Publish on your own site, syndicate elsewhere

by 47thpresident • 7 months ago

1078 248 7 months ago

doodlesdev• 7 months ago

This strategy is an alternative to PESOS (Publish Elsewhere, Syndicate (to your) Own Site) [0]. I really like this read on the indieweb website, it explains well why adopt this strategy for federation and emphasizes that "Friends are more important than federation", something a lot of nerds and hackers forget when defending their ideals.

[0] https://indieweb.org/PESOS

kgwxd• 7 months ago

You can have both! POSSE to post multiple places. PESOS to pull in anything posted directly in other places, i.e. anything that didn't originate from a POSSE post.

j45• 7 months ago

POSSE offers a single source of truth the owner owns, vs PESOS which has multiple source of truth not owned by the owner if it's an external site.

performative2• 7 months ago

superficially it makes me very happy that both strategies make very cute acronyms

fuzztester8• 7 months ago

ha ha, nice. my cowboy (western movies) take on that: ride with your POSSE to make PESOS. :)

theturtletalks3• 7 months ago

POSSE can be applied to more than just social networks, it can be used to disrupt every marketplace!

In fact, I’m building open source SaaS for every vertical and leveraging that to build an interoperable, decentralized marketplace.

Social media is a marketplace as well. The good being sold is people’s content and the cost you pay is with your attention. The marketplace’s cut is ads and selling your data.

GaryBluto• 7 months ago

If only HN had been doing this almost since it's inception. Oh wait.

01HNNWZ0MV43FF• 7 months ago

You can tell it's a good idea because Facebook and other "big enough to crush instead of cooperate" media sites down-rank you for doing it

simonw4• 7 months ago

I really like this philosophy. I've been using it for a couple of years now - everything goes on my personal site, then I post links on Mastodon, Bluesky and Twitter and sometimes (if I remember to do so) LinkedIn, plus copy and paste it all into a Substack email every week or so.

I really need to automate it though - hard on Twitter and LinkedIn but still pretty easy for Bluesky and Mastodon.

echelon• 7 months ago

If we had stuck with standard semantic web microformats, RSS/Atom syndication, FOAF-ish graphs, URIs for identity but also anonymous pubkey identities with reputation graphs - we could have built an entirely distributed social media graph that worked like email.

But alas, Facebook pushed forward too fast to counter.

There's still a chance, but the software needs to focus on simplicity and ease of use. Publishing blobs of signed content that can be added to anything - HTML pages, P2P protocols, embedded into emails and tweets - maybe we can hijack the current systems and have distributed identity and publishing take over.

alabut4• 7 months ago

I wish that were true but if ease of use is all that mattered, then micro.blog and other “Indieweb in a box” services would be as big as Bluesky, or maybe even at least as big as Mastodon.

The truth is that we’re social creatures and for social products, that means hanging out where other friends are already hanging out. It’s my personal thesis that no matter how matter how much we lower the bar to participate in the indieweb, fediverse, or other non-corporate platforms, it’s going to be inherently niche.

Which is fine. Small is beautiful.

jonasced2• 7 months ago

I agree! Do you know why anonymous pubkey identities with reputation graphs didn't stick, or any examples of it being used today? In my head that would solve one or two of the problems I see with the modern internet.

jamietanna2• 7 months ago

Have you looked at https://posseparty.com/ as a possible option? Supports integrations with those platforms and more, and "all" it needs is an Atom feed!

simonw4• 7 months ago

Ooh I hadn't seen that. I'm still hung up on character limits - I want to make sure the summary I include isn't truncated with ... and is instead the right length for that particular platform.

tolerance2• 7 months ago

I know it’s gotten some push back but to be honest I’m fond of the more manual approach that you take on HN.

While I don’t follow nor am I necessarily interested in everything that you cover, I do appreciate the presence of having something like a local “correspondent” around when you do appear to provide trails of supplementary commentary. The lengths that I see you go through to do all of this tastefully and transparently are not unnoticed.

simonw4• 7 months ago

I definitely won't be automating submission to places like HN.

I figure if you chose to follow me on Bluesky/Twitter/Mastodon/LinkedIn there's no ethical issue at all with me automating the process of having my new blog entries show up in my feeds there, as opposed to copying-and-pasting the links by hand.

ChrisArchitect• 7 months ago

Ask HN: Is starting a personal blog still worth it in the age of AI?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46268055

A website to destroy all websites

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46457784

LightBug1• 7 months ago

Awesome initiative. Will delve into this. It's how the web should be.

vegabook2• 7 months ago

This post like many recent ones like it, essentially wants the internet to go backwards to what it once was pre-LLMs [edit: and pre-concentration]. I'd like to suggest that you should follow through and go all the way to pre-internet itself, and rediscover handwriting, in-person local meeting groups, non-digital relationships, and using your hands not on a keyboard. Today I (with difficulty) left my macbook closed all day until this evening (and this comment). Small steps.

dingnuts• 7 months ago

I understand this attitude but when I look back at my rural youth I just hear you telling me that I should have had no one to talk to at all about many things.

Let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater

vegabook2• 7 months ago

You should treasure said rural youth because such lonely luxuries are rare, and will be even more so in the future. Spoken as a rural youth myself.

torh• 7 months ago

I read this as an ownership issue, where Meta owns your content as long as you post on Facebook or Instagram, and has nothing to do with LLMs.

tonyedgecombe• 7 months ago

Meta and all the other AI companies think they own it even when it’s on your site.

BeetleB• 7 months ago

+1 for writing letters. I do it with two people (one lives in the same city!)

But it's not an either/or proposition.

Also, keep in mind that POSSE and this site predate LLMs by quite a bit.

ozgrakkurt• 7 months ago

LLMs had no impact on how content is organized as far as I can tell.

