time.

jqpabc1239• 2 years ago

I'm cool with it provided I can use it as a very high quality HDMI display.

Most will work --- but not always *conveniently*.

On power up, a lot them will launch into setup if connectivity is not configured. Some may actually store/retrieve the TV configuration in their cloud.

AtlasBarfed• 2 years ago

I'm wondering if HDCP is paradoxically to the rescue here?

So the main concern with keeping it in dumb mode I would think is that they could still snoop in on your streams through the plain old HDMI port.

But if the HDMI is encrypted.....

With their antipiracy standard ....

God that would be amazing.

Also, I'm kind of surprised there isn't a raspberry pi open source project that does what those 20$ Roku fobs do.

Finally ... It kind of shows that hardware hacking is going downhill that there isn't a replacement os for the major brands of smart TVs. It's possible they've locked that down, but also the price points are so low you'd think they don't have the money to keep them out.

ryukoposting• 2 years ago

For what it's worth, my LG TV (which is a few years old, to be fair) has never once showed up in my pi-hole's logs. We use an external box for the "smart" stuff, and the TV itself isn't up to any shenanigans as far as I can tell.

JeremyNT• 2 years ago

I have a Samsung TV similarly hobbled. I simply never gave it a network connection and it works fine.

For now at least this really isn't an issue. If and when these companies ever start requiring a network connection it's a different story.

m4635• 2 years ago

pi-hole uses DNS, and will give out fake ip addresses based on the name lookup.

Unfortunately it is NOT a firewall.

Any device can easily do its own DNS like DoH (dns over https), nnot involve pihole in name lookups, and send package directly to the destination ip address.

psadauskas• 2 years ago

I have an entirely separate VLAN network in my house for "appliances". Any access to the internet from that network has to be explicitly whitelisted in my router.

Sateeshm• 2 years ago

I saw an ad on the home menu on my samsung tv. Shit is ridiculous

mnky9800n• 2 years ago

this is how i learned that taylor swift had a birthday recently. my samsung television advertised it to me on the ad banner that goes across the top third of the home screen of the television.

account427• 2 years ago

And you didn't return the TV after that? Why would you accept that kind of customer abuse?

linsomniac3• 2 years ago

Reminder: They make them, they tend to be "monitors", "digital signage" or "commercial". You do have to pay a premium for them, for a variety of reasons.

There may be other options, I have a friend that 6-10 years ago got a TV, then opened it up and removed a USB stick that implemented all the smart features.

toast02• 2 years ago

Digital signage have embedded computers now too. It's only a matter of time before they have mandatory analytics and advertising.

Ekaros2• 2 years ago

Wouldn't that be pretty good value add? A mic feeding data to some AI model and then camera to track how many people use it or stop and watch.

Gormo5• 2 years ago

TVs intended for digital signage usually contain modular computers meant to be controlled by the user.

Workaccount2• 2 years ago

You do have to pay a premium for them, for a variety of reasons.

It's not that you pay a premium for the bullshit-free version, but rather that you get a discount for buying the bullshit-packed version.

lykahb• 2 years ago

Both statements are true. As a baseline it's good to consider the price of the regular TV's before they got smart.

bigfatkitten• 2 years ago

You do also pay a premium because they use use panels designed for 24/7 operation, sunlight readability etc.

linsomniac3• 2 years ago

Another data point: Before all the smart TV stuff you would tend to pay significantly more for an A/V monitor (basically a TV without the tuner) than you would for a regular TV.

Dylan168072• 2 years ago

When talking about digital signage in particular, it's clearly a premium because it's such a big price difference. A discount for the bullshit would be much smaller.

linsomniac3• 2 years ago

I've been fairly happy with the Google/Android TV versions, but the primary feature I bought them for was the ability to pair bluetooth headphones with them. Bluetooth seems to be hard to get, but all Google TVs support them.

The lower end TVs can barely do the Google TV features, often being flaky. The higher end ones tend to implement the features much better, though not perfectly. My TLC 6xxx series is much less flaky than the 5xxx series, but I do sometimes have to reboot it at the beginning of every watching session, depending on the app.

Tagbert• 2 years ago

Can’t you just pair your Bluetooth headphones to the device that is providing the video stream? That is the source, the TV should just be the output device.

lucasoshiro3• 2 years ago

When TVs started to be computers, they started to have computer problems: bugs, outdated software, freezing, and so on. Recently I needed to buy a smart TV to replace a 2015 one that was OK as a TV, but its operating system (...) was so outdated that it couldn't open the apps anymore.

This is easy: when we buy a smart TV we buy a TV plus a computer. I really would like pay less only for the TV, using the "smartness" of other "computer" (Chromecast, Apple TV, Fire Stick, videogame console, an old computer, etc). If the TV or the computer stopped working, it's just a matter of buying _only_ it.

1over137• 2 years ago

Hell, I'd be willing to pay more for a dumb TV!

jsheard• 2 years ago

If you don't mind paying more, they do exist in the form of digital signage / commercial displays. They're usually either completely dumb or support "smart" features via standardized pluggable modules, which can host a normal x86 computer, amongst other options.

jqpabc1239• 2 years ago

Yes, I used to feel the same.

Until I did some research and found out there is no need to go to this extreme --- at least not yet.

It is possible to buy a "smart" TV at a price subsidized by the privacy of "dumb" users and still run it in a "dumb" display mode.

With the TV I just bought, this is called "store" mode. I use it as a big, dumb 4K display connected to "smarts" that I can control.

parineum2• 2 years ago

You would have to. The smart features are there to generate ad revenue. It's part of the reason that TVs have gotten absurdly cheap over the past decade.

MBCook3• 2 years ago

You would. I would. A lot of us would.

But the public has spoken, again and again, with multiple goods. All that matters is price.

You may be able to sustain business selling very high end stuff for people with means.

But most people, out of greed or need, will go with a low cost option. And that will push nearly everything out in a race to the bottom.

AlwaysRock2• 2 years ago

The reason they dont exist (or rather that they exist but are rare) is because you, and me, are in the minority. Most people do not care if their tv is dumb and likely would be upset if their tv didnt have built in app support.

If there was a larger more vocal market for dumb tvs, they would exist more readily.

starkparker• 2 years ago

I wouldn't mind smart TVs if they were as serviceable as most computers. There was that Sharp M551 panel that had a Pi CM4 as the onboard CPU and that seems ideal: a modular, replaceable, upgradable board.

The fact that this both exists and is utterly unrealistic in the consumer space just makes it more infuriating.

xethos• 2 years ago

Why not just... do the thing you want? IE, the solution you alluded to in your comment: have a dumb [which here exclusively means not internet-connected] TV with an externally "smart" device like a Chromecast?

