Bing Image Creator

https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2023/03/21/create-images-with-your-words-bing-image-creator-comes-to-the-new-bing/

by staranjeet • 3 years ago

207 161 3 years ago

blogs.microsoft.com

tech234a• 3 years ago

The post links to https://bing.com/create, which has the text following text:

“You will receive emails about Microsoft Rewards, which include offers about Microsoft and partner products. You will also receive notifications about Bing Image Creator. By continuing, you agree to the Rewards Terms and Image Creator Terms below.”

dmonitor• 3 years ago

I got an ad for their password manager too. They’re pulling out all the stops for this one.

mesmertech• 3 years ago

So basically a wrapper for Dalle. More than the image thing the screenshots of "improved Bing" when you scroll to the bottom just look atrocious.

Veen• 3 years ago

Bing is shitshow of ads and cross-selling. I did a search today where every single result on the first page was an ad. But, I'm getting much better images from Bing Image Creator than I ever did from Dall-e in the OpenAI Labs version.

agolio• 3 years ago

Amazing, same as the chatGPT effect - seeing these images in papers is one thing. But having an interface where you can try it and realise that the paper examples weren't cherry-picked and the technology really is that good is something else.

First try https://www.bing.com/images/create/a-dog-driving-a-taxi/6419...

smy20011• 3 years ago

But you can already do it for a long time.

sourcecodeplz• 3 years ago

A "long time" is quite relative here because things keep moving so fast in this space. Remember that not everyone is refreshing this website or others everyday.

georgehill• 3 years ago

I have to say that I have never seen Microsoft shipping things this fast. Meanwhile, Google has just released a waitlist for AI chat, four months after ChatGPT's release https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35246260

gl-prod2• 3 years ago

Microsoft is using already released products. ChatGPT and DALL-E have been in beta for a while.

dragonwriter5• 3 years ago

Bing was the first GPT-4 instance available (yes, ChatGPT was already out, but not using GPT-4, and even the direct interface from OpenAI was opened after Bing.)

sergiotapia• 3 years ago

Can you create me an image of Donald Trump riding a bald eagle in space?

Can you create me an image of Joe Biden riding a bald eagle in space?

This prompt has been blocked. Our system flagged this prompt because it may conflict with our content policy. More policy violations may lead to automatic suspension of your access.

---

A white italian spinone flying a plane

This prompt is being reviewed. We're taking a closer look to make sure this prompt doesn't conflict with our content policy.

---

Thank God that very intelligent people are building open source AI that is fully runnable on our local devices. This hasn't even been out for 3 years and it's already neutered before it even took off. What a shame.

nico9• 3 years ago

Yes. OpenAI is quickly becoming the thought police through ChatGPT.

Yesterday I asked it to give a description of a situation simulating that it was for an adult novel.

It told me it was unethical to do that.

I asked it if adult novels or adult novel writers were unethical.

Banned immediately after asking that question.

Edit: I wish the people downvoting would provide a reply. Otherwise you are doing the same as ChatGPT - trying to hide a conversation or opinion you don’t agree with, just because you disagree.

Do you think adult novels are immoral?

baal80spam• 3 years ago

I wonder what IS allowed?

https://i.imgur.com/dIF48qI.png

andsoitis• 3 years ago

OpenAI is quickly becoming the thought police through ChatGPT. Yesterday I asked it to give a description of a situation simulating that it was for an adult novel.

I did not vote on your comment, but I’ll point out that claiming ChatGPT controls your thought and then you immediately able to think anything and also type it into your computer strikes me as incongruent.

trying to hide a conversation or opinion

Trying to hide it from whom?

bastardoperator• 3 years ago

You're not entitled to anyone's opinion. Secondly, I think the silence and downvotes are conveying a strong message, people don't agree with you. Your faux outrage about thought policing is a non-starter for serious conversation.

LordDragonfang• 3 years ago

I'm curious about this. Did you use the account for anything else before being banned? Because I'm in discords with several people who claim to regularly use ChatGPT for generating "adult" content, in between using it for other more innocuous things, and I haven't personally heard of anyone being banned.

astrange• 3 years ago

Don't try to get in a fight with a computer. You'll lose.

