Name Age Calculator

http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html

by oxplot • 11 years ago

99 84 11 years ago

rhiever.github.io

Toenex• 11 years ago

More interesting than it might first appear. If you try a name like 'Stanley' you can see the devastating effects of the war years. You also see a resurgence in the name 20 years or so later, I'd guess when people want to remember a parent or grandparent in their own child.

thomasfl• 11 years ago

Surprisingly accurate

Enindu2• 11 years ago

It says, "Sorry, Enindu is not in the boys names database".

maxerickson4• 11 years ago

The source omits names that have less than 5 occurrences from the published data:

http://www.ssa.gov/oact/babynames/limits.html

(So perhaps you aren't in the US and your name wouldn't show up in the source data, or perhaps you are in the US and your name is uncommon)

Enindu2• 11 years ago

Yup. I'm not from US. And also my name is uncommon too. Even in my country. You know what, I didn't see enyone who has my name so far. I think I have a pretty unique name..!

berbc• 11 years ago

Oh http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

cstuder• 11 years ago

Or this one: http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

8568465458877• 11 years ago

http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

DanKlinton• 11 years ago

For some reason in 2001, Osama named stopped being popular http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend... Barak in 2008 became even more popular... Soon not so much :) http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

rmxt• 11 years ago

Spelling it as the president spells it -- Barack -- shows a jump from nonexistent to "something" right around 2009. I wouldn't go so far as to call it noise because it's more than just coincidence, but it's still only ~0.003% of the male population born that year. (60 births/(0.5*4,000,000 total births).

odabaxok• 11 years ago

Also, Trinity: http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

yellowapple4• 11 years ago

Yet no love for "Morpheus" or "Oracle". Racists.

fudgy73• 11 years ago

Think that first blip on 1990 is related to the Neo Geo?

rmason2• 11 years ago

You don't think its as simple as people choosing one of the ten most popular names for a given year do you?

I found it exceedingly accurate with most of the people for a given first name I know being born plus or minus five years of the peak for that name in popularity.

DanBC• 11 years ago

You don't think its as simple as people choosing one of the ten most popular names for a given year do you?

Maybe, but why do those names become popular? William, Harry, George and Charlotte are obvious (British royal babies) and other names have interesting rises and falls.

matiasb• 11 years ago

"Obama", "Britney"

oaktowner• 11 years ago

Weird, check out Brittany.

http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

rmason2• 11 years ago

Interesting, check out Madonna. The name got a second peak thanks to MTV videos ;<)

http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

Or Elvis whose popularity as a first name looks like a roller coaster.

http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

cbd1984• 11 years ago

Kathy is almost as tight of a peak:

http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

My point is, the tightness of the peak might have nothing to do with Ms Spears.

Vintila• 11 years ago

Looks like my mother was born in peak Suzie.

What do they say happens to those who don't label their axis? I've forgotten...

benpbenp• 11 years ago

Ha! I got my own name when I first landed on the site. For a second there I thought the real story was that they'd somehow exploited a third party cookie but it appears to be a coincidence.

onion2k• 11 years ago

http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

Interestingly, "Buzz" seems to track events and anniversaries in the space race quite neatly. Toy Story had no impact.

mickeyp• 11 years ago

Funny how the curve fits historical incidents. Searching for "Adolf" and the name gains in popularity in the 1910s and 1920s; dips in the 1930s as Nazism rises; and nosedives in the early 1940s as WWII kicks off. Interesting.

Contrarily, the name "Winston" jumps in the 1940s.

kornakiewicz2• 11 years ago

http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

I find this funny.

madcaptenor• 11 years ago

This happens with presidential names in general. See Lyndon (http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...) or Dwight (http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...).

kornakiewicz2• 11 years ago

I know where it came from, I wonder why there's no evidence of Barack older than 10, i.e. Barack Obama.

lifebeyondfife• 11 years ago

'Sorry, "Bort" is not in the boys name database.'

kuzmin• 11 years ago

The increase of "Alexander" starting from the mid-80s looks really weird: http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

It's easy to see why names such as "Buzz" have the curves that they have (space race), but it's hard to trace any event that influenced more common names. For example, check "Jacob", "Justin". Does anybody have an idea as to why these curves have this shape?

nl• 11 years ago

The Jacob and Justin rises correlate very well with the baby-boomer generation beginning to have children.