This is essentially your own preferred solution to a problem that just cost you several hundred dollars when you "had" to replace your 2015 TV

lucasoshiro3• 2 years ago

It's not so simple. It's almost impossible to separate the "smart" side from the "dumb" side. Just like trying to use a smartphone and use only the phone, it won't make Android or iOS (and their pros and cons) disappear.

thom3• 2 years ago

What’s my best bet if I just want a normal computer monitor hooked up to some sort of sound bar, and I’m happy using something like a Chromecast for all TV needs? Or are there monitors with good enough speakers now?

bluGill2• 2 years ago

get a seperate usb to audio adaptor and speakers. you can do better than a soundbar.

teh_infallible2• 2 years ago

I use a short throw projector with an Apple TV. There’s also a little device called Micca which you can use to play video files you’ve downloaded.

add-sub-mul-div• 2 years ago

If you're shoveling your data over to Google anyway then why not just get a smart TV and never use its apps?

thom3• 2 years ago

I’m not paranoid about Google, but smart TVs inevitably come with dreadfully slow boot times, clunky animated menus, and just generally lots of crap to work around, even if you primarily interact with them via HDMI. I miss TVs that respond before you take your finger off the button.

magnetowasright2• 2 years ago

Soundbars are bad and there's better alternatives at soundbar price ranges imo. Spend the soundbar money on even a relatively humble set of logitech speakers for a really bare bones simple set up.

thom3• 2 years ago

I’m not really married to that form factor. I guess I’m more curious about HDMI splitters or pass through and what people do there.

causality0• 2 years ago

So what's the best solution? Suppose you have a dumb TV, or a smart TV locked to a single input. It seems like there are big downsides to most approaches. Rokus and Fire sticks have the same downsides as smart tvs, with ads and laggy interfaces. I currently have one output from my desktop hooked to my TV, but the UI leaves a lot to be desired and of course now I have two input devices to deal with, one for the TV and one for the PC. What's the best way to do it?

tomwheeler• 2 years ago

I use an HDMI switch and it works fine for me.

maxglute• 2 years ago

Find a decent media remote you can single hand with built in keyboard, i.e. lenovo n5902 (discontinued) - a bunch of cheap airmouse works pretty well. Setup macro for browser, boomarkts , microphone use etc. Adjust desktop UI scaling.

timClicks• 2 years ago

My workaround is to use a computer monitor connected to a Linux box that I actually control.

mikenew• 2 years ago

I bought my 65" TV for $299 recently, including shipping to my doorstep. Clearly all the bullshit that's baked into it is subsidizing the price by a lot.

I just never gave it network access and I use it like a dumb TV with a streaming box, so I get to benefit from a price subsidized by the the other 98% of the population who are getting exploited. The whole thing is kinda gross.

It's like there's this enshittification tipping point that you can't come back from. Realistically, who is going to buy a dumb TV at a much higher cost? People who are already savvy enough to get around a smart TV? People who aren't? I don't see it working.

ghjfrdghibt5• 2 years ago

I worry about how long it'll be before the manufacturers either make the TV demand an internet connection, or simply build one right into it.

shiroiushi4• 2 years ago

Realistically, who is going to buy a dumb TV at a much higher cost? People who are already savvy enough to get around a smart TV?

Exactly, that's why all this "I want a dumb TV!" stuff is, well, dumb.

It doesn't cost any less for a mfgr to make a dumb TV, in fact it would cost more. Modern TVs need a lot of computing power to make them work properly, so making the thing connect to the internet and show you ads really costs them nothing for hardware. Then they get to subsidize the TV with all the ad revenue, the kickbacks from the various streaming apps pre-installed, etc. A dumb TV would end up having the exact same hardware and a higher price tag. What kind of idiot would buy that? Not enough to make it worthwhile for the mfgr. If you don't want ads, just don't connect the TV to the internet.

It's a lot like modern Windows laptops that are cheaper than the same laptop with Linux pre-installed. MS and/or the laptop mfgr get a bunch of kickbacks from the crapware vendors to pre-install their crapware, so you end up paying less than you would for having the mfgr pre-install Linux (a free OS).

robg• 2 years ago

Just turn off the privacy invading features. LG’s options are pretty great, I’ve seen little bloat, and get the native apps for streaming services just fine.

scosman• 2 years ago

Just don’t connect it to wifi, connect an Apple TV or similar to hdmi 1, and move on.

I’d love a dumb TV, but if you don’t let them online and don’t use built in software it is close enough.

verisimi• 2 years ago

It's almost like there an agenda to allow for corporate and government control of all technology.

RevertBusload• 2 years ago

I run airbnbs and would love a low cost dumb TV since I just equip each one with a apple TV box anyways

maltalex• 2 years ago

Some dumb TVs still exist, only they’re called computer monitors now. And they’re a lot more expensive than TVs because TV-sized monitors are a niche product, and because manufacturers don’t subsidize them in exchange for your data.

mandmandam• 2 years ago

There used to always be some smug commenter in these threads pointing out that life's better without any TV at all... Guess it's my turn.

Really - why bother? Can't you feel how it dominates the room? Don't you resent being constantly programmed by a handful of giant companies hiding behind different brands? Not to mention the ads shouting muck into your brain.

The main benefit of a giant HD TV - and please correct me if I'm wrong on this - is that the bigger and brighter the TV, the heavier the mental domination. After a long day/week working, you get to subside into the minima of mental and physical effort.

Relaxation and escapism are valid human pastimes, and we have 'choice' over what to watch to a higher degree than ever before... And it's a golden age for TV in many ways. But I can't help but feel that TV's hooks into people's minds are also more cunning than ever.

There isn't a nice way to say this, but... I can't help but notice that people who watch cable news, for example, become quite predictably wrong on important topics, and get very worked up over whatever the weekly outrage bait is. It's a toxic brew..

And the same goes for all kinds of other 'programming', from reality shows to celeb gossip to sportsball. Doesn't it ever feel like you're being... Subdued? Or even herded?

/smug

mikestew3• 2 years ago

Area Man Constantly Mentioning He Doesn't Own A Television

https://theonion.com/area-man-constantly-mentioning-he-doesn...

nemomarx3• 2 years ago

Okay but who uses a tv for cable news or any of that?

I want to put youtube channels on it while cooking in the kitchen, or play video games on it. Does anyone actually watch "TV" tv anymore? Isn't it mostly streaming services?

_carbyau_2• 2 years ago

Yeah, for me it is about intentionality. I turn on the TV because I have something in mind I need that TV to display.

Often a computer game or a TV show.

But I have in mind what I want first, THEN turn it on and do the thing.

I have visited people who like to "have the TV on in the background" for whatever reason and it irks me, I can't stand it.

AndrewDucker• 2 years ago

I have a Samsung smart TV.

I removed all of the broadcast channels and it's now an excellent TV. The apps just work, it doesn't show me ads for anything, and I'm perfectly happy with it.

