Show HN: Outerbase Studio – Open-Source Database GUI

by burcs • 2 years ago

356 142 2 years ago

We just launched Outerbase Studio, the open-source version of our core database offering. It works in your browser or as a desktop app and supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite.

What it does:

• Connects to MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite databases. • Spin up local databases directly through the UI, even if you don’t have one running. • Manage and query your data in a lightweight, intuitive interface. • Completely open source.

Why we built it: We wanted to share the core Outerbase experience with the developer community as a free, open-source tool. It’s simple, fast, and removes the barriers to working with databases locally.

GitHub: https://github.com/outerbase/studio

Release Blog: https://www.outerbase.com/blog/outerbase-studio-open-source-...

Try it out: studio.outerbase.com

Would love the HN communities feedback, please try it out and let me know what you think!

burcs26• 2 years ago

Happy to answer any questions around this! As far as next steps we are going to be adding in more database support as well as bringing in some of Outerbase Cloud's AI features.

drewp• 2 years ago

Are there comparisons to related projects somewhere?

E.g. I've use DBeaver before. Is there some reason I should try Outerbase next time?

johtso2• 2 years ago

Don't think DBeaver supports libsql databases? I think the goal here is to be able to working with Turso / Cloudflare D1 databases etc.

burcs26• 2 years ago

I put together this in related to our cloud offering, it's still somewhat relevant for Outerbase Studio even though some features are different:

https://www.outerbase.com/blog/the-5-best-database-managemen...

Our goal is to make data accessible through good user experiences and focus. Whether that is being able to spin up a local database directly from the app, or simply making the query experience as intuitive as possible, we are really pushing on making the database usable.

stronglikedan2• 2 years ago

I downloaded it, fired it up locally, was presented with a login screen, closed it, and uninstalled it. Sorry, but I don't log into local software.

giancarlostoro3• 2 years ago

I saw that it was AGPL licensed, which was odd to me for something that's supposed to be a client. I don't like the AGPL license because of how overbearing it is, I avoid downloading AGPL'd software, unless its a pure compiled binary. I am probably a little too strict about software licenses, but I rather always have the freedom to keep any forks to myself, don't force me to share code for my one-off project.

freeone30002• 2 years ago

AGPL still only requires you to share the code if you’re sharing the fork in some form (binary or networked).

RadiozRadioz2• 2 years ago

This is an incorrect interpretation of the AGPL. You do have the freedom to keep forks to yourself. You're only required to present source code to people who can use your program (directly or via the network).

Brian_K_White2• 2 years ago

AGPL does not prevent anything that anyone has any right to want. The more someone cries that agpl (or gpl3, or gpl-any) is "overbearing", the more they expose how they wish they could steal. You can't say one without saying the other, they are the same statement. And it's an extra level of amazing to need to steal something that's already free.

You can absolutely not only use agpl software, for free, you can even sell access to it. SO OVERBEARING

If you can't stand the burden of having to share with the next guy that which you yourself were given for free, there is no reason for anyone else to feel the tiniest bit of sympathy.

Feel free to write your own software and set whatever terms you like. Surely the need to write it and develop it to the point of actually being any good is not overbearing at all.

Or feel free to license software from someone selling it. Surely Oracle or IBM terms will not be overbearing at all.

Do people even hear themselves?

burcs26• 2 years ago

Sorry I am assuming you downloaded our cloud based client, which yes is a bit different, here is the correct download link for our open-source client:

https://github.com/outerbase/studio-desktop/releases

Apologies for the confusion here!

stronglikedan2• 2 years ago

Now we're cookin' with gas! Sorry I can no longer edit my original comment, but hopefully it and your reply help orient some others. Nice work on this, thanks!

johtso2• 2 years ago

Outerbase Studio is great! Been happily using it to experiment with queries over my Turso database, and see how many rows are being read when optimising.

Excited to hear that some AI stuff is going to be brought over, currently do a lot of switching back and forth with ChatGPT, and having your database schema automatically be part of the prompt would be great.

I'm guessing visualisation stuff is going to stay part of the paid offering?

burcs26• 2 years ago

Thank you Johtso! Glad you have been enjoying it :)

Yeah definitely it's been a challenge to think about how we want to bring it over, probably going to do a bring your own key experience for the AI that way we're not eating the costs on an open-source project. Have been thinking about bundling a Llama type experience as well, but I'm not sure if people would want that, would you?

