Ƀ — Universal Bitcoin Logo Alternative

http://www.ecogex.com/bitcoin

by bpierre • 13 years ago

319 194 13 years ago

rdegges• 13 years ago

This actually looks really great. I do find it a bit interesting that the colorscheme is also roughly the same as what Hacker News itself uses.

drharris• 13 years ago

Agreed, I like it. Also noticed the nod at HN, but it might be a coincidence. Really like that it's an existing unicode character; that's something that other currencies get for free, and Bitcoin should be no exception.

watty• 13 years ago

Orange and gray is an extremely popular combo in logos...

nbashaw2• 13 years ago

Yikes, the unicode character just looks like a messed up B. Most other currencies look a lot better in unicode: $, £, €, ¥, etc

mtinkerhess• 13 years ago

Arguably, those are messed up S, messed up L, messed up C, and messed up Y.

Semaphor• 13 years ago

Well, all of those besides the £ have a nice symmetry. But it's nothing really annoying, neither for it not for the Ƀ.

nbashaw2• 13 years ago

I think they all have clearer visual differentiation and generally are more aesthetically pleasing than Ƀ

Leszek• 13 years ago

Arguably, that's actually a messed up E rather than a C.

WA• 13 years ago

Yeah, I actually thought there was some dirt on my screen. I tried to clean it and after it didn't go away, I scrolled a bit to see that it belongs to the character itself -.-

jws• 13 years ago

That is Unicode U+0243 "Latin Capital Letter B with stroke". It is in the Latin Extended-B block, which contains among other mysteries, about half of the latin letters with strokes.

I'd love to see a "Unicode: What where they thinking?" page that documents why they thought a particular codepoint should be in the standard. I mean, capital A, B, and C with a stroke, but not capital D? A and C have their stroke diagonal, B has its horizontal, U also gets a horizontal stroke, but it is named a "bar". All very mysterious.

BorgHunter• 13 years ago

Capital D does have a "with stroke" character, Ð. Code point U+00D0. In actuality, it's a capital eth (ð), which is a bona fide letter by itself rather than an existing letter with an extra mark in it.

zokier2• 13 years ago

> Capital D does have a "with stroke" character, Ð. Code point U+00D0. In actuality, it's a capital eth (ð), which is a bona fide letter by itself rather than an existing letter with an extra mark in it.

Actually Unicode has two D with strokes, the "LATIN CAPITAL LETTER ETH" Ð (U+00D0) and "LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D WITH STROKE" Đ (U+0110). The uppercase letters are basically indistinguishable, but they have different lowercase letters: đ and ð.

fjarlq• 13 years ago

There is a capital D with stroke: Đ

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_with_stroke

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_(diacritic)

bcoates3• 13 years ago

Michael Kaplan's "Every Character Has a Story" is kind of like that, but it looks like he's adding to it slower than the Unicode folks are adding characters.

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/tags/every+character...

celoyd• 13 years ago

The Unicode people don’t sit around and invent characters – nor do they systematically determine the complete list of characters that should be in the standard.

Instead, they consider proposals from people who want their already-in-use character sets to included in the standard. So if someone proposes SINGING OCTOPUS, DANCING OCTOPUS, and SINGING SQUID, but not DANCING SQUID, well, DANCING SQUID won’t be in Unicode. There are lots of gaps like this.

Erwin• 13 years ago

The dancing octopus will have to wait for the next version.

The unicode consortium is currently only adding the SMILING OCTOPUS: http://codepoints.net/U+1F419

Probably not supported by your browser's font just yet: 🐙🐙🐙

nuxi• 13 years ago

There are three capital D letters with strokes within the Latin range: U+00D0 (capital Eth - old English, Icelandic), U+0110 (capital D with stroke - south Slavic, Vietnamese), U+0189 (capital African D - African languages).

dudus2• 13 years ago

I had my "What are they thinking?" moment when I found out about snowman.

http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2603/index.htm

After that the only one to shock me was "Pile of poo"

http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1f4a9/index.htm

cpeterso2• 13 years ago

Is 'PILE OF POO' (U+1F4A9) more shocking than 'LOVE HOTEL' (U+1F3E9)?