Am I just lucky to have found a good manufacturer?

init2null• 2 years ago

My Hisense with Google TV has proven to be decent. I never connected the TV to the internet and went with an external Apple TV instead. It always starts on the last video input. I was able to refuse all the EULAs and was still left with all the visual niceties that I don't use like upscaling and motion smoothing.

danielscrubs• 2 years ago

Samsung and Sony has been the absolute worst in my case. So slow, so much bs. LG works much better, but Im sure it is having a field day with my data.

magnetowasright2• 2 years ago

Temporarily using a samsung smart TV is the reason I will sooner have no TV than a smart TV. Worst piece of tech I've ever used. I didn't have any of the smart stuff enabled; I was using it almost exclusively to display HDMI (I watched terrestrial TV for Eurovision once a year) and it was a kafkaesque nightmare. It took 15 minutes (when it worked) to go from standby to displaying HDMI. I had to reflash the damned firmware half the time I went to turn it on (from standby). I could go on for hours about it but I won't lol

Brian_K_White• 2 years ago

cars too

poisonborz• 2 years ago

However important, this is a niche problem. Most users will not be able use a dumb TV. Everything becomes more clunky for them. Instead of fighting the uphill battle of making legislation, more people should be made aware of the issue and the - not that complicated - ways to counter this.

Pihole, not giving internet (only local network) / and/or only use a trusted device via HDMI to display content.

xg15• 2 years ago

Really? No legislation needed because people (that is, techies with network skills) can just set up piehole? (Until of course that stops working as well because the smart TVs use DoH, eSNI, certificate pinning, etc)

Gormo5• 2 years ago

No legislation is desired because legislation implemented for this kind of purpose inevitably ends up co-opted by the very interests it's targeted against, who rely on it to create barriers to entry for competitors and roadblocks for DIYers, while entrenching their business model indefinitely.

Regulatory intervention will ultimately make things like PiHole difficult or impossible, while legitimizing "responsible" viewer tracking and mandatory internet connections for TVs.

YaBa• 2 years ago

LG owner here. I won't connect it to wifi, lan or BT. Once in a while nags me to do it, I might do it eventually, in it's own VLAN and without Internet access.

Here in Portugal all ISP provide a smart box, most of them also have common services like Netflix and so on, no need to any "smart" feature from the TV itself. Completly useless.

DoingIsLearning2• 2 years ago

Completly useless.

Not enterely useless, since you payed a lower retail price on it based on manufacturers projected revenue from ads.

The best way to kill the business model is to buy them for the high end display tech but then keep them offline.

sitkack3• 2 years ago

PSA, HDMI carries ethernet, so you depending on the device you connect your TV to, it might get internet access without your knowledge.

mikestew3• 2 years ago

This come up every time, and yet I have never seen an actual demonstration or example of this. HDMI can carry Ethernet, sure, but you honestly think an (for example) Apple TV is going to let arbitrary devices use its network connection? You gotta show that it even implements the spec first.

sitkack3• 2 years ago

I don't have to do any of those things.

I am not going to address all the fallacies in your comment. Whether you have seen an example of it is immaterial to what the HDMI spec says.

ortusdux• 2 years ago

I just want a somewhat trustworthy group to develop a DUMB certification. I would absolutely pay more for a certified DUMB TV.

https://www.theverge.com/2021/11/10/22773073/vizio-acr-adver...

pessimizer• 2 years ago

I love this idea. I'd even do the "buy a smart tv and refuse the agreement so it acts as a dumb tv" if it were certified to be dumb. Otherwise I have absolutely no reason to trust a goddamn television.

They're not even promising me anything; the agreement is a bunch of commitments that I'm making, and they're refusing to provide me their "smart" features because I won't agree to those commitments. That tv can still do whatever it wants to as long as it doesn't break the law in a provable way.

medhir• 2 years ago

“Smart TVs are, unfortunately, more like smartphones: designed for frequent replacement.”

Except unlike smartphones, these TVs are not built with high-end components due to the razor-thin margins that have to be optimized for. So you end up with underpowered hardware and janky software that benefits only these companies through ad revenue.

pfych• 2 years ago

I bought a 4K 240Hz OLED gaming monitor a week ago and it connects to the internet & has streaming services on it. By default, it has annoying popups on startup that can't be turned off in the default menus[^1]. It's extremely frustrating, but it is on me for not doing my research and just getting the highest-rated monitor across review sites...

[^1]: https://pfy.ch/programming/disable-samsung-game-bar.html

mulmen5• 2 years ago

Return it and buy something else. Don’t put up with the abuse.

UberFly• 2 years ago

Yea return it 100%. No way in hell should a computer monitor be connecting to the internet or have streaming apps. In fact this is the first I've heard of this. "Gaming monitor" in name only.

71bw3• 2 years ago

I don't see the issue if it only pops up when the screen is turned on. In my case that's only when the PC is starting. How often do you turn your screen off...?

ycombinatrix2• 2 years ago

Why did you connect it to the internet?

hingusdingus• 2 years ago

If you want the closest thing to a dumb tv search for the hospitality version of a specific television brand.

smitty1e• 2 years ago

Can we generalize this point to the idea that the user might want to manage the complexity level of products?

It's great to have the fully-integrated television that can be controlled by a phone app. This may seem great, until the spyware implications come to mind.

In a similar vein, I like all of the gadgetry on the recent car purchase. The sensors are nice; we can all back in an "park tactically" like a pro with these rear cameras.

But part of me longs for a purely analog chariot with 1960s-level tech that, sure, requires more skill on my part to operate, but I'm OK with that.

This invites the question: if there were a market for a brand new, but de-gunked car, could it even be legally built? Would there be a market? Why not?

furyofantares• 2 years ago

So did I buy a smart TV at some blink of time when the software had gotten pretty good but not yet infested with ads? I have an LG with WebOS.

I guess it might have ads for apps or content if I ever opened the app store thing or whatever it's called. But I never have any reason to do that beyond the initial setup when I installed youtube/netflix/some other apps or when they (very rarely) want an update.

So I'm perfectly happy with having apps for various services and a pretty decent UI with pointer remote, and easy casting and screen mirroring from my phone or laptop.

These homogenous threads make me wonder if I'm alone or got super lucky on the timing of my purchase. But since the OS does update sometimes I don't think that's it?

nopcode• 2 years ago

Might also be dependent on your location.

I have a EU model (LG) and I was able to decline some privacy popups which gives me a functional but dumbed-down version of the OS.

sivers• 2 years ago

Sorry for my dumb question, but the timing of this topic is perfect because I'm just now considering getting my first TV.

Can't I just get a nice OLED smart TV and NEVER connect it to the internet?

Put MP4/MKV movies onto a USB stick and watch them in "AUX/USB" mode? Or use HDMI from my computer, and just treat it as a big monitor?