Yeah for now it is, although we've talked about also releasing a lightweight version of that haha!

kiwicopple2• 2 years ago

congrats on open sourcing

i didn't try it locally yet but it looks like the cloud version can create SQLite databases inside the browser? Assuming the open source version does too, can you also "connect" to those databases somehow?

burcs26• 2 years ago

Thank Paul — Supabase has always been such a huge inspiration for us!

Yes you can spin up sqlite directly in the browser, and on the local studio version you can actually spin up both MySQL and Postgres instances. You have to have docker running as well, and we will automatically spin up the containers for you, making it a completely hands-off experience!

You can connect through them instantly through the GUI without needing to configure anything. We are actually going to be releasing something later this week that will really help with the local dev story by making those local databases accessible from the web

thruflo• 2 years ago

Would be nice to add support for PGlite [0] to have the same “spin up in the browser” experience with Postgres.

Let me know if we can help with it!

[0] https://pglite.dev

nandosobral032• 2 years ago

The mac desktop icon looks huge compared to the standard macOS apps

burcs26• 2 years ago

Whoops I'll get that updated, for some reason it didn't crop the bounding box when I exported it!

nandosobral032• 2 years ago

Thank you! I've tried using outerbase within turso for my last few proyects and the experience has been great. Looking forward to using the app

teddarific• 2 years ago

i hate working with DBs via command line, so this looks really cool. curious if your product resonates with a specific segment of developers, e.g. frontend vs backend? Hoping this can entirely replace me needing to do anything DB related in the comamnd line...

burcs26• 2 years ago

Yes! I too am not a huge command line fan (unless it's git for some reason), my background is actually in design so it was really painful trying to access DBs at first and the only options were the CLI or tools that look like they were built 20 years ago.

That was actually the catalyst for creating Outerbase! We have all types of people using us today, honestly we resonate really well with anyone who needs access to a DB. Frontend folks love us because we're a more modern way to do it and we line up really well with other modern frontend stacks, backend folks like us because we are really focused and make it straightforward to manage your data, and non-technical teams love us because they can actually get the data they need without needing to be a DBA.

jaimehrubiks2• 2 years ago

Does it will it support management of users and permissions? I always struggle with those on the cli

invisal• 2 years ago

Adding user and permission support shouldn't be hard. What database are you using? We can put it on our next roadmap.

jaimehrubiks2• 2 years ago

I've used multiple but recently PostgreSQL is what we are using more. I think it's also the kind of task Platform or devops engineers, who are not usually experts in databases, are often asked to manage along with its deployment, so creating users and permissions is very common.

Lord_Zero• 2 years ago

Support MSSQL please

burcs26• 2 years ago

So we support it in Outerbase Cloud, and we will get to work on adding support for it to Studio as well.

In the meantime if you want you can check out our cloud-offering, we have a very generous free tier!

srameshc• 2 years ago

This is neat. I love the support for both Postgresql and Sqlite and explicit support for Cloudflare D1.

burcs26• 2 years ago

Yeah – we love all of these new databases, we actually partner with Cloudflare, Turso, etc... to make sure we can provide the best experience possible.

j1mmie• 2 years ago

For years I've wondered why a general purpose, high quality, good UX, browser based DB browser has not existed. I've implemented 3 such (not general-purpose) browsers in my career. But I'd be really happy to stop doing that and use this instead.

I would love to see a Firestore driver implemented (maybe I'll take a crack at it some day), as I'm stuck in GCP land for the time being.

amazingamazing• 2 years ago

PouchDB and CouchDB already exist

burcs26• 2 years ago

Thank you, I hope you can stop building those and use us instead as well :)

I've never used Firestore directly, but I did see Firebase's recent announcement about Data Connect. It seems like it could act as a bridge to bring your data into Outerbase. Do you think that would work?

vunderba3• 2 years ago

Because it does exist, but it's not free. Jetbrains Datagrip has been around for a decade and has connectors for most database archetypes (mongo, sql, redis, duckdb, etc).

