Nextcloud Hub 26 Spring: Built together, designed for the future

https://nextcloud.com/blog/nextcloud-hub26-spring/

by doener • 1 month ago

121 102 1 month ago

nextcloud.com

beepbooptheory• 1 month ago

Maybe I'm alone but nextcloud has gone from being kinda flaky and annoying to really great the past few years.

technothrasher• 1 month ago

I don't think I really push it, but I find it just right for self-hosting my calendar, contacts, photos, and files.

wolttam• 1 month ago

I'd agree that it has gotten better over time. I'm glad we have Nextcloud around.

theodric• 1 month ago

I always had terrible trouble keeping it (and before it, Owncloud) updated and in sync with available dependencies on my Debian host. A few years ago, when I built a new NAS, I installed a snap, and that's been the ticket. It's pretty close to flawless now.

lvales• 1 month ago

Yeah, I eventually gave up on self hosting Nextcloud because of incompatibilities with PHP(-FPM), iirc. They were always lagging behind and it became a hassle to mantain. I ended up replacing all the parts I used with other single purpose software, and it's been a better experience overall.

encom2• 1 month ago

When I ran OwnCloud (on Debian), I installed from their APT repo, and one "apt upgrade" handled everything. It was nice and easy, and I didn't have any problems with it.

NextCloud uses its own updater* (which I don't like), and aside from some recent MariaDB snafu it's been very low maintenance.

  (*)sudo -u www-data php /var/www/nextcloud/updater/updater.phar

bigstrat20032• 1 month ago

I'm not a huge "run everything in a container" guy, but Nextcloud is one of those things I absolutely will always run in a container. It's too much of a beast for me to have any desire to try to manage package versions and fixing it if something breaks.

jaffa2• 1 month ago

Is nextcloud the good one and owncloud the inferior one?

FabCH2• 1 month ago

I don’t know about owncloud, but I have been hosting a family Nextcloud instance for a little under two years and it works fine.

It’s boring. It works.

m00dy• 1 month ago

same here, great choice for a private family cloud.

maxloh• 1 month ago

Nextcloud is written in PHP, which doesn't sound scalable to me.

OwnCloud is written in Go but employs an open-core model. Some features are locked behind a proprietary paywall.

mbesto2• 1 month ago

Nextcloud is written in PHP, which doesn't sound scalable to me.

Lol what? Facebook (pre Hack), Tumblr, Wordpress, Etsy...

graemep• 1 month ago

Shared nothing is no scaleable?

cheschire• 1 month ago

“OwnCloud infinite scale” is written in Go. But ownCloud 10 is php.

I tried for weeks to get OCIS working but gave up and went back to ownCloud 10.

They’re committed to security updates for 10 but it’s a small company. I doubt it will get much attention sadly.

encom2• 1 month ago

The good OwnCloud is abandoned, and instead they released some meme enterprise nonsense.

I'm running NextCloud, but I hesitate to call it good, because of its kitchen sink approach to features. I really want 2015 era OwnCloud with just files, it being PHP/MariaDB/Apache-based. I refuse to use anything that requires Docker, which is most of the slop alternatives currently available.

doubled112• 1 month ago

You can remove almost app in Nextcloud. It is pretty modular. You can have a files only Nextcloud, last time I tried.

kombine• 1 month ago

I run nextcloud on a NixOS server within a systemd container, so no Docker.

yetausername• 1 month ago

You don't need to run oCIS in docker, you can use the bare-metal installation: https://owncloud.dev/ocis/deployment/systemd/

just one remark, get the image from assets: https://github.com/owncloud/ocis/releases/tag/v8.0.4

zamalek• 1 month ago

My biggest problem with Nextcloud is that it intentionally broke (at least twice by memory) on some updates, wanting me to run some oci command on the box. Remember that "for my family" also means "for my family when I'm gone." I never got round to having to find an alternative thanks to the divorce, but I'd consider Nextcloud a complete non-starter for this reason.

Find an alternative.