It might ask me to connect, but I can just decline and keep watching the USB/HDMI inputs, right?

the_snooze• 2 years ago

You absolutely can. But you'll want to pay attention to how insistent the TV is when it comes to being disconnected from the internet. I have an offline Samsung that will occasionally prompt me to accept the terms of service, which obviously fails because it's offline. I can imagine there are some brands/models that are more pushy.

cosmic_cheese2• 2 years ago

I’ve been very happy with my Sony in this regard. Its OS is extremely basic Android TV and it doesn’t bug you at all if you don’t connect it to the internet. Newer models than the one I have also come with a “basic TV” mode that disables most of the Android TV bells and whistles.

Yeah Sony means a higher price, so it’s not going to be as cheap as some other options, but peace is worth a lot of money in my opinion…

saint_yossarian• 2 years ago

Also depends on the model, my Samsung TV from 2022 hasn't bugged me about anything yet when offline.

radicality• 2 years ago

I have a Samsung oled from 2022, I think S95B. It’s technically connected to the local network (I still want it to be usable with home assistant), but denied all connections at the firewall level. I don’t recall it bothering me about anything, and I pretty much always turn it on directly into Apple TV.

rroose• 2 years ago

Same here. I have an older LG model with a Nvidia Shield hooked up. I never even get terms of service prompts.

koolba• 2 years ago

Can't I just get a nice OLED smart TV and NEVER connect it to the internet?

Until they start shipping wideband chips in them. Make sure your helpful in-laws don’t connect it either.

chgs• 2 years ago

Connect it but block traffic at the firewall. Or intercept it all. Traffic shape it, MITM it, etc.

The biggest concern to me is built in 5g etc.

nmeagent• 2 years ago

For now (see e.g. [1]), though companies with surveillance capitalist business models are not only abusive but often sneaky and may do things like include a surreptitious prepaid mobile connection to better thwart your wishes. You really can't trust the bastards.

[1] https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/04/hdmi-customized-ad-i...

bombcar4• 2 years ago

My Vizio just turns into a dumb tv if I say “no” during setup.

Since all I need it to do is come on automatically when the Apple TV turns on, it works great.

PenguinCoder2• 2 years ago

How often does it nag you to say yes, while using it as a dumb TV? are all features usable in that mode? I may need to rethink a Vizio if that's the case and not annoying.

m4635• 2 years ago

how old is it? vizio used to collect everything without your knowledge and got sued.

amelius• 2 years ago

Note that HDMI has an option for running ethernet over it. Probably invented by the advertising industry.

You might be better off buying a big monitor instead of a TV.

mastercheif• 2 years ago

Why is HDMI Ethernet brought up so often in Smart TV posts here and on Reddit?

HDMI Ethernet Channel (HEC) was added to the HDMI spec in 2009 to allow Blu-ray players to access the internet without a direction connection.

There are zero devices ever released that support HEC.

There are zero OEM HDMI chipsets that support HEC.

The streaming device manufacturers have no incentive to enable this feature.

It's a nice reminder that a good amount of people on HN/Reddit have no idea what they're talking about, even if they use acronyms.

washadjeffmad2• 2 years ago

That's how I setup and use my C2, which is fairly performant and non-egregious as far as smart panels go. It's not strictly necessary, but I even install firmware from USB.

ragazzina• 2 years ago

Can it play +50GB remux mkvs from a USB pendrive?

layer8• 2 years ago

You’ll still have slow startup and splash screens and the like, but yes.

It would be nice if top-of-the-line models were available with instant-on and unobtrusive UIs, like CRTs used to be.

wodenokoto• 2 years ago

Yeah, the start-up can be atrocious on low-end smart TVs. I had a Samsung that I more often than not would turn off before it turned on, because I thought it hadn't registered the input from the on/off button.

And as salt in the wound, turning off takes like 10 seconds.

jdeibele• 2 years ago

We have an Apple TV connected to an LG OLED. We very rarely use Blu-Rays but we have a Blu-Ray player also connected.

The family has been instructed to never connect the LG TV to WiFi.

Anyway, I'm sure you could use HDMI from your computer and that seems easier than dealing with a USB stick.

droopyEyelids• 2 years ago

This is actually the smart question in a dumb discussion.

None of these TV show ads unless you connect them to the Internet. If it’s a big deal to avoid ads, plug them into a media center PC or an Apple TV.

imgabe3• 2 years ago

Get a projector. I have a Phillips short-throw projector. It has no OS beyond settings. It can have up to a 10' screen. Works great with Apple TV.

Spivak3• 2 years ago

I think this is going to be the "hacker" answer for a long time to come. Hardware that by most metrics is technically better, it's a little more expensive (but not commercial signage expensive) and a lot more inconvenient to set up which puts most people off. Functionally immune to ads being a serviceable business because selling cheap and making it up with ad revenue requires volume they'll never have.

danpalmer5• 2 years ago

Hardware that by most metrics is technically better

I think that's a hard one to sell with projectors. Picture quality is substantially worse, and images are substantially less bright, than with TVs. People buy TVs on 3 axes: price, image, and smart features. Here we explicitly don't want the smart features, but TVs are much cheaper and much better image quality (even at that much cheaper price) than with projectors. Brightness matters a lot for where/when you can use them.

TacticalCoder• 2 years ago

Get a projector.

I confirm.

ant6n• 2 years ago

Came here to write the same. I got an Epson LCD projector used, 2m wall. Works great with an ipad mini and bluetooth box (although Apple ios is kind of dumb, I need to tell it every time I turn it on to not use the speakers in the projector). Watching happens mostly in the evening/night.

LCD (vs DLP) are kind of hard to find these days, which is unfortunate. Proper lens shift isn't so easy to find either. And you need to make sure you get a reasonably quiet one (so a movie projector, not a presentation one).

globular-toast2• 2 years ago

If you don't want DLP (presumably due to colour wheel issues) then you want LCoS (aka D-ILA). Only JVC and Sony make these, with JVC being most well regarded. But be aware they are about the size of a mini-ATX tower on its side, and a second hand one will set you back a thousand credits at least.

rainsford• 2 years ago

Maybe I'm not being creative enough, but for the average living room setup that would currently have a TV (e.g. (couch with a coffee table facing a TV stand), where exactly do you put the projector? You could put in on the coffee table, but that takes up space and doesn't look great. You could mount it to the ceiling, but that's more of a pain than just putting a TV on the stand you already have. And either method makes it significantly more difficult to connect anything, including power, to the projector.

Don't get me wrong, I think projectors are cool, but I'm not sure about their applicability to a large percentage of TV use-cases. Aside from expensive home theater type setups or janky dorm room style installs, both of which I'm a huge fan of, I'm not sure how the average person is supposed to use a projector. I would love to be wrong though, especially if it means I can use a projector in my fairly average living room layout.

imgabe3• 2 years ago

The short-throw projectors only need to be a maximum of 12" from the wall. That's for the largest size, so if it's 12" away you get a 120" screen. You can move it closer for a smaller screen. This should work with most TV stands.

