HDR‑Infused Emoji

https://sharpletters.net/2025/04/16/hdr-emoji/

by tabletcorry • 1 year ago

274 146 1 year ago

sharpletters.net

jchw2• 1 year ago

Looks like this works on Chrome for Android, but Firefox doesn't seem to support HDR at all.

https://bugzil.la/hdr

Maybe some day.

lxgr5• 1 year ago

Neither does Safari on macOS – which honestly seems like the correct behavior, given that this will inevitably be used by websites in user-hostile ways.

lights0123• 1 year ago

Safari only shows HDR in videos, not photos. It's possible to just show a single-frame video though.

new_user_final• 1 year ago

So many people push for more browser engines yet Firefox can't implement HDR in 6 years.

LoganDark9• 1 year ago

Wonder if Ladybird will ever support it. (Imagine HDR on SerenityOS!)

matsemann2• 1 year ago

Feels like either Chrome or my android phone is cheating, because if I cover the hdr image with my finger and switch between Firefox and Chrome, the page background in Chrome is noticeable more grey than the one in Firefox.

Groxx• 1 year ago

This might be the best use of HDR I've ever seen.

And will continue to see for quite some time when my eyes are closed.

pier252• 1 year ago

yes it's blinding on my MBP lol

BoorishBears• 1 year ago

These examples will work best when posted to Slack.

I should not have been clued into this power.

lxgr5• 1 year ago

For more information on the different ways to encode HDR content in images, together with examples for each, I've found this article very useful: https://gregbenzphotography.com/hdr/

And this explains how Apple implements this feature on non-OLED/mini-LED screens (and, in my observation, at least still to some extent even on mini-LED): https://prolost.com/blog/edr

joshuaturner• 1 year ago

Time to make my Slack profile pic really stand out

Hamuko• 1 year ago

Oh god it fucking works. It's brilliant in every sense of the word.

tuetuopay• 1 year ago

oh god. off my evening goes tweaking the multiply value for proper effect.

globular-toast2• 1 year ago

Interesting, my phone seems to do some normalisation, I presume rather than clip the image. So it turns "down" the rest of the page leaving the emojis bright. I wonder which part of the system is doing this. Chrome on Android.

Jeremy1026• 1 year ago

Works great on iPhones

Funnily enough, on my iPhone I'm getting the blue box question mark instead of the images on the page.

muglug• 1 year ago

Can confirm that this works, and can also confirm that people who post glaring HDR images to Slack are frequently peer-pressured to remove them shortly thereafter by everyone in the channel.

tasuki• 1 year ago

Do y'all have HDR screens? Apparently I don't! And judging by this thread, I'm not missing much?

ionwake7• 1 year ago

Sorry for the noob question but I think finally someone in this thread can answer this for me. Sometimes when I see a youtube short video it looks like its HDR is whacked up by like 500% as per the image in this page, but Im confused how this could be done. Is video processing on the video before it is uploaded somehow giving it some sort of encoding which chrome just wacks up? Or is it the hardware doing it and encoding it a certain way?

I am not talking about a slight brightness increase, I am talking Ill be scrolling youtube and suddenly this video is like a portal into another dimension its so bright.

Can anyone explain how its done?

harrall• 1 year ago

Screens can't often do full brightness on the whole screen so if you come across a video or image that is supposed to have a higher contrast ratio, the system will darken everything and then brighten up the pixels that are supposed to be brighter.

Yes, there are formats that able to store a higher contrast ratio so that's why it doesn't happen on non-HDR content but the actual brightening of a portal on your screen isn't because of the format but because of your hardware (and software) choosing to interpret the format that way.

For more a practical example, if you had an 8-bit HDR image, 255 on the red channel (after inputting this number through a math function like HLG[1] to "extract" a brightness number) might mean "make this pixel really bright red" whereas 255 on a SDR format would mean "just regular red." However, each red channel is still a number between 0 and 255 on both formats but your hardware decided to make it brighter on the HDR format.

(Although in reality, HDR formats are often 10-bit or higher because 256 values is not enough range to store both color and brightness so you would see banding[2]. Also, I have been using RGB for my example but you can store color/brightness number many other ways, such as with chroma subsampling[3], especially when you realize human eyes are more sensitive to some colors more than others so you could "devote fewer bits" to some colors.)