It's interesting to note that the increase in the use of Justin has a matching (if slightly lagging) increase in literature[1], while the increase in Jacob isn't[2].

[1] https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Justin&year_st...

[2] https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Jacob&year_sta...

dm2• 11 years ago

"Amy" is another interesting one, what influenced that? http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

I just figured out that it shows a random one when you don't enter a query, that's cool.

Other spikes: Linda, Jordan, Mason, Deborah, Beth, Paige, Laurie, Chloe, Megan, Stella, Stacey, Kim

It seems like female names are much more likely to have sharp spikes in popularity verses male first names.

kidsthesedays3• 11 years ago

Jessica - http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

Names (just like everything else) have fads. Fads come and go.

Flenser• 11 years ago

Little Women apparently: http://nameberry.com/babyname/Amy

The other names show similar shapes:

Meg: http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

Jo: http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

Beth: http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

The second bump for Meg could be due to Meg Ryan?

cafard3• 11 years ago

Bob Green years ago wrote about going to the "Linda Hop", a convention of boomer women all named Linda. The article traced the name back to a song popular in the early 1950s. As far as male v. female, it seems more common to name sons after fathers than daughters after mothers.

SloopJon• 11 years ago

Amy and Sarah were two of the most popular girl's names when I was growing up.

My wife dug in her heels pretty early in the pregnancy for a name that I later learned was a character on a TV show. Judging by the site, she's not the only one. The peak is still under a hundred, so not as embarrassing as, say, characters from 90210.

maxerickson4• 11 years ago

The spike starts before the show aired , but some of the popularity probably came from Family Ties:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_Ties

trumbitta2• 11 years ago

Sooo... Are there many American girls named after a typical old-style italian macho name?

http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

netrus• 11 years ago

If by many you mean about 100: Apparently yes.

darkFunction• 11 years ago

Wow, 'Ace' is really taking off- http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

'Adolf' seems uniformly credited to just a few poor souls- http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

sgb_QQ• 11 years ago

This is cool. I used that same SSA data for a fun agency project for J&J about a year ago: http://hellomynamemeans.com/en/

300bps• 11 years ago

Told me to come back on a modern browser with a snarky message. Guess iPhone 6 with latest iOS isn't modern.

kidsthesedays3• 11 years ago

Infinite loop for me.

k__• 11 years ago

Yepp.

Polling to the max...

mywacaday• 11 years ago

Some strange looking mortality on low volume names, I used Irish names, Male-Darragh, Female-Clodagh. E.g Clodagh goes from 13 to 5.5 between 2009-2010

Rudism• 11 years ago

I don't think a drop reflects mortality, only in popularity as a baby name--the graph is showing you how many new people with that name were added to the total pool over time.

arcatek• 11 years ago

Funny how Mael has won quite a lot of hype in the past years (it's still a rare name, sure, but it's much more common now than when I first ...acquired... it).

rheotron• 11 years ago

Anyone else think this is kind of odd? http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

slazaro• 11 years ago

Girls named Ian? Or the fact that there's a lot of variation? Because with such small numbers, there's going to be a lot of random noise.

yellowapple4• 11 years ago

Not quite as odd as http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

hxmc• 11 years ago

Thanks Johnny Cash: http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

yellowapple4• 11 years ago

Peculiarly, there were dozens of instances of boys named Sue prior to Shel Silverstein writing "A Boy Named Sue", which makes me suspect that the song in question might very well have been a true story.