I have an earlier model of this one: https://www.usa.philips.com/c-p/SCN355_INT/screeneo-ul5-smar...

Hmm, looks like they are starting to make them "smart" now. Boo.

Mashimo3• 2 years ago

Projectors are designed to hang from the ceiling. That is how I installed mine, above the couch. The install is easier then mounting a TV to the wall.

The problem is light control. You want to have blackout curtains and you have to close them every time you want to watch something.

And I might be out of touch with current offerings, but I think the sweetspot for price performance still has not LED options. Only entry and high end. The non-led projectors have a bit more fan noise and expensive to change the bulb, which has limited on-time.

I had my entry level projector for 10 years now and the bulb is still fine. But I also don't watch that much. Paid ~700 EUR. I shitty smart tv with no internet probably also turns on faster. I have to wait ~20 seconds.

simonjgreen• 2 years ago

The cookie pop up is on this site claimed 1,596 partners. Tremendously ironic.

blitzar• 2 years ago

Dumb websites deserve a comeback

lnauta• 2 years ago

I bought a dumb tv some 2 years ago. 4k, 50ish inch and it has a chromecast v2 attached. Works great.

The funny part is when younger family members come over, they get frustrated there's no netflix button on the remote! Last time that lead to a drawing sessions instead of some paw patrol nonsense.

DidYaWipe2• 2 years ago

I bought a projector. "Dumb" as can be.

Now... when I decide to blow the money, it's going to be replaced with a 100" TV. For now I'm assuming that I won't have too big a battle to use it as a plain monitor.

But I bought a Harmony remote a while ago and returned it after finding out that, to maintain it, I had to set up a BS account with Logitech. A bunch of apologists on Reddit mocked those of us who called out this despicable nonsense.

Just a couple months later, we had the last laugh when Logitech pulled the plug on the whole thing.

MBCook3• 2 years ago

I was just looking at some earlier because a friend was asking.

A lot of them seem to be integrating smart TV features for streaming and such. So your privacy is going away there too.

DidYaWipe2• 2 years ago

Yep.

I think their days are numbered anyway. Unless you're going to project beyond 100", the worst LCD TV is going to blow away the best projector. Once a 98-100" TV is $1000-1500, forget it.

silverlake• 2 years ago

My new HiSense TV with Google allows to run it as a basic TV. I think this was added to Google TV in 2021. Problem solved.

phantomathkg3• 2 years ago

Streaming Devices Are the Real Smart Choice

This is not true. There are tons of set top boxes out there are underpower piece of garbage. Unless you are getting your hands on Google Streamer/Apple TV.

montroser• 2 years ago

Why wouldn't streaming devices do all the same surveillance? Don't they have as much financial incentive and broad access as tv manufacturers?

phantomathkg3• 2 years ago

Yep. As someone working in the media app industry. I would say it is in device manufacturers and entertainment apps interest to know what the user are interested, to allow them to keep the user using the app/device.

sneak5• 2 years ago

The Apple TV also has giant ads on the home screen, too.

phantomathkg3• 2 years ago

Yes, and I only see a marginal point of people choosing Apple TV over "Smart" TV. It tracks, but at least give you the performance.

jmyeet• 2 years ago

Every smart TV you don’t connect to the internet is a dumb TV.

vlunkr• 2 years ago

Can we just get some physical buttons back! My tv came with a single multi-purpose button. It’s literally the premise of a dilbert comic. Then the button broke from over use. Just volume, power, change inputs. Not that complicated!

drillsteps52• 2 years ago

While I agree that smart TVs are a marketing ploy by the manufacturers to increase the revenue by shortening the lifecycle, I'm not buying the premise that I can protect my data by using dumb TVs. Everybody's using AppleTV, Amazon, Google, or Roku devices, which are perfectly capable of collecting that information and using it themselves or feeding it to various vendors (for a reasonable price). Not to mention that all content providers (ie Netflix) are doing exactly the same.

throwaway484762• 2 years ago

I have a raspberry pi for "smart" TV use.

drillsteps52• 2 years ago

...to stream from which content providers? They still have your viewing history, and that history eventually will end up at the data brokers to be perused by the interested parties. Which is really not that different from if you were using smart TV, except maybe a little bit more revenue for TV manufacturers.

prng2021• 2 years ago

The author already mentions the benefits of streaming devices. What difference does it make whether you have a dumb or smart tv if the only functionality you use is from a streaming device?

Havoc• 2 years ago

Yeah that’s never going to happen.

The vast majority of the buyer pool consider the smart stuff a feature.

So the only way the remaining fraction of a percent of buyer make economic sense is with insane markups. And when people hear about the additional +100% markup or whatever for their artisanal dumb tv the interested pool gets even smaller

GuB-422• 2 years ago

Dumb TVs are called monitors, you can buy them. For large sizes, I guess you can look at the kind of displays they have in shops and meeting rooms.

Today, TVs are by nature not dumb, what make them a TV and not a monitor would be the presence of a tuner, and modern tuners are built-in computers that can at least decode compressed video, which is not a trivial task, especially at 4K.

The reason people don't like smart TVs is not because they have a computer inside of them with internet connectivity. It is because of ads and partnership deals. And of course people don't like it, because as much as manufacturers advertise them as features, they are not made to add value for the customer, they actually lower the value. But here is the thing: they lower the price even more.

Let's say a manufacturer makes a TV intended to be sold for $300, they reach for their sponsors and can get $50 of deals. Now they can chose to sell a "sponsored" TV for $250 or one without the annoyances for $300, and as it turns out, the majority of customers will go for the $250 option. So much that there is no good economic reason to even sell that $300 ad-free TV, the niche is too small. Competitors without sponsorship deals and $300 TVs will be out-competed by that $250 TV and will have to adjust. As a result, we all have the "smart TVs" we hate (but with a price tag we love).

Pros are ready to pay to avoid all that bullshit, but they don't need TVs either, they need monitors, that's why you can find monitors without that bullshit, for a price.

mgkimsal• 2 years ago

So much that there is no good economic reason to even sell that $300 ad-free TV, the niche is too small.

Is it? This is one of those things where I don't feel I've ever had a choice.

So... we get the cheapest TV and just hook a laptop up to it, and just watch stuff from a computer via HDMI.

yowayb• 2 years ago

Agree. I nomad, and about 6 years ago I saw my last TV without an HDMI input. And only once in that time, I came across a DP monitor. I now carry a USB-C to HDMI cable that lets me use my phone as a desktop whenever it's plugged into a TV.

