Codex Resets

https://codex-resets.com/

by denysvitali • 4 days ago

309 200 4 days ago

codex-resets.com

yewenjie• 4 days ago

Is Claude also doing something like this? I saw my Fable limit resetting earlier than expected.

zwily• 4 days ago

It did once. That's all I know of though. Nothing like Codex.

PacificSpecific• 4 days ago

I've had this too on my personal pro plan and also when I run the usage command it says it's resetting tomorrow rather than getting cut off.

I'm trying to squeeze what I can in the meantime but I feel like they said it was getting cut off multiple times and they keep extending and possibly resetting it (havent been looking close enough to know for sure)

rovr138• 4 days ago

They had an issue yesterday that said Fable needed extra usage.

I’m guessing they’re getting ready.

tekacs• 4 days ago

https://x.com/claudeai/status/2078302415804379218

No, they've been clear about the fact that Fable is staying in indefinitely now.

They also extended the 50% extra usage thing through to August 19.

nullbio• 4 days ago

Nope. Anthropic is incredibly greedy and always has been.

usef-• 4 days ago

They're far shorter of GPUs, apparently. OpenAI made huge hardware deals last year (which look less crazy now).

nzeid• 4 days ago

Forgive my ignorance... Usage limits reset for 100% of customers at the same instant?

jrflo2• 4 days ago

Originally yes, everyone's usage limit went back to 100% at the same time regardless of if you were at 0% or 99%. Now they tend to give out "banked" resets where users can choose when to use it for up to a month (except the most recent one, which I think was non-banked)

minimaxir2• 4 days ago

Over the last 2 weeks, 6 of the resets are direct to the usage limit.

In the same timeframe, 2 additional resets were banked.

ipsum22• 4 days ago

They realized the banked resets were too expensive, so they stopped giving those out for the last 2 resets.

herpdyderp• 4 days ago

My next question is: why? Purely marketing tactics?

behnamoh• 4 days ago

How long is this gonna last? OpenAI obviously is doing it to gain mindshare but they're burning money before their IPO and can't sustain these resets.

They've bought a lot of dev goodwill tho, which matters I guess.

thehamkercat• 4 days ago

They also got a lot of goodwill by letting people use codex subscription in any harness they want, anywhere they want

jrflo2• 4 days ago

I think it's mostly to spread hype for the new models. Sol can be ridiculously long running, even without /goal so it can run for 12hr+ on a problem with defined and verifiable output. So it's a good way for people to get hyped about the capabilities without worrying about usage limits.

doawoo• 4 days ago

coworker tried Sol the other day and it sat and thought for 10 minutes before maxing out our company's per-user weekly limit lol

ssl-34• 4 days ago

Are Codex users even a drop in the bucket of overall use? I mean, it's a pretty specific way to interact with the bot.

Codex usage is clearly common enough to have entered the vernacular of folks here on HN.

But we aren't everyone, and it seems likely to me that there's a lot more people in the world burning tokens using ChatGPT than there are who even know what Codex is.

HDBaseT3• 3 days ago

It is safe to assume there are more 'normal' chat sessions than 'codex' sessions, although Codex sessions likely consume 10x the tokens the average person does asking for a lasagna recipe.

nicce• 4 days ago

OpenAI obviously is doing it to gain mindshare but they're burning money before their IPO and can't sustain these resets.

We don’t know that. If they have already paid for the hardware and it is not running 100%, and customers would not pay to get reset, they don’t really lose money.

trollbridge7• 4 days ago

It's a pretty smart move. If they weren't doing this, I would have simply switched back to DeepSeek, Mimo, GLM, etc. (and maybe K3) whenever I hit my usage limits, as was my normal custom.

freakynit3• 4 days ago

I personally believe that they are buying time until they can make current gov. to bring-in a legislation that targets Chinese models one way or the other.

And now Kimi-K3 has caused a new Deepseek moment.. but this time, the only horizon that was still untouched: frontier performance.

Expect escalation of things from now on.

cbg0• 4 days ago

They're performing the resets when the cluster load goes down and they have sufficient capacity to handle the reset.

