Updates to GitHub Copilot interaction data usage policy

https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/updates-to-github-copilot-interaction-data-usage-policy/

by prefork • 4 months ago

390 165 4 months ago

djmashko2• 4 months ago

Content from your issues, discussions, or private repositories at rest. We use the phrase “at rest” deliberately because Copilot does process code from private repositories when you are actively using Copilot. This interaction data is required to run the service and could be used for model training unless you opt out.

Sounds like it's even likely to train on content from private repositories. This feels like a bit of an overstep to me.

mt42or• 4 months ago

Is it legal ? Surely not in any EU countries.

mentalgear2• 4 months ago

At least one instance where it was enabled in EU countries as well.

okanat2• 4 months ago

Does it even matter? They trained AI on obviously copyrighted and even pirated content. If this change is legally significant and a legal breach, the existence of all models and all AI businesses also is illegal.

0x3f3• 4 months ago

It might or might not be legal, but it seems materially worse to screw over your direct customers than to violate the social-contracty nature of copyright law. But hey ho if you're not paying then you're the product, as ever was.

section_me2• 4 months ago

If I'm paying, which I am, I want to have to opt-in, not opt-out, Mario Rodriguez / @mariorod needs to give his head a wobble.

What on earth are they thinking...

sph2• 4 months ago

What on earth are they thinking...

@mariorod's public README says one of his focuses is "shaping narratives and changing \"How we Work\"", so there you go.

section_me2• 4 months ago

"shaping narratives", sounds like they follow the methodologies of a current president

fmjrey• 4 months ago

Translation: more alignment with Microsoft practices

sph2• 4 months ago

Thanks to Github and the AI apocalypse, all my software is now stored on a private git repository on my server.

Why would I even spend time choosing a copyleft license if any bot will use my code as training data to be used in commercial applications? I'm not planning on creating any more opensource code, and what projects of mine still have users will be left on GH for posterity.

If you're still serious about opensource, time to move to Codeberg.

thesmart3• 4 months ago

Yeah, I'm guessing that probably because in their TOS you grant them some license work-around for running the service, which can mean anything.

midasz• 4 months ago

I'm in my happy space selfhosting forgejo and having a runner on my own hardware

heavyset_go• 4 months ago

Made the same choice, my open source projects with users are in maintenance mode or archived. New projects are released via SaaS, compiled artifacts or not at all.

I scratch my open source itch by contributing to existing language and OS projects where incremental change means eventually having to retrain models to get accurate inference :)

Deukhoofd• 4 months ago

So basically they want to retain everyone's full codebases?

The data used in this program may be shared with GitHub affiliates, which are companies in our corporate family including Microsoft

So every Microsoft owned company will have access to all data Copilot wants to store?

mentalgear2• 4 months ago

On April 24 we'll start using GitHub Copilot interaction data for AI model training unless you opt out. Review this update and manage your preferences in your GitHub account settings.

Now "Allow GitHub to use my data for AI model training" is enabled by default.

Turn it off here: https://github.com/settings/copilot/features

Do they have this set on business accounts also by default? If so, this is really shady.

archb• 4 months ago

Interestingly, it is disabled by default for me.

gpm2• 4 months ago

Me too, which is making me wonder if they're planning on silently flipping this setting on April 24th (making it impossible to opt out in advance).

crashingintoyou• 4 months ago

Reading the github blog post "If you previously opted out of the setting allowing GitHub to collect this data for product improvements, your preference has been retained—your choice is preserved, and your data will not be used for training unless you opt in."

xgdgsc• 4 months ago

I guess we have to check out again on April 24 ?

g947o• 4 months ago

https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/188488

Why are you only using data from individuals while excluding businesses and enterprises?
Our agreements with Business and Enterprise customers prohibit using their Copilot interaction data for model training, and we honor those commitments. Individual users on Free, Pro, and Pro+ plans have control over their data and can opt out at any time.

dormento• 4 months ago

Aka "they have lawyers and you usually don't, so we think we can get away with it."

themafia• 4 months ago

and we honor those commitments.

Ah, so when the inevitable "bug" appears, and we all learn that you've completely failed to honor anything, what will be your "commitment" then? An apology and a few free months?

Time to start pushing for a self hosted git service again.

