Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web

by pantelisk • 2 months ago

553 120 2 months ago

How can we add more tracks. is there a limit?

pantelisk17• 2 months ago

There is a little [ + ] button next to CHANNELS in the sidebar, it has no limit but right now so add as many as you like :)

It's using dom to render the multitrack waveform boxes currently so I would assume after a certain point it might start to slow down a bit. In the future might switch it all to be webgpu based to avoid such limits.

macwhisperer• 2 months ago

this is cool thanks for making it!

serious_angel• 2 months ago

    It seems like the inspiration went from Audacity, and with great changes to the design and feel of calmness and solidity!  
    I've tried loading a file with XM format, yet the current state of the import logic stated "Unsupported". Is there any chance you'll support the format?  

    For example, the following artwork is radiating charmingly in VLC:  
    - https://cable.ayra.ch/modplayer/mods/!Others/DYNAMITE_-_Winamp_5.0RC8_crk.xm

    And, thank you! very much for the experiments, effort, miracles... art you do...

pantelisk17• 2 months ago

Thank you :) I 'll look into it, I am a little cautious of bloating up the filesize (right now it's at 98kb of js and 10kb of css), but if I can make something work efficiently I 'll give it a go.

On an unrelated note, I'm a little surprised there is no good open source web audio tracker (like Renoise but for the web) out there yet...

dspillett• 2 months ago

For that much functionality 98kb is hardly bloated at all by modern standards, impressively slight in fact, it could probably cope with some more.

Unless part of your fun is keeping it so very trim, of course!

gardaani• 2 months ago

Is bassoontracker too old-school? https://www.stef.be/bassoontracker/

genericacct• 2 months ago

Very nice. One feature id like to see is import of stem bundles as produced by various tools like suno or stemsplitter

ugh123• 2 months ago

Is there midi support and vst support? I know that's asking for a lot =)

RobotToaster• 2 months ago

Doesn't seem to support midi currently unfortunately. I was hoping for the same.

sgallant• 2 months ago

This is great. I need to do audio work this coming week and was dreading Audacity.

throawayonthe• 2 months ago

when have you last tried audacity? it's been getting friendlier

amelius• 2 months ago

How much work would it be to compile Audacity for the web?

(I'm a bit behind on web technologies nowadays)

Forgeties79• 2 months ago

Agreed but it’s still not a proper DAW and suffers from those limitations. It gets very rickety when you go beyond a basic stereo mix.

Kaliboy• 2 months ago

Have you tried Ardour? It's like a superset of Audacity.

timc3• 2 months ago

Try Ocenaudio - I’ve used pretty much every audio editor free and paid for and this is my go to for a free editor.

I also cannot understand why anyone would recommend Audacity.

hootz• 2 months ago

Ocenaudio is closed source, that may be one of the reasons someone might recommend Audacity over it.

jrm43• 2 months ago

Hehe ditto

I get flak for this, but Audacity is my "proof" that GIMP's name is why people don't use it, not the UI.

Like GIMP, Audacity's UI is awful, but people still use it. :)

m0nit0r• 2 months ago

Looks promisimg. Must try the next days.

argimenes• 2 months ago

Makes me think of Quatermass ...

algoth1• 2 months ago

Getting the 2002 Cool Edit Pro 2.0 vibes!

yesbut• 2 months ago

what is the theoretical file size / project size limit? what happens when the browser crashes?

pantelisk17• 2 months ago

I usually use it to edit audio tracks quickly up to 10 minutes long, though I have received nice emails from people who have used for 1hr+ podcasts successfully (though certain heavy operations wouldn't be very fun to use).

For multitrack sessions, there is the ability to export to a .amss file that contains all the settings, markers, tracks etc. For single track edit... it would just crash right now. There is already a feature for caching audio tracks in indexeddb (it's under >File), but honestly it's not a web api I have found to be super reliable. I don't blame the browser developers, because I 'm sure if it was more reliable certain websites would put it to use storing gigabytes of trackers on the user's machine :). For this reason, I haven't made it auto-save the session automatically yet, trying to be a good citizen on the user's computer, maybe that will change in the future if there's a strong need for it.