Laurel12342• 4 days ago

Capacity is one thing but inference still costs money.

damsta2• 4 days ago

can't sustain these resets

If I would have my tin foil hat on I'd say they can manipulate how the subscription usage gets calculate during the week, so that these resets don't cost them much or anything. Sometimes it feels like the usage just disappears with nothing to show for it.

mvkel2• 4 days ago

5 days ago: 7M users
4 days ago: 8M users
3 days ago: 9M users

That's some incredible growth.

lekevicius• 4 days ago

tbf they turned previous ChatGPT macOS app into Codex, so getting a "new" Codex user might mean someone using ChatGPT just updated their app.

an0malous• 3 days ago

I don’t even know what Codex is anymore and at this point I’m too afraid to ask. I remember the days when it was a VSCode extension.

Didn’t they also name their new hardware product Codex?

ozgung• 3 days ago

Numbers are for Codex AND ChatGPT Work users. So if a ChatGPT subscriber tries Work tab they must be counted as a new active user. So it’s not like 1M new developers daily.

sebjones3• 4 days ago

I was thinking about this. How do they measure this? Every upgrade of the ChatGPT apps get counted?

rvz2• 4 days ago

They just merged the ChatGPT app and the Codex app into one super app.

It is a clever growth hack.

ipsum22• 4 days ago

I would expect them to grow faster than 1 million users a day in that case, since chatGPT has almost a billion users. Maybe everyone's just using the web app or mobile?

ayuhito• 4 days ago

I have an inkling of a feeling that this generosity is a stunt only to help juice the growth and “story” specifically for the IPO…

Best use the AI subsidies while you can!

Verdex• 3 days ago

Which seems a bit off to me. Can they even ipo right now due to the apple business?

Although I don't think you're wrong. The number of "organic" social media posts I've seen in the past few weeks of the form: 'Wow, Anthropic users are ugly losers...nothing like those handsome openai tiger blood winner sages' is simply too high in my mind for anything other than an ipo prelude.

[Also are altman and musk really fighting on x? Like, that's got to be a sign of some sort of internal stressors right?]

monster_truck5• 4 days ago

They, like every startup ever, count users in a very stupid way.

One person using the app on two computers and a phone? That's obviously 3 users.

Growth Hackers and SEO types have done so much to make the world an insufferable place. I congradulate them on the OpenClaw psyop, that was some very inspired bullshit that did fuck all and is now irrelevant.

solumunus2• 4 days ago

Such a counting method doesn’t explain that incredible growth. Do you think day by day huge portions of users are using additional devices in perpetuity?

sva_• 4 days ago

Compare to Anthropic who consistently do their resets between Thursday and Friday, somewhat alienating people who have their resets around that time.

perching_aix• 4 days ago

Oh, they have free drops too? I guess dual wielding the two $20 subs is the best value option right now then.

trollbridge7• 4 days ago

Anthropic has been like this for a while, although in their latest announcement, the $20 tier won't have the "cheap" access to Fable, and neither will the $100 tier.

bottlepalm2• 4 days ago

It’s like two parents fighting over their children with who can give them the most gifts. I’m loving it, two Christmases!!

sumedh2• 4 days ago

Ant is not giving lot of gifts though :(

paxys• 4 days ago

Being able to use Fable with subscription plans is a gift.

bottlepalm2• 4 days ago

My /usage is telling me '+50% weekly limits promo through Aug 19' - that's huge, and better than what I'm getting with the equivalent Codex plan I have right now. Though what Codex does have over Claude is Sol /fast - that hands down is the best coding experience right now.

brookst4• 3 days ago

Ant has quota resets two or three times a month, at least for me.

huey773• 4 days ago

Crazy value for money now with the banked resets. At my $COMPANY, we have claude enterprise at API pricing. I've blown through $10k already this month, opting for Opus 4.8 w/ Sonnet 5 agents where possible. On my codex pro plan, I am 5.6 sol'ing my way everyday with the odd ultra mode. Point being my real API usage here must be very unsustainable!