http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1f3e9/index.htm

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_hotel

ErikRogneby• 13 years ago

the diversity in font implementation is interesting to see: http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2603/fontsuppor...

breadbox• 13 years ago

The snowman is an old meteorological symbol for snow. Predates Unicode by decades. I assume it's because a snowman is easier to render by hand than an actual snowflake. (Or like how rain is symbolized not by trying to draw recognizable rain itself, but by an umbrella.)

jrochkind12• 13 years ago

The OP suggests that U+0243 B with stroke is a "capitalized alternate symbol for the voiced bilabial fricative in Americanist phonetic notation"

I would suspect that the other stroke capitals that are present were used in specific actual alphabets (and probably represented in some existing pre-unicode font or code block), whether 'Americanist phonetic alphabet', or other -- and the stroke capitals that are not present, were not.

In general, unicode codepoints are justified by actually existing use.

(There is an interesting metaphysical problem that arises as our lives become increasingly digitized -- things that are not present in unicode _won't_ be used, because they won't be _able_ to be used online... so how will new things be added justified by use, once all the existing pre-digital glyphs have been added? I dunno.)

vanderZwan• 13 years ago

> In general, unicode codepoints are justified by actually existing use.

I vaguely remember something about Klingon and unicode related to that... ah, there we go:

"In September 1997, Michael Everson made a proposal for encoding this in Unicode.[2] The Unicode Technical Committee rejected the Klingon proposal in May 2001 on the grounds that research showed almost no use of the script for communication, and the vast majority of the people who did use Klingon employed the Latin alphabet by preference.[3] Everson created a mapping of pIqaD into the Private Use Area of Unicode, which he listed in the ConScript Unicode Registry (U+F8D0 to U+F8FF[4][5])"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klingon_alphabets

wmf• 13 years ago

In a related vein, I suspect ligatures, small caps, and non-lining figures already look weird to "digital natives" because they were dropped during the age of DTP and generally have only been reintroduced as typographic novelties.

nandemo• 13 years ago

For what is worth, the voiced bilabial fricative is a sound similar to English "b" and "v". Languages that use that sound normally write it with "b", "v" or "w". It's common in Spanish but also creeps up in certain words in Portuguese, Japanese and others. [1]

In IPA, the standard phonetic alphabet, that sound is notated by "β" instead. The b-with-a-stroke, as well as barred-b (ᴃ) were used by some linguists before IPA became widespread, but they still kept appearing since they were easier to type in most typewriters (B, backspace, hyphen) and apparently also because some linguists didn't like IPA.

In addition, b-with-a-stroke is part of the Jarai alphabet, a variant of the Vietnamese alphabet used to write the Jarai language. [2]

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voiced_bilabial_fricative [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jarai_language

ygra• 13 years ago

Everyone can add new things in the PUA, in fact, that's where Emoji were before they were encoded. There is the ConScript Unicode Registry [1], an inofficial effort to map various constructed scripts to the PUA without them clashing. There are lots of pages in Klingon out there that make use of that encoding even though it's not in Unicode. Some of those have been encoded formally by now, so there is a way of creating new characters. It just takes a little longer.

Also, by now with webfonts you can easily create your own font to include characters from the PUA you designed, so you can use them online.

[1] http://www.evertype.com/standards/csur/

po• 13 years ago

There is an interesting metaphysical problem that arises as our lives become increasingly digitized -- things that are not present in unicode _won't_ be used, because they won't be _able_ to be used online...

I remember reading about exactly this problem recently in China: http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report_chinese-villagers-force...

setrofim_• 13 years ago

so how will new things be added justified by use, once all the existing pre-digital glyphs have been added?

I see two possible scenarios:

1. They won't be. Instead, existing glyphs will become increasingly overloaded with new meanings.

2. New glyphs will start their life as icons. Once a certain icon becomes wide spread, it may be made into a code point with a glyph.

In practice, it would probably be some combination of the two.

brazzy• 13 years ago

> A and C have their stroke diagonal, B has its horizontal

That's not something specified by Unicode, it's up to font designers how characters actually look.

ianstormtaylor• 13 years ago

I think having the unicode character is a great idea, you definitely want it to be reproducible in print without include images.