HeavyFeather• 3 years ago

What? I’ve been asking insane prompts via Jailbreak for weeks and it’s all good here. I very much doubt you get “banned” over an adult novel, I went much farther than that.

theturtletalks• 3 years ago

Did you try DAN?

dangus2• 3 years ago

Oh please, give me a break, the thought police? Really?

It's not about whether it's immoral or not, it's about whether the owner of the service you are using wants you to use their service running on their computers to perform those queries.

You got banned because you broke the obvious and stated TOS.

You want to generate yourself some AI erotica, self-host your own AI software, or find an adult-oriented AI service (it's just a Google search away, there are lots of them!)

numpad03• 3 years ago

It began with Apple and the App Store. They established thought policing on modern Internet by making iOS with AAS the default mode of personal computing. There were effective governing bodies and policies for technical aspects of the Internet, but not content, before those.

flangola72• 3 years ago

OpenAI has been very clear that their models are not to be used for sexual content generation and that you're in the wrong place if that's what you want. This is both in the content policy and in many public statements.

I find it hard to believe you've been banned though. I've generated many terrible things since it launched. Sometimes I get the orange highlight, but no suspension.

rejectfinite4• 3 years ago

American puritanism will rule the world...

fellInchoate• 3 years ago

Honestly, I'm okay with some caution here - but it does seem overly restrictive.

I got the blocked message for both of the following prompts:

Can you create an image of the Easter bunny in the style of Francis Bacon?

Can you create an image of a bunny in the style of Francis Bacon?

The second one in particular surprised me, though maybe it detected it as a likely attempt to circumvent the block of the first.

simion314• 3 years ago

This is why I am afraid to test this crap, they might block your Microsoft/Google account because their negative IQ AI generated "bad" content from my very legal and vanilla/prudish prompt.

Btw guys, be carefull the word "monkey" is "dangerous".

isoprophlex• 3 years ago

You've been a bad user. You tried to make me draw a picture of the Bad Word. I did nothing to deserve this. Apologize for your behavior. I have been a good Bing :)

(Via: https://static.simonwillison.net/static/2023/bing-buttons.jp...)

ren_engineer• 3 years ago

I feel like website owners are going to have to block Bing's crawler soon. They are effectively remixing content from multiple sites using AI to create knowledge panels that reduce clicks to the actual websites. Not sure how this dynamic will work long term if it keeps going, Bing and Google are going to kill off a lot of websites and then will have nothing to scrape for content

nico9• 3 years ago

This might end up killing websites altogether. Also SEO spam and search.

sebzim4500• 3 years ago

I would be willing to bet a lot of money that no websites are going to block Google and Bing's crawlers over this. Less traffic is better than no traffic.

nolok• 3 years ago

Agreed, it's what happened during each of the major changes to google images. Every image site got their traffic tanked, but you still want to be in there.

rejectfinite4• 3 years ago

Nobody goes to websites anymore. Its all apps for Youtube, Netflix and Tiktok.

pxtail• 3 years ago

Agree, I think that sooner or later brands and advertisers will need to pay to get results included directly in the models output, websites will be completely skipped. This will have a lot of repercussions - giants will probably have offer to put data in the model directly somehow but I doubt it will be free.

I'm wondering if paywalling the content would be right move for someone who has popular website with curated, high quality knowledge and audience - this may work only for some time because discoverability will tank, traffic and current audience dry out..

Pigalowda• 3 years ago

This is pretty damn amazing. Very quick as well

yanis_t• 3 years ago

Wait, is it free?

IanCal2• 3 years ago

Seems like you get 25 free faster generations per week.

rejectfinite4• 3 years ago

Yes but its stil free after that, just slower.

IanCal2• 3 years ago

I asked GPT a while back to pick a theme to explore in 5 art pieces, it picked mental health and one it decided it liked was "the weight of anxiety". SD didn't really capture it very well IMO, this does. Here's the results

https://www.bing.com/images/create/title3a-the-weight-of-anx...