Tiberium2• 4 days ago

API pricing itself might have extreme margins compared to the real cost. Anyway, in my testing the Pro 20x $200 plan gives you about $2200 API-equivalent weekly usage if you're only using GPT 5.6 Sol, so quite close to $9k-$10k/month API-equivalent, it's a bit inconsistent with cache costs.

It's very interesting that for Anthropic the $100 and $200 plans only differ 2x in weekly limits, the 5 hour limit differences are more severe. But for OpenAI, Pro 20x is, well, 4x of Pro 5x for only 2x cost. So, for example, 100% of weekly usage for Codex on a Plus ($20) account is just 5% of weekly usage for Codex on Pro 20x.

And you can calculate how much extra usage you can get from resets, and especially banked resets by purposefully using the whole quota and using your banked reset - they expire 30 days after they're given out, so if you don't use one, it just disappears.

loufe• 4 days ago

Edit:

The $200 plan is explicitly 4x the $100 plan[1] only for "per session". That's so vague. I initially pushed back against your claim, but reading now Anthropic is not at all clear, in fact.

[1] https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11049741-what-is-the-...

debian3• 3 days ago

I just upgraded from Pro to Max 5x and I’m getting about 3.5x not 5x

crimsonnoodle58• 4 days ago

Curious, does Anthropic force companies of a certain size like yours to their Enterprise plans? Or was it by choice for the enterprise features?

Because with a Premium Team seat I run 2-3 vscodes with Opus 4.8 Max all day and never seem to hit my limits.

denysvitali4• 4 days ago

Yes, past 150 seats you have to switch to Enterprise (IIRC)

paulddraper2• 4 days ago

Yes Team is max 150 users (except maybe grandfathered accounts).

The solution is to use individual Max plans, but then you miss Enterprise management features.

echelon• 4 days ago

This is the Kimi and GLM effect.

Open Source is coming.

flawn• 4 days ago

* open-weights

(sorry for nitpicking, i think it's important to emphasize - only OLMo has been the most most prominent fully open source release)

slopinthebag4• 4 days ago

$10,000 in less than three weeks is incredible. The bean counters sure have a blind spot for AI…

Aurornis2• 4 days ago

That’s less than the fully loaded cost of hiring another engineer.

If someone is making the case that it’s helping the team get twice as much work done without hiring more people (which I’m neither agreeing with or disagreeing with) then the bean counters would actually prefer it. Hiring people is messy and expensive. Spending on API costs is a dial that you can turn down later if you need to, without laying anyone off and paying severance.

on_the_train• 4 days ago

Here it's only Microsoft (ghcp) allowed, and 39$ per month is considered ludicrous with no way to increase. Ah Europe

stavros• 4 days ago

Sounds less a Europe thing and more a "your company" thing. Our company gives Claude Premium to everyone.

Klayy• 4 days ago

not a Europe thing

Aurornis2• 4 days ago

Point being my real API usage here must be very unsustainable!

I think it’s funny that everyone anchors to the API pricing as the real cost.

Most likely is that their API costs are printing profits. They can sell the subscription plans at a slight loss because it gets more people like you hooked on GPT models at home and suggesting them at work, where the real money is made.

I think their subscription plans go mostly unused when averaged across all subscribers, too. Some customers are getting great deals by maxing out 100% every week, but most probably use much less.

The reset game is an addictive challenge that gets the hardcore users more hooked on their products because you feel pressured to use it as much as you can before the next unpredictable surprise reset lands.

slopinthebag4• 4 days ago

Idk, Kimi K3 is not that much cheaper than Opus and it’s probably a smaller model. We’ll know for certain when commodity providers price it, but I expect it to be the same price.

sebjones3• 4 days ago

My usage sky rocketed with GPT 5.6 sol thanks to all these resets. I'm pretty sure this is not sustainable for me.

trollbridge7• 4 days ago

Kicking myself that I didn't use one of my 4 resets which just expired, but then again, they reset our usage anyway. We are just blasting away with 5.6-Sol-ultra, doing a project I wouldn't have otherwise done (basically drastically editing someone's novel for them and adding illustrations).

faangguyindia• 4 days ago

yes but as a normal user your data and traces are being used to train AI which helps enterprise customers.

rvz2• 4 days ago

At my $COMPANY, we have claude enterprise at API pricing. I've blown through $10k already this month, opting for Opus 4.8 w/ Sonnet 5 agents where possible.