GuB-422• 2 years ago

So... we get the cheapest TV and just hook a laptop up to it

Exactly, and that's another reason why "ad-free" TVs won't sell. Those who just want to connect their laptop via HDMI will buy the cheapest TV with that feature. They won't pay more to avoid seeing ads in the menu screens they don't use anyways.

Now, it may change if they force ads in the HDMI stream or something equally annoying, but they didn't go that far (yet?).

nitwit0052• 2 years ago

If it was purely competitive pressure, they'd be happy to let you pay extra to not have the ads.

Instead, they seem to make an effort to make sure no such model is available in stores. People have go hunt down display models intended for businesses, or never connect them to the internet, and display media from another device.

I suspect ultimately, they don't want to be manufacturers. They want control of a "platform" they can milk for infinite money, similar to what Facebook, Google, and friends have.

NemoNobody2• 2 years ago

ahh - this is what I do and why I've never noticed "smart" TVs.

My TV is connected to my desktop and will never ever have an Internet connection or it's own - nor will it ever turn on to show anything other than my desktop.

It's the solution for almost media issues tbh.

Shaanie• 2 years ago

I suspect it's not quite that simple. First, is there actually enough demand for ad-free TVs to make the option worth including? I personally probably wouldn't pay $20 to avoid ads in the home screen since those kind of ads are just a minor nuisance, which makes me question the size of the market for the ad-free option.

Second, what would the pricing be for the option?

If it's $10-20, that'd probably be fine, similar to what Amazon did for Kindle. But if it's more than that, then I bet the negative PR they would get for including the option outweighs the potential benefit to customers. "I would never buy an X, they're extremely greedy and want $50 just not to show ads. Crazy. I'll buy Y brand instead (which has ads but no 'corporate greed' option to not show them)".

demosthanos2• 2 years ago

Your model is oversimplified in a way that downplays the value of ads to the manufacturer. They don't reach out to sponsors and get a $50 static offer per TV in deals. They do some math and figure out that they can make at least $X per customer on average over the lifetime of the TV by selling ad slots dynamically.

The subtle difference here is that because the sponsorships can be updated live across TVs that have already been sold, the actual value of each TV sale can be made to go up after the date of purchase by updating software and/or changing the ad deals.

So the manufacturer isn't pricing the TVs at a discount precisely equal to the ad revenue they receive per TV, they have to price the TVs based on a complicated formula that includes both a rough estimate of the minimum value of ad deals and customer willingness to pay (keeping in mind that customers are choosing their willingness to pay based on a landscape that has no ad-free models!). And what's more, the manufacturer is free to alter the deal after the sale is made to try to make a larger profit per-TV than was originally priced in.

You make it sound like it's a reasonable outcome of an efficient market, but the current situation—where one party can and does alter the deal retroactively and unilaterally—does not create an efficient market!

john-radio• 2 years ago

TVs and monitors are technologically different. They are constructed to be focused on from different range depths and widths. You can't just buy a TV-sized monitor and use it like a TV.

M95D2• 2 years ago

They are constructed to be focused on from different range depths and widths.

Can you explanin? AFAIK, TVs have dot pitch much larger than monitors. To me it seems better to have monitor as TV than a normal TV.

bmicraft5• 2 years ago

You can and I did.

hedora9• 2 years ago

Monitors have different (worse for distance viewing) panels, so they aren’t a replacement.

Also, the price of an excellent non-ad-supported computer (eg Apple TV) to replace the one that comes in the TV is $140.

That’s rounding error vs the price of a midrange TV, and it shouldn’t be a selling point in the > ~ $1000 range.

ses1984• 2 years ago

When post above you referred to monitors, they weren’t referring to computer monitors but any screen sold without a tv tuner including all kinds of units large distance viewing screens.

geuis• 2 years ago

Show me a 48-52 inch "monitor" that's 4k 120hz full HDR. Have been looking for one for years.

dimensi0nal• 2 years ago

Asus PG48UQ? LG also makes one with the same specs.

chabska• 2 years ago

I just typed "48 inch monitor" into amazon search bar and got one that seems to fit your spec. What's the problem?

JoshTriplett3• 2 years ago

That doesn't explain why it's impossible to buy, for instance, a 65" OLED without ads. We're talking about a TV with a four-figure price tag, and there's no ad-free option.

aidenn04• 2 years ago

On top of that, the dumb TVs could come from the same hardware line and just run different software. It's not like they need to spend millions to retool like they would for an unusual panel size.

bmicraft5• 2 years ago

They've probably calculated that that the value they get from showing ads on more expensive TVs (read: to a more affluent audience) rises at least as fast as the sale price of the TV, maybe even faster.

reginald785• 2 years ago

65" OLED TVs signal that the user has money, exactly the kind of user you want to advertise to most!

flemhans• 2 years ago

Even computer monitors are slowly going the "smart" route…

m4635• 2 years ago

this is an annoying trend. Like monitors with a remote (that you can lose)

rldjbpin• 2 years ago

there are "smart monitors" now, which are just smaller-sized tv with better panel performance (https://www.samsung.com/us/computing/monitors/smart-monitors...)

notfed• 2 years ago

Where do I find 65" monitors?

denkmoon2• 2 years ago

This is so weird. You just don't connect it to the internet. It's that simple. No need for "dumb TVs" to return. Smart TVs are just dumb TVs with extra stuff.

I'll care about this when they start embedding 5G SIMs so I can't prevent it connecting.

hooverd2• 2 years ago

Hah, if only...

denkmoon2• 2 years ago

Elaborate?

dicknuckle2• 2 years ago

The TV I bought 2 years ago and never connected it to the Internet. Not even for setup. Zero issues.

joeyagreco• 2 years ago

1. If you want the functionality of a smart TV without all of the bloat, I've found Apple TV to be fast and functional. Little to no ads.

2. Running a PiHole (or something similar at a DNS level), you can prevent a lot of the "phoning home" these TVs do. That still does not solve the bloatware/speed issue, but point 1 addresses that.

bhaney• 2 years ago

As long as I can still open them up to remove/destroy all the wireless radios and networking chips and they keep working as a basic display device afterwards, subsidize them with as much crap as you want.

exabrial• 2 years ago

Dumb cars, dumb blenders as well

protocolture• 2 years ago

My Kogan is a dumb panel, but I think it was the last year model where they sold both a smart and a dumb version. I imagine if I went looking theres only smart available.

agrippanux• 2 years ago

A little over a year ago I was checking my home network logs and realized my smart TVs were sending gigs of data to Roku servers - when the TVs were off.