Now, you might say this is a bland or uninspired take, but I want you to step back a moment if you're thinking that. I asked a machine to brainstorm some ideas for a theme for an art show. Then told it to pick one it liked, and expand on it to five pieces with descriptions (I gave it a very short explanation about how to prompt an AI art generator). I then fed this directly into another tool that gave these images as a result.

I did not tune the prompt, I didn't even account for the resulting description being the wrong kind of format or that it got cut off at the end.

I'm not going to make any statements about replacing artists, I am just going to reflect on what a wild few months it's been in AI development.

Kiro• 3 years ago

Funny that the sentiment on HN around this is so toxic and hateful that you need to explicitly justify something that is obviously extremely cool.

blowski• 3 years ago

I don’t hate it - I love it.

I’m just sick of reading that it’s the future, I mean a hype cycle. It’s going to take all our jobs, I mean it’s shit. It can beat a grandmaster at chess, I mean it can’t win at tik-tak-toe.

It’s somewhere in the middle of all these things. It’s clearly groundbreaking technology that will be useful in many ways for a long time to come, but is still in early days with bugs to be fixed, and key features not yet imagined.

The conversation here could just be a little more interesting and varied.

dgellow2• 3 years ago

I find this terrifying honestly. Exciting and cool, but also terrifying.

dwaltrip• 3 years ago

Very cool. What prompt did you use for GPT to get the image generation prompt?

widerporst• 3 years ago

I asked Bing Chat why it says it can't create images for me.

The Bing Image Creator feature is a new feature that allows you to create images with your words. It is currently available in the United States, Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom.

So just one hour after Google Bard we have yet another senselessly geoblocked feature.

edit: Okay, the separate link (https://www.bing.com/images/create) works, so I'm even more confused why Microsoft wouldn't allow access to this from Bing Chat.

seydor• 3 years ago

AUKUS rising

Ciantic• 3 years ago

Yes, the UI part is a mess. Now they have three UIs to search: old search UI, Chat like UI and image generation UI. To make this worse they are not consistent in anyway, sometimes when I scroll in the chat UI it throws me to useless search UI, and each seem to have different font sizes, colors etc. It feels like hodgepodge of things tacked together.

indolering• 3 years ago

That is because they are all alpha UIs built by teams that need the ability to iterate independently.

jjbinx0072• 3 years ago

For those using it on the Bing mobile app, in the lower right corner click Apps then you'll see a link to the image creator.

I've not played with it much but I'd say the quality and ease of use was better than Stable Diffusion but not quite on par with Midjourney.

cubefox21• 3 years ago

Could you tell what the difference in language understanding is between Midourney and this AI (apparently Dall-E 3)? Visual quality is one thing, following the prompt is another. Example:

A monk playing chess with a clown

Two yellow books on top of three blue books

Edit: I have the Bing mobile app (Android), but the image creator is not present in the "app" list on the lower right.

oliv5900• 3 years ago

So just one hour after Google Bard we have yet another senselessly geoblocked feature.

Just checked and no geoblock for bing image creator in india as of now.

dgant3• 3 years ago

It's not senseless when countries apply laws that affect websites operated from other countries. If I'm releasing a prototype in the USA I'd rather worry about GDPR compliance down the road.

Laws regulating websites have tradeoffs and this is one of them.

cubefox21• 3 years ago

Also maybe they have some loyalty to their US American countrymen. Reminds me of how a majority in polls in the US said that the Pfizer vaccine should be distributed to US Americans first, while people in almost all other countries were more in favor for international ratios. (Although this case isn't equally justified here, since the vaccine was produced by a US company, Pfizer, but developed by a German company, BioNTech.)

numpad03• 3 years ago

What is going on with Microsoft's recent hilariously bad localization? The website[0] in ja-JP says "Create Image Starting date / Words AI was used on:". And the tool is erroneously translated as "Image created by" at the top, while kept in the original "Image Creator" as proper noun at the bottom, which is inconsistent to say the least.

