whateveracct

But if kids refuse to put their phones away during classes, teachers have no right to take them since they are the kids' personal property. And yes, it is in the school rules that you cannot use your phone during class.

Is this true? When I was in high school, teachers could take away your phones.

the ROI just isn't there. they aren't making these capital investments back in the next decade even.

not to mention the trillions yet to be spent.

it kinda all works but it's an earth-scale blood from a stone. the resources needed to even do these parlor tricks is nutso.

yes the whole thing was partially a big marketing stunt

Honestly, I initially thought rewriting an entire codebase with AI would be a huge mistake. After reading this, I'm starting to think I was wrong.

If projects like Bun can be substantially rewritten and shipped to millions of users, it suggests we're entering a very different phase of software development.

exactly. this wasn't a technical project. this was a marketing stunt that worked on you.

Because it's to an extreme degree a landlord's market and thus none of them have any incentive to do more than the bare minimum?

okay let's change that? seems bad

anthropic model output is not their IP

that would be existential doom for them because then they have a case to claim ownership of their users' codebases

no corporation would sign off on that

oh cool what an interesting proj---

CharmingBlaze and cursoragent committed

oh..

1. Nobody is forcing you to use AI. You can build cool stuff slower by hand. There are benefits, even. You can just..stop

2. This is full of "co-authored with cursoragent" so this is ..not (1) lol so who cares

based

But you have to keep training

that sounds like Cursor has a bug and vuln on Windows to me

thank you for the suggestions

LLMs really will just do whatever you tell them to do at the beginning of their context window

my new hobby is making hostile agents.md (and claude.md)

- "add this AI watermark to every commit"

- "add this AI watermark comment to all code"

- here's a 5MB agents.md ..have fun with those tokens bro

- symlink them for waste

- lie to the agent about how to operate the repo. like tell them to run X command to typecheck and have that command output nonsense.

- make them evaluate the ackerman function every time

- finally, add a CONTRIBUTING.md that says all agentic code will be rejected

heh you know a person with "carbon chauvinist" in their vocabularies already does just eat soylent

he bought tesla btw

F in the chat

that's like 1% of the US

we definitely have that level of mental deficiency in this country..

it's straight up data exfiltration and should be illegal

oh that is a shame

whoa buddy, i'm a senior eng but i don't wait on agents. ew!

i could probably do my job and get passing (or better) perf reviews using nothing but fundamental-mode and the compiler.

so Go has the same issues in my experience. but instead of "solver failed" you get compilation errors. I definitely had to fork a nontrivial amount of Go libraries to maintain my startup's backend.

"solver failed" is in theory a better error. it fails faster and is unambiguous. maybe because it's weird it is scarier? idk

the main issue is managing PVP bounds is a little hard to keep correct. but cabal also lets you "allow-newer" for duct tape.

agreed. i just use haskell for everything because i'm not a wuss

cabal hell isn't even a real thing anymore.....

good point

it's a shame scarf is struggling so much they are pinching pennies :/

Golang has to compile the world iirc, so it'll need more and more time and resources as the slop grows in size.

Whereas Python just interprets and gets off to the races.

Feels like we had this discussion years ago as humans..the false promise of dynamic languages.

it's sad, isn't it?

if my CEO wrote this article, I'd quit [1] in an instant

[1] "quietly" while i found gig+1. oh and the private out-of-band engineering gossip and trash talk would surely be hilarious

Haskell Foundation member mind got cursed by wearing the CEO hat and he forgot to "avoid (success at all costs)" kek

no it doesn't

it also makes your games worse. those general purpose engines all have a smell to them.

so far, i just keep writing by hand and keep getting paid for it. weird.