A very happy gambler of tokens at the Anthropic casino, running up costs on the house at no cost to them, but to $COMPANY paying.

jeffybefffy5192• 4 days ago

Price shock in 3...2...1...

alasano2• 4 days ago

You're using Opus 4.8 and then Sonnet 5 which is both worse and more expensive in practice than Opus.

blks• 4 days ago

Does the company actually gets any value close to your salary + benefits + ~15k$ you gonna burn this month?

huey773• 4 days ago

Yes I honestly think if we pull it off the revenue would easily pay off. Otherwise an expensive experiment, but with fewer staff so the damage is less than it used to be and a verdict much faster.

Laurel12342• 4 days ago

How do you spend so much? Our company also has Claude enterprise pricing. I have a monthly limit of $800, I use Opus for everything, and I'm around the limit after the month. Genuinely can't imagine spending 12 times as many tokens without intentionally trying to waste money.

huey773• 4 days ago

I am not trying to tokenmaxx, but I will work on 2-3 tickets simultaneously in seperate terminals (worktrees). Also having Claude triage and check logs etc. - plus the odd bit of project planning in Claude desktop/cowork. We also have a triage agent skill for the work I’m doing which fans out. All in all deadlines looming so it’s been a case of pump out the work and prove the product. I suppose if you’re in more a BAU state this kind of usage is overkill.

somewhereoutth• 4 days ago

So... basically watching them set fire to money in realtime??

p-e-w• 4 days ago

And they can’t stop because they want to IPO soon, and stopping this madness would signal loudly that they are bleeding cash, don’t really have a business model, and might not be worth $2 trillion after all.

kubb• 4 days ago

Yup! Big beautiful burning pile of cash. Though there’s some nuance with subsidizing inference (which is supposed to make them money long term) vs training (which we’re supposed to ignore I guess).

malshe• 4 days ago

We lose money on every sale, but make it up in volume

trollbridge7• 4 days ago

To be fair, they're motivating me to move from the Pro to the Max tier (the $200 one, which has 4X the usage of Pro for 2X the price).

throwitaway222• 4 days ago

Confirmed, was at 40% earlier, now at 90%

freakynit3• 4 days ago

I didn't knew about these resets up until a few days back... and every time they used to reset these limits, I thought I was going crazy... the usage numbers just didn't match. And the weekly end window just kept pushing ahead by a day or a few... just the right amount of deviation to make you believe you are going crazy.

Tiberium2• 4 days ago

To be fair, when they reset usage for everyone (instead of a banked reset), they move your reset back a week later, so:

1. Your window ends (usage reset) in 3 days

2. They reset usage for everyone

3. Your usage goes back to 100% and your current window ends in 7 days now.

jdw64• 4 days ago

I love Codex!

irfan_99• 4 days ago

ai tools now becoming expensive + too rate limits even on paid plans

nickandbro• 4 days ago

Great now what about one for Claude Code?

midnightbobarun• 4 days ago

I'm kind of impressed how often they manage to do this. Claude Code and Grok Build do resets too, but nowhere near this often. And in an ironic twist for a big company with the infrastructure, Google Antigravity never seems to do resets like this at all (at least that I've noticed). I wonder how much this stuff costs OpenAI to do?

enraged_camel• 4 days ago

They can do it often because they have compute, and they have compute mostly because they are pretty far behind Anthropic when it comes to heavy enterprise users. They’ve supposedly added several million since 5.6 launch, which is a steep growth curve. We will see if those users stick around. Anecdotally, I’ve stopped using it for anything major because it has attempted to do some very unsafe things when I wasn’t looking. Friends I’ve talked to have also gotten over the initial honeymoon period.

vineyardmike• 4 days ago

They (OpenAI) also made many more deals to acquire compute before they actually had the revenue to support it. They paraded around the world making deals with everyone and anyone. By doing it earlier, they got way better unit prices. Anthropic bought their compute at significantly higher prices by waiting until they actually had demand to fulfill.