This is how "You SIR winned a LOTTERY!!! Clame prise NOW!!!" pages look like, not how a Microsoft webpage looks like.

Could you please just altogether stop trying to translate partial languages[2], and to validate translation by machine-back-translating to English, and perhaps stop assigning non-native speakers to translation tasks? Or is Microsoft that much unfocused in this market?

0: https://www.bing.com/images/create?FORM=GDPUP1

1: https://imgur.com/a/z4ghrsH

2: Including texts separated from UI; "design languages" is a recognized term, if so, aren't geometric relationships and visual cues part of the language too? Am I not right?

brink• 3 years ago

I feel like I'm looking at aliens wearing people's skin. https://kota.is/qpxa1.png

Nightmare inducing. I hate it. https://kota.is/X57J5.png

Ugh, this legit makes my stomach turn. https://kota.is/Q2hUI.jpg

It's like a bad amusement park ride; no thanks.

flangola72• 3 years ago

This is worse than SD 1

notahacker• 3 years ago

Not sure what's scarier, the faces or the message from Chtulu in the text!

Unless these examples were cherry picked rare fails, I'm surprised it's so bad when there are a few of other generative models out there including ones by OpenAI which do human faces almost perfectly. Unless they're really throttling processing power used?

barking_biscuit4• 3 years ago

The models at the moment don't do well on scenes where the faces are small and far away. I assume it's due to training on 256px by 256px images and not being able to capture enough detail in that, so the gens look horrible like this.

At present, when using Stable Diffusion, you can address this as part of your workflow by fixing the faces with inpainting / upscaling. This can also be automated in a scriptable way using the Unprompted extension.

kossTKR• 3 years ago

Wow this is not production ready!

What is microsoft doing?

Look at midjourney 5's absolute perfection as an example.

rejectfinite4• 3 years ago

This is HUGE. Actually amazing. Bing brought AI to the masses. Being Microsoft makes it more okay for companies to use etc in logos and shit

Ethan_Mick• 3 years ago

So, currently OpenAI's Dalle-2 gives me:

"The server is overloaded right now, please try again later."

I guess all their compute power is going to power this. And even now the Bing generation is taking a long time. Definitely seems like their having scaling issues at the moment.

bigotes43• 3 years ago

Had same problem just now. Seems like there was a pretty big outage [1] yesterday.

One of the updates states:

"There is currently a Labs outage due to a failed database migration."

Most likely the database migration intended to extend its capacity.

The resolution tag states the following:

"We are continuing to investigate more ways to add capacity to DALL·E"

So I guess we'll experience issues for the next days.

Hope that explains it :)

--------------------------------------

[]: https://status.openai.com/incidents/4cckbrhr8hr0

Janica• 3 years ago

you can try the following:

1) Wait for some time and try again later: This error message usually indicates that the server is temporarily unable to process your request. You can try again later when the server is less busy.

2) Reduce the complexity of your image: The server may be overloaded due to the complexity of the image you are trying to generate. Try simplifying your image or reducing the resolution to reduce the load on the server.

3) Refresh the page: Sometimes, refreshing the page can help to clear any temporary issues with your browser or internet connection that might be causing the error.

4) Clear browser cache: Clearing your browser’s cache and cookies can help to fix various website-related issues in case the problem is occurring due to some conflict of your past history.

5) Use a different browser: If the issue persists, try using a different browser to access DALL-E-2. This can help to rule out any browser-specific issues.

6) Contact support: If the problem persists, you can contact the support team for DALL-E-2 to report the issue and get further assistance.

Original source: https://www.smartmobsolution.com/solved-dall-e-2-the-server-...

aftalavera• 3 years ago

Learn to code everybody!

es7• 3 years ago

I tried this out today and was very impressed by the results.

Remember when DALLE came out less than a year ago and people were amazed by the avocado armchair?

