Introducing Google Cast for audio

http://chrome.blogspot.com/2015/01/introducing-google-cast-for-audio.html

by Navarr • 12 years ago

232 166 12 years ago

chrome.blogspot.com

dlevine• 12 years ago

So Google has decided to compete with Airplay. Although I guess this is better, because I'm assuming it will work with any router, and not just special ones sold by Apple.

jamesbrownuhh• 12 years ago

Is that what you meant to say? AirPlay isn't restricted to special Apple routers either.

ubercore2• 12 years ago

That is true, but I also believe there are some lower level "nice to haves" they enable on their routers to make sure Bonjour/mDNS works properly for airplay. If not intentionally, I do know that some routers (Actiontec / FiOS comes to mind) that have particular difficulty with providing reliable Airplay connections.

JoelSutherland• 12 years ago

It's actually more like Sonos. Airplay streams from the device to the receiver. With this (and Sonos) a command is sent to the device which does the streaming on its own.

matthewmacleod• 12 years ago

I'm not sure that's totally accurate – I think AirPlay has multiple modes of operation, including the ability to stream directly from a third device.

I don't remember the details of this off the top of my head.

pat2man• 12 years ago

Even better I bet speaker manufacturers will ship both and basically your speaker will "just work" regardless of what platform you are using.

mikecb3• 12 years ago

This is the best news yet coming from the auto manufacturers and Android Auto/Apple Carplay. I personally would never choose one of the two, but the option will make both ecosystems more successful.

mankyd2• 12 years ago

Google Cast Ready speakers come with Cast technology built-in, so you don’t have to buy any additional equipment.

Except for, you know, the entirely new speaker(s).

I love this idea, but I want a simple, small dongle, like the chromecast, that outputs audio only rather than HDMI. I already have a speaker/amp in my living room that has a mini-stereo in. I simply want a way to connect a chromecast to it.

jluxenberg2• 12 years ago

I use this HDMI audio extractor to turn a Chromecast into what you describe: http://www.amazon.com/J-Tech-Digital-Premium-Extractor-Conve...

brerlapn• 12 years ago

That is pretty slick. I've had a Squeezebox for years, but it's not too helpful for Youtube benders. For now, I've just got audio out from the TV to the stereo which works fine for casting. The audio's not hi-def but usually the quality of the source audio is the bottleneck in my experience, not the RCA audio connection.

andybak5• 12 years ago

Here's a slightly cheaper way to do the same thing: http://liliputing.com/2014/02/10-adapter-turns-chromecast-in...

kyouens2• 12 years ago

I am doing the same thing without the HDMI audio extractor. The Chromecast is plugged directly into an HDMI port on the receiver. It works fine. Maybe whether the extractor is necessary depends on the receiver.

jdboyd4• 12 years ago

Do you have to connect the HDMI out to anything for that to work?

coda_2• 12 years ago

this thing works great, I do the same thing. I wonder if these integrated speaker devices will support playing content that is not audo-only... like youtube videos. it's great to be able to get music from youtube videos. I hope they don't limit the stuff you can cast to audio-only with these new google-cast for audio devices.

FlailFast2• 12 years ago

Maybe Chromecast v2 could have that, alongside HDMI 2.0? That, plus 802.11ac and 2x2 antennas would make it absolutely perfect. (And probably more expensive than $35, but possibly worth it)

mikecb3• 12 years ago

Sounds exactly like what the Nexus Q was supposed to be (with updated specs).

cbhl• 12 years ago

That already exists. It's known as the Nexus Player, which is "Google Cast Ready", has HDMI 2.0, and 802.11ac 2x2.

http://www.google.com/nexus/player/

deanclatworthy3• 12 years ago

I do this with a raspberry pi. I set up an AirPlay service on it, and added a tiny USB wifi dongle and put it in a nice white casing. Works great and cheaper than airport express that will do what you need also.

http://www.raywenderlich.com/44918/raspberry-pi-airplay-tuto...

mankyd2• 12 years ago

Airplay doesn't do much good for my Android phone, unfortunately :/

carlob• 12 years ago

The problem is that the quality of the audio out of the raspberry pi is terrible. I wonder if these HDMI audio extractors I see in the comments are any better. I have a raspberry pi connected to a projector that doesn't have audio out and I can't decide between a sound card for the pi (think wolfson), or a HDMI audio extractor in order to improve the quality.

rikkus3• 12 years ago

Last time I tried this, the sound output was awful from the Pi itself and glitchy when using a USB DAC. Any problems with the audio in your experience?

cscharenberg• 12 years ago

I use a bluetooth adapter connected to my receiver's inputs. My use case is pretty simple though: send audio from my phone (Spotify or audio book) to the receiver.