DavidSJ• 4 months ago

Do they have this set on business accounts also by default? If so, this is really shady.

Looks like not, but would it actually have been shadier, or are we just used to individual users being fucked over?

martinwoodward5• 4 months ago

Just confirming, we do not use Copilot interaction data for model training of Copilot Business or Enterprise customers.

verdverm5• 4 months ago

You shouldn't do it for public by opt-in, it should be opt-out. But that is the Microslop effect on GitHub, users are an afterthought.

lenova• 4 months ago

Ugh, can't believe they made this opt-in by default, and didn't even post the direct URLs to disable in their blog post.

To add on to your (already helpful!) instructions:

- Go to https://github.com/settings/copilot/features - Go to the "Privacy" section - Find: "Allow GitHub to use my data for AI model training" - Set to disabled

inetknght• 4 months ago

can't believe they made this opt-in by default

You can't believe Microslop is force-feeding people Copilot in yet another way?

and didn't even post the direct URLs to disable in their blog post

You can't believe Microshaft didn't tell you how to not get shafted?

thrdbndndn• 4 months ago

I always thought "opt-in" (not "opt in") meant something you have to actively choose to enable; otherwise, it stays off. So calling something "opt-in by default" sounds like a misnomer to me.

But English is not my first language so please correct me if I'm wrong.

parkersweb2• 4 months ago

Yes - not impressed at all that this is opt-in default for business users. We have a policy in place with clients that code we write for them won’t be used in AI training - so expecting us to opt out isn’t an acceptable approach for a business relationship where the expectation is security and privacy.

aksss• 4 months ago

It is not opt-in by default for business users. The feature flag doesn't show in org policies and github states that it's not scoped to business users.

gentleman112• 4 months ago

What did everyone expect? I can't understand this community's trust of microsoft or startups. It's the typical land grab: start off decent, win people over, build a moat, then start shaking everybody down in the most egregious way possible.

It's just unusual how quickly they're going for the shakedown this time

whynotmaybe• 4 months ago

Per their blog post

Business and Copilot Enterprise users are not affected by this update.

pjmlp• 4 months ago

We have a business account, and because of issues like this, access to anything CoPilot is blocked.

indigodaddy• 4 months ago

Checked and mine was already on disabled. Don't remember if I previously toggled it or not..

martinwoodward5• 4 months ago

If you previously opted out of the setting allowing GitHub to collect data for product improvements, your preference has been retained here. We figured if you didn't want that then you definitely wouldn't want this..

baobabKoodaa2• 4 months ago

(oops)

tech234a• 4 months ago

It’s currently March

baobabKoodaa2• 4 months ago

Oops. Thank you for correcting me!

TZubiri2• 4 months ago

Two issues with this:

1- Vulnerabilities, Secrets can be leaked to other users. 2- Intellectual Property, can also be leaked to other users.

Most smart clients won't opt-out, they will just cut usage entirely.

matltc2• 4 months ago

That's me. Frankly, looking at just uninstalling VSCode because Copilot straight-up gets in the way of so much, and they stopped even bothering with features that are not related to it (with one exception of native browser in v112, which, admittedly, is great)

nine_k• 4 months ago

VSCode can be cleaned: https://github.com/VSCodium/vscodium

(I prefer Emacs anyway, but VSCode is a worthy tool.)

rvz• 4 months ago

From April 24 onward, interaction data—specifically inputs, outputs, code snippets, and associated context—from Copilot Free, Pro, and Pro+ users will be used to train and improve our AI models unless they opt out.

Now is the time to run off of GitHub and consider Codeberg or self hosting like I said before. [0]

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22867803

0x3f3• 4 months ago

Codeberg doesn't support non OSS and I'd rather just have one 'git' thing I have to know for both OSS and private work. So it's not a great option, IMO. Self-hosting also for other reasons.

