What does heavily encrypted even mean? Fully encrypted? Slightly encrypted? Encrypted enough to call it “heavily encrypted” but not enough to be protected from whoever is interested?
HN user
hkpack
Not everything Ukraine uses is public knowledge.
There are huge developments in automation happening and are being used right now.
It is interesting that both options of either not using CC entirely or using CC but paying it off by the end of the month are equivalent, but you’ve somehow reframe the second ine as some virtuous skill one have to master (I’m not just buying bread, I’m also managing my finances by repaying the value of it in full by the end of the month to avoid being charged for interest and simultaneously improving my credit score).
Business model of banks in regard to CC are preying on people not paying it all in full for various reasons.
NextCloud's macOS app is implemented in a way that completely disregards any UI guidelines or just common sense for the platform.
Developers either don't use macOS at all, or don't care.
But functionally it works for our small team.
Yes, that is a completely new business which has OpenAI, Anthropic and Google as competitors.
While Twitters competitors were Facebook, Reddit, Pinterest, Tumblr and Mastodon.
Before the AI craze, Musk chopped an awful lot of headcount at Twitter, right, and proved it was overkill, has that panned out?
He basically killed the Twitter as a business. The only lesson here is that it is really hard to fail having infinite money.
then there has to be something sinister afoot.
Not sinister, but just a simple strategy of a business to increase sales of his products (such as hey.com) as well as pushing his personal preferences (grok) to younger audience masquerading as being done for public good.
It is just repulsive for people who see through this. But I think it is an OK business strategy which may be somewhat successful.
Values of DHH and his businesses on one side and Linux community on the other are not very well aligned, so it will inevitably cause these kind of tensions.
But if the goal is to target younger people who are not part of Linux community yet, then it may work, and that's the play here.
Thank you for your help, I think you already know how much people in Ukraine appreciate it.
But comparing Ukraine and African countries is more like apple and oranges.
Ukraine is by large a European country which culturally is much more similar to Poland or even UK.
Because it was always portrayed in the west as corrupt or insignificant was just more caused by living under soviet or russian shadow than a reality.
Nova Poshta was already an established business well before 2022 war started, but even without it, government-owned Ukrposhta was always rock solid going decades back. Theft was happening ocasionally by workers but at a rate comparable to any other western country. DHL, FedEx was operating also for a very long time and the biggest problem with them was the need to pay the import duty tax on expensive items, which you can avoid when shipping with Ukrposhta.
Self-host your git, take this as a sign.
Forgejo is great.
I wish you good luck in building a datacenter in the middle of Sahara.
Well this is the dream right ?
Yes it is, we call these dreams a nightmare
Land is expensive, water is scarce, people don’t want sound pollution anywhere near them.
Building a datacenter in the neighborhood is already unpopular enough that companies do tricks to prevent public from knowing what is being built and by whom in advance.
Sending a small box with a panel to space may be a solution if a: the inside of the box is expensive and the cost to launch is cheap.
You amortize the box over 2-5 years and burn it in the atmosphere afterwards.
If the math is mathing, multiply by a million and voila, you have a datacenter in space where each rack is flying separately.
With a regular compute it may not be profitable but with GPUs connected to each other by optical links? I think it may be possible.
Have you seen how much of a shithole France became
No, how far away should I be to see that?
This is the way, ended up using identical setup.
It is upsetting that you get downvoted. I think people in the US are thinking that a war is impossible or something, and looking for a stereotypical response.
Instead, for an eastern and central European countries, a war is the real threat. The chance to lose a war with Russia backed by China is very real.
And the reason it is real is the loss of protection from the US. It is no longer guaranteed that the US will participate once Russia invades, and that makes the invasion itself almost inevitable.
Participation of the US is important only because it has a massive stockpile of WMD. It is obvious for everyone that US is not prepared for a modern war on the ground against a real power.
Prosperity and economic growth doesn't really matter when you are threatened with losing the massive war with causalities calculated in millions.
You first want to secure and guarantee peace for the future, and then you think about economy, competition and so forth.
And massively increasing weapons production is the way to avoid the big war.
US company doing cloud in Europe changes nothing because of the CLOUD Act: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLOUD_Act
It is funny that in terms of values they are not a leader but a follower of Russia. The origin and protector of all their conservative values - including fake Christianity, view on power and gender, race, minorities government structure and so on and so forth.
I am not fan of the era when CEO is expected to be a cult leader type person.
Cook did very well in all areas as well as in not trying to create a cult.
2000 shaheds are just a regular week in Ukraine.
90% of that are destroyed far away from targets and the other 10% do cause some damage, but it is usually far from being devastating as the drone is far from being very precise.
A single F35 which could penetrate air defense and go into the country would be a real problem. If Russia has 10 of them, I think it would significantly alter the current equation of power as it may allow for air superiority.
Famous story about the plane cockpit for average pilot ended up being bad for absolutely everyone comes to mind.
Probably you cannot average humans.
Is it really identical when the receiving party can now identify every workstation at your internal network and track them separately?
For example, any website can now not only log that the traffic originated from org A, but specifically from org A, workstation N.
I wonder, is privacy implication is not important enough for people to worry about this?
If you are not a software engineer you can judge code the same way as you can judge design while not being a designer.
It is that in one case it is obvious for you that you don’t understand what you are looking at, and in another, for some reason, it is not.
There are security benefits of not having public IPs on every VM.
I assign few VMs public IPs and use them as ingress / SSL termination / load balancer for my workloads running on VMs with only internal IPs.
I personally use kvm with libvirt and manage all these with Ansible.
It is about trends and perceptions - 70s were very hopeful, now with global problems - wars, climate, AI, uncertainty, what is growing is desperation.
I definitely don’t envy kids that are born nowadays.
I don’t know why it’s CIA wet dream, while it’s mostly used against western democracies.
Are people in CIA incompetent?
It is not only about domestic manufacturing.
The trend is that roads are becoming more dangerous in the US, with the cars being bigger as a major contributor.
People in US are fine with increasing casualties for some reason, and I’m glad that in EU the general consensus is to continue with keeping roads safer.
Does anyone knows why current US administration keeps aligning with Chinese interests in their actions while proclaiming that China is their main adversary?
They even send JD Vance to support Orban in his elections. The same Orban and Hungary which Xi Jinping supports and recently visited out of all the EU.
You cannot agree with someone on so many actions and keep pretending that you are against each other.
I think your description would be perfect in describing a psychopath - i.e. someone who can rationalize and think about other beings logically, without actually being able to subconsciously empathize.
Not all people like that at all. Some people really do feel emotions of others before being able to rationalize it.
Why not? I know people who are very good at feeling other people’s emotions but very poor at analyzing them.
In kids you can see it all the time - like a kid started crying because he sees others cry, but if you ask them why they cry - the explanation is always ridiculous.
But even some adults are like that, interpreting your own or even others emotions is both a skill and a talent.
- mgimo finished? - aaaask