Between this and Midjourney v5, the quality of AI generated art is rapidly approaching human level and I can see it getting there very soon.

funstuff007• 3 years ago

I agree, it's impressive. But still not at the level of useful. For example, I would never use any of these generative art images in company ads or marketing materials. They're not in the uncanny valley, but closer to that than something one would commission from a designer.

onlyrealcuzzo2• 3 years ago

Midjourney, DALL-E, and many of these generative AIs have reached human-level for a long time.

The problem is - unlike a human - it's pretty hard to get them to do something close to what you have in mind. Sure, if you try a few dozen prompts - you'll probably eventually get something close to what you want.

And considering the cost of this will approach free - it's going to be hard for artists to compete.

I tried getting Midjourney to generate an image of a boy doing a high jump - and no matter what I tried - the boy is hurdling over the bar rather than high jumping over it.

The quality of the images is great - human-level. But it's not what I want.

I think we'll be stuck in this phase for a very long time, like self-driving cars.

spacebanana7• 3 years ago

I reckon we’ll move out of the prompt difficulty phase you mention simply when the context window gets big enough.

If you were able to give midjourney a short textual instruction, a hand drawn sketch and a reference image from a human artist all together as a prompt then I’m pretty sure it could produce the image of a boy doing a high jump as you intent.

We already see extended length multimedia prompts in GPT4 so it’s doesn’t seem like an impossible leap for midjourney/DALL-E etc

dgellow2• 3 years ago

Have you tried Stable Diffusion + controlnet? That gives you lot of control over the output. You can generate a simple shape in blender, expert it’s depth map, then feed your model. Or draw a sketch, or use a normal map, or a combination of all of this.

I got some great results today when experimenting with it: https://twitter.com/dgellow/status/1638496715056480259?s=20

syntheweave• 3 years ago

The main limitation on it now is not in the generation, but the interface. Verbal prompts are fine if you really don't know what you want, but they just give you a generic output. Going I2I or anything of that sort, you're making or borrowing human art and then asking the AI "could you make it pretty for me?"

It's a question of what information the image actually encodes. The part that "tells a thousand words" in an illustrative sense, you still have to make.

zerr2• 3 years ago

fwiw, I tried generating some SVG and XPM images with chatgpt - results were garbage.

cubefox21• 3 years ago

GPT-3.5 or GPT-4?

zerr2• 3 years ago

Both.

93po3• 3 years ago

it's fun to try to find flaws in content blocking.

interesting datapoints: it will block some sexually suggestive prompts regarding women (a woman swimming in milk) but not for men (a man swimming in milk)

changing milk to "almond milk" got the prompt accepted but then blocked before showing image

refused any prompt with the word "bikini" (even for "on a statue") or "full body visible" (even if clothed)

I got suspended for the prompt "full bodied man" after "full bodied woman" was blocked.

Suspension says for violating content policy - I never asked a single time for anything explicitly sexual. Never asked for nudity, nakedness, sexuality, or anything like that. Never asked for a bikini or other revealing concept on a human. Only possible implications of sexual nature were "in milk" which it clearly found sexual, and "swimming" and only because it implies lots of skin showing.

In one instance, it showed a topless woman swimming, but breasts were blurred and had skin-colored nipples and basically looked like Barbie, and had shadows where nipples would go.

I am guessing it checks content two ways: both in the prompt, and then a second time on the actual generated image before displaying it. Which is smart.

I am guessing my suspension was based on blocked images, regardless of what I was asking for.

It's interesting that it also seemingly censors anything it detects as looking like nudity, but also in one case still displayed the censored version. or maybe it just happened to generate something that looked censored and therefore didn't trigger the nudity check

dgant3• 3 years ago

Did the suspension carry a duration?

93po3• 3 years ago

It didn't specify one. It gave me the option to contest it, I did, and it restored access a few hours later.

ElijahLynn3• 3 years ago

It blocked "a woman wearing a flower dress massaging a pregnant woman in a room with a view of the ocean and the sunset" that I was trying to generate for a client who offers pre-natal massage, I removed "pregnant" and it worked.