Except there's no reason to directly use the exact same letter outlines for the logo. The outlines could be improved and the general colors, shapes could also use some work.

cturner2• 13 years ago

I don't see a strong need for special symbols for currencies. Currencies can be represented using three letter codes like GBP, USD and BTC. It's ASCII, unambiguous and scales better than having a new custom symbol per character.

miles2• 13 years ago

Where's the "Upvote with half my karma" button when you need it?

agravier• 13 years ago

About that: note that in the ISO standard for those 3 letter currency codes, the first two letters represent the country or union that issues the currency. For instance, there will not be another GB* currency that is not british. And BT* correspond to Bhutan, IIRC. So BTC is problematic.

cturner2• 13 years ago

That's as arbitrary as the idea that only a nation-state can support a currency.

Samuel_Michon3• 13 years ago

So then Bitcoin should adopt ‘EAB’ (Earth Bitcoin)? Or ‘WOB’ (World Bitcoin)? That'd be fun, a Bitcoin penny could be called an Erby or Wobby (that's about USD 0.90 right now).

wyqueshocec• 13 years ago

I believe X is used for non-state stuff. For example, an ounce of gold is XAU, and silver is XAG. So maybe XBC or XBT for bitcoin?

imissmyjuno• 13 years ago

Where does euro fit in?

cpeterso2• 13 years ago

Bitcoin could use XXB or XBT. (XBC is already taken for some EU bond market units.)

smackfu3• 13 years ago

Yeah, which is kind of weird when a country revalues their currency. For instance, Mexican Peso was the obvious MXP, then it was revalued so they needed something new, so it's MXN (Mexican Nuevo Peso, I guess). Similarly, Turkish Lyra went from TRL to TRY ("Y" for "Yeni" meaning New.)

IvyMike2• 13 years ago

Personally, I like it.

One request: someone should declare that the Comic Sans version should have an eye: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro_sign .

Maybe I just did.

christiangenco• 13 years ago

Swap your []s and ()s.

corin_2• 13 years ago

That still doesn't work, because this site doesn't use the same formatting as (reddit)[http://www.reddit.com]

IvyMike2• 13 years ago

Crap. I have shamed my family, my ancestors, my culture, and myself.

Leynos• 13 years ago

This doesn't show up in Android (2.3), unfortunately.

petercooper• 13 years ago

Or the iPad. Just a box.

nfg• 13 years ago

Interestingly for me in both Chrome and Safari on iOS it renders as a box on this page, but a barred-B in the tab/window title!

gesman• 13 years ago

I think ฿ is becoming de-facto bitcoin sign quickly.

And sincerely it looks more appealing as a currency sign either.

bpierre• 13 years ago

Except ฿ is already the sign of the Thai baht (currency of Thailand), which is pretty confusing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thai_baht

jl6• 13 years ago

Not a fatal issue. A plain $ sign is very often used to mean a non-U.S.-dollar currency, with minimal confusion due to context.

neeee• 13 years ago

Wikipedia already has a disambiguation page for it linking to bitcoin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B8%BF_(disambiguation)

bcoates3• 13 years ago

Not enough bling. It should be " ҉в҉ " for maximum currency power.

ctbeiser• 13 years ago

Why is it that a currency logo now needs a color scheme? Every other major currency in the world is doing fine without a special color. I don't see why Bitcoin is any different.

nlh• 13 years ago

Well, one might argue that Bitcoin isn't "every other major currency in the world", and that's the point. Extraordinary currencies call for....extraordinary logos? ;)

clarkm• 13 years ago

Visa, MasterCard, and PayPal all have color schemes.

franciscoap• 13 years ago

Well, they don't have a color scheme, but some currencies definitely have a color "identity".

The Euro is yellow on blue, like the EU flag.

When you think of the Dollar, you think green (so many popular sayings came from this one!).

I am sure there are more, but I cannot remember any at the moment.

namwen• 13 years ago

The B inside the mark should be pushed ever so slightly to the left. Because it's center aligned with the strik-through as the left edge, it appears off-center.