Biggest limitation right now is its lack of support for vector style databases like Lance, qdrant, etc.

wiseowise2• 2 years ago

Browser based

atombender• 2 years ago

Datagrip is fantastic. You can also get the same functionality if you buy the IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate Edition, which includes many of the languages and tools that are also separately productized. I recommend this because the database tools integrate so well with the editor. For example, you can have a scratch file open that contains multiple SQL snippets. You can hit cmd-Enter when inside one snippet, and it will execute it and render the results either as a panel or inline inside the editor, notebook-style. Plus, full schema validation and autocompletion in the editor, and support for many, many databases including Postgres and ClickHouse.

Not only that, but the SQL support works for embedded strings in programs written in other languages such as Go. So it knows that some statement conn.Exec("SELECT ...") is SQL and syntax-highlights it, performs schema validation and autocompletion inside the string literal. Not only that, but you can open the string literal as a separate editor and edit it, including doing things like "reformat", which was an unexpected delight when I discovered it.

It's this kind of "feature stacking", which features working organically with each other, that makes Jetbrains IDEs so damn good.

But the basic database tools are also superb. Its table view is really fast. It has syntax highlighting (e.g. if a column value is JSON), live editing (including the ability to open a column value as an editor, in which case you get all the usual syntax tools), and even graph rendering with support for multiple data series and grouping in a single graph.

There is also excellent support for exporting data. You can mark a bunch of result rows and copy them as CSV or as SQL INSERT statements, or you can save the entire result to a file. This is how I often export data from BigQuery, as it's much more convenient than Google's own tooling (the web UI is particularly bad, requiring that you export the query result to a GCS bucket first).

These database UIs aren't technically difficult to do. But somehow nobody else seems capable. The closest I can think of is Microsoft's tooling around SQL Server, which is pretty slick, albeit MSSQL-specific. I often wonder how Jetbrains, which is a pretty small company, can be so effective and produce such an incredibly feature-rich product portfolio.

carlosjobim• 2 years ago

I remember I used TablePlus, which was what you described. Very pleasant program. Not browser based, though.

slaucon• 2 years ago

Yeah, my last company paid for a subscription to this. Enjoyed using it. Don’t think there’s a massive market, but definitely lots of devs who want easy DB access and would pay $5/month.

yesthisiswes• 2 years ago

I used to love table plus. My favorite part was that you could hook a query up to a chart. Then you could have the query fetch fresh data every second to give you a live dashboard.

At the last company I worked for I made a command to ssh into our servers and extract job data. I saved the data in a local SQLite database. Then I made a dashboard in table plus to show the it in a chart that would refresh every second.

I had a real-time dashboard in about an hour once I figured out all the job info I wanted to capture. It was really cool!

mritchie712• 2 years ago

I think it's because there's no business model in the pure "DB browser" product. People don't seem willing to pay enough for it to build a good business around it.

Everyone I've seen either pivots to a Retool competitor or a BI tool.

Source: I've tried it twice.

mistrial9• 2 years ago

small teams and individuals have failed to make enough money selling technical tooling products since forever; enthusiastic engineers keep building them. source: the 1990s

debarshri• 2 years ago

I think DB Browser is not a product but a feature. It is fairly challenging to monetize it. It can be an entry point for a developer's workflow, and then you can upsell something else.

RyanHamilton3• 2 years ago

For 12 years I got banks to pay for an editor I created. But yeah to grow the audience I made the database client free as others wouldn't pay. I have also created a separate BI tool so you're totally correct.

mayli• 2 years ago

dbeaver? it has dbeaver community edition, and supports tons of database.

wiradikusuma• 2 years ago

DBeaver's UI/UX is.. functional.

irunmyownemail• 2 years ago

dbeaver is my preference as well.

ndrake• 2 years ago

This isn't bad: https://github.com/sqlpad/sqlpad/tree/master

abraxas• 2 years ago

It's quite nice and really lightweight but it's also very basic. So basic you can't even click on the table name in the side panel to see a preview of the data. I use it every day but yearn for a few more features.

anon291• 2 years ago

Seriously... not only a browser but also something akin to access. It's crazy to me that it's 2024 and no/low code tools online are all still worse than MS access.

dspillett2• 2 years ago

It seems odd that there is nothing like Access (or the other couple if similar DB tools that were around in the heyday of Access and before), but I think it is because the demand is relatively small. I've seen several projects start in that direction then pivot elsewhere or just die an unsupported death.