I killed all internet access for my TVs, bought Apple TVs to attach to them and never looked back.

johnny_canuck• 2 years ago

I happened to notice this article in my HN feed a few minutes after cursing at my Samsung TV about how poor it's internal software is. It's shocking how slow and clunky it is. I have a shield connected to it to skirt it for the most part but it's impossible to avoid it entirely. Not to mention how confusing it is for the less technical persons in my family.

sholladay• 2 years ago

I predict that Apple will do this. Supposedly, they are considering making a TV, after years of not wanting to. And it makes sense with the landscape of today, where TVs have become a privacy nightmare and their interfaces are arguably worse than ever. It seems like ripe picking for Apple, playing to their strengths. If they do end up making a TV, I think it would make sense for it to be a dumb TV. Like how the Pro Display XDR is a dumb monitor, not having speakers or a webcam. Apple already makes a good TV remote, which could probably be repurposed easily. And thanks to CEC, I never use my actual TV remote anymore except to navigate its settings menu on rare occasions.

To me, the question is would it have an actual TV tuner in it? Would Apple bother with making a whole interface around scanning for channels and such when it’s not a common use case anymore, adds complexity, and isn’t necessarily in their interest financially? Maybe it will end up being a very large monitor, but sold like a TV. Perhaps alongside the existing Apple TV box, which would hopefully get a rebranding.

rsyring• 2 years ago

IMO, if apple were to make a TV, it wouldn't be dumb. It would probably have similar software as their current Apple TV hardware.

Gigachad• 2 years ago

The problem was never smart TVs. All the people looking to buy dumb TVs just want to plug a chromecast or raspberry pi in to it to make it a smart TV anyway.

The problem is that the built in OS sucks and is full of OEM malware. Apple could fix this by providing an actually good experience.

dagmx2• 2 years ago

Why would Apple make a dumb TV though?

The Pro Display XDR exists because there’s nothing really comparable in the space with those specs and there’s a market to be had for it.

The Studio display similarly exists because the only competitor for specs at the time was its own predecessor.

Both exist at a price point where the specs (specifically resolution at those specific screen sizes and HDR for the XDR) trump the higher cost of entry, and they get paired with an Apple device to take advantage of those capabilities.

TVs are highly competitive on cost because they’re effectively subsidized. Apple might have better processing but they’d get the same panels as everyone else. Unlike the Mac displays, they’d have to deal with the same content that every other TV has so that’s not a differentiator. There’s no money there for a dumb tv and there’s no differentiator for the average customer.

Instead the expectation is that Apple would lplay to its strengths of vertical integration. Build in their Apple TV hardware with Homekit etc on board. If they did anything less it would be panned.

The Apple TV experience would be the differentiator. It’s already miles ahead of the competition in the ways an average customer would care about, and brings apples privacy+ad stance to bear.

bubblethink• 2 years ago

They don't make their displays in house. Until they bring displays in house, it doesn't make sense to get into the display business.

reginald785• 2 years ago

To me, the question is would it have an actual TV tuner in it? Would Apple bother with making a whole interface around scanning for channels and such when it’s not a common use case anymore, adds complexity, and isn’t necessarily in their interest financially? Maybe it will end up being a very large monitor, but sold like a TV. Perhaps alongside the existing Apple TV box, which would hopefully get a rebranding.

ATSC 3.0 is suppose to have IP networking requirement for ad so Apple would probably be better of abandoning this if they're selling an add free privacy TV.

guidedlight• 2 years ago

All Sony Bravia TV’s ask you if you want to configure as a dumb TV during initial setup.

hedora9• 2 years ago

I was looking at those.

Note that they don’t support volume control on their analog line out ports. This is a deal breaker for me.

Hisense seems to be the luddite’s best choice in 2024.

abenga• 2 years ago

What are you using to play the audio from the line-out ports?

Uvix2• 2 years ago

"Line out" is supposed to be just that, line level. Not supporting volume control is correct; that should only be used for headphone jacks. (Yes, they're generally compatible, but they are not the same thing.)

aidenn04• 2 years ago

That seems like something that could be fixed with a preamp? I run things into my receiver and then to the TV, so I haven't needed a line-out port before.

mubou• 2 years ago

Did you do this? I'm just curious, if you unplug the TV and plug it back in, how quickly does it start up when in "dumb" mode?

My problem with the Bravia TV I have is it takes a solid minute for the Android system to boot up, so I can't just put it on a smart plug and expect it to turn on when I turn it on...

lardissone• 2 years ago

That's the worst part of the smart TV. I don't use the smart features and have it disconnected from internet, but still takes a minute to boot up.

It's bad, but even worse if you have kids.

jamespitts• 2 years ago

A better way to look at this kind of product would be: TV with an API.

Now apply this orientation to any device which you would connect to the TV with an API. Speakers with an API. DVD player with an API. Device to interact with my Apple TV... with an API.

Imagine what wonderful things would be made possible by such a class of products. I would pay a lot more for this, and I know that many others would too.

seventytwo• 2 years ago

“Smart” things are basically just bullshit.

anonymousiam• 2 years ago

I've got an LG OLED TV that I'm really happy with, because I rooted it before the exploit was patched, so now it's ad-free, and is more capable than any model presently available.

https://rootmy.tv

roberttod• 2 years ago

As much as I agree with the sentiment, I can buy a firestick, Apple TV or Roku for a very small cost. Sure, a dumb TV would be lovely, but only because of a quicker boot time.

Given a dumb TV is going to be more expensive, I can't see a market for it based on a small marginal gain for the consumer. And 90% of people don't even care enough about the poor user experience vs the marketing that hypes up features no one uses or needs.

dagmx2• 2 years ago

Boot time rarely matters since most TVs just sleep, and not shut down.

Cold boots are reserved for failure situations or updates.

I agree with the point that most people deal with terrible user experience.

A lot of my friends ask me why I went with an Apple TV when my TVs have built in functionality or I could use Roku / whatever Google call their dongles now for cheaper.

The answer is experience. I’ve tried to deal without an Apple TV and my god, the number of ads, the slow UI response, color handling etc.. all have me going back to the Apple TV.

But none of the stuff I mentioned is worth the price difference to the majority of people.

ptmcc2• 2 years ago

Yeah the Apple TV interface is so much faster, more responsive, and ad-free than virtually every built-in smart TV function. I don't understand how anyone, especially anyone remotely savvy, can stand to use them.

Even the "good" ones like the Android TV in my Sony is sluggish clunky garbage in comparison. I gave it a shot when I bought it, but couldn't stand it. Disconnected the TV from the network and just use the Apple TV and it's nearly perfect.

jonnycomputer• 2 years ago

Still using my 2007 television. It's pretty ass dumb. I have new computer displays of course.

Horffupolde• 2 years ago

Don’t have a TV to begin with.