Also, right now there is no backend, once it loads there are no more requests made to the server, so it's bound to frontend limitations. This is by design, I want it to be an app that respects users, doesn't upload or leak information, no ads, etc, even if it means getting a small hit in functionality in other areas.

I think of it like photopea/pixlr are to photoshop. Quick and easy to use, get you at 90% of the way. If somebody wants to do a serious operation, then by all means go for a paid desktop pro-daw solution :)

edit: reason

em-bee3• 2 months ago

i managed to load a 12 hour book. it took some time to load, but once loaded the UI remained snappy, so i guess it is usable. the only problem is that the waveform does not scale when i zoom in.

ZeWaka• 2 months ago

Not sure why you remove the tooltips from deactivated buttons

JKCalhoun3• 2 months ago

So want something like this but where the tracks are in the cloud.

I want to "check out" someone's drum loop and add a guitar riff. Check it into a branch.

Someone else checks out the drum+guitar, adds a bass line. Checks in.

"Jamming" with other people is one of the most fun things. To the degree that you can "get close" on the web…

RiffHub, anyone?

sporkl• 2 months ago

I think that's what Soloist[1] is trying to do (unaffiliated, but I've met the founder)

[1] https://www.soloistapp.com/

someguyiguess2• 2 months ago

That doesn’t look similar at all. That looks like an app for making loops on your phone.

someguyiguess2• 2 months ago

Yes. I’ve wanted something like this for a while. I’ve always wondered why there isn’t version control for DAWs. So many times I’ve spent hours editing a track and accidentally saved it without specifying a unique file name. Only to open it later and wish I could go back to before the changes that fucked it up.

PaulDavisThe1st2• 2 months ago

The good version controls used for code & text are line-oriented; most DAW session file formats are semantically scoped, and so the VC tools won't work well.

Most DAWs allow you to "snapshot" a session at any time, and return to it as you want to. Certainly Ardour does that.

empressplay• 2 months ago

Logic Pro allows you to revert to previous saves / auto-saves.

Griffinsauce2• 2 months ago

Reaper makes periodical autosaves.

TheOtherHobbes• 2 months ago

DAW projects aren't text. They can include audio files, plug-ins, automation curves, MIDI data, and more.

A complete reconstruction would have to save and freeze all of those elements.

You can save references to save space, but you still need a complete collection of everything as a starting point.

And DAWs themselves regularly change their saved file formats.

For a completely secure reconstruction you'd have to save a complete virtual machine with the current DAW version, current OS, current installed plug-ins - with licensing and DRM - and all of the project data.

16bitvoid• 2 months ago

Bandlab Studio, maybe? Never used it, but might be what you're looking for. There's a web version and a mobile app.

https://www.bandlab.com/creation-features

epiccoleman• 2 months ago

Bandlab is decent enough for this, yeah. It's not "version control" in the way that programmers are used to, not by any means. More like "Google Docs" but for a DAW session. Certainly good enough for "my brother who plays keys lives in a different city but we want to collaborate on something".

Griffinsauce2• 2 months ago

This is roughly the idea but the platform is very clunky. My band also somehow lost access to some tracks due to permissions vagueries and in general the experience is very enshittified. I would not recommend it.

ajs1998• 2 months ago

Could be pretty easy to do with atproto accounts. Users could save/share their music as a tangled.sh repo and other people could contribute or fork as they please. A nice UI could hide all of that and make it fun to collaborate on music.

Too bad I'm lazy. RiffHub looks neat.

antoniojtorres• 2 months ago

That reminds me of what Splice used to do

esikich• 2 months ago

Idk if the GitHub analogy really works for music.

With software, the code is a tool. And you can give the code away and still make money on hosting, support, enterprise sales, consulting, recruiting, whatever.

With music, the stem is the product.

If the drum loop is mediocre, nobody cares. If it's actually good, the creator usually wants ownership, licensing, royalties, exclusivity, or at minimum, attribution. But even at that level, it's trivial. Once you remove the triviality of it, it becomes art, which is the product.

People absolutely want cloud collaboration though. Shared sessions, async recording, version history, stem exchange, all of that makes sense.