__jonas• 1 month ago

The breakdown as I understand is as follows:

- Owncloud: The 'original' platform, written in php, still developed today

- Nextcloud: A fork of Owncloud (php) by some of the people that worked on it, including the project founder over directional differences, now more widely used than the original Owncloud

- Owncloud infinite scale (OCIS): An implementation of the Owncloud server in Go, with the goal of making it faster and more scalable than the PHP version

- Opencloud: A fork of Owncloud infinite scale (Go) after an acquisition of ownCloud, the company.

ezst4• 1 month ago

Upgraded yesterday, I only use a small amount of features (files, memories, calendar, tasks). It sucks that tasks isn't compatible yet (but I mostly use DAVx⁵/Tasks.org as front-end), and it sucks that the landing page still pulls close to 20MB or so, but besides that, nothing to report one way or another.

christefano• 1 month ago

Is Memories working for you after the 34 update? I remember it took a long time for the community to update Memories to work with 33, and that experience has me holding off on updating to 34 with the hope that app updates come quickly.

ezst4• 1 month ago

Yup, it worked out of the box!

hagbard_c4• 1 month ago

I replaced Memories with Immich running as an external application using the OpenID connect provider app to authenticate Nextcloud users. Immich and Memories seem to aim at more or less the same spot but Immich outpaces Memories nearly everywhere: it is a lot faster and offers far better search features which is the main attraction for me since it makes it possible to actually find that needle in the 160.000+ large haystack.

gh02t• 1 month ago

Oh man, tasks isn't compatible yet? Thanks for mentioning that, I guess I'll wait a bit to upgrade.

ntnsndr• 1 month ago

I now use Nextcloud both for a family server and an academic lab. It has become such a daily part of my life, and I am really grateful for it. I just wish the network effects were stronger so I could benefit more from the federated features, and people didn't think it is so weird to get a Nextcloud link.

Lab use: https://git.medlab.host/MEDLab/Handbook/src/branch/main/docs...

Personal use: https://nathanschneider.info/2026/06/toward-a-durable-writin...

blendergeek• 1 month ago

Nextcloud has the most confusing versioning of any software I have ever used.

Nextcloud Hub 26 is Nextcloud 34 and follows Nextcloud Hub 9 which is Nextcloud 33.

And I could be off on those exact numbers.

bisby• 1 month ago

When numbers are confusing, it's usually just a recalibration.

Hub 9 aligns with cloud 33. But they are switching Hub to a dated numbering scheme because it's intended to be timestamped. It's not "Hub 26" its "Hub 26 Spring" -- it's not a version number, it's a time.

The underlying Nextcloud keeps an incremental semver release version so it can be based on features rather than timeline. Because the Nextcloud version and Hub version aren't tied to each other.

This would be like saying that iPhones have a confusing naming scheme because iPhone 17 uses iOS 27 and has 2 different numbers. If next year's iPhone was called "iPhone 2027" and used "iOS 29", we'd still understand that.

Melatonic3• 1 month ago

Apple did just recently have a confusing scheme. We went from iOS 18 to 26

And all other devices also went to 26

Would it be that hard for Nextcloud to just have a single version across all apps and then a separate but similar server scheme ?

tda• 1 month ago

I run Nextcloud at home with 1.5TB of files and 2 users, on a reasonably sized server. It is painfully slow. Still better than OneDrive, but only just: synscing takes forever, never reaching a fraction of available bandwidth. Upload from my phone is flaky, often hangs and needs manual intervention. It is a battery drain. The whole experience with add-ons and the general UI feels like a 2010 PHP app.

I am grateful Nextcloud exists, but no app deserves a vibe coded Rust rewrite more than Nextcloud. Literally nothing to loose

chrneu• 1 month ago

This seems to be a really common issue with NextCloud. I'd say about 30% of installs seems to just..be slow? I've had this happen to me on a handful of installs, and i've had friends/collegues it's happened to.

I'm not aware of any "Fix" besides whiping your install(s) and trying again. Try not to use a backup if you can, as it can keep the slowness/lag across installs.

It's really annoying.

mixmastamyk• 1 month ago

Opencloud is the golang rewrite and is much faster.