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_log%E2%80%93gamma

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colour_banding

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chroma_subsampling

ionwake7• 1 year ago

Thank you so much for your reply - I will look into it!

kllrnohj8• 1 year ago

Screens can't often do full brightness on the whole screen so if you come across a video or image that is supposed to have a higher contrast ratio, the system will darken everything and then brighten up the pixels that are supposed to be brighter.

There's no system that does that. The only thing that's kinda similar is at the display level there's a concept known as the "window size" since many displays cannot show peak brightness across the entire display. If you've ever seen brightness talked about in context of a "5%" or "10%" window size, this is what it means - the brightness the display can do when only 5% of the display is max-white, and the rest is black.

But outside of fullscreen this doesn't tend to be much of any issue in practice, and it depends on the display.

dr_kiszonka• 1 year ago

I use YouTube on my rather inexpensive TV. When a thumbnail of an HDR video starts playing, the whole screen brightens up significantly. I don't know as much about HDR as you do, so maybe they are using some other perceptual trick. It might also not be "full brightness." BTW, why can't screens do full brightness on the whole screen?

detaro3• 1 year ago

The video is marked as containing a different color space with a higher brightness/color range. That could either be because the initial camera recorded it that way (e.g. iPhones can do that) or because someone took a "normal" video and edited it.

ionwake7• 1 year ago

Would this be specific software on the iphone used to record a video ? Or a default setting on a certain iphone? I ask because I only very rarely see this whacked up HDR youtube short, like super rarely.

kllrnohj8• 1 year ago

There's many factors in play from what your SDR white point is at, how your OS handles HDR video, what the content contains, and finally what your brain is doing.

HDR10(+) & Dolby Vision, for example, encode content at absolute luminance, so they are basically completely trash formats since that's an insane thing to expect (the spec for authoring content in this format literally just goes "lol idk do X if you think it's going to be seen in a movie theater of Y for TV and hope"). Sadly, they are also quite common. Mobile phones (both Android & iOS) are instead pushing HLG, which is better. Although then hilariously MacOS's handling of HLG was atrocious until the latest update which fixed it but only if the video contains a magic flag that iPhone sets, but isn't standard so nobody else sets it (the "avme" tag https://developer.apple.com/documentation/technotes/tn3145-h... )

There's then also just how your eyes & brain react. When HDR shows up and suddenly the white background of a page looks like a dim gray? That's 100% a perceptual illusion. The actual light being emitted didn't change, just your perception of it did. This is a very hard problem to deal with, and it's one that so far the HDR industry as a whole has basically just ignored. But it's why there's a push to artificially limit the HDR range in mixed conditions, eg https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9074

ionwake7• 1 year ago

You clearly know alot about this, but I think there could be a misunderstanding. Not trying to offend but when I see the youtube link mentioned above in the other comment, my macbook screen literally goes darker AROUND the video , which gets brighter. I am not making this up. I think its how chrome on macbooks handles raw HDR encoding.

Can someone else confirm I am not mad?

PS - I am not trying to shut you down, you clearly know alot in the space I am just explaining what Im experiencing on this hardware.

recursive4• 1 year ago

I don't think I understand HDR. It just looks brighter and more contrast. I can just do that with normal manipulations. What's this all about?

Edit: Maybe my hardware doesn't support it. I'm using an LG monitor with Windows. There's also a good chance I've never actually seen anything in HDR.

detaro3• 1 year ago

I can just do that with normal manipulations

Then you are probably not viewing this with HDR-capable hardware and software. Otherwise it'd go past what you can just do with normal manipulation on an sRGB image.

pjerem• 1 year ago

You need an HDR screen, what that basically means hardware-wise is that each pixel can control its brightness.

On compatible screens, those emojis are appearing super bright. In fact brighter than the maximum brightness setting while the rest of the screen doesnt change.

donohoe3• 1 year ago

I used (abused) HDR in an editorial project last year. We were working with an amazing illustrator doing a take on series of stories exploring the intersection of faith, storytelling, and technology.

As the early versions of the images emerged we thought we could used HDR to provide more or a aura to some elements. We tried to make it subtle and not overwhelm.

This example is my favorite:

https://restofworld.org/2024/divinity-altered-reality-muslim...