Some people are just using it to post more garbage into the platforms they already were using

xenophonf• 7 months ago

Someone recommended Posse Party in a now deleted comment, but beware its (ambiguous and poorly written, if you ask me) noncommercial license:

https://github.com/searlsco/posse_party/blob/main/LICENSE.tx...

dieselgate• 7 months ago

It’s almost like HN is a great platform for the POSSE model!

Awesome share thanks for the link. Will send to a family member who is looking to gain viewership with their writing - they usually post on medium I think.

Zaskoda• 7 months ago

We followed this practice at a Non-Profit I volunteered for some years ago. For us, it was motivated by a few reasons:

- we trained the community around us to look to our website first for the most recent news and information

- we did not want a social media platform to be able to cut us off from our community (on purpose or accident) by shuttering accounts or groups

- we did not want to require our users have accounts on any 3rd party platforms in order to access our postings

- but we still wanted to distribute our messaging across any platforms where large groups of our community members frequently engaged

Another aspect of our process that was specific to our situation and outside of POSSE - we only posted one topic/issue/announcement per blog post. We had a news letter that would summarize each of these. Many organizations like ours would post summaries of many things to a single blog post, basically the same as the newsletter. However, this was cumbersome. For example, if someone in the community had a question, it was much clearer to link to a single post on our site that answered the question AND ONLY answered that question. It made for much better community engagement, better search engine indexing, cleaner content management, and just a better experience for everyone involved.

RyanOD• 7 months ago

"we did not want to require our users have accounts on any 3rd party platforms in order to access our postings"

1000x yes to this! It can be really frustrating when a link takes me to FB, TW, IG, etc. - none of which I use.

theshrike796• 7 months ago

It's embarrassing how many official non-us politicians, parties and organisations use Twitter as their main communication method.

foxfired5• 7 months ago

I've restarted blogging last year, going from a handful of blog post to, publishing consistently. All content gets published on my blog first. I've seen an ~8x increase of traffic. I was affected by zero-clicks from Google's AI overview, but the bulk of my traffic now comes from RSS readers.

I published a write up just this morning: https://idiallo.com/blog/what-its-like-blogging-in-2025

NetOpWibby• 7 months ago

Hell yeah! Just subscribed.

I want to add analytics to my blog too, haven't had any on my sites for about a decade.

acessoproibido3• 7 months ago

Maybe a dumb question but why?

Im a firm believer that data collected that doesnt have a clear action associated with it is meaningless - and i couldnt think of an action i would take if my traffic goes up or down on my personal blog - but tbh i mainly blog for myself not really to build an audience, so our objectives might differ

foxfired5• 7 months ago

Just an FYI, the data collected to make those conclusion was through the server log (Apache2 in my case). So if you run your own server or VPS, you already have this information.

casualscience2• 7 months ago

These are impressive metrics, are you able to make a living off of your 10M views?

I'm planning to leave my job this year and focus on content, mostly have been considering YouTube, but if blogging can work too, might consider that as well

foxfired5• 7 months ago

Not even close to making a living! It does pay for my server though which costs $15 a month. YouTube gives you much more visibility. I'll try to compile the numbers from my single Carbon ad placement and the donations I receive from readers.

But I also don't think I have the process in place to do Blog, YouTube, Podcast and hold a full time job. Yes the job is my source of income.

theshrike796• 7 months ago

Making a living on "content" is really hard, subscribers or views don't turn directly into income.

At some point you're getting sponsors to pay for it and then it get complicated.

nunobrito• 7 months ago

Good article, learned quite a bit.

mtlynch• 7 months ago

the bulk of my traffic now comes from RSS readers.

I don't think this is correct unless you mean strictly the number of HTTP requests to your web server.

You were the 9th most popular blogger on HN in 2025.[0] Your post says you have about 500 readers via RSS. How can that represent more readers than people who read your posts through HN? I'd guess HN brought you about 1M visitors in 2025 based on the number of your front page posts.

[0] https://refactoringenglish.com/tools/hn-popularity/domain/?d...

foxfired5• 7 months ago

You are right, my statement may be a bit misleading or incomplete. The ~500 readers are not just local rss bots, but they include aggregate RSS bots. For example, I see the feedly reporting ~200 subscribers, newsreader reporting 50 subscribers, feedbin, etc. Each of those only have between 1 to 3 ip addresses. So for each RSS bot, there are an arbitrary number of actual users reading. I can't track those accurately.

However, users can click on an RSS feed article and read it directly on my blog. These have a URL param that tells me they are coming from the feed. When an article isn't on HNs frontpage, the majority of traffic is coming from those feeds.

By the way, thank you for sharing this tool. Very insightful.

merelysounds2• 7 months ago

Syndication can be done fully automatically by the server

At the risk of stating the obvious: this can get tricky, many popular social media platforms restrict automated posting. Policies around automation and/or api usage can change often and may not even be fully public as some might overlap anti spam measures.

acessoproibido3• 7 months ago

Havent been able to figure this out for Instagram - also the only social media that is still relevant for me. (thankfully?) never got into twitter where it seems to be easy.

theturtletalks3• 7 months ago

How does Buffer[0] operate then? Even an open-source alternative to Buffer, Postiz[1], offers Instagram.

0. https://buffer.com

1. https://github.com/gitroomhq/postiz-app

stogot• 7 months ago

Wasn’t Buffer something else in the past? Did they pivot?

merelysounds2• 7 months ago

How does Buffer operate then?

Buffer documents a number of workflows and limitations in their FAQs.