Curiously, the popularity of naming boys "Susan" [0] also peaked more than half a decade before the song was published. ("Sue", in contrast, peaked even earlier in the mid-40's, though it seems it made a comeback in the late-80's).

[0] http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

jasonhanley• 11 years ago

These should be normalized for the number of births per year.

maxerickson4• 11 years ago

I think most people are more interested in the absolute numbers for each year. There aren't any conclusions being presented from the data, so it isn't a huge problem. It also doesn't vary so much:

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005067.html

rhiever3• 11 years ago

Here's another version that normalizes for births per year: http://rhiever.github.io/baby-name-explorer/

Enjoy!

jyotiska• 11 years ago

This is really interesting: http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

tbomb• 11 years ago

No love for Sansa though

ra1n85• 11 years ago

Sorry, "Bort" is not in the boy's name database.

Outrageous.

jaryd• 11 years ago

For the uninitiated: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K99OWlAWeN4

mason240• 11 years ago

Robert'); DROP Table Students; was also not in the database.

polysaturate• 11 years ago

Little Bobby Tables

impostervt• 11 years ago

"The median living boy named Johnie was born around 1948 and ranges from 51 to 79 years old."

This is what happens when you're #4...

danielharan• 11 years ago

Has anyone used this to get inferred stats on a database of people's names? I'd be especially interested in applications for e-commerce analytics.

Raphmedia• 11 years ago

Very accurate for mine!

betaclass• 11 years ago

I wish they wouldn't have curved/smoothed the graphs. Since it's by year, there are discrete points and values. When you curve a line it has implications for the underlying data, which in this case are incorrect.

rhiever3• 11 years ago

I originally didn't smooth the data, but it looked way too jagged and crappy for many of the names. Ultimately, I erred on the side of aesthetics and sacrificed the ability to look up exact numbers in the graph. Rest assured, though, if you want the exact numbers you can download the underlying data of every graph with one of the links under the graph.

mwexler• 11 years ago

Jeremiah (http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...) has an interesting rise in the 70s, but then disappears in the 80s (like so many things) but comes on strong again by the 2000s. The double humps doesn't seem to appear all that often, even clicking on the other examples in these HN comments, some of which appear to show spikes but are still normalish humps, not bimodal.

cafard3• 11 years ago

Heaven help us, but that might have been the Three Dog Night song "Jeremiah Was a Bullfrog."

cafard3• 11 years ago

Another explanation, slightly more flattering to the parents, occurs to me: the popularity may owe something to the movie "Jeremiah Johnson", which came out about then.

yellowapple4• 11 years ago

What surprised me is that quite a few old-timey-sounding, probably-Biblical names ("Jebediah", "Ezekiel", "Jeremiah", "Abraham", "Noah") were either practically non-existent or otherwise rather unpopular 50 years (and further) back from the present.

amyjess3• 11 years ago

I legally changed my name last year, so I have the fortune of having two sets of names to play with.

Here are my observations (note that I'm not actually posting my deadname here, but I'll still post my thoughts on it):

Old first name: My parents were spot on. I'm well within the typical age, and the median year was only four years off from my birth year. It had a very high spike in the 70s and 80s, and it's since gone down to 1970 levels and stayed there.

Old middle name: On the other hand, my parents gave me an old man's name. The age range starts at 47, and I'm 30. It peaked in the early '60s and was a curiosity by the time I was born.

New first name (Amy): I'm a little off here, but not by much. I'm only a year outside the typical range. When I was born, it had already been in decline for a few years, but it had far from bottomed out yet.

New middle name (Jessica): Spot on. Median age is only three years away from my actual birth year, and I was born really close to the peak. Oddly enough, when I was putting together my new name, I originally wanted Jessica to be my first name, but I ended up changing my mind and making it my middle name because I liked Amy better. Shame it crashed so hard in the last few years.

transman• 11 years ago

I'm not comfortable giving my old and new names, or my year of birth, BUT I can share that my first and last names before transition were very female (I've never met a guy with either of them) and my post transition first and last names are very male (although my first name often has female versions). All of my names have been family names, with minor spelling changes because of language changes as ancestors migrated to the U.S.