I'm not sure there are any good GitHub alternatives. I don't trust Gitlab either. Their landing page title currently starts with "Finally, AI". Eek.

eipi10_hn• 4 months ago

Maybe sourcehut? https://sourcehut.org

diath• 4 months ago

This approach aligns with established industry practices

"others are doing it too so it's ok"

theshrike79• 4 months ago

Ackshually Anthropic is opt-in AND they give you discounts if you enable it

cma• 4 months ago

Anthropic puts up random prompts defaulting to enabled to trick you into accidentally enabling.

nodar86• 4 months ago

What kind of discounts? I have never heard of this

stingraycharles• 4 months ago

It’s opt-out, not opt-in, at least for Claude Desktop and Claude Code, unless you use the API.

stefankuehnel• 4 months ago

If you scroll down to "Allow GitHub to use my data for AI model training" in GitHub settings, you can enable or disable it. However, what really gets me is how they pitch it like it’s some kind of user-facing feature:

Enabled = You will have access to the feature

Disabled = You won't have access to the feature

As if handing over your data for free is a perk. Kinda hilarious.

petcat• 4 months ago

I guess the "perk" is that maybe their models get retrained on your data making them slightly more useful to you (and everyone else) in the future? idk

a1o2• 4 months ago

I went to check on this and I have everything copilot related disabled and in the two bars that measure usage my Copilot Chat usage was somehow in 2%, how is this possible?

Before anyone comes to me to sell me on AI, this is on my personal account, I have and use it in my business account (but it is a completely different user account), I just make it a point to not use it in my personal time so I can keep my skills sharp.

hakunin• 4 months ago

Does Github count it as copilot chat usage when you use AI search form on their website, I wonder?

saratogacx• 4 months ago

If you're taking about the quota bar. That is only measuring your premium request usage (models with a #.#x multiplier next to the name). If you only use the free models and code completion you won't actually consume any "usage". If you use AI code review that consumes a single request (now). Same with the Github Copilot web chat, if you use a free model, it doesn't count, if you use a premium model you get charged the usage cost.

7bit• 4 months ago

It's worded that way to create FOMO in the hopes people keep it enabled.

Dark pattern and dick move.

mirekrusin2• 4 months ago

The feature is that your coding style will be in next models!

rzmmm• 4 months ago

I wish my GPL license would transit along with my code.

Rapzid2• 4 months ago

Is that not some stock feature-flag verbiage?

bigiain• 4 months ago

Stock dark pattern verbiage...

I'm a little surprised the options aren't "Enable" and "Ask me later".

NewJazz2• 4 months ago

But it isn't a feature, so using a feature flag is a bit weird.

martin-t• 4 months ago

A few days ago, I unchecked it, only to see it checked again when I reloaded the page.

It could be incompetence but it shouldn't matter. This level of incompetence should be punished equally to malice.

data-ottawa• 4 months ago

It’s not so bad, there’s no double negative and it’s not a confusing “switch” that is always ambiguous as to whether it’s enabled or not.

In contrast when you create a a GCS bucket it uses a checkmark for enabling “public access prevention”. Who designed that modal? It takes me a solid minute to figure out if I’m publishing private data or not.

stavros2• 4 months ago

Disabled - You won't have access to this feature of disallowing training.

Imustaskforhelp2• 4 months ago

Thanks to your comment, I have disabled it now :-)

I agree that it feels like a dart pattern for the most part, makes me want to use codeberg/self hosted git

TZubiri2• 4 months ago

If this doesn't sound bad enough, it's possible that Copilot is already enabled. As we know this kind of features are pushed to users instead of being asked for.

Maybe it's already active in our accounts and we don't realize it, so our code will be used to train the AI.

Now we can't be sure if this will happen or not, but a company like GitHub should be staying miles away from this kind of policy. I personally wouldn't use GitHub for private corporate repositories. Only as a public web interface for public repos.

hmate92• 4 months ago

For what it's worth they're not trying to hide this change at all and are very upfront about it and made it quite simple to opt out.

matltc2• 4 months ago

They didn't even link the setting in their email. They didn't even name it specifically, just vaguely gestured toward it. Dark patterns, but that's Microslop for ya

hmate92• 4 months ago

going to github i was greeted with a banner and a link directly to the settings for changing it

w4yai• 4 months ago

I've seen worse dark pattern to be honest... I don't think they're being malicious here.

ncr1002• 4 months ago

They do not make it very simple to opt out. That is false.

On Android for instance I invite you to use the GitHub app and modify your opt-in or opt outside settings... You will find that nothing works on the settings page once you actually find the settings page after digging through a couple of layers and scrolling about 2 ft.

hoten• 4 months ago

Why is there no cancel copilot subscription option here?. Docs say there should be...