Schlagbohrer2• 1 month ago

At that point it would be so painful it'd prompt users to switch to competing software.

The whole NextCloud suite seems to have this problem of too many offerings that don't get polished to completion.

ezst4• 1 month ago

Look into "next cloud HPB" (High performance backend) https://github.com/nextcloud/notify_push

Melatonic3• 1 month ago

You sure that's the right link ?

hs86• 1 month ago

Weirdly, the decision to use PHP was justified back then by the easy deployment of the tarball on some shared webhoster. Open yourwebsite.com/owncloud, enter your database credentials, and you already have your instance running.

Now that use case is gone, everyone is expected to use their big Docker image, but the server is still written in PHP. I can't shake the feeling that some people just don't want to give up the tools they are used to and have stuck with them for a bit too long.

jacomoRodriguez2• 1 month ago

Forget the official phone client and use FolderSync. It integrates perfectly (and seamlessly) to the nextcloud dav endpoint and you have way more options to fine-tune how and when and what you want to upload.

There are so many bugs in the phone clients, I ditched it two years ago, since then I'm super happy with the whole thing!

fundatus• 1 month ago

I love Nextcloud but I feel like they should really completely redo their UI. It just doesn't look like something from this decade.

bigstrat20032• 1 month ago

That is not a compelling reason to overhaul a UI (which is something that should rarely, if ever, be done). If it works and is pleasant to use, what it looks like is of no consequence.

emilbratt• 1 month ago

Wait, you don't feel so?

I have maintained a Nextcloud server for a small business for the last 6 years. I agree when I started using it early 2020 that the ui felt less modern, but after some updates down the road up until now it looks completely like it is from this era. Am I missing something? However, I never complained about the UI neither then nor now.

hkpack• 1 month ago

NextCloud's macOS app is implemented in a way that completely disregards any UI guidelines or just common sense for the platform.

Developers either don't use macOS at all, or don't care.

But functionally it works for our small team.

bityard3• 1 month ago

Wha-huh?

This is the decade where every company bought into flat design, monochrome, chonky whitespace, extremely radiused corners everywhere. Pulling up my instance, Nextcloud apes that to a tee. You'd be hard-pressed to find any "modern" UI trend that they haven't shoe-horned into their design somehow.

The _did_ completely redo their UI a few years back, and for the worse in my opinion. The Calendar in particular is far less usable and (and much more buggy) than it was around the time it was forked from OwnCloud.

drnick13• 1 month ago

Nextcloud is great, I self-host an instance at home. I mostly use the calendar, address book, and file sharing with links a la Google Drive. It's probably heavier and slower than it should be for what it does, but it works.

Just like Home Assistant, it is a "must have" tool for self-hosters.

lgcmo• 1 month ago

What's your experience like?

Lot's of people say that's a mess to maintain and too broken to actively use.

I often doubt if that's due to actual problems, or mix with that and bad decisions on the setup. Is dockering, keeping the data handling itself outside of it and a few other easy (or not so much) precautions enough to have a somewhat smoother sailing?

Also, how much time do you need to keep things from failing apart?

drnick13• 1 month ago

I never had any issues with it. The Docker image is basically a turnkey solution. The only extra step was to set up nginx as a reverse proxy. I wouldn't deploy a complex piece of software like Nextcloud without Docker to be honest, and this is coming from someone who runs stuff bare metal when it is practical to do so.

Edit: In view of the other response, I checked my docker-compose and I am also using the community maintained image (https://hub.docker.com/_/nextcloud) instead of the all-in-one image. It is supported by MariaDB, redis, and aio-talk (for Nextcloud Talk).

Another thing: You should not skip major versions when upgrading. Pin the version in your Docker compose file.

snailmailman2• 1 month ago

They have an “all in one” container that supposedly works out of the box.

I didn’t want to give it access to the docker socket, with the ability to spawn its own containers. So instead I just use the nextcloud container directly. (With several other containers, like DB, reverse proxy, collabora, etc) It’s a mess to configure, hence their recommendation to use their “all in one” setup. All sorts of weird defaults with documentation that says “this is the default but you should absolutely change it to do X instead so that it performs better”. Things like setting up a service to generate thumbnails, setting up redis, etc.