Florin_Andrei• 12 years ago

The Moto Stream works fine for me with Android and iPhone:

http://www.motorola.com/us/accessories-headphones-speakers/M...

kyouens2• 12 years ago

Whether it will work seamlessly may depend on the receiver, but I have a Chromecast plugged into an HDMI port on my Yamaha unit. (Note, there is nothing plugged into the HDMI out port on the receiver.) This setup works flawlessly for streaming audio throughout my house. Some people say they had to use an HDMI audio extractor to achieve this, but that was not necessary in my case.

milkytoast• 12 years ago

Yeah, similar setup here - I've plugged mine into the first HDMI port on my Onkyo receiver (http://amzn.com/B0077V88V8), and everything works fine. Audio through the reciever, no TV on - plus I get the automatic input switching thing that Chromecast does (seems to just go to the first HDMI port on the receiver, not the actual one it was plugged into). Pretty nice.

jedc• 12 years ago

I think you just described ROCKI! - http://www.myrocki.com/

They had a successful Kickstarter in 2013 (https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/rocki/rocki-wifi-music-...) and went through Techstars Boston in Fall 2014.

joelhaasnoot• 12 years ago

I wonder if they'll just make this as simple as a Chromecast being a "Google Cast Ready" speaker - aka, a stream output for audio.

jeena• 12 years ago

You could try to build it yourself https://jeena.net/rp-airplay-radio

Zigurd2• 12 years ago

Any Bluetooth audio adapter will do, and it will do for iOS devices, too. Unless you want a longer tether than Bluetooth allows there is no advantage to "casting."

Perhaps if one could cast to multiple Chomecasts...

tracker12• 12 years ago

That would be disturbing if you could hear more than one at a time, there will be variance in delay...

rasz_pl• 12 years ago

$4 BT audio dongles like this one

http://www.ebay.com/itm/3-5mm-USB-Bluetooth-Wireless-Stereo-...

will work fine, only problem is double compression of audio - it sounds like crap

Jack5500• 12 years ago

I own a Chromecast and like all about it except it's ability to play oyur own content. I understand why they forbid it, but for the same reasons I'm using it much mroe rarely than I would otherwise. Additionally this could have easily been an addition to the original Chromecast via a simple extractor.

Scaevolus• 12 years ago

Plex works well with Chromecast to play your own media.

Reebles2• 12 years ago

There are actually many apps that allow you to play local content now. It was pretty bad for a while before they released the SDK though.

The two I use are Videostream for Google Chrome, and BubbleUPnP for Android.

_lce03• 12 years ago

Have you seen which permissions those kind of apps require?

I don't want to allow these apps to read my history, share my contacts, or expose the current running apps just to cast some media ..

ismavis• 12 years ago

There are lots of apps that cast your local content, AllCast for one.

gsands• 12 years ago

Check out the Chrome extension Videostream for Google Chromecast, link: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/videostream-for-go...

LAMike• 12 years ago

https://github.com/xat/castnow let's you play local files from the command line

Reebles2• 12 years ago

Will we finally get gapless playback in the Chromecast's native music player? I've tried to use my Chromecast for music, but the gaps between tracks are just complete deal breakers for many albums. I had just assumed audio was not a priority for google.

Navarr2• 12 years ago

Chromecast is just a web browser - so I imagine that's due to the client (which each service has their own, I think). Not sure what exactly they're doing for audio casting, but I imagine it's dependent on the service to implement properly

rikkus3• 12 years ago

It's a deal breaker for me, yes. It took years to persuade Spotify to fix this problem.

radley• 12 years ago

The sdk offers gapless playback but the OS still can't actually do it. Poweramp is one of the few apps that can do gapless, but it uses ffmpg instead of native.

drdaeman2• 12 years ago

"Google Cast is designed to give you more freedom while listening to music."