E.g. for a non-professional Instagram account, the user gets a notification to manually share a post via the Instagram app.

you can prepare your post in Buffer, receive a notification on your mobile device when it’s time to post, then tap the notification and copy your post over to the social network to finish posting.

source: https://support.buffer.com/article/658-using-notification-pu...

acessoproibido3• 7 months ago

I really want to implement this, but i havent been able to figure out how to do it for Instagram (the only social media that is really relevant in my friend circle) and whatsapp/signal groups other than doing it manually. If anyone has tips, especially for Insta let me know...

pwdisswordfishy8• 7 months ago

Here's a tip: don't bother doing this. Go PESOS instead. One way to do it:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46482285

cosmicgadget2• 7 months ago

I don't do any syndication so my self-published site is simply a POS :'(

Somewhat related, predictions for the future of the web by IWC contritbutors:

https://vhbelvadi.com/indieweb-carnival-round-up-dec-2025

softwaredoug• 7 months ago

I am not so sure. You need to speak in the native voice of each community. A LinkedIn post vs Tweet vs E-Mail are different. You need to get value from the network directly without expecting a click thru. A lot of engagement + authority happens via the network itself

I think it's more accurate to see blogging as a distinct channel from other types of social media + content marketing

alabut4• 7 months ago

That’s a good take and is underrated. It’s what has kept me from completely automating everything in favor of a semi-automated approach instead of doing the “spray and pray” approach of blasting everywhere.

Follow-up comments and engaging with others after posting is big too. People that “syndicate” without actually engaging on each platform are like some weird proselytizers that show up to a house party and hand out flyers to their own weird shindig without talking to anyone there.

Yokohiii• 7 months ago

LinkedIn? I think LinkedIn is the only platform that demands a specific style that is completely alien to the internet.

nicbou5• 7 months ago

I can confirm. I post across 5 platforms and each has its own regulars and its own vibe. The tone of my posts is slightly different on each.

The general idea for me is that I crosspost short messages about what I am current working on, but the actual finished product is self-hosted. Deleting any of the accounts will not result in lost information.

susam5• 7 months ago

Also, don't forget to set up an RSS or Atom feed for your website. Contrary to the recurring claim that RSS is dead, most of the traffic to my website still comes from RSS feeds, even in 2̶0̶2̶5̶ 2026! In fact, one of my silly little games became moderately popular because someone found it in my RSS feed and shared it on HN. [1]

From the referer (sic) data in my web server logs (which is not completely reliable but still offers some insight), the three largest sources of traffic to my website are:

1. RSS feeds - People using RSS aggregator services as well as local RSS reader tools.

2. Newsletters - I was surprised to discover just how many tech newsletters there are on the Web and how active their user bases are. Once in a while, a newsletter picks up one of my silly or quirky posts, which then brings a large number of visits from its followers.

3. Search engines - Traffic from Google, DuckDuckGo, Bing and similar search engines. This is usually for specific tools, games and HOWTO posts available on my website that some visitors tend to return to repeatedly.

[1] https://susam.net/from-web-feed-to-186850-hits.html

vasco• 7 months ago

The question is, do you have this traffic because of RSS client crawlers that pre-loaded the content or from real users. I'm not pro killing RSS by the way, but genuinely doubtful.

susam5• 7 months ago

The question is, do you have this traffic because of RSS client crawlers that pre-loaded the content or from real users.

I have never seen RSS clients or crawlers preload actual HTML pages. I've only seen them fetching the XML feed and present its contents to the users.

When I talk about visitors arriving at my website from RSS feeds, I am not counting requests from feed aggregators or readers identified by their 'User-Agent' strings. Those are just software tools fetching the XML feed. I'm not talking about them. What I am referring to are visits to HTML pages on my website where the 'Referer' header indicates that the client came from an RSS aggregator service or feed reader.

It is entirely possible that many more people read my posts directly in their feed readers without ever visiting my site, and I will never be aware of them, as it should be. For the subset of readers who do click through from their feed reader and land on my website, those visits are recorded in my web server logs. My conclusions are based on that data.

victorbjorklund• 7 months ago

Same argument can be made about all podcasts.

ronbenton2• 7 months ago

RSS is my preferred way to consume blog posts. I also find blogs that have an RSS feed to be more interested in actually writing interesting content rather than just trying to get views/advertise. I guess this makes sense—hard to monetize views through an RSS reader

threetonesun• 7 months ago

It's funny back in the Google Reader days monetizing via RSS was quite common. You'd publish the truncated version to RSS and force someone to visit the site for the whole version, usually just in exchange for ad views. Honestly while it wasn't the greatest use of RSS it was better than most paid blogs today being ad-wall pop-up pay-gate nightmares of UX.

cosmic_cheese2• 7 months ago

Based on my own personal usage, it makes total sense that RSS feeds still get a surprising number of hits. I have a small collection of blogs that I follow and it's much easier to have them all loaded up in my RSS reader of choice than it is to regularly stop by each blog in my browser, especially for blogs that seldomly post (and are easy to forget about).

Readers come with some nice bonus features, too. All of them have style normalization for example and native reader apps support offline reading.

If only there were purpose-built open standards and client apps for other types of web content…

ungreased0675• 7 months ago

Do you have a recommended iOS RSS feed reader?

neilv3• 7 months ago

Now that browser developers did their best to kill RSS/Atom...

Does a Web site practically need to do anything to advertise their feed to the diehard RSS/Atom users, other than use the `link` element?

Is there a worthwhile convention for advertising RSS/Atom visually in the page, too?

(On one site, I tried adding an "RSS" icon, linking to the Atom feed XML, alongside all the usual awful social media site icons. But then I removed it, because I was afraid it would confuse visitors who weren't very Web savvy, and maybe get their browser displaying XML or showing them an error message about the MIME content type.)

rednafi6• 7 months ago

I removed all the bullshit social media icons and made sure that the rss icon is the first thing you notice on the landing page[1].