I think the problem is that demand/interest is not sufficient to keep a self-hosted project going, nor monetisable enough for a hosted one. People wanting to self-host end up going with something more specific, possibly self-made, for their needs, rather than a generic solution, and a hosted solution has a couple of significant costs to cover:

1. Resource use when people load a large amount of data then run under-optimised queries on it (or impossible to optimise, if they've chosen a bad structure for what they want out of the data). This can be mitigated by throttling individual users' IO/memory/CPU use but then the product gets a reputation for being slow.

2. The support that many people will expect (especially if they are paying, but even if they are not) which could consume a lot of time. A project that is very lucky might end up with a community that takes on a good amount of this load, but you can't bank on being that lucky.

3. Resource to keep available all the hardly used, or even never used, projects that will sit around if the service is free. Mitigating this with cold storage will help, but as with throttling active use this will make the service appear slow generally (people will remember the tens-of-seconds startup time more than they will notice subsequent actions being more than fast enough).

Getting people to pay will be an uphill struggle, and money from advertising is unlikely to cover the above, especially with many people like me blocking commercial stalking which also blocks a lot of advertising.

paulryanrogers2• 2 years ago

How about LibreOffice Base?

evantahler• 2 years ago

SequelPro for me!

paulryanrogers2• 2 years ago

Isn't it unmaintained? Have you tried SequelAce?

KronisLV• 2 years ago

browser based

For whatever reason, this is the main limiting factor, local software can already be really good, for example:

• DBeaver - pretty nice and lightweight local tool for a plethora of databases https://dbeaver.io/

• DataGrip - commercial product, but you'll feel right at home if you use other JetBrains products https://www.jetbrains.com/datagrip/

• HeidiSQL - haven't really used this myself but the version graph on the page is cool https://www.heidisql.com/

• DbVisualizer - really cool tool that helps you explore messy schemas https://www.dbvis.com/

• Jailer - something for exploring datasets, a bit niche, but can be useful https://wisser.github.io/Jailer/

There's also some solutions that are specific to certain databases, like:

• pgAdmin - for PostgreSQL https://www.pgadmin.org/

• MySQL Workbench - for MySQL/MariaDB, sometimes a bit buggy but I really like the reverse engineering and forward engineering functionality https://www.mysql.com/products/workbench/

• Adminer - one of the somewhat rare web based solutions for the likes of MySQL/MariaDB, actually pleasant to use as long as you use it securely, this I think is a good example of web based DB tools https://www.adminer.org/

(out of respect for my own sanity, not mentioning SQL Developer, even though it sort of works)

RyanHamilton3• 2 years ago

QStudio. Editor and notebook in one, works on all os with 30+ databases and is Free: https://www.timestored.com/qstudio/ disclaimer: I'm the author

kennethh• 2 years ago

Great list.

Azure Data Studio is pretty good and free to use. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure-data-studio

Supports of course most MS products but also: PostgreSQL MySQL MongoDB Apache Spark Apache Cassandra

bbkane• 2 years ago

Two more tools I really enjoy:

- https://www.beekeeperstudio.io/ - electron based and I find it really simple to use.

- https://github.com/k1LoW/tbls - generate markdown docs from databases (similar to DbVisualizer, but it's a static binary and you can just push the md files - see https://github.com/bbkane/envelope/tree/master/dbdoc for example)

asmith11• 2 years ago

Jailer is awesome and really not “niche”. Also, it's not something for exploring "datasets", but for tables and relational databases in an innovative way. I think it would be fantastic if more people knew about it. (https://wisser.github.io/Jailer/)

gondo• 2 years ago

There is also an old school browser based phpMyAdmin

tianzhou• 2 years ago

https://www.bytebase.com/sql-editor/ with data access control, dynamic data masking.

jgrpf• 2 years ago

DbGate might fit your needs: https://dbgate.org/

It even has a demo: https://demo.dbgate.org/

sirjaz• 2 years ago

Any plans to use tauri? That way you can use the native os web view, plus cut the overhead of electron

burcs26• 2 years ago

Great point, I am a big fan of how lightweight Tauri is. We have used it in the past but have got hung up on some of the browser APIs not being supported.