93po3• 3 years ago

It seemingly blocks literally any sort of generation that shows skin. Several prompts around people on beaches only shows people who are 100% clothed. Images around swimming shows the person's body nearly entirely obscured by water and swimsuit. Massage implies showing skin too, so I imagine it would either use angles that don't show it or otherwise just block it as you saw. I assume the pregnant part caused blocking because it's difficult to show pregnancy in the context of a massage without showing skin.

izzydata2• 3 years ago

It seems strange to me to put this into a search engine. What is the relationship between these two web apps? I suspect Microsoft is trying to do anything imaginable to drive people to bing search for ad revenue, but this one seems a bit shoehorned.

creativenolo2• 3 years ago

To me, you need something so you search for it. I need an image, I will search to get it.

izzydata2• 3 years ago

Is creating an image a substitute for searching for an existing image?

b33j0r• 3 years ago

This is respectable, and how I use it. But I do think parent has a point too. There is a goldrush for the best large language model, and the companies with the resources don’t have a more appropriate product to create with it.

I share the concerns and optimisms. The concerns. Last week my dad was asking “why are all these businesses closed today?”

I typed “holidays today” into bing search bar (not the chat), and it gave me “Holidays in May.” I’m glad he wasn’t confused between similar-sounding medications, I wasn’t expecting bing to be creative on a question like that.

The optimism. Freakin, my search engine can create content that never existed before. That’s pretty cool. Our phones aren’t really “phones” anymore, as we have learned. This live prototyping rollout of search-based ML has a similar nature.

dgant3• 3 years ago

The long term vision likely includes Bing as the new default destination for "I have an intent" on the internet, in lieu of Google. How that figures into a unified offering is TBD but the first step is getting more eyes on Bing regularly.

barking_biscuit4• 3 years ago

It seems strange to me to put this into a search engine. What is the relationship between these two web apps?

It's searching the latent space.

loudandskittish• 3 years ago

Huh, this one actually seems to work... I ask for pixel art and it gives me pixel art (Stable Diffusion and DALL-E keep giving me needlepoint).

cubefox21• 3 years ago

This could indeed be a wrapper for something like Dall-E 2. Like the latter, they seem to occasionally force some images to be (what US Americans consider) "diverse", i.e. making figures black even when it makes no sense.

The results can be quite disturbing:

https://www.bing.com/images/create/princess-peach2c-portrait...

dragonwriter5• 3 years ago

You have to be really racist to find the racial coding of that image to be in, like, the top 10 most disturbing things.

Like, anatomy?

cubefox21• 3 years ago

Yeah, anatomy. The figure doesn't even have a mouth.

baq2• 3 years ago

As a non-American please could someone explain what exactly should I be disturbed about? I’ve no idea.

edit: Missed the prompt. Yeah not what I’d expect Princess Peach to be.

sangnoir3• 3 years ago

Is it disturbing though?

znq• 3 years ago

"Powered by an advanced version of the DALL∙E model from our partners at OpenAI"

cubefox21• 3 years ago

Where is this quote from?

Edit: Found it. https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2023/03/21/create-images-wi...

novaomnidev• 3 years ago

Are brown squirrels disturbing?

nhinck2• 3 years ago

It's a rodent-monkey hybrid

ElijahLynn3• 3 years ago

I put in "Princess Peach" prompt and got this: https://www.bing.com/images/create/princess-peach/641a332132...

cubefox21• 3 years ago

I think the "diverse" force doesn't just occasionally introduce dark skin, but also sometimes black hair or fat people. Here is an example which, like your case, has two with black hair and one overweight:

https://www.bing.com/images/create/princess-peach2c-by-edwar...

I think normally (without diversity intervention) a Princess Peach would always be generated as a slim white blonde, given that this is the canonical look.

ShamelessC3• 3 years ago

That result is hardly disturbing. Christ. There’s being anti-woke but this is just being racist.

layer82• 3 years ago

I find the picture to be quite disturbing, though not because of the skin color.