[1] https://rednafi.com

data_base• 7 months ago

I use RSS Style[1] to make the RSS and Atom feeds for my blog human readable. It styles the xml feeds and inserts a message at the top about the feed being meant for news readers, not people. Thus technically making it "safe" for less tech savvy people.

[1] https://www.rss.style/

crabmusket• 7 months ago

Shout out to Vivaldi, which renders RSS feeds with a nice default "card per post" style. Not to mention that it also has a feed reader built in as well.

frogulis• 7 months ago

Is there any reason today to use RSS over Atom? Atom sounds like it has all the advantages, except maybe compatibility with some old or stubborn clients?

cromka• 7 months ago

People still refer to all these as RSS, even if Atom is actually in use.

talideon2• 7 months ago

RSS itself provides no benefits over Atom. In fact, you're quite likely to see a bunch of RSS feeds that use elements from the Atom namespace.

You should just use Atom.

alwillis• 7 months ago

A great summary why Atom is better [1].

Here's an oldie but a goodie regarding RSS vs Atom [2]

[1] https://ittavern.com/difference-between-rss-and-atom/

[2] http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/Rss20AndAtom10Compared

renegat0x0• 7 months ago

Also curated list of rss sources

https://github.com/rumca-js/Internet-feeds

ekianjo• 7 months ago

How do you measure the traffic coming from the RSS feeds?

rcarmo2• 7 months ago

You add UTM tags to the links, like everyone else.

susam5• 7 months ago

I do not deliberately measure traffic. And I certainly never put UTM parameters in URLs as a sibling comment mentioned, because I find them ugly. My personal website is a passion project and I care about its aesthetics, including the aesthetics of its URLs, so I would never add something like UTM parameters to them.

I only occasionally look at the HTTP 'Referer' header in my web server logs and filter them, out of curiosity. That is where I find that a large portion of my daily traffic comes via RSS feeds. For example, if the 'Referer' header indicates that the client landed on my website from, say, <https://www.inoreader.com/>, then that is a good indication that the client found my new post via the RSS feed shown in their feed aggregator account (Inoreader in this example).

Also, if the logs show that a client IP address with the 'User-Agent' header set to something like 'Emacs Elfeed 3.4.2' fetches my '/feed.xml' and then the same client IP address later visits a new post on my website, that is a good indication that the client found my new post in their local feed reader (Elfeed in this example).

xenator• 7 months ago

For incoming traffic you can use ?from=rss or utm. To measure traffic to rss itself just parse server logs

pwdisswordfishy8• 7 months ago

Please also enable CORS[1] for your RSS feed. (If your whole site is a static site, then please just enable CORS site-wide. This is how GitHub Pages works. There's pretty much no reason not to.)

Not having CORS set up for your RSS feed means that browser-based feed readers won't be able to fetch your feed to parse it (without running a proxy).

1. <https://enable-cors.org/>

senfiaj2• 7 months ago

You can try https://corsproxy.io/ as a workaround.

ronbenton2• 7 months ago

I still feel RSS was the pinnacle. Of course it’s a personal preference, but I much prefer letting people pull my content than pushing it onto them.

manuelmoreale2• 7 months ago

It’s also a lot less wasteful and more respectful in my opinion. Scattering content everywhere in the hope others will see it doesn’t feel right to me.

nesk_• 7 months ago

Just discovered https://posseparty.com/ to ease your cross-posting.

jamietanna2• 7 months ago

I've been doing this for years with my site, and it's brought me a lot of joy that I can go back and search my site for various posts I've made over the last decade across all the platforms I use - I have a more high friction setup, but that's because of my own terrible choices

nicbou5• 7 months ago

This is my approach and I fully recommend it. My personal website is my canonical home address on the web. It has outlived a few platforms and many rounds of enshittification.

A few caveats:

- You will have different communities on each social network. Your personal website might be home to you, but to your users, it's not. You're just another creator on their platform of choice.

- Each community has its own vibe, and commands slightly different messaging. This is partly due to the format each platform allows. Each post will create parallel but different conversations.

- Dumping links is frowned upon. You should be a genuine participant in each community, even if you just repost the same stuff. Automation does not help much there.

- RSS and newsletters are the only audiences that you control, and they're worth growing. Everywhere else, people who explicitly want to follow you might never see your updates.

- You should own the domain you post to. This is your address on the internet, and it should stay yours

- People do check your personal website. I was surprised to hear friends and acquaintances refer to things I post on my website.

starkparker2• 7 months ago

I've found that managing the conversations across venues is way harder than publishing to them, and POSSE doesn't address this except for one line about backfeeds/"reverse syndication", which most mainstream services either don't support or actively sabotage. It easily takes more effort to engage across services than to post across them.

jdthedisciple• 7 months ago

How do you fellow HN'ers separate their online with their corporate identity and day job?

I cannot rid myself of the suspicion that your average boss is going to have a prying eye on your online activities and may even use them against you one way or another e.g. if you offer services/work on side projects that may in any way may compete w/ your employer.

Anyone got experience to share in that regard?

Thinking about this famous precedent: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27424195#27425041

sailorganymede• 7 months ago

IDK, your average boss is just a dude who has bills to pay and mouths to feed. They don't really care what happens as long as you're not doing something stupid, especially visibly and on their time.

decryption• 7 months ago

My experience is that bosses read my blog, then when they or a fellow manager need to hire someone, have reached out to me asking me to apply. So it cuts both ways - maybe your shitty boss sees you blogging and sharing your experience, but a good boss will see that and go "I want this passionate and curious person to work for me".

rectang• 7 months ago

I only work for small companies that don’t have any business interest in areas where I want to maintain independent side projects.