I think it worked well - and this technique would have been useful. We tried something similar but could not get it to work.

Our method was to use a stretched HDR video in the background.

Here are the steps I used:

In Photoshop create white image to proportions required. Save as MP4:

  File > Export > Render Video

Save as "sample.mp4"

With the MP4, generate a HDR version in WEBM:

  ffmpeg -i sample.mp4 -pix_fmt yuv420p10le -color_primaries 9 -color_trc 16 -colorspace 9 -color_range 1 -profile:v 2 -vcodec libvpx-vp9 sample.webm

With the plain MP4, generate the HDR version:

  ffmpeg -i sample.mp4 -pix_fmt yuv420p10le -color_primaries 9 -color_trc 16 -colorspace 9 -color_range 1 -profile:v high10 -vcodec libx264 sample.mp4

timciep• 1 year ago

That looks amazing!

shahahmed• 1 year ago

these look so tasteful and well done

BolexNOLA• 1 year ago

Big fan of the final result. Very striking

tobr• 1 year ago

Remember seeing this when it was published. Excellent work, great use of HDR.

mzs• 1 year ago

Here's how RoW did it:

    .religion-atf__nav-chapter--current .religion-atf__nav-chapter__book {
        box-shadow: -4px -4px 50px 0 #fff,4px 4px 50px 0 #fff
    }

altairprime• 1 year ago

Would using a color() instead of #fff permit a brighter selection than srgb #rgb/rrggbb?

InsideOutSanta• 1 year ago

Wow, this is super smart, and the effect is really compelling and novel.

razkarcy• 1 year ago

This is a beautiful implementation all-around. It captures a similar "wow-factor" that gilded pages in physical books provide. If this is the future of digital media I'm excited!

jjcm2• 1 year ago

Incredibly well done. FWIW, the video hack is no longer needed. Originally that was required due to browsers only having hdr support with video, but recently support for PNGs were added as well. You can just use an all-white png with the rec2020 color space set.

zamadatix6• 1 year ago

Safari on macOS does not have HDR support in images shipping to general user channels yet.

jofzar3• 1 year ago

This is probably why the emojis are working in slack, because it's just electron.

ValveFan69692• 1 year ago

This is a lot of technical mumbo jumbo for a simple thing like brightness. HDR is a gimmick like 3D TVs. The best image quality is not the one with the most colors, which is entirely pointless, but instead a simple image, with no fancy features that only serve to distract the eye.

Like in the famous case of the Apple logo in the 1990s. Steve Jobs, when asked why he uses a black and white Apple logo instead of a color one, said - "color will only distract the eye from what's important".

throawayonthe• 1 year ago

calling HDR a gimmick is somewhat silly considering it's already in widespread use for media, and it's great

shepherdjerred• 1 year ago

Agreed, this is exactly why I only watch silent era black-and-white films.

itishappy• 1 year ago

Hard disagree. HDR is more than just boosted brightness, but the boosted brightness on it's own has been (in my humble opinion) the biggest advancement in TVs in the past decade. For instance, I'd choose a 500 nit 1920x1080 panel over a 250 nit 3840x2160 panel any day.

Almondsetat• 1 year ago

Yep, watching a logo is exactly like watching a movie

alwa2• 1 year ago

I feel like the whole emoji example might favor your point of view, but that, delightfully, grandparent commenter’s example is one of the better counterpoints I’ve seen.

Selectively deployed, a glint of extra brightness, above and beyond the “100%” baseline, simulates the glints and shimmers that draw our eyes naturally—in this case, in the same manner as gilt on the physical counterpart to the books they’re depicting. It fits in cleverly with a long tradition for that specific context.

Where I agree is with the idea that brighter-for-brighter’s-sake is not better after a certain point, any more than color-because-we-can. And it seems, as far as I can tell, that uniformly cranking up the full frame brightness into the HDR range is not The Done Thing, at least in film and design, at least so far. Possibly for compatibility with the wide range of displays stuff will end up on.

ben0x5392• 1 year ago

What devices is this meant to work on? On my laptop I'm not seeing anything out of the ordinary.

hatthew• 1 year ago

Do your OS and screen both support HDR and have it enabled? It works by default on my mbp m2's screen, but not its external monitor or on my windows desktop/laptop.

