eipi10_hn

You can pay per year ($54 for 3600 searches/year) and see how far you can go in a year.

You can do that with Kagi. Just put `?` at the end of the search and it will give you an answer.

They said until they can't afford to maintain it.

It will depend on your banks/services. If those apps strictly implement Play Integrity API, you won't be able to use them on Graphene OS

You can't install Graphene OS on Samsung phones.

Google Pay (Google Wallet) actually also has virtual number so my real card number won't leak in many cases.

Yes, and people will sit there and sip tea while waiting for "someone"? For how long?

You need to give evidence that this has something to do with Wyden's March warning first.

I dislike everything you said.

Where can I buy this printer?

Your comment is psychotic too.

Mullvad vs my ISP.

One at least has open source software clients, and publishes audits from other 3rd-party audit organizations.

The other open source... nothing. Their client apps have dozens of trackers inside. And it's a dream to see any of the ISPs in my county publish any 3rd-party audits. Their other products (going with the service) have trackers and personalized targeting ads inside.

Yeah, in my 1 million alternate universes should I trust my ISP more.

My ISP is in a communist country, they sell other products like TV boxes, cameras, clouds and have ads/trackers on all of their products too.

Should I trust my ISP than Mullvad? LMFAO.

Then just show which claims need more evidence in their articles.

So just don't comment?

You are weird

Orion is their first product, before Kagi.

Disgusting.

Yes, it's that BIG of a load: https://status.sr.ht/issues/2025-03-17-git.sr.ht-llms/

I usually just use another profile for the stuff that I clear cookies when closing the profile. The other profiles I just use for a limited of sites that need logging in, each site is in its own container and I don't browse other sites on those profiles.

If I ever need to fill the login, I just do any of these:

- KeepassXC has auto-type feature, so I just choose the needed one and let it auto-type - I enable the extension only when I need to log in and choose the one I need to fill (not auto-fill, but only fill when I click on the account from the extension pop-up dashboard).

Same as Bitwarden? You just need to remember Keepass password, just like remember Bitwarden password.

I actually was a Bitwarden user at first, but over time in reality the frequency that I change email/password is not that much. It's not like I change those things every hour or every day like with my work files/documents and need constant syncing to the drive. And the chance that I add/change passwords at 2 devices at a close time is even less.

So gradually I don't feel I need syncing that much any more and switched to Keepass. I made my mind that I'll only change the database from my computer and rclone push that to any cloud I like (I'm using Koofr for that since it's friendly to rclone) then in any other devices I'll just rclone pull them after that when needed. If I change something in other devices (like phones), I'll just note locally there and change the database later.

But ofc if someone needs to change their data/password frequently then Bitwarden is clearly the better choice.

The argument is you are using OS as a counter example when it's not the counter example.

What is the chromium of OS world but Linux doesn't depend on them?

Proof?

Ah yeah, after accusing others that they vibe-code without proofs, no apology and steering the accusations to other things?

LMFAO. Brave uses uBO's lists and filters, including trusted filters which have much more capabilities with much more risks to your sites' data and they allow that on all other lists too (even uBO only allows their own lists as trusted by default, other lists need to have permissions from users manually). That's how they can block youtube ads, and no they don't code their own filters for youtube ads either. And be assure that they can't check 100% all commits from uBO and other lists either.

If you want to play "no trust to a 3rd party dev", you should not use Brave's adblocker either. Or at least turn off all the lists inside it, and use your own lists. Your security risk is in those stock lists.

Because Windows doesn't go open-source and others can't build their OS from windows like chromium. With OS, there are no open source kernels that are actively maintained and security-fix bump every month by full time staff of giant corporation. With browsers, devs already have an open source engine with most of the work and build are from full-time staff of a giant corporation, and then they just lazily build "their own" browsers upon that and brag on social media.

Build your own browser engine and see how you can pay the devs to make them work on it.

No. Thunderbird has its own merits and they work without Firefox. Mozilla has credibilities in e-mail because of Thunderbird. This topic has 0 relations to Firefox.

Yes, it's unrelated. Each one has its own resources and roadmaps. They are totally not dependent on each other. Thunderbird and its roadmaps/projects are not affected by Firefox' earnings at all. One's development doesn't affect the others.

Half the thread impunes Mozilla for taking so much money from Google and imply that they are controlled opposition, and the other half gets upset when Mozilla doesn't implement every standard that Google tries to steamroll through the standards bodies because of objections to how they can be used for fingerprinting, or complains that the attempts at anti-fingerprinting break websites, etc.

Yeah, double standards at its max. Firefox inputs every privacy concerns for these APIs that Google puts 0 Vietnam Dong to care about users' privacy. And those people cry about why Firefox doesn't implement it.