When a startup I was working at made a successful exit and got acquired my a major corporation that did have business interests which overlapped with my side projects, I refused the bonus contract and froze my side project activity until leaving about a year later.

Don’t get cute. Avoid side projects that compete with your employer, and disclose unrelated side projects properly so that your employer is forced to acknowledge them. Do what it takes to avoid entanglement, making sacrifices if necessary.

RadiozRadioz• 7 months ago

Use a pseudonym, don't cross-contaminate

crashabr• 7 months ago

The concept seems trivial and widely used by many existing bloggers (and the default for most media outlets) so I feel like I'm missing something.

starkparker2• 7 months ago

It's very much not an obvious pattern to people who haven't blogged or don't read blogs.

MichaelWhi• 7 months ago

I also thought this and didn’t get the point. But the link was published 2013 and maybe for users not used to personal blogs but only social media nowadays it’s worth mentioning…

theshrike796• 7 months ago

People spend immense amounts of time writing intricate comments and guides on Meta platforms and nowhere else.

They wouldn't even need to host them anywhere, just have the same text on a device they own and control.

So fucking much is lost when a FB group just suddenly disappears along with all of the time people have spent writing on them.

hoherd• 7 months ago

One of the biggest steps down in Facebook history was their removal of RSS syndication. There was a time in the past when you could subscribe your Facebook account to external RSS feeds. The entries in those feeds would create new content on your "Facebook wall". This essentially let you use any third party that supported RSS to publish content into your Facebook feed.

Facebook removed that feature. The effect of this was that people had to create content within facebook instead of outside it. This reoriented the flow of content creation so that it must originate inside of Facebook, removing the ability to use FB as a passive consumer of content created in a workflow where the creators chose the entire flow.

IMHO this is one of the biggest steps down ever in FB history. It was one of the biggest attacks on the open web, and I'm sad to say that it mostly worked, and the internet at large is worse as a result.

wombatpm• 7 months ago

The other step down was when you had to pay in order to guarantee that your post was seen by all of your followers.

0xpgm• 7 months ago

I guess it happens when engineers stop driving decisions and the finance people take over. Won't be too good for the company's valuation if people can access the content elsewhere.

I guess that's why Discord is also locked down as much. They have community content that is inaccessible anywhere else but Discord.

alex11385• 7 months ago

Yeah but Zuck has always been a nasty piece of work. He wasn't "just young" and "grew up" when he wrote those IMs. See: (to list just one) the constant copying of Snapchat

nicbou5• 7 months ago

To be fair, it benefits a platform’s users to reduce automated posts in favour of real contributions.

fuzztester8• 7 months ago

I don't like this engineers vs. finance people / MBA divide that I see parroted a lot on HN. And obviously, it's parroted by engineers.

Like, all engineers are saints and the other side are all sinners. What crap. Get real, guys. There are all kinds of multicolored and multidimensional people.

Having been on all 3 or 4 or 5 of these sides :) (dev, sysadm, manager, consultant, ...), I have seen that.

Grow up, folks, and enjoy life in all its richness.

clickety_clack• 7 months ago

It’s hard to believe now, but Facebook was a good product for a while there.

pmdr4• 7 months ago

That's why I wonder if, deep down, Zuck realizes the walled slop garden he's ultimately created instead of what it looked like he'd set out to create 18-20 years ago.

sehugg2• 7 months ago

2011. This in my memory is the year of the industry-wide vibe shift from open APIs to walled gardens/cesspools.

alex11385• 7 months ago

Speaking of industry wide shift, how many companies has FB fucked up by proxy?

I refer to the video metrics scandal. How many video autoplay and other things has everyone felt obliged to copy because Zuckerberg (who seems to care about nobody) made FB into a fradulent company?

bjhess• 7 months ago

EchoFeed is a lovely service to enable this regardless of what service you use to publish on your own site (so long as it supports RSS/Atom/JSON). I've used it to good effect for my blog in the past.

https://echofeed.app/

ozim• 7 months ago

Downside is “elsewhere” is going to cut your reach when you post a link because they want their users to stay in their estate.

aussieguy1234• 7 months ago

Medium API is mentioned

But this is no longer available.

You have to copy and paste the article into Medium manually unfortunately.

156890237• 7 months ago

kkkjh

rednafi6• 7 months ago

I've used Twitter to publish my thoughts for years. In the beginning, I'd write multiple threads to get my points across.

Then, when Twitter started supporting longer tweets, I started publishing essays and it got the job done.

But at the end of each year, it was really hard to trace all my posts and write reviews about them. That's exactly what brought me to POSSE. I've been maintaining my blog[1] since early 2020 and it feels really good to know that I own my stuff. Plus, over the years, it has opened up so many doors for me.

Too bad many of these walled-garden platforms have now started to demote posts if they contain external URLs. I'm battling that by posting the links as a comment to the original post, which contains a cover photo of the blog.

[1] https://rednafi.com

cdrnsf• 7 months ago

I take this approach with everything I post, though I only syndicate to Mastodon. I have an RSS and JSON feed for each of the content types (they all have different schema) on my site: posts, links, books, movies, concerts, status updates and a combined feed. I also maintain an ICS calendar subscription of upcoming album releases.

These items, in turn, can be optionally syndicated to Mastodon when published. For status updates, I have a field that supports Mastodon-specific text (for mentions and so forth).

I also expose an oembed endpoint that returns the appropriate data for each content type for platforms that support it.

Everything I read is from RSS feeds I follow via freshRSS. Links are saved to linkding and are transformed into TTS "podcasts" that are sent to audiobookshelf.