But public forks of high quality musical material don't really compound the way software tools do. Most musicians are not trying to maximize downstream reuse of their riffs by strangers on the internet.

radarsat1• 2 months ago

Not everything is about making money.

Also I don't get the impression the idea is intended for "most musicians".

whateveracct• 2 months ago

some people liked github because it was fun to share code. it wasn't all a funnel to compensation..

notThrowingAway• 2 months ago

Out of all web-based apps I've tried, audiotool matches your description the closest.

tom2948329494• 2 months ago

Have a look at https://opendaw.org/

I recently saw a talk of the developer who basically bootstrapped this. Open source and all, and he talked about the idea of collaboration and showed some features and forks that sounded like what you want.

The talk: https://youtu.be/BD7jQcuUOaA

import• 2 months ago

Yes if you’re collaborating with 10 people in the same project, otherwise non sense.

abhikul0• 2 months ago

While not exactly the hub style you mentioned, maybe this is as close to Jamming you can get.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/guide/garageband-ipad/chsf2f...

Summershard• 2 months ago

As a side note, is there any online community where you find people willing to do this? I’ve always struggled most with finding people eager to play and create music, especially as I get older. What you describe sounds like fun.

conradfr4• 2 months ago

If that's just "turn-based collaboration" use the same DAW and a shared Drive/Dropbox/Whatever.

dwa3592• 2 months ago

this is exactly what i thought - but i guess the discoverability is missing. where you can say, "hey, i have this guitar riff, any drummers?". it's more of a community + access to the same daw.

coldcity_again4• 2 months ago

For a realtime-ish solution I wonder if you've seen Ninjam[1]? It used to be that most evenings one could find various populated rooms; the serverlist[2] shows that the infrastructure's all sat there ready for people to come.

You play over the most recent (eg) 16 bar repeat. At the end of each repeat, everyone gets the updated loop. It's easier to experience than describe but is surprisingly effective and bypasses a whole class of latency issues.

[1] https://www.cockos.com/ninjam/

[2] http://autosong.ninjam.com/server-list.php

danilocesar• 2 months ago

There's an open-source wahjam btw.

EastLondonCoder• 2 months ago

I’m working on something close to that. At the moment it’s just for ableton. The idea is to be able to sync a daw project, binaries will be saved on cloudflare and then use git for certain cases where it’s possible to merge. In case one person is working on a bass line and another is working on a guitar part. I’ve been using git for this workflow but the idea to have use interface that’s legible for non git users

whycome• 2 months ago

Apple will certainly jump on this. They already have GarageBand and they are making the hardware more accessible in the form of the Neo MacBooks. They are good at capitalizing on that FOMO power. And by making it a part of GarageBand (which already makes use of iCloud), they can keep it in their ecosystem. Collaboration is already doable with shared files, but I’m sure they can streamline the process

Edit: and another comment alerted me to the existence of live jam sessions, so this would be a possible extension of it

rigonkulous• 2 months ago

What you're looking for, is Endlesss:

https://endlesss.fm/

vandyswa• 2 months ago

What's a waveform box and how does one select it?

pantelisk17• 2 months ago

It's the audio track in a channel. A channel is the horizontal strip, a waveform box is a piece of audio somewhere across that strip. You can double click on one to enter single editor mode, or single click to make it active (once it's active you can drag it around, apply effects to it, move it on a different channel etc etc).

Sorry still working on improving the UX :)

EDIT: There's a short video here - https://x.com/pkalogiros/status/2053492761350046032

sam1r• 2 months ago

Significant props for accepting .flac files out of the bat. Incredible work.

kirbysayshi• 2 months ago

looks at code, sees safety closures, function assignments, sequential var declaration

Ahh I see you are one of the old ways, of the lost knowledge :)

I am very nostalgic for this style of development, even though I do not miss it in a team setting at all!