Old first name:

- as female: the peak, of over 20,000, was a decade after I was born, stayed there approximately 15 years and has had a slow decline since

- as male: actually follows a similar curve, but the peak was only over 100

Old middle name:

- as female: the peak, of over 10,000, was between the World Wars, went through a steady decline until a decade before my birth, when it went into a sharp decline

- as male: the peak, of over over 25, was a few years after peaking as a female name, then went through a steady decline until 20 years before my birth and has leveled out at 10+ a year

New first name:

- as male: first peak, of over 10,000, was around my birth, then went through a small dip and peaked again a couple decades later

- as female: similar to the male curve with the two peaks breaking 50 a year

New middle name:

- as male: the peak, of over 2,000, was between the World Wars, went through a sharp decline until just after WWII, when it leveled out for a couple of decades, then went through another sharp decline before leveling out around my birth.

- as female: extremely sporadic, mostly due to the low numbers of women getting this name; the range went from just over 20 in one sample year to none for almost 20 of the sample years

amyjess3• 11 years ago

Hmm... I didn't even think about running my names as the other gender. I ran my old names as male and my new names as female.

I hadn't heard of any of them except my old middle name being gender-neutral, and even in that case, I've only ever heard of one woman with my old middle name (nobody I know, either; she's a famous actress). Kinda feel sorry for all the dudes out there named Amy (well, unless they're really trans girls, but that's statistically so unlikely)... at least boys named Jessica can go by Jessie.

Comparing across genders now, the patterns are actually similar across genders, just with fewer numbers. My old middle name though, for girls, is very spiky with lots of very short ups and downs, while as a boys' name, the graph was smoother. I wonder if that correlates with the release dates of a certain actress' movies. Also, by far and above the most common of the four across gender lines was my old first name... it was the only one that ever broke 300 (and only barely).

solarmist2• 11 years ago

Actually, I'd say your parents were spot on with both your first and middle name, because middle names are usually picked in honor of someone in their or their parent's generation (usually a relative).

The other thing is for the "classiest" names (ie most fashionable) you want to be at the head of the trend not at the height of popularity as it's become "common" by then.

solarmist2• 11 years ago

And, to me, having a modern middle name (Jessica) actually sounds out of place.

kabdib• 11 years ago

Vernor is interesting :0)

viiralvx• 11 years ago

Welp, I knew my Igbo name wouldn't be in the boy's name database. :/

karmakaze• 11 years ago

Many of the common traditional english names drop off around 1995. Tried a few to find what's taking up the slack. Jack[1] was an unexpected one. Lots of J names in general, but few that pick up around 95.

[1] http://rhiever.github.io/name-age-calculator/index.html?Gend...

monknomo• 11 years ago

My parents were ahead of the curve, apparently.

~25 when I was born, ~750 and climbing now.

If only I had a trust fund that looked like the growth curve on my name popularity...

scholia• 11 years ago

Much as I admire Randy Olson, there's been a much better version of this around for at least 10 years: Baby Name Voyager. http://www.babynamewizard.com/voyager

rhiever3• 11 years ago

Thank you for the kind words. :-) Although that app you linked is a bit different - it's showing when names were popular over time. This app goes one step further and calculates how many of those people are still alive and makes a best guess at how old someone is based solely on their first name.

I also made a version similar to the Baby Name Wizard that look solely at name popularity here: http://rhiever.github.io/baby-name-explorer/

And I suppose it's just a matter of aesthetics for which one you prefer in that case.

Cheers!

HeyLaughingBoy• 11 years ago

Travis peaked first in 1980 which was when the famous Levi's commercial first aired.

Would love to see someone correlate hit TV shows with popular names.

Name Age Calculator

Related Stories