XCSme• 7 months ago

Don't most social platforms tank reach if you add a link to your post or as a first comment?

lazarus016• 7 months ago

I just started building my own website today with Django. I’m doing it because I just enjoy doing it. Most of my work is in data and ML infrastructure and it is just killing me. Working on the front end has opened my mind to possibility and given me new inspiration.

I love hn and was inspired by all the devs who have their own site. I was drowning in work, but put the Django architecture together on vacation, started putting things together today and it’s been a blast.

I don’t enjoy social media and was thinking to posse intrinsically.

I appreciate this post and the authors perspective.

eleventen• 7 months ago

What features did you want for your personal site that lead to choosing Django (or a backend framework at all) instead of a static site generator?

lazarus016• 7 months ago

I just wanted to learn how to create an enterprise grade web application. I read a book on Django last year and did a few tutorials and enjoyed it. I also deploy infra on gcp and it works well there. It cost about $60/month for baseline hosting with light traffic/storage. I will probably use it for an interface for some of my ml projects. I was also looking into dart/flutter a much steeper learning curve for me personally.

1dom• 7 months ago

SSGs are good for static sites with no interactivity or feedback. If you want interactivity or feedback, someone (you or a 3rd party service provider) is going to have to run a server.

If you're running a server anyway, it seems trivial to serve content dynamically generated from markdown - all an SSG pipeline adds is more dependencies and stuff to break.

I know there's a fair few big nerd blogs powered by static sites, but when you really consider the full stack and frequency of work that's being done or the number of 3rd party external services they're having to depend on, they'd have been better by many metrics if the nerds had just written themselves a custom backend from the start.

rbbydotdev• 7 months ago

Very similar to what I’m building with opal editor. The “site” is static markdown which lives and is stored in your browser, css, images, markdown and html. You can keep it as is with markdown or compile to html. From there you can easily push to vercel GitHub cloudflare netlify. Cheating the server less bit of it by using CORS proxies

https://opaledx.com

https://github.com/rbbydotdev/opal

MIT and open source no documentation yet. But coming very soon

OgsyedIE• 7 months ago

I'd like to have a POSSE setup for video with a landing page, a static image and transcript, a download button for very slowly downloading the video, metadata and links to instantly-available external copies so that I can channel as much of the server costs that video entails to the big platforms.

Has anybody written about adapting POSSE for videos?

fsflover• 7 months ago

Sounds like using your own PeerTube instance.

searls3• 7 months ago

POSSE Party (http://posseparty.com) supports syndicating YouTube Shorts and Instagram reels, but trying to syndicate longer form video just didn't make sense IMO

est2• 7 months ago

I really wish Bsky/mastodon has something like RSS so I can static host them for both publishing and aggregating .

jjude• 7 months ago

Doesn't bsky support rss: profile_url/rss ?

For example: This is rss for Simon Willison: https://bsky.app/profile/simonwillison.net/rss

est2• 7 months ago

I wish I could host the RSS and the bsky network can accept them.

benwerd• 7 months ago

I must say, it's delightful to see this on the front page of HN.

A lot of people have been following indieweb POSSE principles for almost 15 years: publishing on their own site and syndicating elsewhere. I built my own platform for it that I used for 11 years, but you can use just about anything.

What's superb about the indieweb principles is that they're as simple as the web itself. It's worth digging into microformats, webmention, micropub, and the other lightweight standards the community has nurtured. It's all really good work that will become even more useful as more people turn away from centralized social media and AI-saturated services towards human websites. The indieweb is a slow burn but a really vibrant, growing, human community.

Fiveplus• 7 months ago

The concept is sound, but the syndicate part is becoming increasingly hostile to maintain. I used to have scripts that auto-posted to twitter, facebook and reddit. Over the last two years, almost all of those broke due to API paywalls or aggressive bot detection.

I've found that "POSSE" is shifting more toward "Publish on Own Site, Manually Link Elsewhere."

Paradoxically, ActivityPub (mastodon/fediverse) is the only place where true automated syndication is still reliable. I think the future of POSSE isn't trying to hack together API keys for walled gardens, but treating your personal site as a fedi instance so the syndication is native.

pastel87392• 7 months ago

I wish there was a way to plug in Fedi hosting with a static site generator, but iirc the protocol currently doesn’t allow that

rsolva• 7 months ago

For basic functionality, it is possible! https://paul.kinlan.me/adding-activity-pub-to-your-static-si...

mands• 7 months ago

I recently found out about https://micro.blog/ which I think is in a similar vein (https://micro.blog/about/indieweb), but as a hosted service.

joeross• 7 months ago

It’s the easiest out of the box way to embrace POSSE.

kazinator• 7 months ago

Posse what? You can literally publish on your own site and syndicate elsewhere using anything whatsoever, including typing .html files into /var/www, if that's your thing.

superkuh• 7 months ago

Receiving webmentions can be as simple as making a custom log in nginx and just having it save all POST to the webmention URL endpoint. I love it. And sending can be done with curl or whatever you want (ie html forms without JS).

Or, you can use any of the many community projects which handle all this backend stuff and provide it as a service.

Either extreme works. I love the indieweb set of protocols for this. Other things like ActivityPub require active interaction for the cryptographic handshake at a minimum and make simple solutions infeasible despite other benefits. Indieweb can be as complex or as simple as you want.

0xis• 7 months ago

Uplifting to see indieweb.org on HN!