I sense some irony in this statement.

makomk• 12 years ago

It almost makes AirPlay open by comparison. At least that lets you stream your local music collection rather than restricting you to approved cloud music services.

bitskits• 12 years ago

Google Play Music supports this. Upload your audio files; stream from anywhere. No subscription needed.

BHSPitMonkey3• 12 years ago

If you expose your local media over HTTP (doesn't even need to be world-accessible), a Chromecast on the same network can play it.

djur• 12 years ago

I've had good experiences with Plex for local media. And anything you can put in a Chrome tab you can cast to the device.

danellis3• 12 years ago

At least that lets you stream your local music collection

What makes you assume that Google Cast wouldn't? You can stream your local video collection to a Chromecast.

In fact, how is it restricted at all? If it works like a Chromecast does, the SDK is open and anyone can write receiver apps to run on it. How much more open do you need it to be?

_lce03• 12 years ago

I don't want to cast from the cloud. Just make the device able to receive any media from my LAN!!

it's nice that the dongle can stream from the web, but it's way more useful to make the device aware of upnp/dlna devices over my local network.

Because of this I've moved to raspberry which

  - exposes itself over the network as a upnp device
  - plays remote media in the main TV
  - acts as a nas, it can stream to kids' room
  - downloads media via torrents (that I can remotely control)

Plus it's a fully Linux environment that I can fine tune as desired

andybak5• 12 years ago

I don't want to cast from the cloud.

It certainly helps battery life for your mobile device to step aside as soon as playback has started. When casting video it doesn't matter even if I turn the device off.

dragonwriter• 12 years ago

Its possible to have things on your LAN other than mobile devices.

drdaeman2• 12 years ago

You know, UPnP has media renderers, servers and control software as three separate matters. This is already a solved problem.

And, well, I had controlled mpd running on my desktop machine (that has the speakers connected) and streaming from my NAS from my N900, like, 5 years ago. Replace desktop with something like rPI and the tech is here.

commandar• 12 years ago

Plus it's a fully Linux environment that I can fine tune as desired

You are not the Chromecast's target audience.

corobo• 12 years ago

I'm so glad someone else is aware of this fact. Every time I see someone blatantly not the target market I think back to that dude that shot down Dropbox because he could do everything they were planning on his Linux box.

Dude should have been asking for a ground floor share holding job rather than shooting it down if he was able to so easily do it

angryasian• 12 years ago

If you're using Android, you can just mount your shared directories with samba and can cast through a player to chromecast. I also have a htpc and its a much better solution overall.

mahyarm• 12 years ago

It's not casting from 'the cloud', but from a server. And that server can be any device on your local network. Thats how it can receive any media on your LAN.

coda_2• 12 years ago

Plex is pretty awesome for casting content on your own network if you haven't looked at that.

enobrev• 12 years ago

I have my own Plex server with a couple Chromecasts hooked up throughout my apartment (two televisions and one connected to an HDMI port on my stereo for audio-only). It works fantastically well, allowing me to switch where things play-back as I move from room to room. And, like you said, it's linux, so I can do what needs to be done in regards to automating / organizing my media collection.

BHSPitMonkey3• 12 years ago

Chromecast accepts URLs to LAN resources. All you need to do is expose your files over HTTP (I do this with my NAS and it works fine).

aagha• 12 years ago

What app do you use to do this?

tracker12• 12 years ago

Well, there's Plex, but that's slightly different... I've been thinking of taking some of the work from mediacenterjs, and the chromecast stuff for node.js and coming up with a media center that outputs to a chromecast device, and controls via a phone/tablet.

bduerst• 12 years ago

Eh, the lack of gigabit ethernet makes it a pretty poor NAS.

Don't get me wrong, I like the RPi, but you can spend $25 more and get a much better NAS board.

antihero• 12 years ago

Have you heard of Subsonic? The web client supports casting, and so does the amazing paid firm of the Android client, Dsub.

hengheng4• 12 years ago

Very nice. I'm right now sitting in front of a schematics of a nice modern modular stereo hi-fi amplifier that I'm building. I made sure to leave plenty of internal interconnects for BTO radio modules, so that I could accomodate for Bluetooth, DAB, UPnP rendering, TI CC8520 or whatever wireless standard would be coming my way later down the line.

Seems that I can now plan to add a Google Cast radio module that can be integrated into the device. I don't even have to change my design it seems, I don't even have to put all my money on this horse, and I can still do without this gadget at first and get the basic device to market as quickly as possible.