I'll have to look into it again, it could have just been a skill issue.

brayden_wilmoth4• 2 years ago

Tauri when we last tried it was using your default browser to power it, which is great in theory. When we went to use newer API's such as the Popover API then browsers like Safari had a subpar user experience for a number of reasons of its own.

As much as the performance and lightweight aspects of Tauri are great we also have to weight the consistency of user experience which Electron gives having Chromium built into it. All that said... it's worth us taking a second look to see if Tauri will work for us in this use case!

shreddit• 2 years ago

Can i put it inside a docker container alongside my pg container and serve it under a path like “/dbadmin” with password protection? That’s my current workflow with pgadmin.

burcs26• 2 years ago

Definitely! We actually embed studio as part of another one of our offerings. It's actually iframed in, but you could achieve similar results if you wanted to dockerize it.

https://github.com/Brayden/starbasedb/blob/main/src/studio/i...

tronikel• 2 years ago

Any plans to add a dockerfile or push images so we could easily launch a container with 0 config?

delduca• 2 years ago

I would use it if it weren’t based on Electron. In recent months, I’ve replaced all Electron apps with native versions, and not only are they more performant, but my RAM is now saved for more important tasks.

distrill• 2 years ago

it runs in the browser

ingen0s• 2 years ago

Kudos! Following this

d0100• 2 years ago

Would be nice to have an option of choosing a "compact" interface

When you contrast web UI with native GUI, the realspace you lose in the web accumulates fast

All that padding makes it hard to see the actual information, especially for power users

Compare this with Navicat, or even DBeaver, their native tabs, buttons and cells are almost half the height of Outerbase Studio GUI

burcs26• 2 years ago

This is great feedback thank you, we will work on adding in a compact mode!

tangoman• 2 years ago

totally agree with this comment, a desktop UI should give me all the screen real state I can get, waste as little as possible in empty space.

bottled_poe• 2 years ago

Could you please add an option to enforce the use of transactions within the SQL input?

burcs26• 2 years ago

Great idea, I'll get it added to the roadmap!

maxloh2• 2 years ago

For similar projects, check out:

- Supabase Studio (open source, Postgres only) https://github.com/supabase/supabase/tree/master/apps/studio

- Prisma Studio (closed source, supporting most popular databases) https://www.prisma.io/studio

- Drizzle Studio (closed source, supporting most popular databases) https://orm.drizzle.team/drizzle-studio/overview

maxloh2• 2 years ago

It would be great if we could self-host it with pre-defined credentials (perhaps using an .env file). This would be useful for demo projects with Docker Compose.

For production use, we'll need some form of OAuth support, or users will have to implement their own authentication gateway in front of the Studio server.

burcs26• 2 years ago

We support adjusting the JSON config file so you can update it with your credentials!

outerbase.json { "driver": "mysql", "connection": { "database": "chinook", "host": "localhost", "port": 3306, "user": "root", "password": "123456" } }

hahn-kev• 2 years ago

I'd love to try it out, but I get an error about an invalid URL in the console when I try to open a database. Also it does not support Firefox

burcs26• 2 years ago

Apologies you had such a subpar experience, I'll look into what is going on here!

pkphilip• 2 years ago

Good project. The only thing I don't like about it is the dependence on Electron.. because it slows down everything.

8mobile• 2 years ago

Congratulations on your work! I tried Outerbase Studio and really appreciate the clean and visually appealing design. However, I noticed that it occasionally slows down during use. Looking forward to seeing future updates to make it even smoother!

burcs26• 2 years ago

Appreciate the kind words! Will dig into performance and see what we can do to further optimize it!

ibrothergang• 2 years ago

Great, I'm going to try it

dav43• 2 years ago

Looks nice and make be helpful. Keep in mind I can’t and most people can’t install this in a corp environment. If you get a pip install or npm install I’d be able to use it through corporate mirrors internally.

Make it as easy to run as something like datasette.

burcs26• 2 years ago

Would the browser version suffice? If not we support running commands like:

$ npx @outerbase/studio \ --port=5000 \ --user=admin --pass=123 \ mysql://root:123@localhost:3306/chinook

vasvir• 2 years ago

What I found invaluable is the use of Kate (yes the editor) SQL plugin. It can connect to MySQL/MariaDB, Postgres and others.

The main benefit is that you can organize your SQLs in files or even better in markdown files.