HatchedLake721• 1 year ago

Have you done any magic with the scroll behavior?

Usually the first rule of web development is to not touch scrolling, however, I’m on the iPhone and it’s seems to be faster than native scroll, and surprisingly it feels very good!

donohoe3• 1 year ago

I wholly agree on leaving scrolling as-is. We’ve done it sparingly in other projects with caution.

For this one, we did not interfere with scrolling behavior.

baobabKoodaa• 1 year ago

Hey, could you please post a before/after HDR of one of the images?

OisinMoran3• 1 year ago

Wow this is gorgeous! Well done. Oddly this one doesn't work on my Google Pixel, while the emoji one does.

donohoe3• 1 year ago

I know Apple devices support HDR but won’t use it if you have a low battery. I wonder it’s something similar?

chromatin• 1 year ago

Looks incredible (Firefox)

mattlondon• 1 year ago

FWIW this does not work on my device (pixel 9 pro) but the emoji one does.

dmd• 1 year ago

To forestall confusion: If the smiley face on the right is not much much brighter than the page background (which is #ffffff), then your hardware does not support this and you are not seeing what others are seeing.

ZeWaka• 1 year ago

To forestall more confusion: If your system is set to dark mode, the page background is not #fff, and is instead #1d1e20.

moron4hire• 1 year ago

There's a dark/light mode switcher at top of the page, but the page background still looks grey, even when going to another page on the blog that doesn't have the HDR images.

zimpenfish• 1 year ago

If the smiley face on the right is not much much brighter than the page background [...] then your hardware does not support this

Or you're using Safari because my hardware absolutely does support this (tested in Chrome and I am thankful that Safari does not support it because good grief.)

astrange4• 1 year ago

A funny thing I've noticed in Safari is that the play buttons on video elements are HDR white, and so the screen will adapt (turn grey) when you scroll past one.

kllrnohj8• 1 year ago

and I am thankful that Safari does not support it because good grief

Safari absolutely will support HDR images if it doesn't already. It might not support this PNG hack, but it's inevitable that it'll support HDR HEVC or JPEG images since those are what's produced by iOS and Android cameras respectively, and they obviously aren't going to just ignore them.

nine_k• 1 year ago

Works in mobile Chrome, not in mobile Firefox; increases the overall screen brightness a bit to add the dynamic range. Shines!

jessewilson• 1 year ago

Instructions on turning ’em off: https://github.com/swankjesse/hdr-emojis

1970-01-01• 1 year ago

Thanks, I hate it.

ChrisArchitect• 1 year ago

HDR-Infused Slack emoji that is, not unicode emojis.

dangoodmanUT• 1 year ago

HDR is terrible

The fact that you can't turn it off system wide shows the macOS leadership is asleep at the wheel

Night_Thastus• 1 year ago

HDR is terribly implemented, in most cases. (Especially Windows)

macOS handles it about the best of the bunch.

What I hate is on Windows, you need to basically explicitly set the program, the OS, and the monitor into an "HDR mode". Then, once you're done, you need to un-set it or the colors and brightness will be screwed up.

That is tedious AF. I refuse to use it until it doesn't require constantly toggling crap on and off.

benbayard• 1 year ago

I think with Windows 11 it's a little easier now. At least, I don't have to do this for playing games in HDR. But I can't take screenshots or record videos this way using most built-in tools. Like window's screencapture tools and steams tools.

jofzar3• 1 year ago

Not to mention the default hdr mapping is just mega bad.

Even nvidias was wrong for a while.

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/1b03yfg/rtx_hdr_pap...

I just want my hdr mapping to work

LoganDark9• 1 year ago

The fact that you can't turn it off system wide shows the macOS leadership is asleep at the wheel

You totally can, at least on Apple's XDR displays.

Just go to System Settings -> Displays -> Preset and change it from "Apple XDR Display (P3-1600 nits)" (or whatever) to "Internet & Web (sRGB)". You lose the ability to change screen brightness (I assume because you're locked to reference brightness), but HDR is fully off.

