sebzim4500

This isn't the chat that made the actual discovery, this is just a chat explain it to Tao

Its probably 100x more than it would have cost to do it legitimately, so seems like reasonable damages to me

I believe it's just giving a prompt to an LLM saying "combine these things ..."

That's a really interesting claim, can you give an example of a question that could reasonably be on a K-12 exam that a frontier model can't answer?

Please don't listen to those miserable people, I find your posts really interesting

For 99+% of users it will flex 10000% above their current usage

I would guess that evaporative cooling is usually still cheaper even if you price in externalities. In most of the world there isn't really a shortage of water.

I don't see why it would be incoherent to ban datacenters but not AI use.

That makes way more sense, I thought he meant gypsy. In either case he should just say the word, this site isn't for children.

In the same sense that chrome is just a safari fork I suppose

Sure, it's reasonably likely they merge at some point but the ratio between the prices at that time will be different than the current ratio, so it still matters which share you buy today.

Especially since Musk is heavily incentivised to merge them at a price favourable to spacex since he has a much larger share

On the other side of this though, the third time the guy should have realized that hedging wasn't working and committed to the truth or a lie.

I'm certain that is not a mainsteam opinion on reddit, but by its nature you will be able to find arbitrarily stupid opinions in individual echo chambers

Yeah but that's not nothing, and passengers will be annoyed by seeing cars overtake them

Presumably Tesla will not make this decision, it will be interesting to see how much consumers value faster ride times if Tesla FSD ever get their shit together

I have a moderate fear for the safety of my children with these things on the road

I have some terrible news for you about the human drivers already on the road

Didn't they admit this at the time? Cost was one of the reasons they gave for not immediately making it public.

Probably but the cost of running a short lived python interpreter to run "print (100 + 200)" is likely negligable compared to the cost of running the language model itself

Yeah I get what you are saying but I don't see much of a plausible mechanism for humans either and yet clearly there is one.

Not GP but given we have no idea what conciousness is it seems foolhardy to go too low or too high for any of those numbers

I'm not sure I understand your comment. Just because a number of of the form 2N with N > 2^32 doesn't mean it can't also be written as the product of two numbers below 2^32.

    E.g. 2^40 = 2^20 * 2^20

I don't think it's marketing, for quite a long time Claude was clearly better and not everyone has adapted to the new reality where they have similar capabilities.

I guess we'll see, because most 14 year olds don't have a lot of money to put into SpaceX.

You think that's bad? I introduce you to LION, (evoLved sIgn mOmeNtum) [1]

[1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.06675

Figure out how much of your fund it is and take a short position to hedge it

Maybe this is confirmation bias but I feel like Github has had terrible uptime since before LLMs were a thing.

None of that feels like AI smell to me despite the "it's not X it's Y" framing. I can't really explain why though.

Yeah until you get to quantum computing and then it seems as if the universe is doing enormously more work than you would think necessary.

For people like me had tried it in the past and found it annoying, note that it now has a 'casual' mode where it only changes the truly useless titles and leaves reasonable ones alone.

I mean obviously they had a point? No one wants to lose their job.