Once configured though, it mostly just works. You can’t let it auto update between major versions, but you probably should be doing that anyway. There are usually breaking changes and you have to manually run a command or two between major updates. That doesn’t happen too frequently though.

I can’t speak to the quality of the all-in-one setup. It’s likely easier than what I did - but also what’s the point of putting it in docker and also giving it control of docker? Seems to defeat the point of containerization.

dzikimarian• 1 month ago

I have instance for couple of years. No issues for now. Never had a feeling it's going to fall apart. I host it via docker image, pull new version from time to time and that's mostly it.

Only two problems I can think of: it's bit slow - even our company instance which has reasonable resources could be bit faster. Also they could use a better UI designer.

None of it is major problem for me. As self-hosted Dropbox/calendar/cospend it's perfectly fine.

hagbard_c4• 1 month ago

I've self-hosted first Owncloud from version 2.x, then moved to Nextcloud when it became clear that was the better option. Early versions could end up non-functional due to update glitches but for the last 3-4 years or so it has been mostly smooth sailing with here and there a glitch due to some app introducing a system-wide behavioural change - looking at you, Richdocuments/Nextcloud Office, stop adding headers to each and every app which cause things like Maps and News to stop functioning. Developing apps for it can sometimes be tedious due to frequent API deprecations which cause a lot of bitrot which in turn means you're own your own when it comes to less frequently updated apps.

It certainly is good enough for active use and, given a well-maintained collection of apps hardly takes any time to maintain. I'd say give it a go, it is free after all.

artgship• 1 month ago

Been using Nextcloud exclusively for probably 4 years now? Before that it was a mix of nextcloud + Google Drive. It works for me really well, I can grab my files through my vpn with any of my computers when I am not at home.

tapoxi• 1 month ago

If I want to buy a small NAS that just runs Nextcloud and has a copy of my Google Photos library - what do I go with?

I don't have a ton of space so something that fits in the media center.

jmathai• 1 month ago

If you’re going to run your own NAS then consider swapping Google Photos out with Immich.

I know it’s not the question you asked but I feel not enough people know about it as an option and it’s really as good as Google Photos.

bayindirh2• 1 month ago

GMKTec G9. Four NVMe slots, plus some internal memory to deploy TrueNAS. It only has 12GB of RAM, but has two ethernet cards, acceptable cooling and performance and has a small footprint.

SSDs shall be single sided and gonna need heatsinks, but I believe it works well and is not tied to any manufacturer for anything.

If you want go all-out get ASUSTOR's Ryzen based systems. You can use the stock firmware or disable it without wiping it and deploy TrueNAS on it. It's a beast.

TrueNAS has containers and applications and VM support so you can run any service you want on it.

shadowpho• 1 month ago

I have a g9 and cooling is fine, but not great. I ended up opening it up and placing heatsinks on hot chips

TiredOfLife• 1 month ago

Google photos will become one way sync only in august. You can upload to cloud, but no sync to pc.

geff82• 1 month ago

How is OpenCloud a serious competitor?

Diti• 1 month ago

Am I the only one who doesn’t trust Nextcloud because they use Vimeo instead of a privacy-respecting CDN to showcase videos of their project?

redlewel• 1 month ago

Yes, you are the only one.

troyvit• 1 month ago

This is a niche use, but I use the PhoneTrack app[1] with Nextcloud. It allows me to track my phone without relying on a third party service. It saved my ass already when I lost my phone in the park one night, and it's a nice way to track long hiking trips or road trips too as it saves the gpx and lets you export it:

https://github.com/julien-nc/phonetrack

imalerba• 1 month ago

I left nextcloud because how slow it felt even on my beefy server. I switched to opencloud.eu, it might have less features but it's just what I needed

vitally3643• 1 month ago

Seriously. I ran it on a server with two Xeon CPUs and 128GB of RAM. The web interface took minutes to do anything. Browsing a large photo library was just completely unworkable (and that was before they ripped out all the sorting and filtering features from the photo library).