Mobile

https://github.com/settings/billing/licensing

EDIT:

https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/manage-your-accou...

If you have been granted a free access to Copilot as a verified student, teacher, or maintainer of a popular open source project, you won’t be able to cancel your plan.

Oh. jeez.

pizzafeelsright• 4 months ago

I am not certain this is that big of a deal outside of "making AI better".

At this point, is there any magic in software development?

If you have super-secret-content is a third party the best location?

thesmart3• 4 months ago

How about "no." You may be okay giving away your individual rights, including to copyright, but I am not.

danelski4• 4 months ago

They've had ample access to the final output - our code, but they still hope with enough data on HOW we work they can close the agentic gap and finally get those stinky, lazy humans that demand salary out of the loop.

OtherShrezzing2• 4 months ago

It’s not clear to me how GitHub would enforce the “we don’t use enterprise repos” stuff alongside “we will use free tier copilot for training”.

A user can be a contributor to a private repository, but not have that repository owner organisation’s license to use copilot. They can still use their personal free tier copilot on that repository.

How can enterprises be confident that their IP isn’t being absorbed into the GH models in that scenario?

martinwoodward5• 4 months ago

We do not train on the contents from any paid organization’s repos, regardless of whether a user is working in that repo with a Copilot Free, Pro, or Pro+ subscription. If a user’s GitHub account is a member of or outside collaborator with a paid organization, we exclude their interaction data from model training.

8cvor6j844qw_d6• 4 months ago

For private repositories under a personal account, if the repo owner has opted out of model training but a collaborator has not, would the collaborator's Copilot interactions with that repo still be used for training?

lmc• 4 months ago

Thank you for clarifying this.

danelski4• 4 months ago

Quite simply, that's just a matter of the corporate internal policy and its (lack of) enforcement. This problem is just a subset of the wider IP breach with some people happily feeding their work documents into the free tier of ChatGPT.

OtherShrezzing2• 4 months ago

So, how does this work with source-available code, that’s still licensed as proprietary - or released under a license which requires attribution?

If someone takes that code and pokes around on it with a free tier copilot account, GitHub will just absorb it into their model - even if it’s explicitly against that code’s license to do so?

danelski4• 4 months ago

Most of the new culture and website contents is under full copyright. How much of an obstacle was that to these companies?

semiinfinitely• 4 months ago

ill be moving off github now

thesmart3• 4 months ago

I'm ready to abandon Github. Enschitification of the world's source infrastructure is just a matter of time.

_pdp_• 4 months ago

Microsoft doing dumb things once again.

Who in their right mind will opt into sharing their code for training? Absolutely nobody. This is just a dark pattern.

Btw, even if disabled, I have zero confidence they are not already training on our data.

I would also recommend to sprinkle copyright noticed all over the place and change the license of every file, just in case they have some sanity checks before your data gets consumed - just to be sure.

pred_3• 4 months ago

What is the legal basis of this in the EU? Ignoring the fact they could end up stealing IP, it seems like the collected information could easily contain PII, and consent would have to be

freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous. In order to obtain freely given consent, it must be given on a voluntary basis.

LadyCailin2• 4 months ago

I actually don’t seem to have this option on my GitHub settings page, which leads me to wonder if this only applies to Americans.

LauraMedia• 4 months ago

I actually did have to manually disable this from Germany, so it might be a different reason you don't have it?

spartanatreyu• 4 months ago

I have the setting in Australia.

I'd be curious to see which countries are affected

rennokki• 4 months ago

It breaks GDPR easily: GDPR enforces you to comply with opt-out by default, no workaround by prefilling before hitting submit.

While some think this applies only to personal data, then yes. But it takes only one line of code to use my phone number for testing while I test locally a register form in the application I'm developing.

Once it gets sent to Copilot I can threaten with legal action if they are not taking it down.

pred_3• 4 months ago

Based on https://github.blog/changelog/2026-03-25-updates-to-our-priv..., it looks like they are going to go for “legitimate interest” which seems clearly overridden by data subject interests in this case, hence not lawful.