However, I suffer from a lack of high-quality news sources, no matter whether they support RSS. They no longer publish online these days. And, realistically, I am not interested in most post from people I am interested in. So I just manually poll some times a month in my browser.

askvictor• 7 months ago

What blog systems (either self hosted or easy to move) do folks recommend nowadays? I'm not interested in spending much time tinkering and updating, but have enough sysadmin experience to host one myself. Was last using blogger, though trying to de-googlify my life slowly

ketzo• 7 months ago

if you're cool just writing markdown files, I really like Astro for self-hosting static content.

alabut4• 7 months ago

I’ve been an Astro user for the last two years and I can’t recommend it. RSS support isn’t native, doesn’t support anything other than plain markdown, and all of the extra magic of MDX and their custom .Astro templates is wasted without feed syndication.

My big project for sometime this year is to switch to Eleventy.

pastel87392• 7 months ago

Definitely recommend any Static Site Generator like Jekyll, Hugo, Eleventy, Astro, rolling your own, etc. it’s easy to deploy the resulting bundle on various hosting services and set up builds on git pushes.

nicbou5• 7 months ago

A single-binary static site generator would be my approach now. You can trust it to run in a few years.

I wrote my own SSG because I operate a website for a living and had specific needs. Prior to that I ran Craft CMS on the professional website and Wordpress on the personal one.

The benefit of SSGs is that the technical effort is tied to publishing. Once it’s online it stays online. You have both the human-readable source content and the static site. With traditional CMS there is a constant effort required to keep the website running. My dockerized Craft website wouldn’t start on the first few tries after a year offline.

SSGs are fantastic for building long-lasting websites with a low maintenance burden.

manuelmoreale2• 7 months ago

I know this doesn’t answer your question specifically but it might help: https://manuelmoreale.com/blog-platforms

lylo4• 7 months ago

Can I shamelessly self-promote Pagecord? Free plan plus super-cheap premium plan with loads of features. Also source available so self-hostable (arguably cheaper to let me do it for you!). Export in full HTML or static-site friendly Markdown so you’re not trapped.

https://github.com/lylo/pagecord

theshrike796• 7 months ago

Hugo is my choice, but any static site generator is good enough. You can build one yourself in an afternoon if you don't need anything fancy.

moultano• 7 months ago

A related idea that I'd like to see more people do. If you have 10-20 tweets on a subject, plug the holes and turn them into an essay on the real internet. My first step in writing https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46452763 was to copy a bunch of tweets into a doc.

Micro blogging is a great way to brainstorm and iterate on your thoughts over time, but eventually you have enough material to graduate from micro blogging to blogging, and more people should do it.

nicbou5• 7 months ago

I started POSSE microblogging. My website has an “etc.” section for tweet-like posts. It relieved the pressure to create HN-worthy posts every time. It also gives me a place to share art and links.

peterspath• 7 months ago

Add yourself to so called slashpage (https://slashpages.net) directories. I discovered a lot of personal blogs over the years from those.

Like:

- https://nownownow.com

- https://defaults.rknight.me

- https://aboutideasnow.com

- https://chrisburnell.github.io/interests-directory/

- https://bukmark.club/directory/

- https://uses.tech

I find browsing and discovering fun. So, after years of lurking I decided to make my own directory. It is called Top Four (https://topfour.net).

A /top4 page is a personal webpage where you can share your definitive ranked list of your top 3 favorites and an honorable mention. In a specific topic, such as movies, albums, snacks, games, or anything else you feel strongly about. Or read the announcement: https://peterspath.net/blog/project-top-four/

datadrivenangel• 7 months ago

Philosophically this is what we need more, but linkedin is absolutely tanking engagement for posts that have links.

pmdr4• 7 months ago

Because it's not benefiting them in any way when users leave the website, especially to some 'unsafe/unapproved' website.

ryu2k22• 7 months ago

syndicate elsewhere

That's almost a job in itself because you have to constantly make sure not to get shadowbanned. This is probably only an option for people who already use "social media" sites in the first place. Putting a link to your site in forum signatures was the way to go. Unfortunately, forums are 99% dead.

ricardobeat2• 7 months ago

Why would you get shadow banned? You think the format or backlinks would trigger bot detection systems?

ryu2k22• 7 months ago

I made an account on twitter/x specifically to promote my site at some point. I was shadowbanned by default and had to follow other people, like and share their posts and comment on other's post just to get my own posts to show up on people's feeds. When I checked again at some later point I was shadowbanned again.

When I tried reddit I also noticed that I was shadowbanned by default and didn't even bother to do anything about because I assumed it would turn out the same way. Like I said you can use those sides to get the word out, but only if you're actively using them as a user to begin with.

nacozarina• 7 months ago

reading how indie bloggers want to syndicate to big media that consistently crushes their dreams is kinda wild

lylo4• 7 months ago

This is pertinent. I’ll get hundreds of page views a day on a blog post and if that’s syndicated to X it’ll get 55 views, never to be seen again despite having 1200 followers.

Focus on publishing your own work. Syndicate if it’s effortless, otherwise don’t worry about it.

Blogging lives! :)

lylo4• 7 months ago

Great to see this here. I’ve been using EchoFeed (https://echofeed.app) to syndicate articles from my blog to social media (it uses RSS as the feed source). I also recently learned about POSSEparty (https://posseparty.com) which has more options but is self hosted.

RSS most certainly isn’t dead either. I run pagecord.com (indie blogging app) and the majority of traffic is from a huge variety of feed readers.

judah• 7 months ago

Nifty, but I see they don't support Facebook or X? That's a showstopper for a lot of people, including me.

lylo4• 6 months ago

I think posse party does but not via API (because $$$) - presume it uses other tricks to do this.

ishweta2• 7 months ago

Is it really worked as Broadcast on other Blogs

noisy_boy• 7 months ago

Because RSS readers are coming up in comments, if you are using one, which one would you recommend? For Linux AND Android?

notme43• 7 months ago

Feeder on Android is my pick. Thunderbird does RSS, and I already use it for email, so it's a nice all in one on Linux. Both can use OPML files to import/export your feeds.

talideon2• 7 months ago

I run Miniflux on a Digital Ocean droplet, and Miniflutt on my phone.

theshrike796• 7 months ago

Self-hosted FreshRSS to grab the content and reading on a Proper Browser. NetNewsWire as a mobile reader that connects to FreshRSS.

ishweta2• 7 months ago

is it really working ?

jbreckmckye2• 7 months ago

A problem I would like to see solved, is how I can post something on my site first, but still use BlueSky as a commenting platform.