God knows how many times I had to retype the same or a very similar SQL in the past.

vollbrecht• 2 years ago

It seams that you currently only support Windows and MacOS via your electron wrapper. Are there plans to also release a Linux version?

Vinnl• 2 years ago

Would love to be able to use it to inspect my local databases on my Linux machine, indeed!

burcs26• 2 years ago

Yes, I will add Linux support to the roadmap!

antman2• 2 years ago

Very nice! Are there any plans for a visual query builder? MS Access had a very good experience on that and I am mot aware of any opensource tools that do it.

burcs26• 2 years ago

We could definitely do something like that, question for you if you've used any sort of AI -> SQL generator do you think it replaces the need for something like a visual builder? Or is it still nice to be able to construct them with visual blocks?

antman2• 2 years ago

I have good experience in both and I will say that AI sql generators assume unambiguous data estate names and addition descriptions which is not common in large organizatuions.SQL AI is currently an academic exercise

wcast• 2 years ago

Really nice! The Web UI over DB is also the motivation of more BI oriented tool https://github.com/metabase/metabase Writing to tables is also possible via actions https://www.metabase.com/docs/latest/actions/introduction

L-four• 2 years ago

All of the browser based database UI's I've tried have a lot of issues when it comes to binary data and very large int's in ways that will corrupt your data.

dspillett2• 2 years ago

The large ints thing is because people forget that numerics in Javascript are all officially floating point. The optimisers might often see that they can use real integers for performance, but you can't depend on that so have to assume it isn't happening.

Integer numbers are accurate up to 2^53-1 (and down to -2^53) as the IEEE754 double precision type is used, which is sufficient for a majority of tasks, but obviously not all.

Native BigInt (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Refe...) is widely supported these days (has been since late 2020 IIRC, or early 2023 if you waited for LTS releases without the feature to reach EOL) but is not yet widely used (many don't seem to know it is there, or assume it isn't widely supported, or are concerned about performance). Performance isn't usually bad (about 60% or the basis Number type last time I compared) but there are other issues with JSON or with many libraries only supporting Number not BigInt.

Dachande663• 2 years ago

We currently use Metabase for SQL reporting, so I've been looking for something to allow actually changing values for a while. That being said, I don't think I would want to touch this. Reading through the code, it looks like a) it doesn't actually use transactions which I just find mind blowing and b) the first two files I looked at (api/database) has the schema for a database defined twice so already I worry about the data model of the app, let alone managing my own.

burcs26• 2 years ago

This is good feedback, we are working on adding in transaction support to the open source version. For what it's worth, our cloud product wraps everything in a transaction.

jadbox• 2 years ago

I thought Metabase can change values?

matthewhefferon• 2 years ago

Metabase does support actions for PostgreSQL and MySQL that allow you to write back to your database.

betimsl• 2 years ago

Adminer.

Alifatisk• 2 years ago

Is there a plan to support collaboration? Like two or more users work in the same workspace so that querying and getting the result would happen in real time together.

I've had difficulties finding such application. The closest I've been to achieving something like this is vscode + liveshare + some sql management extension.

brayden_wilmoth4• 2 years ago

More of the collaboration features and team features have been or are being built into the Outerbase cloud offering. You can already invite teammates, share resources, see whose looking at what databases, and more there.

bko• 2 years ago

This looks great. I've built something similar. The important thing that I'm not sure if you support is permissioning.

Consider you have some email list that you need to maintain and ideally you want to let others maintain. Throw it in a table and give them permission to add rows.

There are a ton of things that I consider 'configs' like that and can't believe there aren't strong standards about how to do these sort of maintenance things (or maybe there are but I'm unaware)

Usaz112• 2 years ago

good!

lacoolj• 2 years ago

lets swap out pgadmin for this

replicate all its functionality, then imma stick this on all our production servers

yeeeeeeeah boooooiiiiii

TripleChecker• 2 years ago

Are you planning to release any 'end-user' features such as reports and dashboards? BI tools like Metabase already offer capabilities for SQL queries and database exploration, so I wonder what additional features or advantages your tool might provide to distinguish itself in the market.

Small typo in the footer - 'Compilance' (error report: https://triplechecker.com/s/345418/studio.outerbase.com)

Show HN: Outerbase Studio – Open-Source Database GUI

Related Stories