Neat.

matthewmcg• 12 years ago

This sounds really neat--any information on your product you can share?

hengheng4• 12 years ago

Will do! I'm finishing up the design right now, and I plan to go DIY first anyways in order to get some quick feedback, circumvent expensive EMI certification, and to sell some units before having to go into case manufacturing. As soon as the prototype shows it's working at the quality level I hope it will, we'll start marketing it, and I'll make sure to drop you a note right then!

tacos• 12 years ago

Probably want the RF transmitting components outside the shielded amplifier chassis...

hengheng4• 12 years ago

There usually are antenna output pins even on some of the cheapest Bluetooth modules, and I plan to go for an all metal case anyways. You've certainly got a point though ;-)

tdicola2• 12 years ago

Is there any indication they're going to sell Cast radio compatible chips to end users? I seriously doubt you could get one without signing NDAs, etc.

hengheng4• 12 years ago

Don't care about NDAs as much. At least not as much as about cut tape availability at the usual distributors. I'm fine as long as I can buy 100 chips at mouser instead of buying an obscure reel in shenzen (as might be the case for hdmi transceivers btw). They mentioned a couple chip manufacturers in the announcement, so I'm hoping they will follow through with that, or at the least, make modules available.

The same has been going on for digital radio recently. Only silabs have decent chips at 10€ per piece in single quantities, the rest is all large modules and obsolete chips that are all "not recommended for new designs".

Same for Bluetooth. CSR is quite hard to reach, chips are NDAed, and chip programmers and documentation is hard to get by unless you go the aliexpress route. Then suddenly the modules are easier to place on my PCB than the chip, amazingly cheap, and even the programmers are available as knockoffs for 50 dollars instead of 800.

It sometimes feels unprofessional to seemingly tack random Chinese Lego blocks onto each other, but apparently that's how the industry runs. I've even stopped mocking huge Javascript libraries recently, in sheer appreciation of this realisation ;-)

acgourley2• 12 years ago

Note the lack of spotify support. It's turning into a bit of a showdown between players like google cast and spotify connect.

There will definitely be a small market in building devices which can serve as bridges between the standards.

ultrafez• 12 years ago

It's disappointing that we are in the situation where we have several competing protocols for streaming audio - Google Cast, AirPlay, Spotify Connect, UPnP/DLNA.

As a society we are capable of making software and hardware that interoperate among manufacturers - email and HTTP are good examples. We could be a far more technologically advanced world if capitalism didn't encourage companies to create competing closed-source protocols that only benefit the companies themselves, to the detriment of everyone else.

carsonreinke• 12 years ago

This is how I feel every time there is an announcement like this.

acgourley2• 12 years ago

To be fair, the existing UPnP/DLNA standard really wasn't good enough. For example, AirPlay just added wifi direct connections between devices which is a requirement for good streaming video.

On balance I believe it's a net positive to have some competing standards for a while as we figure out what works best. I do hope we can arrive at some interoperable standards, or we can at least mitigate the spread via low cost adapter devices.

nightski• 12 years ago

Yes but if everyone agreed on a standard I could see us all complaining that "we could be far more technologically advanced world if we didn't force everyone to use the same standard and there was more room for innovation and competition".

nobodyshere2• 12 years ago

Spotify still works through AirPlay though.

notatoad2• 12 years ago

I'm not sore what Spotify gets out of this - why bother pushing your own protocol, why not just make your music work as many places as possible?

9point63• 12 years ago

They're probably looking to nurture some vendor lock-in

shoggs• 12 years ago

I don't like the way Google Cast always needs to connect to a service before playing any media. This could be a little bit annoying with audio. Its okay for me to wait a couple seconds to connect for watching a movie. But let's say you wanna switch from Google Music to Spotify, it's always gonna take some time.

_lce03• 12 years ago

And have you tried to use it without internet access? It completely refuse to work.

My ISP had some problem that let 200 families without service for a week. Although I have my local network fully working, the dongle refused to boot

dotunderscore• 12 years ago

You are aware that the chromecast is really nothing more then a web browser in a stick? It has no storage for any thing other then the firmware to run the device.

quotemstr• 12 years ago

It'd be nice if I could turn my old Squeezebox Boom into a client for this thing.

dchuk2• 12 years ago

I love my Chromecasts. I have two of them in our house, and we don't have a television subscription, we just use a mixture of Plex, Netflix, and streams for sports. We're saving a bunch of money every year now, and it works great.

