HN user

dbbk

2,179 karma

Making it up as I go along. Meetings and calls!

Posts10
Comments1,733
View on HN

It's not the point of the visa, the O-1 is supposed to be for people of extraordinary ability, eg Nobel Prize winners. It's used for software engineers.

The O-1 has also been abused for a long time, basically any software engineer kid who gets into Y Combinator has been getting an O-1

Are you also responsible for AskUserQuestion swallowing the preceding output on Fable? It asks me questions about its response that it never even showed me. It's (and I hate to use the term) unusable.

It is such a shame that Anthropic has no interest in QA, because they have incredible models, and bafflingly broken products. In an alternate universe Claude Code would be 10x better than where it is now...

GPT-5.6 13 days ago

Yes it was an intentionally added feature, that was extremely bad.

GPT-5.6 13 days ago

I really love the Opus/Fable models but I'm honestly sick to death of the buggy product. The CLI always has some weird issue. Right now it doesn't even output messages before tool calls, it just swallows them and they disappear.

I don't like OpenAI as a company, but they appear to have QA, and that is probably enough to get me to switch.

TypeScript 7 13 days ago

"In their right mind?" I wouldn't start a project in anything other than TypeScript now. My platform is a monorepo across web and native mobile (Expo), and is TypeScript throughout. All my types flow everywhere automatically. Even the shape of a database table is shared with the native app with tRPC. Nothing can break the type contract anywhere. How would you do that with another language?

Grok 4.5 14 days ago

We could just not have AI models that generate CSAM I don't think that's too much to ask

GPT‑Live 14 days ago

It sounds like they've switched to a "native audio" model which if I understand right is what Gemini has had for quite a while?

Workers Cache 16 days ago

Cloudflare Snippets were actually better if you wanted to run logic before the cache (they are entirely free)

Workers Cache 16 days ago

I was a bit confused what this adds other than just standard CDN-Cache-Control page caching that we do now. Some quirks I've found;

- You still get billed per request, whether the request hits cache or not (but don't get billed for CPU time)

- You now get billed for static asset requests! This makes no sense to me. "One thing to watch: when caching is enabled, requests that are normally free — static asset requests and worker-to-worker invocations through service bindings or ctx.exports — are billed at the standard request rate, because each one now consults the cache in front of your Worker." Yeah that sounds like a bug that just happens to generate them more money.

- The cache key automatically has the worker deployment version, so even gradual deployments populate their own cache which is nice

- It seems like you can set a totally custom cache key? But that was previously Enterprise only, can't see if that's still the case here.