Being marginally better than hell is still hell.
HN user
ses1984
I’m just challenging your point that ai doesn’t have source.
Is training code and dataset not source?
It would be fine if they protected property rights if they also protected human rights.
Police actually exist to protect capital. At least in the USA.
They only cost about $100.
No one is saying all programmers lack engineering discipline. It is simply not required for all programmers, even in many situations when it probably should be.
This is my first time seeing any research like this, thanks for the link.
I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm really curious about the limits of what people can hear, what can be taught and what is rare.
The way the sentence is structured implies he is evil either way. He is either (dim witted and evil) or (just evil).
Can you give any examples of people identifying these artifacts in a/b tests?
Who has the best ears? What can they detect?
That’s fake news. I had covid and I was fine.
/s
Not every bit of code is going to be meaningless.
Just 99.999%.
Why not have sub agents talk to a payment service? Sub agents should ultimately be associated with a human or business entity, the human or business entity could provide a single payment service for agents.
The question isn’t whether or not they employed a particular tool, the question is how big of an impact did it have.
Do you want each sub agent to be able to anonymously transact?
KYC is probably particularly important in this space and it should be easily traceable to a human.
Maybe it’s just my lack of imagination, but I don’t see a use case for giving agents money when they can barely be trusted to not break out of a sandbox and cause hallucinatory chaos.
Let’s say for a minute this is a failure of my imagination. Does each sub agent really need to be able to independently transact?
You don’t need to open a bank account to get a prepaid debit card.
Or you could just give your agents a debit card number loaded with only as much money as you specify.
My one dog hates broccoli but she will choke it down just so the other one can’t have it.
Goyum?
Isn’t the post above saying the same thing after the part where you cut it off…?
14 em dashes
"recovery in progress -- not a comeback story with a bow on it"
Brand new account posting their own article.
:(
There's one use case where VMs don't work, real time media processing. Mac is the preferred platform for this kind of think by most users but I use one application which is windows exclusive: rocksmith. It's theoretically possible to get something that's only marginally worse than the native experience, but I've never seen it done. Even if I could do it, I don't know if I could accept how the app behaves in practice.
But they spent money that was earned already, not money that was raised or borrowed.
It must be nice to not need to use that crap, but one day you might.
I don’t think Amazon did that…?
Some things are easier to verify than they are to solve, right?
So if you see an answer on stack overflow, read it, comprehend it, and you can pretty easily mentally verify the correctness to a sufficient degree of confidence…
I guess I’m not worth my salt.
People especially wanted uber because uber charged below market rates by subsidizing rides with vc money.
Nobody thought there was any remotely high chance of a poor quality rendering of an ape being worth more than a house for the indefinite future
Isn’t that what all the biggest bagholders thought?
How else do you explain anyone still holding a worthless NFT they spent thousands on?
At my last two jobs, smoke tests were a common topic of conversation.