I guess it could just be done as a multi phase post, as janky as that is.

_heimdall4• 7 months ago

I think webmentions would be the answer there, though I don't think Bluesky currently supports it so you'd be looking at scraping rather than a push-based model.

soapdog• 7 months ago

you can just post a message on bluesky and link it to your blog post at the end with some text saying "want to comment? Reply to this post."

Personally, I prefer using webmentions. I got them back to my site using a combination of services, so if someone talk about a post I made in bluesky or mastodon, I usually get a webmention back to the post.

randoglando• 7 months ago

I have this set up on my blog www.ashwinmenon.com

You can inspect and see the JS. There are a few others doing this too!

jbreckmckye2• 6 months ago

Thanks Ashwin - very helpful!

mark_l_watson2• 7 months ago

Q: While I agree strongly with the philosophy of this article, and twice I have set up static site generators for blogs hanging underneath my top level personal domain markwatson.com, each time I cause I could only blog when sitting at my computer, not when I was using an iPad or iPhone (I limit my daily time at a computer to just a few writing and coding sprints, otherwise I literally put my laptop away - out of sight out of mind).

Does anyone know of any mobile friendly static site generators?

I think I have about 3000 blog articles between Substack and Blogspot.

us-merul• 7 months ago

You can write your posts in Markdown, use Obsidian to sync them across devices, and render the pages in Quarto. This might not let you publish from mobile, but you can at least write them anywhere you want.

paulwetzel• 7 months ago

If you set up the static site generator as a CI/CD action in you favorite git provider, can work with both hosted GitHub, GitLab, etc. or self hosted Forgejo [1], you have both version control for your blog as well as an automatic way of publishing.

Sure, the UX is not that great as with a dedicated interface like substack, but building a Hugo site is really just editing markdown files anyway, most mobile git enabled editors should be able to do that.

[1] https://home.futuretim.io/posts/hugo_build_and_post/

mark_l_watson2• 7 months ago

Thanks!! I will try that.

pwdisswordfishy8• 7 months ago

You could use Substack/Blogspot/Mastodon themselves as your "static site generator".

POSSE (the concept linked here) is overrepresented in relation to revealed preference. PESOS (publish elsewhere, syndicate on site) is more compatible with how most people (including nerds) actually use the Internet; for all the talk about static site generators and "owning" your own "digital garden" >9/10 people would fall somewhere on the embarrassing part of the curve from the "Blogging vs. Blog Setups" comic. <https://rakhim.org/honestly-undefined/19/>

If you migrated to a fediverse instance with longer post length limits, you could use that to actually blog/post while mobile, and meanwhile you have a script on your homepage that "lazily" syncs those posts to your static site—

When anyone visits your homepage, they see your site as it was when you last built it.

When you visit your own homepage, it automatically fetches your social media feed, patches the previous input to the SSG with the new content, and then uses the APIs of whatever you're using to host your site for rolling out the new posts.

als0• 7 months ago

Does this have a negative impact on SEO or search results in general? I'm clueless about this.

rcarmo2• 7 months ago

Never stopped doing it. And my resolve strengthened when most blogs started doing summary feeds to force people to visit —- I kept doing full text feeds as a matter of course, and if it wasn’t for the Twittergeddon, I would still be automatically posting to Twitter (now I do it to Mastodon - https://mastodon.social/@taoofmac)

esafak• 7 months ago

IndieWeb: a blast from the past!

uwagar• 7 months ago

seems like the rate at which everything is going, websites may soon be dead.

sneak• 7 months ago

What’s the ideal tooling for this for videos?

yunesj• 7 months ago

I'd prefer to write markdown, publish to my static site, and cross-post to social media. I imagine I'd also want to get an overview of - or make an ad-hoc post from - one of several accounts on one of several platforms.

I came across Posse Party and Postiz, both of which are self-hosted. It doesn't seem like either is built for this use case.

Which direction would you go in?

searls3• 7 months ago

FWIW, "write markdown, publish to my static site, and cross-post to social media" is exactly what I built POSSE Party to do. All your site needs is an Atom feed to read from https://github.com/searlsco/posse_party/blob/main/docs/feed....

https://justin.searls.co/atom.xml gets flung to 8 social accounts

xtiansimon• 7 months ago

This parallels the learning paradigm of diving into some topic, write a blog post to solidify, practice, demonstrate your knowledge, and finally promote via social media. Which parallels the origin story of sharing your scientific research. It's The Way of knowledge on the internet.

I've noted here before a course from Arlington UT about this on Edx "Data, Analytics, and Learning" (2014).

Nice to have another way of describing this pattern of writing and publishing, even if it does have a funny name POSSE.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46015121 https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/19117279/CSC...

Thorrez• 7 months ago

Doesn't work with a lot of subreddits though, which ban posting links to your own site.

neves• 7 months ago

How do we deal with the fact that billionaires’ social media platforms reduce the reach of posts with links? Will we always have our posts throttled?

maknee• 7 months ago

Read through the comments. Added RSS and subscribe to my blog!

[1] https://maknee.github.io/blog/

Publish on your own site, syndicate elsewhere

Related Stories