My instance killed itself somehow, likely a failed auto update. I was, of course, using the default docker setup with the watchtower instance etc etc. I never got it to come back up, and I haven't missed it at all.

Even opening the damn login page took a good 30 seconds to load, there's no excuse for this kind of performance on a real-deal enterprise server.

c0balt2• 1 month ago

NextCloud needs tuning (mostly of php-fpm and caching ) oob to be fast/usable in my experience. Just throwing resources at it won't make it faster as the defaults are generally quite conservative.

They even have a specific guide for this topic, https://docs.nextcloud.com/server/stable/admin_manual/instal...

As a side note, it's PHP so your single core clocks will generally be more relevant for latency than multi-core performance, feeding many cores requires a lot of divisble work.

esperent• 1 month ago

I run it on a Hetzner vps with 4 vcpus, 16gb of ram that's also running multiple other containers. I haven't checked recently but most of that ram is free.

I'm not going to claim nextcloud is the snappiest app but I can open it right now, from across the world from my server as I'm on vacation, and it loads in <5s. I haven't done much tuning.

bityard3• 1 month ago

I'm not sure how you are holding it, but I ran Nextcloud on a VPS with under 1GB RAM for many years, now it's on a 12GB RAM cloud instance and is only using a few GB of RAM last time I checked.

jacomoRodriguez2• 1 month ago

I run mine in hetzner cloud with 4vcpu, 8gb of ram. Via AIO including recognize, colabora and whiteboard. It runs very smooth, even when I access my photos, which number in are 100.000+ I guess you have some config / setup issues

Schlagbohrer2• 1 month ago

NextCloud Notes is frustratingly broken for offline use. The UI bricks itself with its own error messages when it can't phone home to the server. Even notes which are marked in the app as "Make available offline" don't work offline!

The iOS applications also are quite poor. For example the home screen widget has never shown me any of my favorited items even though it should, I have many favorited items, it is fully synced when I'm on my home network, yet it says "no favorites".

Considering the size of NextCloud and how long they've been around I wish they would fully complete more of their offerings before launching a dozen new ones.

InsideOutSanta• 1 month ago

Worse are the clients which, in some error states, make regular login attempts, triggering Nextcloud's login lock, locking out users who have no clue what's going on. I like Nextcloud overall, but I wish it was more stable.

NaiveBayesian• 1 month ago

I love nextcloud and have been using it for years. However recently I've considered taking my instance offline or at least behind a VPN because even if only 10% is true of what AI folks are claiming about LLMs finding exploits left and right, it seems super risky to be hosting your private data on nextcloud.

How do you folks deal with these massively increased threats to self-hosted open source apps?

codepoet80• 1 month ago

I only use my ownCloud instance behind Tailscale...

snailmailman2• 1 month ago

I use nextcloud all the time, my private instance works great and does everything I need it to. But I keep it behind a VPN. It’s got a lot of parts, and thus a lot of surface area. It may be secure but I just assume it isn’t. I rely on the VPN to be the security boundary.

0fflineuser• 1 month ago

Host it in your home an use a vpn to connect to your home network when you are outside, that way it isn't exposed to the internet but you can still access it.

theK• 1 month ago

Yup, that's the way it has to be. And thanks to the autocomplete on steroids we call Ai nowadays it actually has become way easyier to do such a thing.

longitudinal932• 1 month ago

But then you are losing the ability to use it for file sharing ala Google Drive or Dropbox.

I simply moved mine behing a random string with the home of the domain completely innocuous (an HTML re-direct elsewhere)

onel3• 1 month ago

I think a full blown VPN might be an overkill. Something like tailscale is much easier to set up, even though technically it's the same thing.

freedomben• 1 month ago

Yeah definitely would put behind a VPN. I run mine on my desktop at home and use Tailscale (Headscale for self-hosting) to make it accessible when I'm out of the house. Blazing fast speeds when at home, and reasonable when not.

zerkten• 1 month ago

Putting everything behind a VPN seems like the solution selfhosters have landed on. That way you have some control over how quickly you have to respond.