AlanYx• 1 year ago

That option only works with Apple's XDR enabled displays (internal and external). For non-Apple external displays with HDR10, there's a separate "High Dynamic Range" toggle in the display settings in the display. On some Intel macs, if you open Display preferences while holding down the Option key, another option appears to disable simulated HDR. I'm not sure how to disable simulated HDR on the internal display of current Macbook Airs.

pier252• 1 year ago

I love HDR for movies/shows on OLED but other than that I agree. It really sucks you can't disable HDR in apps like Netflix etc. It does look terrible on non OLED TVs. In Chrome you can force a specific color profile in the settings. I believe sRGB shouldn't allow HDR content.

Personally I think the biggest benefit of HDR is not even those super bright annoying colors but 10-12 bit colors and the fact that we can finally have dark content. If you look at movies from 10-20 years ago everything is so damn bright.

tshaddox3• 1 year ago

That strikes me as an odd opinion. Surely the colorspaces and display technologies that predate HDR had as much dynamic range as they could reasonably squeeze out of the technology at the time. Is it the brightness specifically that bugs you? I could understand that, although brightness is not directly related to HDR (in the same way that loudness in digital audio is not directly related to bit depth).

Of course I do agree that these things should be configurable. And on my MacBook Pro, I can set the built-in display to sRGB. Is that option not available on your particular Mac and display?

astrange4• 1 year ago

That strikes me as an odd opinion. Surely the colorspaces and display technologies that predate HDR had as much dynamic range as they could reasonably squeeze out of the technology at the time.

Some of it was just bad historical decisions. In particular SDR video only uses the values 16-235 instead of 0-255 because of some NTSC compatibility thing I don't quite remember. That's a huge loss!

bigstrat2003• 1 year ago

Agreed. I've used it on my PS4, and all that it accomplished was an annoying screen blank and restart every time I started a game which used HDR. It didn't actually make anything look better. I turned it off after some experimentation and I don't plan to ever mess with it again with how underwhelming it was.

LoganDark9• 1 year ago

Fun fact: On "XDR displays" (such as recent MacBook Pros and also Apple's new Studio Display XDR), you can actually decrease the display brightness to see more dynamic range.

Here is a recording of this happening for those who can't experience it for for themselves:

https://logandark.net/files/2QN2R1P3-26295O2O-9045N31P-P2POQ... (6.7 MB / 6.4 MiB)

(sorry for the terrible quality, it was a very lazy recording)

nialv7• 1 year ago

Works great in Chrome and Slack, and not at all on Android devices.

Hurmm it does work for me in Chrome on Android.

Spunkie• 1 year ago

Doesn't seem to work at all on linux in any browser I test. My laptop and distro support HDR and it's turned on.

A_Duck• 1 year ago

Here are all the emojis in HDR format, ready to import to Slack

My apologies to your co-workers

https://we.tl/t-CV83O4r74f

MasterScrat2• 1 year ago

More HDR shenanigans from some time ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36389285

Demo: https://notes.dt.in.th/HDRQRCode

Interestingly that one worked on iPhone, while the new emojis one doesn't

WhyNotHugo• 1 year ago

Nice! Using HDR to improve contraste of a QR code is a really neat idea.

MasterScrat2• 1 year ago

On MacOS, if you toggle the OS from dark to light mode and back, you can see for a second the HDR effect being turned off

basisword• 1 year ago

This worked well on my iPhone but my M3 MacBook Pro doesn't seem to render the HDR version of the image in Safari. Is that expected? Pretty sure the Photos app works with HDR.

sgt• 1 year ago

Yes, that is expected. I think it is intentional as it can be pretty disturbing.

ALLTaken• 1 year ago

Here's how you do that in CSS4!

For an image or video:

- https://github.com/ccameron-chromium/hdr-headroom-limit/blob...

- https://drafts.csswg.org/css-color-hdr/#controlling-dynamic-...

For a canvas element:

- https://github.com/w3c/ColorWeb-CG/blob/hdr_canvas_r2/hdr_ht...

Resource: https://www.w3.org/TR/mediaqueries-5/#dynamic-range

ValveFan69692• 1 year ago

I don't have any interest in HDR. HDR is a very new technology that is just a gimmick. The human eye is barely able to perceive more than a few colors. Therefore anything above 16.7 million colors is not useful. And even that is overkill, 250-300 shades of a single color is more than enough for anybody.

jjcm2• 1 year ago

I was playing around with this a ton yesterday.