Kwpolska• 4 days ago

I’m not sure if resets require that much compute, maybe a few whales will use the service a bit more right after a reset. What matters more is the money, as they’re giving away free usage, and subsidising subscription users even more.

porker• 4 days ago

Some of these resets were because of bugs in the 5.6 launch that caused subagent-users to burn _a lot_ of extra tokens. It was placating customers.

It is impressive they've got the capacity to do so.

minimaxir2• 4 days ago

I really wish there was a canonical platform endpoint to programmatically check Codex usage amount and the quota reset times so I could just vibecode an app to alert "hey, your usage just went to 100% so that means OpenAI did a reset" and "hey, your 5-hour usage is at 10%, wrap up what you're doing".

The only way to do it now is through shenanigans with the Codex App Server which is not ideal.

ehsanu1• 4 days ago

Check this site for the first part? Maybe they can offer a notifications API, hah.

qntmfred2• 4 days ago

I keep this bookmarked and check it frequently

https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/analytics

usagisushi2• 4 days ago

The API endpoints on this page accept an OAuth token from ~/.codex/auth.json. You can simply ask Codex to create a report skill with some curl examples.

ssl-34• 4 days ago

The 5h limit is gone (for now). It does not presently need to be chased. :)

For the automated checking of other stuff: It was a one-shot prompt to get Codex clank up some Python that returns remaining usage, next reset time/date, and so on.

The result does use Codex App Server, but it's a short-lived process that is dealt with over stdio so that's... fine-ish, I guess?

alasano2• 4 days ago

You can use this endpoint for quota reset times.

Just ask Codex to use its local auth token as a bearer token and send a GET request to it. The response includes "available_count" and "credits[].expires_at". Or script it yourself obviously.

https://chatgpt.com/backend-api/wham/rate-limit-reset-credit...

denysvitali4• 4 days ago

Use CodexBar: https://github.com/steipete/CodexBar

sumedh2• 4 days ago

OpenAI should have just focussed on Coding instead of wasting time with Sora.

dbbk• 4 days ago

Well yeah they realised that

qntmfred2• 4 days ago

I'd enable push notifications for this site

wonderfuly• 4 days ago

This feature has just been added!

Lwrless• 4 days ago

Those resets and the removal of the 5-hour usage limit are quietly anchoring me to a much higher usage baseline. I've stopped rationing and just spawn a bunch of agents to work at whatever pace I want, because there always seem to be more resets on the way (at least true for the last week). And now I am actually worried about that if one day they just stop doing so, my "normal" workflow will suddenly exceed the limit, and upgrading will feel like a step backwards.

sebjones3• 4 days ago

All these resets are given because of rival competition. When they win the market, we are going to be squeezed $$$.

lwansbrough• 4 days ago

Can anyone explain how you “win” the market of super intelligence? Particularly with open weights models now rivaling the frontier, it seems like a race to the bottom even if the prices don’t yet reflect that.

trollbridge7• 4 days ago

If they try to engage in monopolistic pricing, I'll simply start paying for GLM-5.2, K3, DeepSeek et al.

ssl-34• 4 days ago

Perhaps.

But that hasn't happened, and it may or may not ever happen; we don't know the future. All we know is the past and the present.

And that today, we have tokens to burn.

Razengan• 4 days ago

This is actually what I've started to feel a vague nagging concern about as well..

Say what you will, there's no way I'm going back to non-AI assisted coding. Even though I don't use AI to generate code or assets, it's great for reviews and brainstorming etc.

What if OpenAI/Anthropic decide to do a Netflix/Spotify move and pull the rug out from under us one day?

Like skyrocketing the price, or limiting peasants to older models (because Glorious Leader said so), or maybe some leak comes out that they've been spying on us all along.

kristianc• 3 days ago

Quietly eh?

luciana1u2• 4 days ago

there is now a dedicated dashboard tracking when a tech company resets its own rate limits and it is somehow more reliable than the actual product status page

dofm• 4 days ago

Casino comp and drug dealer freebie tactics again. Shoddy business, IMO.

SpyCoder77• 4 days ago

fomoz• 4 days ago

This is a useful site.