But damn, the lack of a desktop sdk/api for chromecast is just infuriating. I get it, Google believes in Mobile and Web only, but you'd think if they're shooting for market domination, they wouldn't ignore an entire market segment in terms of developer options.

sanderjd• 12 years ago

Pretty off-topic, but what sports streams do you use? I'd love to ditch cable, but can't seem to find good replacements for sports.

dchuk2• 12 years ago

Been using the links posted here for NFL: http://www.reddit.com/r/nflstreams

There are sidebar links for other sports too.

jdboyd4• 12 years ago

This is why I'm hoping for the Matchstick project to work out. Some apps that work with ChromeCast already just work with Matchstick. They recently posted about trying to get supported for DRM requiring apps like NetFlix. There should be more news this week from CES.

Of course, for my to consider this a success, I want to see the software running on more than just their HDMI dongle. People have already compiled it to run on some Chinese dongles with the same CPU, but I'd like to see it also run on some more open platforms like Freescale iMX.6, Allwinner A20, and most especially X86.

tek-cyb-org• 12 years ago

Ive been doing google cast audio. It's called, Chromecast+hdmi analog audio extractor=free youtube music to home audio system. :)

andreyf• 12 years ago

Google Cast Ready speakers pull content directly from the cloud, so you'll get the best audio quality and can freely multi-task on your phone, tablet, or laptop, all without straining the battery

Is it that much of a battery strain to connect to a radio in the house, and usually in the same room? The device that'll be doing it is designed to connect to cell towers up dozens of miles away [1], after all...

1. http://smallbusiness.chron.com/far-can-cell-tower-cellphone-...

andybak5• 12 years ago

It's about letting your mobile device sleep rather than to constantly be (semi)-awake to push audio.

cheshire137• 12 years ago

Might be nicer than wrestling with my Vizio soundbar to connect via Bluetooth. Takes multiple attempts to make it connect to any of my devices (laptop, phone, or tablet), then sound drops and gets flaky frequently when I stream music.

sv3nss0n2• 12 years ago

http://www.google.com/castaudio/ gives a 404...

vpontis2• 12 years ago

I just checked and it's working fine for me.

sv3nss0n2• 12 years ago

yes, now it works for me too.

lowlevel• 12 years ago

A full 10 years after AirTunes. Yay.

vpontis2• 12 years ago

Wow, it seems like this will take a while to come out and I didn't see any word on pricing.

A good alternative to this is a Beep. Beep sells devices that plug into any speakers audio jack to let you stream music from your phone. What's better is that it also syncs up multiple units so you can have your music in sync across your house.

We've used them in our office a few times and love them. https://www.thisisbeep.com

ZeroGravitas• 12 years ago

I don't think it's been officially announced yet, but at least one of the reports on the new Google Cast stuff, and a dev who claims to work on one of the partner apps commenting on reddit, suggest that the audio cast stuff will synced audio across multiple devices.

This would be a killer feature if true.

Navarr2• 12 years ago

And their minisite: http://www.google.com/castaudio/

mililani• 12 years ago

So, when will Chrome Cast finally support Bluetooth audio? That's what I want.

ludite313• 12 years ago

I created an iOS App that allows you to stream audio directly from one device to another. It works great if you have an old iPod touch available. https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/music-stream-free/id91402690...

dtjones• 12 years ago

Here is a list of all music apps supported: https://www.google.com/intl/en_us/chrome/devices/chromecast/...

I wish Spotify would integrate..

taternuts2• 12 years ago

  >"Google Cast streams your music directly from the cloud instead of from your phone, so you won’t lose any sound quality."

Huh??? This is almost _never_ the case in my opinion, especially when using popular cloud services for music playback. Pretty sure I just had to nerf a high quality .WAV file to a .WMV 20 minutes ago before I could even upload it to google music.

Sargos2• 12 years ago

.wav is not a music format. It's meant for pure sound clips and doesn't even have the capability of adding metadata like artist and song name. If you care about sound quality then just use FLAC.