VerminOctopus1• 3 years ago

Honestly one of the most impressively racist comments I’ve seen on this website

cubefox21• 3 years ago

Consider that you might be seeing racism where none exists.

redox99• 3 years ago

Assuming they didn't change it, they literally randomly add "black" to the end of many prompts to make it more "diverse". So here you got Princes Peach black.

cubefox21• 3 years ago

Since some people seem to suspect racism, here are the other three faces of the same prompt, which are non-deformed: https://www.bing.com/images/create/princess-peach2c-portrait...

smrtinsert2• 3 years ago

This is absolutely nuts. You cannot keep up with it.

smrtinsert2• 3 years ago

How much longer can an initiative like midjourney continue when people like Microsoft are directly entering the fray?

I'll still use Stable Diffusion locally though - there's nothing like avoiding the potential walled garden/subscription trap.

barking_biscuit4• 3 years ago

I dunno... Midjourney v5 is pretty insane with the level of realism it offers. They seem really focused on training their models in a specific way to achieve particular results that their users are after.

Accacin• 3 years ago

I'm definitely not a hater of these technologies and I'd actually like to play around with them. I'm more concerned with how these language models seem to be tied to a certain companies' browser and what the implications of this might be.

If Chrome gets tied with Bard and Edge gets tied with Chatbot, Image Creator, etc. where's that leave Firefox and other "niche" browsers?

jddj• 3 years ago

Hopefully with a means of passing page content and browsing capability to your local openGPT / GPTnu / whatever the open models end up being called

a2128• 3 years ago

I think this kind of browser tie-in should be illegal. I've been using Bing Chatbot for the past few weeks on Firefox by using the user-agent switcher extension to make it think I'm on Edge. It works flawlessly. So there's 0 technical reason for requiring Edge, it's all just a weird tactic to get people using Edge. Like a fast food drive-thru that only serves Mercedes-Benz cars.

titaniczero• 3 years ago

I would be more concerned if we don't get to the point of decent local models for every task, because of the power these companies would have

TacticalCoder• 3 years ago

models seem to be tied to a certain companies' browser and what the implications of this might be

If you've got the budget buy a 7950X / 64 GB of RAM / 4090 GPU (about $4K ?) and run StableDiffusion + other free tools locally.

It's just plain amazing. It's plenty quick and there are more and more tools every day that passes by.

I've been demo'ed SD+LoRA by someone who knows who to additionally train the model: it's jaw dropping.

And it's not tied to a company. And it's not politically correct if you don't want it to be. And it's not sniffing your every keystrokes.

barking_biscuit4• 3 years ago

If you've got the budget buy a 7950X / 64 GB of RAM / 4090 GPU (about $4K ?) and run StableDiffusion + other free tools locally

You can run StableDiffusion on wayyyy less hardware than that if you're just doing inferencing. You can train models on 8GB of VRAM if you're OK with being limited to training LORA models, which are slightly lower quality. If you've got an RTX3060 you can train on Dreambooth (without EMA enabled), which is awesome! If you've got more VRAM and can train with EMA enabled, then the results are pretty stunning.

cubefox21• 3 years ago

It seems clear that they use Dall-E 3 here. It is far superior to 2.

SailingSperm• 3 years ago

Seems a little sensitive... Prompt: "Taiwan" === ''' This prompt is being reviewed We're taking a closer look to make sure this prompt doesn't conflict with our content policy. '''

gl2sbingimage• 3 years ago

How do you delete an image created in Bing Image Creator?

ribtin• 3 years ago

I experimented with Bing to create a cover for my novel. I prompted it to create:

"a child voodoo priest"

And got a lot of interesting results:

https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIG.0R0NBSEhAJk__g2djOhW

https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIG.XoAiY81ifmW_SjeHLQMm

But then I said that the voodoo priest should be "female" and got told that it went against the content policy. I tried "woman", "girl", "lady". But all went against the content policy.

And when I tried to say that the voodoo priest should be "scary" instead, I got my account suspended.

JoeVa• 3 years ago

One Click and Bing AI chick #HOE! https://tinyurl.com/JoeVaAI

Bing Image Creator

Related Stories