Super cool app you’ve made!

fagnerbrack• 2 months ago

Let's make it modern again, just write a blog post on <famous-company> tech blog

jdw64• 2 months ago

Cool!!

hnuser• 2 months ago

looks vibe coded

pantelisk17• 2 months ago

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23337091

coldcity_again4• 2 months ago

Strongly disagree. Looks coded with love and fingers.

djfobbz• 2 months ago

This is a very impressive undertaking. Great job!!!

keithluu• 2 months ago

Awesome tool. Is this the a new version? I used this few weeks ago and it looked a bit different.

shuaibird• 2 months ago

Looks cool. It feels like an early web-based Logic Pro-style editor.

cocodill• 2 months ago

It feels like cool edit pro 2 before it was turned to shit by adobe. Your app has a pretty good and intuitive UX. And that's the most important thing in an audio editor.

coldcity_again4• 2 months ago

Ahh THAT's what it was reminding me of. Thanks! CEP2 was great indeed.

gunapologist99• 2 months ago

Is this open source? No license.

boje2• 2 months ago

I'm surprised no one has noticed this yet.

pantelisk17• 2 months ago

Author here. License is pretty much do whatever you want with it (free as in free information and free beer), I suppose the closest one to that would be MIT, but I don't like its serious legalese tone. I prefer the whimsical "free as in..." phrase

boje2• 2 months ago

Digging further, this has been shown before in 2020:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23337091

The author mentions in the thread that he eventually plans to have a proper license for it and needs to figure out the licensing of some of the dependencies, but that was six years ago.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23338538

This is not directed at the quality of the project itself, however, which seems to be good.

subhashp• 2 months ago

Super Amazing!

andrew_kwak• 2 months ago

Tried it out for a bit. Really smooth for a web app, especially with multitrack editing. Do you know if it can handle MIDI files too, or just audio?

sailingcode• 2 months ago

Impressive, congratulations for the nice work.

pantelisk17• 2 months ago

Hey HN. Thanks again for featuring this project :) this is my favorite community on the internet and my go to site to visit, almost by reflex, when I have idle time, so it feels me with joy to have made something well received here.

I 'll be heading off soon, so decided to write some features included in this release that might not be apparent right away (still working on improving the UX).

- Drag n drop multiple audio files into multitrack = multiple channels automatically created

- Double click on a waveform box in multitrack, opens it in the original audio editor (for more precise editing)

- Copying (command+c, or shift+c) works between multitrack and regular editor. So for example, you can open a file in original editor tweak it, and then copy all or part of it and paste it in multitrack in a specific channel.

- Most effects have already pre-made presets to make them easier to use

- You can make your own effect presets by clicking the 3 dots after having made a modification in an effect (stored in localstorage)

- Zero crossing selection is under "Edit"

- There is a tempo tools section in View. You can automatically detect tempo of a track, tap to guess a tempo and play with metronome

- There is also an id3 tag viewer (for mp3 files) there as well

- You can right click or press M to add markers (makes it easier to highlight sections of a track, especially when working with longer audio tracks)

- Seamless Loop tool (under Edit): crossfade preview, silence trim, repeat loop, open loop in a new editor tab.

- Offline/PWA support: Help > store offline version, will open a new page that will trigger a service worker that will make the site work offline as well.

- Session export as .amss file for multitrack. If you aren't done working on a session you can export all of its audiofiles and configuration in an LZMA compressed container file (will still be pretty big though). For single audio mode, mp3/wav/flac export is available.

- Pressing X in multitrack when 2 waveform boxes overlap, makes them crossfade smoothly (denoted by an "XF" label at the top right - undocumented behavior but can be quite useful, will keep improving it)

- You can open the menu by pressing the ~ key and then navigate it with arrow keys (left/right for sections, bottom up for selections, enter to trigger an action and esc to close) for a tiny bump in speed of getting things done. Similarly the time controls are clickable and open a mini menu where a time can be specified to jump quickly to it (arrow keys to go between minutes/s/ms)

And finally my favorite feature of them all (though not a new one per se),

- In "View" select "Frequency analyzer" or "Multitrack mixer" and then press the dock button. Audiomass supports the ability to extract elements of it into new pop up windows. So you could have parts of the application on a different monitor keeping the main app in the main tab. It's a very old trick, but I find it kinda cool :)

Thanks again and hope you enjoyed the sample music! (edit: formatting)

Intermernet• 2 months ago

This is awesome. Congratulations!