If you don't want to wait until your PII inevitably gets sent through, you can already now file a complaint to your local supervisory authority: https://www.edpb.europa.eu/about-edpb/about-edpb/members_en

edelbitter• 4 months ago

Has there ever been a GDPR fine that actually exhausted all applicable legal challenges within a sufficiently short delay from initial violation to actually matter?

liquid_thyme• 4 months ago

They use data from the poor student tier, but arguably, large corporates and businesses hiring talented devs are going to create higher quality training data. Just looking at it logically, not that I like any of this...

rectang• 4 months ago

I just checked my Github settings, and found that sharing my data was "enabled".

This setting does not represent my wishes and I definitely would not have set it that way on purpose. It was either defaulted that way, or when the option was presented to me I configured it the opposite of how I intended.

Fortunately, none of the work I do these days with Copilot enabled is sensitive (if it was I would have been much more paranoid).

I'm in the USA and pay for Copilot as an individual.

Shit like this is why I pay for duck.ai where the main selling point is that the product is private by default.

david_allison2• 4 months ago

I have GitHub Copilot Pro. I don't believe I signed up for it. I neither use it nor want it.

1. A lot of settings are 'Enabled' with no option to opt out. What can I do?

2. How do I opt out of data collection? I see the message informing me to opt out, but 'Allow GitHub to use my data for AI model training' is already disabled for my account.

martinwoodward5• 4 months ago

Hey David - if you want to send me (martinwoodward at github.com) details of your GitHub account I can take a look. At a guess I suspect you are one of the many folks who qualified for GitHub Copilot Pro for free as a maintainer of a popular open source project.

Sounds like you are already opted out because you'd previously opted out of the setting allowing GitHub to collect this data for product improvements. But I can check that.

Note, it's only _usage_ data when using Copilot that is being trained on. Therefore if you are not using Copilot there is no usage data. We do not train on private data at rest in your repos etc.

david_allison2• 4 months ago

Cheers!

QuadrupleA• 4 months ago

Fun fact: Copilot gives you no way to ignore sensitive files with API keys, passwords, DB credentials, etc.: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/11254#discussi...

So by default you send all this to Microsoft by opening your IDE.

malnourish• 4 months ago

I swear I just set up enterprise and org level ignore paths.

veverkap• 4 months ago

Yeah, it's a Copilot Business/Enterprise feature

0xbadcafebee2• 4 months ago

Separate fun fact: Gemini CLI blocks env vars with strings like 'AUTH' in the name. They have two separate configuration options that both let you allow specific env vars. Neither work (bad vibe coding). Tried opening an issue and a PR, and two separate vibe-coding bots picked up my issue and wrote PRs, but nobody has looked at them. Bug's still there, so can't do git code signing via ssh agent socket. Only choice is to do the less-secure, not-signed git commits.

On top of that, Gemini 3 refuses to refactor open source code, even if you fork it, if Gemini thinks your changes would violate the spirit of the intent of the original developers in a safety/security context. Even if you think you're actually making it more secure, but Gemini doesn't, it won't write your code.

WatchDog2• 4 months ago

Gemini also won't help you with C++ if you are under 18, since it would be unsafe.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39632959

verdverm5• 4 months ago

I use Gemini 3 to edit multiple forks. Your statement is false based on stuff I actually do.

nulld3v• 4 months ago

Sadly, this issue is systemic: https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/2847

stavros2• 4 months ago

OpenCode has a plugin that lets you add an .ignore file (though I think .agentignore would be better). The problem is that, even though the plugin makes it so the agent can't directly read the file, there's no guarantee the agent will try to be helpful and do something like "well I can't read .envrc using my read tool, so let me cat .envrc and read it that way".

sceptic123• 4 months ago

Fun fact: you shouldn't have sensitive files with API keys, passwords, DB credentials, etc. in your repo

wzdd• 4 months ago

“In your repo” and “in the directory you are running copilot” are two separate things.

nunez• 4 months ago

It’s fine to have them in your repo if they’re encrypted and the private key isn’t in there as well!

cebert• 4 months ago

I wish GitHub would focus on making their service reliable instead of Copilot and opting folks into their data being stolen for training.

latand63• 4 months ago

Why won't people like to make the models better? Aren't we all getting the benefit after all?

danelski4• 4 months ago

That's akin to being grateful for your local shop owner that they allowed you to sweep the floor for other customers.

latand63• 4 months ago

Please don’t strawman me, I asked completely different question.