3lpsy• 1 month ago

I host my entire homelab in my home and use tailscale to access it. You just connect your nextcloud instance to tailscale. Then you connect each client to tailscale. Works on iOS and android (and of course any desktop). When you're on you're home network (LAN), tailscale _should_ use the LAN IP for routing. And then when away, you'll route over derp servers usually.

You could also use tailscale for auth, but i like to enforce separate authentication so that you have to be authenticated to the tailnet and have to go through the normal authentication to app.

bityard3• 1 month ago

That works okay if you are the only user.

I use quite a few Nextcloud features where access via tailscale is either inconvenient or impossible. My whole family uses the calendar on their phones and other devices, which means they would have to either learn about VPNs, or I would be the one managing all their devices for them. (Neither are likely to happen.)

I also often share individual files or folders with external contacts as a more private alternative to dropbox or google drive.

onel3• 1 month ago

That's a good setup. Tailscale, or wire guard like apps, are kindda the future. We're moving towards this more private internet where access is invite only.

cahaya• 1 month ago

Same. Solving it by moving complex and sensitive data to an offline desktop app https://document.bot that support offline (self hosted) AI models (and optionally EU/ US AI providers). However, it doesn't integrate yet with shared (org) drives.

drnick13• 1 month ago

I've considered taking my instance offline or at least behind a VPN

The practical downside is that you won't really be able to use all the features of Nextcloud that way, such as file sharing with people outside your LAN, or Nextcloud Talk (a Zoom substitute).

That being said, I don't store sensitive documents on my Nextcloud instance exposed to the Internet. For that, I have a Samba server on a LAN.

FabCH2• 1 month ago

I ban almost the entire world using iptables.

Or rather, I drop all traffic other than that coming from my geo.

This has dropped my „rattling the door handle“ rate to 1/week instead of 1/second.

throwup238• 1 month ago

How do you folks deal with these massively increased threats to self-hosted open source apps?

I throw everything behind Cloudflare ZeroTrust SSO or whatever it’s called with a whitelist of Github accounts, and Cloudflare Tunnel to network the containers/VMs without exposing any ports to the outside (except SSH), enforced by both the cloud firewall and iptables/ifw.

onel3• 1 month ago

I think moving it offline is part of the solution, but the main one is to actually find/fix the issues. So I guess this will require more involvement from us in open source.

jacobgkau• 1 month ago

Your apps are now available via focused waffle menu for centralized access to all your apps. It reduces distraction and uses the interface space efficiently as your your library grows.

"your your" typo aside, I remember when Nextcloud moved from a drop-down menu for the apps to listing them all out separately on the header bar, to make them more visible and reduce the clicks to switch apps. I guess they've changed their minds again; I look forward to when they change them back.

paweladamczuk• 1 month ago

The Euro-Office project is the most interesting part of this announcement to me.

tomaskafka2• 1 month ago

Is it still a pile of php files underneath, with file sync speed 50x slower than binary implementations and protocols of eg. Seafile?

hagbard_c4• 1 month ago

Yes, it is still PHP. Sync speed is mostly fine though, most of the 'slowness' which Nextcloud is known for comes from the sometimes sluggish web interface. Point a fast WebDAV-compatible file manager [1] at a Nextcloud instance to get a better impression of backend speed. Point it at an image directory and you'll see as many php-fpm processes launched as there are thumbnails to process.

[1] https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash is a good web-based example of such a thing, ignore all the guff about needing docker since you can just run the whole thing from a single self-compiled binary. By default it sends some telemetry to the mothership, you can remove that by commenting out the relevant code in server/middleware/index.go, look for the init() function and comment out the endless loop containing telemetry.Flush()

tomaskafka2• 1 month ago

I remember doing benchmark on LAN about 5 years ago, and Nextcloud was order of magnitude slower than Seafile even for basic file sync (on the order of tens of GB).

Nextcloud Hub 26 Spring: Built together, designed for the future

Related Stories