The streaming quality from Google Music is top notch, it just seems that you had a problem getting the music into the service due to an antiquated format.

mattmcknight2• 12 years ago

The problem is with this part of the statement: "Google Cast Ready speakers pull content directly from the cloud, so you’ll get the best audio quality" Pulling content from the cloud doesn't not mean you'll get "the best" audio quality.

taternuts2• 12 years ago

FLAC get's compressed to 320 by google music anyways

9point63• 12 years ago

You converted an LPCM Audio file to a Windows Media Video file to upload to Google Music?

spdustin• 12 years ago

I use an Airport Express as an AirPlay receiver, which is connected to a line input on my Sonos setup. Nice thing is that Sonos can switch to that input automatically when it senses a signal.

I've also used Shairport[0] on a Raspberry Pi as an AirPlay receiver - it worked great, I just wanted to keep tinkering with the Pi so I switched to the Airport Express, which I already owned.

[0] https://github.com/hendrikw82/shairport

Edit: I see someone else already said that, whoops. FWIW, I didn't have any major audio quality issues in the brief time the Pi was used for AirPlay.

thrownaway2424• 12 years ago

Thing is if you have a Sonos already, then you have had music casting from Google for a while. It's not the same protocol, but the Google Play Music app has been able to "cast" to Sonos for at least some months, maybe a year or more.

guiomie• 12 years ago

I was going to by one out of excitement, but then I realised it is only available this spring. I might not buy it anymore, since the hype I had at this exact moment will be gone...

StringyBob• 12 years ago

Any support for multi-room audio? (or multiple remote speakers?) Sonos seem to be the only ones with a handle on this, and even then it's not particularly low latency...

jonah2• 12 years ago

If you use SonosNet rather than your standard wifi network, it has much better latency.

nobodyshere2• 12 years ago

iTunes does that with AirPorts

mauricesvay• 12 years ago

Is the protocol documented somewhere? Would be great to see a software implementation of that.

jonah2• 12 years ago

Darn, I just bought a bunch of Sonos gear...

therealmarv• 12 years ago

Bluetooth speakers: Unbelievable but they also stream sound which is only locally on mobile phone. Why do all Googlers think that everybody in the whole world has good wifi everywhere?

com2kid2• 12 years ago

BT Speakers typically use A2DP, which sounds horrid. Recompressing already compressed audio is not a path towards goodness.

That said, reading up on A2DP, it seems that A2DP supports higher quality audio streams, but I have yet to see anyone advertise such in their products.

thechut• 12 years ago

Why is there not a dongle for this. This should have been the first step and part of the announcement.

dtx• 12 years ago

No Spotify? Wow. I don't even recognize half the music services it supports. As someone else said on this thread, I am happy with 320kbps music streaming on Spotify + it's remote control features + the recent hardware support for Spotify Connect.

Cub32• 12 years ago

Is it just me or has anyone else been waiting for multi-room audio, I don't understand why I can't 'cast' to two locations at once?

Seems like they'd take the Sonos market pretty easily if/when implemented

krrrh• 12 years ago

As a recent Sonos convert, I really think that they are going to be hard to catch in terms of nailing so many aspects of the user experience. Not least of which is how good the hardware (esp the Play:1 speakers) sound and look. I Have to admit how surprised I was to learn that the same company that made those janky wall controller systems a decade ago is now the second largest speaker company in the world.

Cub32• 12 years ago

My only issue is the price, the only thing it gives over any other implementation is the multi room aspect, as soon as a company like Google bakes it in to their already established platform I don't see them selling many units

bgruber2• 12 years ago

well, i guess that means miracast is done for.

com2kid2• 12 years ago

Miracast is such a POS, I am saddened by exactly how horrible it is.

I have a Miracast setup with over a second latency for video. When it works at all.

shekhar101• 12 years ago

Totally unrelated but I have to know this! Somebody posted an article many months back that talked about DIY audio system that gives run for money to Bose, Beats and likes. It was open source design by an anon electrical engineer. Anyone knows what was it?

dannyrosen• 12 years ago

Surprised no one mentioned Mopidy[0] in the thread. From their github:

Mopidy is an extensible music server that plays music from local disk, Spotify, SoundCloud, Google Play Music, and more. You edit the playlist from any phone, tablet, or computer using a range of MPD and web clients.

[0] https://github.com/mopidy/mopidy

Introducing Google Cast for audio

Related Stories