I've been enjoying the resets, plus I had 3 resets I haven't used.

Just using 5.6 Sol in Fast mode the whole time, 1B tokens per day.

However, when they removed the 5h limit they also quietly lowered the 5.6 Sol context from 354k to 258k or something like that. I noticed it in Codex.

dannyw2• 4 days ago

There were a few tweets about it so they weren't super quiet about it. I think you can get it back by setting `model_context_window=YOUR_VALUE` in ~/.codex/config.toml though.

thejazzman• 3 days ago

It no longer works and only respects a server supplied value now

luciana1u2• 4 days ago

there's now a live status page tracking when a trillion-dollar company decides to hand out free compute, and refreshing it at 2am feels like a completely reasonable thing to do

d-yoda• 4 days ago

Anthropic would say that's exactly why they're in the red.

sim04ful• 4 days ago

I'm starting to think It might be a good idea to stay with American models, by virtue of them feeling so threatened they give out more and more free perks.

lelanthran• 4 days ago

I'm starting to think It might be a good idea to stay with American models, by virtue of them feeling so threatened they give out more and more free perks.

If you keep staying with them, they'd feel less and less threatened.

You need to use them about half as much as you do a Chinese model so that the usage stats that get collected show them that they are still losing users (and attention) to the Chinese models.

JoheyDev888• 4 days ago

hese resets are a trap. They're artificially anchoring our workflows to a massive baseline, trapping us for the inevitable 5x price hike when the market finally consolidates.

setnone• 4 days ago

i just need one more, the last one, i swear

monster_truck5• 4 days ago

I stopped paying for Codex because of this shit. "Whoops we burned a week of 20x usage in minutes because we fucked up the cache again. You can keep paying money to get more resets to fix it"

nah, I'll use open models. Only way I'd use codex now is if it was free, and I don't mean someone else paying for it. I would rather have them pay for DSv4P or Kimi

afro88• 4 days ago

When did that happen with Codex? I thought that was a Claude Code thing

monster_truck5• 3 days ago

Check the github issues brother, search for "usage". Read through the noise. Look at the dates. Don't forget the closed ones.

It's been happening every week since 5.2 was fresh. Not everyone is effected every time. Sometimes it's regional, other times it's per platform, or per version, with a feature (new or old) either enabled or disabled, or some combination of these things. Sometimes you get resets that nobody else does, other times you don't get the ones that were announced. Sometimes you get emails telling you that boosts on limits you didn't even know you had are expiring. At points it did balance out when they really fucked up metering and were underbilling by absurd factors, but that feels more like being toyed with and experimented on than a genuine mistake.

That someone had the 'brilliant' idea to add banked resets (which do expire, so you have to use or lose them, hope you didn't have other plans) says to me that they are no longer as confident about actually being able to fix this as they once were. I'm sure some amount of it is a function of compute availability and reliability, but the rest are definitely issues with the app and it's a rake they keep stomping on.

Compared to just about any other dev centric service I have paid at least $200/mo for, this does not feel very professional to me. They got $1200 outta me and it never really improved. At points I felt like I was getting my moneys worth, and I did burn through a few hundred million tokens, but the frustration of having your projects and plans interrupted and having to wait is not awesome... and then I used Deepseek V4 Pro and felt sick to my stomach with buyers remorse as I watched what it did with just $10.

partsch• 4 days ago

I think it's perfectly normal for errors to occur given the pace of development.

Retroactive refunds are certainly better, but I think OpenAI is much more customer-focused in this regard than Anthropic.

monster_truck5• 3 days ago

Sure, but also who asked? And that's because they have the compute to burn, which is conditional based on their need to use it to train the next one.

Anything else I've ever paid $200/mo for, advertised as being for professionals, had a markedly better customer experience. If you wanna be Patrick and tell your pet rock to take its time at that price, well then you're Patrick. Good job!

I'm having far more fun with Kimi and Deepseek, at lower prices, without these problems. And I don't have to follow a bunch of obnoxious shitposters to stay clued in on what the fuck is going on or what this week's excuse is.