It’s not about being grateful or something, but that many people (devs) are too concerned about their code being stolen as if they’ve come up with something unique and the LLMs are some kind of database (which it isn’t).

At the end of the day we’re going to be using AI to write all the code, many of us already doing that. And if some GitHub copilot model would be better - we’re getting more quality code that is generally available for next pretraining runs (for your and other models). Some would even switch to copilot if it’s good.

What do you think about it?

stefanos82• 4 months ago

Serious question: let's say I host my code on this platform which is proprietary and is for my various clients. Who can guarantee me that AI won't replicate it to competitors who decide to create something similar to my product?

halfcat• 4 months ago

If the code is ever visible to anyone else ever, you have no guarantee. If it’s actually valuable, you have to protect it the same way you’d protect a pile of gold bars.

What does “my code...for my clients” mean (is it yours or theirs)? If it’s theirs let them house it and delegate access to you. If they want to risk it being, ahem...borrowed, that’s their business decision to make.

If it’s yours, you can host it yourself and maintain privacy, but the long tail risk of maintaining it is not as trivial as it seems on the surface. You need to have backups, encrypted, at different locations, geographically distant, so either you need physical security, or you’re using the cloud and need monitoring and alerting, and then need something to monitor the monitor.

It’s like life. Freedom means freedom from tyranny, not freedom from obligation. Choosing a community or living solo in the wilderness both come with different obligations. You can pay taxes (and hope you’re not getting screwed, too much), or you can fight off bears yourself, etc.

Heliodex• 4 months ago

Finally. The option for me to enable Copilot data sharing has been locked as disabled for some time, so until now I couldn't even enable it if I wanted to.

badthingfactory• 4 months ago

I appreciated the notification at the top of the screen because it prompted me to disable every single copilot feature I possibly could from my account. I also appreciated Microsoft for making Windows 11 horrible so I could fall back in love with Linux again.

jmhammond• 4 months ago

Mine was defaulted to disabled. I’m on the Education pro plan (academic), so maybe that’s different than personal?

marak830• 4 months ago

As it's enabled by default, does that mean everything has already been siphoned off and now I'm just closing the gate behind the animals escaping?

Shit like this shouldn't be allowed.

sbinnee• 4 months ago

Bold move. Who uses Copilot these days? Unless they have free credit I mean.

phendrenad2• 4 months ago

So I do all the work of thinking about how to do something, and as soon as I tell Copilot about it, not it's in the training data and anyone can ask the LLM and it'll tell them the solution I came up with? Great. I'm going to cancel.

explodes• 4 months ago

We all knew Microsoft was going to destroy GitHub eventually when it was first bought.

How much longer do you want to tolerate the enshittification? How much longer CAN you tolerate it?

ncr1002• 4 months ago

On my Android phone I was able to change the setting using Firefox by logging into GitHub and not allowing it to launch the GitHub app.

I was unable to change the setting when I used the GitHub app to open up the web page in a container.. button clicks weren't working. Quite frustrating.

etothet• 4 months ago

The fact that this is on by default, especially for paid accounts and even more especially for organizations, where certain types of privacy is sometimes mandated by the industry your business is in, is ridiculous.

There should also be a much easier one-click to opt out without having to scroll way down on the settings page.

tuananh• 4 months ago

making this option opt-in by default is a very shady choice, GitHub.

greatgib• 4 months ago

And something important, that is leaking from the phrasing of their blog post, is that it is not really "Github" that wants to suck all your data "prompts, code, context, documents", ... but it is "Microsoft"!

robeym• 4 months ago

There are several settings in my account relating to Copilot that are locked/enabled with a shield and key icon next to it. Any idea how to disable these settings? It's on the same settings/copilot/features page.

dartf• 4 months ago

I don't see an option to opt-out? Is it US only thing?

kevcampb• 4 months ago

This is terrifying. Github was the one provider I did not expect to make such an action. We're now playing whack-a-mole with vendors to try and ensure that our company IP doesn't end up being used to train a model.

AlexeyBelov• 4 months ago

Github was the one provider I did not expect to make such an action

There is no Github anymore in any meaningful way. It's Microsoft. Github doesn't have a CEO anymore.

nhkjhh• 4 months ago

nig

Updates to GitHub Copilot interaction data usage policy

Related Stories