maxerickson

Here, in a small US town, the most frequent public music is one or two people ~destroying the speaker on their phone.

Second is probably motorcycles blasting it over the engine noise.

I'm perfectly happy to acknowledge that tomatoes are a vegetable in the kitchen.

If you want to understand their reproductive biology, you are stuck understanding them as fruit.

It's maybe telling that you bring up a confusion that is harmful instead of explaining why grouping massively parallel processors under the term "gpu" is harmful.

For the companies doing massive build outs, there's already significant pressure to improve effectiveness and efficiency.

You are probably misusing disingenuous. It implies dishonesty (so intention).

Talking about their product segments the same way they do is not being pedantic. Insisting on your personal definition is!

Their data center business is selling gpus. They wrap them in a complete platform, but that's what they are selling.

They do report it separately from consumer and business sales of gpus used in PCs.

They do vegetation control in larger easements, the power lines/electrcity aren't the only possible factor.

It's at least arguably about storytelling. You don't sit around the fire talking in verse for your entertainment.

For instance, one of Homer's works is in the news due to a film being made of it.

I suppose that suggests the Coen brothers.

So what's your point?

"Ethics aside" for the person empowered to act on behalf of the state?

How did you get that impression?

Your argument then rests on it being easier to keep cattle than to not keep cattle.

Your comment demonstrates the uselessness of the concept by doing the thing it is sick of.

Another way to look at it is that people who need the money early have the option. The guessing is just if you agonize about ending with an optimal payout.

The efficiency of the chips only matters if the orbit is full.

If the orbit isn't full, all they are is additional compute.

Do you think yimby's hate transit and encouraging revitalisation?

They are going to support both for the same reason that they are yimby's...

I think there is a good chance that they didn't throw enough balloons to warrant replacing it.

I wonder if they bothered to get high concentration vinegar.

"that's not a problem worth thinking about to most people?"

Begs the question.

What is your idea of strategic ownership? Musk has voting control, everyone else is along for the ride.

Looks like OnePlus and OPPO are different companies. Shared ownership, but different companies.

The US Corolla Cross Hybrid pretty much has the Prius AWD drivetrain.

When you say enforcement isn't worth it, you end up letting the most inconsiderate people with some of the worst decision making set the tone for society.

It's also pretty likely that the state violence will be a threat rather than a literal pistol whipping. Harder for the vigilante to make that work.

Buses here go door to door. Or almost anyway. I guess it's because the school age population has declined.

Does the tempo matter?

Like compare changing live routing to publishing a paper map showing alternate routes.

In either case it seems to me that the vehicle operator should be most responsible for the impact of the route that they use.

Spectrum here rolled out fiber when other companies did. I'm pretty sure it is because it is the same subsidized last mile fiber and not because they were inspired by competition.

What's the reasoning? That people won't switch away from the more expensive, slower, less reliable service if you get there a bit later?

Starlink isn't wildly expensive, nor is it unreliable or slow, but it loses the comparisons.

Internal business tools are not innovative products. The potential edge comes from things like being better aligned with the business process or eliminating tasks from the process.

They probably aren't really using the OSM data.

For example, if I use Google Maps to drive to a new neighborhood and then take a bunch of notes about the new neighborhood, my notes are not subject to the terms and conditions of Google Maps.

A decent representation of the actual path is usually pretty straightforward. The metadata and topology are more of the work.

In areas where 3dep is recent, you can usually see a trail under forest cover. It's pretty great.

The review does not block the data being added, it's more of a request for feedback.

Different maps have different update cycles. The slippy map on osm.org is meant to update as quickly as possible, usually a few minutes, but sometimes there are hiccups. Zoom levels that show larger areas also update a little slower.

As long as what you are adding is up to date/accurate, I wouldn't worry about whether you've captured everything about the features. "This thing is here" is a lot better for the map than no information.

Yes, "prior to release".