Xcelerate3• 13 years ago

I don't like it. It looks stupid. It looks like some text rendering glitched. I much prefer the B that resembles the dollar (or some of the other alternatives) over this one.

nwh2• 13 years ago

That's a Thai currency symbol already though.

duskwuff• 13 years ago

And $ can stand for about twenty different currencies. Not all currencies have, or need, unique symbols.

baby• 13 years ago

so does thailand, arabic and korean... to you . because you're not used to it.

monsterix2• 13 years ago

Personally, I am just about okay with it. Have you considered inserting 'c' of (B)it(c)oin instead of the horizontal bar (dash) on the alphabet B?

Even if ฿ is the symbol of Thai currency it could be used for Bitcoin too. Much will depend on the context and besides not many buy online goods in Thai currency. US $ is the de facto currency in most places.

Also a small, really small, horizontal dash on the second leg of B isn't as great as horizontal dashes of £, €, ¥ no?

Have you considered a slant cutting across B? Or the mathematical/Greek beta sign (U+03D0) or its derivatives [1]?

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta

lyndonh2• 13 years ago

> not many buy online goods in Thai currency

Great idea, there are only 65 million people in Thailand and they will never need to use the Internet.

monsterix2• 13 years ago

> need to use the Internet.

Is not the same as purchasing goods online from foreign websites. Purchasing using Bitcoin is but only one use-case.

Besides I have not many (not one, in fact) Thai portals listing its prices in any currency other than US$. Not one.

May be there could be some selling incense sticks in local Thai Baht, but meh that's not meant for 65 MM Thais. However, it may not be a great idea to adopt this symbol because, like you, many Thais would want their currency symbol to remain unique.

What keeps you from saying that?

valgaze2• 13 years ago

iPad Unicode is a no-go: http://i.imgur.com/ugqJZre.png

publicfig• 13 years ago

Is that because of the iPad? Notice it exists just fine in the page title bar.

valgaze2• 13 years ago

Seems like it, same weird behavior (title bar OK) on chrome ipad: http://i.imgur.com/GnOqBnZ.png

chasing5• 13 years ago

Looks terrible. The earlier B+$ blend (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bitcoin.png) works better. Alludes to a dollar sign, but uses the B. I'm not the biggest fan of Bitcoin, but I thought that logo was clever and memorable. This one looks like crap.

beering• 13 years ago

1) You are so quick to call this crap. 2) One of its explicit goals is to find an existing character. Your post ironically shows that you can't currently type the B+$ symbol.

chasing5• 13 years ago

Well, without hitting up the Google I have no idea how to type that B-with-a-line-through it, either.

Plus, yeah, I'm standing by my first reaction that it looks, if not like crap, than kind of random. It doesn't really communicate anything on its own. A bystander won't see it and think "this is a currency symbol." Which I would think Bitcoin proponents would want!

itafroma• 13 years ago

The symbol the GP describing is an existing symbol, ฿, and is used for Thailand's currency, the baht: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thai_baht

Cakez0r• 13 years ago

I don't find it very aesthetically pleasing either. It's widely accepted that bitcoin is shortened to btc, so I don't think being able to type the symbol is really necessary. I couldn't type the new proposed character either without going back and looking up the alt code or copying it from character map.

mrmiller2• 13 years ago

... The logo you linked to does not look nice. I'm sorry.

eksith• 13 years ago

Agreed. It looks like a lame coin you'd see on an online gambling site. The new B actually reminds me of a logo to a financial institution and is far more classy.

chasing5• 13 years ago

Just to note, I chose that image for the actual B+$ symbol, not to gold coin stuff around it. Yeah, that's pretty goofy looking.

unconed• 13 years ago

The problem is two fold:

1) Despite creating an actual style guide for the logo, including recommended usage, the proposal IMO lacks serious attention to typographic detail, the one thing a currency logo actually needs. None of the examples look particularly great: the type is misaligned, the text dominates the B logo in practically every badge.

2) The Wikimedia-linked B is much better designed as a shape, has the right weight, but the tacky coin presentation completely ruins it.

Someone needs to take approach 1 to proposal 2 and we'll all be better for it.

Edit: nevermind, someone already did: http://forrst.com/posts/Rebranding_of_Bitcoin-Ft5

barbs3• 13 years ago

If it were part of Unicode, I'd prefer the B+$.