They're especially cocky right now, they have to beat their chest and pretend like their only competition is Anthropic. They're in for a rough wake up call man. Playing it fast and loose with developer loyalty is a fantastic way to get burned when options like those exist. They are earnestly just as good and in some cases better, and check this out: nobody can take them away from you no matter where you live. If you want to rent 8 GPUs and run the open models yourself, you can do that! You can even be enterprising and sell your excess compute to your friends, or strangers. Best to figure this out before the regulatory capture starts

edumucelli• 4 days ago

Also the fact that now you can keep unused resets and use them later is a big advantage: "You have 4 usage limit resets available".

johnnyApplePRNG• 4 days ago

Careful with those, they expire.

I just had one randomly delete the other day.

No, they don't apply it :/

bazzingadev• 4 days ago

Can this made into a public api of sorts so that my agents know ?

ucha• 4 days ago

Why add a middleman when you can ask your own account with /usage?

nsbk• 4 days ago

This feels a lot like free spins in slot machines. I have a friend obsessed with using up all the Fable usage which supposedly ends today. He's doing a lot of stuff of questionable usefulness just because it's a resource perceived as scarce.

d1sxeyes3• 4 days ago

Permafable got announced earlier this week, but definitely the slot machine feel is real.

chrisshroba• 3 days ago

What do you mean by Permafable?

inigyou• 3 days ago

AI in general is a slot machine and it wouldn't surprise me if that was a large part of the psychosis. You prompt the lever, watch the display spin, and sometimes, just sometimes, a bunch of coins come out.

squidbeak• 3 days ago

There's no psychosis in noting that something consistently produces good work, or in wanting to get the most out what is effectively an employee - hired for the price of the subscription. Seriously, if that's 'psychosis', then every employer on the planet eager to wring out productivity from their employees is afflicted with the same psychosis.

Isn't it rather a psychosis to insist that people are imagining the results they see, just because you don't like the tech and can't stomach the thought there might be something in it?

nxobject• 3 days ago

We’re at the gamification stage of motivating people to use your product, eh?

Philip-J-Fry• 3 days ago

That's what half of people's AI developed projects feels like to me. I have colleagues using Openclaw, and having an entire team of agents managing their home infrastructure. And I'm just thinking "why?". They're not developing anything that useful, their homes are already automated via home assistant. It's just agents for agents sake. Outside of my work life, I find very little need to be using AI.

f6v• 3 days ago

Remember when people used to play Pokemon Go?

matheusmoreira• 3 days ago

Yeah, it's the gacha of software development. I too redline my subscription every single week just because I want to get the most value out of the money I spent. Literally 100% weekly usage, every single week.

I am using the resulting software and documents though. I'm daily driving the projects I wrote with AI. Started new ones for fun, such as decompilation projects for my cherished childhood games. Hardened my router and my LAN. I just keep finding an unending amount of things to do.

It took over a month to complete a full Fable code review of my lone lisp project.

no_no_no_yes• 3 days ago

Why does Fable usage end today?!

Anthropic won't have anything competitive with OpenAI Sol and Kimi K3?

jasonvorhe• 3 days ago

No schedule. No changelog. Only the feed. We watch it so you don't have to.

Using genai for such a bland text. The slop intensifies.

__alexander• 3 days ago

I just learned the hard way that codex removes resets once the weekly cycle starts.

denysvitali4• 2 days ago

No, it doesn't (AFAIK), but resets do expire

theoneone• 3 days ago

you should periodically feed the data to chatgpt to try to predict the next reset!

zuzululu• 3 days ago

really need one soon .... gpt sol used up all my banked resets

hirvi74• 3 days ago

Not to veer to far off topic, but do any of you long-term Codex users happen to know how long the Codex Resets can be banked for? I can find no indications of an expiration date in the TUI or on the Web App. From what I have searched, I have been getting somewhat mixed answers.

Anyway, I do appreciate how OpenAI seems to be far more generous with these resets than other providers. I've never come close to needing a reset yet. I have some tasks that I have been procrastinating, so my need for my resets might come in handy in the near future.

siquick• 3 days ago

30 days

O_H_E• 2 days ago

There is a concrete expiry date listed for each reset in the codex desktop app.

Codex Resets

Related Stories