One thing I was attempting to do was create an emoji that only had partial portions that had their brightness maxed, while the rest of the emoji displayed "normally". It turns out this was quite hard to do - most filters or scripts such as the one on this page simply max out the channels, which creates a "fried" look to the image.

Gimp luckily has support for this, but getting an existing image to display the "same" with the new color space proved fairly difficult. I found this curve to be the best starting point, after which I edited things from there manually: https://image.non.io/a3c227d4-56d6-40bd-a898-3879fd062cf3.we...

I used this to create a companion emoji to the :mean-jacob: emoji (https://html.non.io/emoji/mean-jacob.png) my team is quite fond of using (I'm Jacob). I made :angel-jacob:, which has a halo that shines with the brightness of a thousand suns. I don't expect my team will use it, but still it was a fun exercise: https://html.non.io/emoji/

matsemann2• 1 year ago

Thanks for this! I was also trying to do the same, what I ended up doing was making a mask and only apply the multiply/pow to things inside that mask, but the profile still messed up the colors of the remaining pixels. So I dimmed the parts not in the mask by taking away -30% saturation or so. But your result is much better, will try it.

neilv• 1 year ago

This creates an additional reason to run Firefox: innate HDR abuse blocking. :)

jillyboel• 1 year ago

It's just a white circle in firefox on linux and android, looks terrible. Even in chrome it looks terrible, are the eyes supposed to be red?

0xTJ• 1 year ago

I'm on Wayland, and get very different results between Firefox and Chromium. On the former, it's white with yellow eyes and mouth, while on the latter the face is yellowish, with whites in the eyes, and red pupils and mouth.

ValentineC• 1 year ago

Thanks to swankjesse's GitHub repo in a different comment, I learnt that it's possible to disable HDR on Chrome by setting the force-color-profile flag to sRGB:

chrome://flags/#force-color-profile

paradox460• 1 year ago

Works great in Chrome and Slack, and not at all on Android devices

Working fine here on my pixel 8 in Vivaldi

pxc2• 1 year ago

To someone with light sensitivity issues, stumbling upon HDR content like this usually feels like an unexpected act of violence. I wish my phone featured a way to turn this off globally, as it's absolutely brutal in those endless video feed apps.

The first emoji here is just too bright. Even with my phone on low brightness, it's too blinding compared to everything else.

BillinghamJ• 1 year ago

On iPhones, there is an option - "reduce white point" in the vision/display accessibility settings, and also low power mode. You can force low power mode to remain on with the Shortcuts app

pxc2• 1 year ago

That sounds very good. Unfortunately in this instance I'm on Android.

aizk• 1 year ago

This is exactly the kind of stuff I come to hacker news for.

markrages• 1 year ago

The Loudness War has come to Slack.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudness_war

globular-toast2• 1 year ago

It seems this is the sad inevitability whenever a high dynamic range format doesn't include loudness/brightness normalisation in the standard. We just can't help ourselves. If I understand correctly, things like Dolby Vision do include some kind of normalisation.

notpopcorn• 1 year ago

If you take a screenshot of it, the effect is gone. The emoji and the background are just the same #ffffff in the screenshot. Seems like an easy way to make some unscreenshottable text or something. I don't know how I feel about that.

OisinMoran3• 1 year ago

works [...] not at all on Android devices.

It's working for me in Chrome on my Pixel. I've also noticed Instagram using it recently. Very fun effect, could imagine a good dark mode prank using it...

sintax• 1 year ago

To test if your OS+browser combo actually supports HDR: https://www.wide-gamut.com/test

boarnoah• 1 year ago

Ugh, that reminded me again that Firefox doesn't support HDR outside of OSX.

Although to be fair it is not like Windows in general supports HDR well for desktop use anyway, SDR colours are way too DIM like brightness is at 25%

Modified3019• 1 year ago

Here’s what I see on iPhone safari vs saving the images to photos

https://imgur.com/a/dSva7S9

What you will see however, is completely unknown.

efemoney• 1 year ago

How can one turn this off on Slack (MacOS 15.4)??? Omg I am going crazy seeing the entire screen dim except a few SCREAMING emojis

yobananaboy• 1 year ago

This also works on Slack profile pictures if you want to be extra obnoxious!

HDR‑Infused Emoji

Related Stories