WickyNilliams6• 13 years ago

I propose that the "B" aspect of Bitcoin should be downplayed (the initial isn't important, see dollar/pound) to instead put more focus on the "Bit" aspect since it is a digital currency. Combining a 1 and a 0, handily gives us the uppercase Phi! Φ

cyrus_• 13 years ago

This also has other benefits:

  * Supported by most widely-used fonts.
  * Easy to pronounce, one syllable
  * Has mainstream connotations (bitcoins sounds like a nerd thing)
  * Could use the lowercase phi for a more granular denomination maybe

vacri• 13 years ago

Phi is used in a lot of other places, so there's some ambiguity inherent in using that. $ is used in programming, but that's something that came after the symbol was assigned. ¥, £, € are not used for anything else that's common.

lessnonymous2• 13 years ago

Why do dollar signs matter? Is this not a currency outside the usual system? It has absolutely no relationship to dollars except for exchange. It's as closely aligned to Yen (¥) or Philippine Pesos (₱) which both have horizontal bars.

Additionally, the sign you suggest is closer to a Cifrão than a dollar sign as it has two vertical bars. Unfortunately it's common for people to arbitrarily use two vertical strokes on a dollar. If this were to happen with the Bitcoin, then there would be confusion with the Thai Baht (฿).

Instead, use a horizontal stroke and the ambiguity is removed. The symbol doesn't have any close matches in current use or in Wikipedia's 'historical' section.

Scryptonite• 13 years ago

I would much rather use the original BTC symbol. I would gander it has something to do with the fact that my mind has an easier time having the vertical bar(s) in "$" be a symbol of monetary value, and that I would have a different opinion if I were born in the UK or Germany and had the "£"/"€" characters on my keyboard.

Samuel_Michon3• 13 years ago

According to the Wayback Machine, this exact page has been online for two years[1]. It's also been mentioned on the Wikipedia page for 'Ƀ' since June of 2011[2]. The OP has submitted this link once before, 10 months a go[3].

That's not to say that this isn't an interesting proposal, it just means some ideas take time before they gain any traction.

[1] http://web.archive.org/web/20110815000000*/http://www.ecogex...

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%C9%83&diff=54...

[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3987186

jtchang• 13 years ago

Doesn't look bad at all. Simple currency symbol.

jahewson• 13 years ago

It looks like it was designed in 1977, which is disappointing because a currency symbol should have a timeless design. Use of color is nearly always doomed to failure because others will not be diligent about reproducing the colours faithfully.

The existing Bitcoin symbol is far superior, and that it is identical to the Thai Baht is of no great significance - currency symbols are hardly unique. The horizontal bar looks awkward - it lends a poor balance to the design, and looks more like a rendering glitch in smaller sizes.

APB• 13 years ago

Just another Bitcoin (alternate) identity

http://www.behance.net/gallery/Bitcoin-(alternate-identity)/...

lucb1e2• 13 years ago

I'm sorry to say it, but, eww. I guess it's just not my style.

omegavesko3• 13 years ago

Same here, ugh. Looks like programmer art from the early 2000s.

GhotiFish• 13 years ago

This symbol isn't bad, but I like the current Bitcoin symbol. Further I think the Bitcoin symbol should be ADDED to unicode. It's a new currency, it's a new symbol. it's in the vernacular. It should be added to unicode. Rather than co-opt another symbol that might have other uses.

I can understand the reticence to add a symbol because some group of people have begun using it for their nomenclature. That kind of thing happens all the time, after all, bitcoin could go away. I understand that, but exactly how much traction does one need to get? Does 10% of the planet need to know? Does 30%? 50%? When's the tipping point?

Then again. If our new little currency has 3 different symbols and no one can agree on what it should look like. THEN I'd understand not putting it in unicode.

   *cough*

zokier2• 13 years ago

I have to go with the crowd saying that currency symbols are silly things and should be deprecated. I never liked the euro symbol, it's awkward to write by hand or type with keyboard. And extra awkward with limited/non-standard keyboards such as those found on mobile devices. I usually use just "e", eg. 10e (with or without space depending on context). If I need to be more explicit or formal for some reason then I'd use EUR or just spell out the full name (eg. 10 euros). There is some benefit of having a four-letter name for your currency.