AvAn12• 2 years ago

+1 for Sceptre

xeckr• 2 years ago

I agree. Hacking a smart TV to bypass/replace its OS would make for an interesting project, though.

enahs-sf• 2 years ago

Depending on your home setup, projector seems like a decent option as well.

hsuduebc2• 2 years ago

Oh I would love to have just dumb oled panel with only input cable without that bloatware installed.

jimt1234• 2 years ago

It's not just TVs. I upgraded the appliances in my kitchen last year. Every "high-end" refrigerator required internet connectivity just to use the product. Most of the dishwashers and ovens had this same requirement.

ptmcc2• 2 years ago

I've replaced several appliances recently and while, like TVs, all have wifi garbage built in, I've never once connected any of them and they all function perfectly fine.

And on the topic of TVs, my Sony TV also works happily while disconnected and never nags about it.

Hard_Space• 2 years ago

That was a really keyphrase-saturated article - they're really going for SEO capture!

BLKNSLVR2• 2 years ago

I'm awaiting the LineageOS equivalent for Android TV. Is anyone on that?

Custom ROM to drive the TV, no ads, no commercial partnerships. Root your TV.

sfRattan• 2 years ago

I am days late to this thread, but there's at least one person out there putting out builds of LineageOS-based AndroidTV for Raspberry Pis.

https://konstakang.com/devices/rpi5/

If you go to the devices menu there's stuff for older models as well. I haven't tried out the builds yet, but have seen reports around the Internet of other people using them with success.

Currently playing around with Android TV on a $20 disposable Walmart Onn-branded streaming box to see what apps and customizations are possible before taking the plunge and fiddling with on of my RPi 4Bs. Though you might want a Pi 5 for a 4K TV.

Long term goal would be to combine Raspberry Pi, reliable builds of AndroidTV which are downstream of either LineageOS, CalyxOS, or GrapheneOS, and then some kind of IR Receiver like the FLIRC and a remote control.

pipeline_peak• 2 years ago

I’d like to see a relatable ad campaign. One that’s very “hey, we hear ya, no one actually wants this” type speech.

It would certainly catch an eye because what else is there to say? I don’t remember the last tv ad, it was so forgettable.

Now to the problem, much of the points the author makes are environmental concerns about “consumer” electronics. This is just so far off base to the older consumer audience and possibly entirely. You have to focus on…the ads and the bloat. Explain why your tv costs slightly more, because you made sure the experience was seamless.

I’d really love if this took off, but unfortunately without a titan like Samsung it won’t. Otherwise it’ll just be an outrageously expensive tv with average performance, and we al know that’s not the right formula.

patrakov2• 2 years ago

Big monitors (e.g., Gigabyte AORUS FV43U) are today's best dumb TVs.

losthalo• 2 years ago

Will a Roku stick work with one?

patrakov2• 2 years ago

I have no Roku stick, but reviews mention that BluRay players and Apple TV work fine.

faust201• 2 years ago

The point is tech savvy users can do all sorts of things like ublock origin, DNS, dumb TV etc

The majority of users in this world don't. So there will some people left out to suffer ads/tracking etc.

NemoNobody2• 2 years ago

You can still buy "dumb tvs" tho - well a 2-3 years ago you could I guess.

I've never once considered buying a smart TV - nor would I ever.

olalonde• 2 years ago

HN is so disconnected from reality... No one in the real world actually wants a dumb TV.

Ekaros2• 2 years ago

Or if they would accept one they would not pay more for one. Minority who would actually do it is so small it is not worth it.

nox101• 2 years ago

I like dumb articles - articles with still text and pictures - I tried to visit the site and it was covered in "smart ads" - ads using JavaScript to try in every way possible to shove ads in front of me

Funny the person complaining about ads is working for a site that is part of the problem

wbharding• 2 years ago

I think they’re called “commercial displays” now (no malware subsidy like smart TVs tho)

cwales95• 2 years ago

Whenever I obtain a 'smart' TV, I never connect it to the internet. I don't want a TV that can phone home.

aabiji• 2 years ago

This is tangential, but I think TV in general, smart or dumb, is slowly becoming obsolete, especially with genZ.

Loranubi• 2 years ago

Smart TVs are the reason I haven’t bought a new tv in almost 15 years. I would like to upgrade to a fancy 4K one instead of my old 1080p one. Dumb TVs back then weren’t more expensive than smart TVs today so I don’t believe price is the reason for smart TVs. Margins maybe…

rob• 2 years ago

I'm actually using a 47 inch LG 3D TV that I purchased in 2012 that's 1080p. I keep looking for an excuse to upgrade but it's been working fine. It's been almost 15 years as well and I thought they weren't going to last this long for some reason. I don't even use any of the 3D stuff!

someonehere• 2 years ago

Because of a similar post a few years back I learned you can buy kiosk TVs from commercial vendors. They strip the garbage apps and leave you with a dumb TV. It wasn’t really that much more either. Used them for new conference room TVs for an office build out. They work and last flawlessly.

Aissen• 2 years ago

Because of mass-market economics, it makes (almost) no difference to the vendor whether the TV is smart or not. So just buy a smart-TV and don't connect it to the internet. It's that simple. Oh, and also, don't forget to live in the EU so you can refuse those contracts that add mandatory data collection.

I have documented how you can use an LG TV and disable its obnoxious "Hi LG" feature without giving it internet access: https://social.treehouse.systems/@Aissen/111267905868798609

_chu1• 2 years ago

I only purchase Sony TVs, and I simply just connect an HTPC to them. If there are any smart features, I just choose not to accept the EULA and not to connect it to the Internet.

Night_Thastus• 2 years ago

They will not. Users only care about 2 things: Price and functionality.

It doesn't cost manufacturers anything extra at this point to include all the 'smart' features. It would cost more to make a 'dumb' TV.

No sane manufacturer is going to make a TV with less features that costs more for the sake of not even a percentage of the consumer base looking for TVs.

If you don't like it, buy a TV that's less egregious and get a PiHole. Then don't use the features you don't want. There. Done.

pabs3• 2 years ago

Alternatively, we could repurpose smart TVs to run open source software.

https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html

account427• 2 years ago

Streaming Devices Are the Real Smart Choice

Physical media you own is the only smart choice. No apps, just a BluRay player. Or better yet, .mkv files on a PC.

Connectivity options also need an upgrade. HDMI ports, ARC (Audio Return Channel) support for soundbars, and USB inputs should be standard.

DisplayPort should be standard, at least until the HDMI consortium pulls its head out of its arse and allows open source implementations. Of course the TV manufacturers are all part of the HDMI Consortium. Might need antitrust enforcement.

This article is pointless though since smart TVs are also dumb TVs. There is no incentive for display TV manufacturers to make a separate SKU without the "smarts" but on most models you don't have to use them.

Gollapalli• 2 years ago

Aren’t the things all running Android anyway? How hard would it be to flash a ROM? I don’t have a TV to tinker with, but I saw some mentions of ADB on this thread.

Seems like the folks on XDA are doing something with this. Might be time for someone suitably inclined to do an FOSS TV distro

Dumb TVs deserve a comeback

Related Stories