As others on this thread have commented, you haven't specified a license. Don't jump on the first thing you think of. Consider the various OSS licenses and decide which one suits you best.

croisillon• 2 months ago

does it have to be dark mode?

ammar_x• 2 months ago

This looks great for quick audio operations without the need to use heavy apps.

One question: I tried the "Fade In" effect; is there a way to control its timing (i.e. the part of the clip where the effect is applied) ?

pantelisk17• 2 months ago

you can click and drag to select part of the audio (and then drag the edges of the selection region that has appeared if you want to adjust it), and then apply the effect. All effects prioritize the current selection first, and if no selection is present then get applied on the entire track.

codingconstable2• 2 months ago

well done you!

codingconstable2• 2 months ago

Well done you!

conradfr4• 2 months ago

Cool work, the weird part is effects being item based instead of track based and that selecting an effect stops the playing and you apply it blind.

pantelisk17• 2 months ago

Thanks for your comment :) you can press "preview" (and there is a little on/off) in the effect's modal window. But I agree with you, an automation type system that operates on the entire track might be better

conradfr4• 2 months ago

Ah yes I miss the preview + space to play.

coldcity_again4• 2 months ago

Great to see how far this has come on. Brilliant work!

TheCipster• 2 months ago

Very cool! Congrats OP. How would you compare it to OpenDAW?

https://opendaw.org

pantelisk17• 2 months ago

OpenDAW is different beast in the same field. It's a full music editor and suite, where you can write notes down on a piano roll (or record with midi), then use synthesizers and samples to turn that into a song.

Audiomass is an audio editor, meaning that it works with already existing files that might need to be cut, edited, cleaned, or filtered, or in case where one has multiple stems put together to be mixed.

Think of it a bit like vector vs pixel editing. OpenDAW is vectors (music info), audiomass is pixels (music data)

nocodeg• 2 months ago

Brilliant project and great execution. Well done!

epicsagas• 2 months ago

The PWA/offline mode is underrated. Just stored it locally and now I have a full audio editor that works without internet, lives in a tab, and doesn't ask me to update. This is what the web platform was supposed to feel like.

the_arun• 2 months ago

I need an Audio tool to remaster old songs. Basically to bring old songs to modern crystal clear quality. I would be happy pay subscription fees. Is there a tool for that?

enannnn• 2 months ago

this is coool

Abhi0501• 2 months ago

Really cool project! Been looking for a browser-based audio editor. How does it handle large file sizes?

pantelisk17• 2 months ago

I just tried it with a 2 hour podcast file, since more people asked about long files. It is performs great on chrome on my pretty powerful macbook. Some operations are a little slow and zooming in to max level starts to be slow, default things like cut/paste, apply fade effect and volume controls to areas of the file feel ok.

marc_g• 2 months ago

I was editing some audio last week and I just picked the first thing in Google that didn't look like shit and didn't try to take my first born child (which I don't even have), to use any feature of it. Turns out it was this! Thanks, it's been a pleasure using your tool and I'll definitely do it again!

Asterism• 2 months ago

Looks awesome! Had some trouble using it though. I double clicked a sample and got stuck there. Nothing in the view menu or any way I could see to get back to the initial overview screen.

pantelisk17• 2 months ago

oh to go back to multitrack, there is a button at the top right (multitrack beta). Maybe it feels abit disconnected being there

MrClouds• 2 months ago

From an audio engineer: this is so freakin cool.

miniBill• 2 months ago

The included sample slaps :)

jonasholmer• 2 months ago

Hey, really awesome work! As someone that makes a lot of music and creates instruments and plugins, there's one thing though I feel need to push back against slightly. So now you're in the position where I'm assuming the codebase is quite young an malleable. I think it's worth asking yourself: do we need another garageband-like linear music tool? I would say, no. The reason I'm bringing this up in first place is because, yes, there will always be people that think you should make another... superhero-movie or something. But why not make an effort to make something instead that genuinely introduces some new ideas?

standbyme• 2 months ago

wow impressive

spospider• 2 months ago

Very cool! I can see myself using this for quick edits

Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web

Related Stories