On a related note having your currency symbol as a prefix is also bit awkward as no other units generally are used as prefix. That's why I often prefer to write 10 usd instead of $10.

nostromo2• 13 years ago

One of the nice features of Bitcoin is that it's supposed to retain its value better than fiat currencies, which are designed to lose value over time.

Keeping that in mind, you could put a non-spacing unicode equals sign under the B like this: B͇. Looks quite nice also.

If you wanted to keep the double slashed dollar/euro/yen theme, you could also use non-spacing unicode to make something like B⃦ or B⃒.

gahahaha• 13 years ago

Bitcoin is actually designed to be very deflationary, not stable.

nostromo2• 13 years ago

By "retain its value" I meant >= not just == as opposed to inflationary fiat currencies which do not retain their value.

I suppose we could do B͐ instead. :)

medell• 13 years ago

I see B minus.

moreati• 13 years ago

I'm quite a fan of the Forrst proposal http://forrst.com/posts/Rebranding_of_Bitcoin-Ft5.

lucb1e2• 13 years ago

Both of the symbols shown in the top image are fine by me, the proposed one perhaps a bit better than the original. The OP's proposal just looks ugly and incredibly outdated. This new logo you linked looks like it's new, speedy, and I like the two-color simplicity.

giblfiz• 13 years ago

Relevant regarding standards: http://xkcd.com/927/

mortenjorck• 13 years ago

I anticipate this meeting with similar uptake to Leo Laporte's campaign to rebrand podcasts as "netcasts" about seven years ago. Sure, it makes more sense, it's more flexible, but there's way, way too much inertia to change at this point.

etjossem• 13 years ago

I don't know how widespread browser support for Ⓑ is, but it's the most intuitive symbol I can think of. Maybe ⓑ?

stcredzero2• 13 years ago

Better than the character in the title, apparently.

zonkey• 13 years ago

I like the lowercase b because it translates to bit. And it looks like a coin.

omegavesko3• 13 years ago

Chrome supports it, but it looks really wonky.

http://i.imgur.com/YB3krUW.png

iso8859-14• 13 years ago

It's not really dependent on Chrome, it's dependent on your fonts. http://i.imgur.com/o2BIyki.png

Xcelerate3• 13 years ago

Actually, I propose we just submit a new symbol for the next Unicode release later this year:

http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2012-m12/0037.h...

mynameisvlad5• 13 years ago

That's a horrible idea if you want the mark to be used across the internet. It will take plenty of time for new systems to use newer version of Unicode, and some systems will never support it at this point.

Xcelerate3• 13 years ago

I disagree. All major browsers will support it within a couple months and any Bitcoin related software would just build the symbol in. Where else is it going to get much use? Microsoft Word?

johngaston• 13 years ago

huh

dfischer• 13 years ago

I like it.

sturmeh2• 13 years ago

That's lovely, but I can't see it in Chrome or IE8 on Windows XP.

What is wrong with ฿?

lessnonymous2• 13 years ago

There is nothing wrong with the Thai Bhat. Why do you ask?

sturmeh2• 13 years ago

They won't be needing their fiat anyway. :P

rileytg• 13 years ago

Awfully similar to hacker news colors no?

tomrod• 13 years ago

Interesting. It doesn't render on an iPad with Chrome, but does render in the header. Weird.

nwh2• 13 years ago

Same in Safari. I don't understand the difference.

jessaustin• 13 years ago

How about using two glyphs, with U+00A2 for the second? ฿¢ B¢ b¢ etc.

antimora• 13 years ago

Does not work on android. The letter looks square.

shmerl• 13 years ago

Good idea.

alenart• 13 years ago

What's the Bitcoins to Stanley Nickels conversion rate? What about to Schrute Bucks?

FWIW, I see a B with something that looks like a dirt speck blocking a pixel of my screen.

barbs3• 13 years ago

Not sure if this was recent, but preev.com has this character as its symbol now.

rickyconnolly• 13 years ago

Outrageous. How am I supposed to designate voiced bilabial fricatives and ask for Bitcoin donations on the same page?

johnward• 13 years ago

This didn't show up on my iphone3g

Ƀ — Universal Bitcoin Logo Alternative

Related Stories