cbg0

Nothing, this is why they have both.

An update from the land registry (the truthfulness of this remains to be seen depending on how fast this comes back online):

ANCPI announced that it had begun migrating its applications to Romania’s Government Cloud. The operation is being coordinated by the Special Telecommunications Service (STS) and is expected to be completed on Wednesday, July 22.

After the migration, authorized institutions will inspect the applications and data and prepare a report on the condition of the systems and any additional measures required. Based on that report, ANCPI will announce an estimated date for restoring its applications. Services will be brought back online gradually, according to operational priorities.

ANCPI says it is rebuilding its database from backup copies stored in several locations. The agency rejected reports suggesting that it did not have sufficient backups, explaining that the use of multiple storage locations provides redundancy and allows data to be restored after cybersecurity incidents.

According to ANCPI, affected systems must remain isolated until every identified vulnerability has been addressed. Although shutting down the services has caused temporary inconvenience, the agency says the measure was necessary to protect the data and ensure that operations restart safely and reliably.

The restoration of the IT infrastructure is described as a complex process being conducted in cooperation with the relevant authorities. ANCPI has also confirmed that a criminal investigation is underway, but no official conclusions can yet be released.

The agency warned that claims circulating publicly about the alleged consequences of the attack are not based on official information and do not reflect the current state of the investigation.

Don't get all starry-eyed, the people owning those sites also have access to LLMs, so both the hacks and paydays are rare.

They're performing the resets when the cluster load goes down and they have sufficient capacity to handle the reset.

Supermarkets are forced to discount soon-to-expire items which go into "bargain bins".

It can be made available online with a longer lead time if the manufacturers care enough about it. I guess it depends on whether the complexity is worth it, because if you're just selling cheap fast fashion then discounting/donating might still be worth it even if you produce excess, but more high-end brands probably won't stock uncommon sizes.

There are actually laws in EU countries to prevent this. Supermarkets have to discount food that is soon to expire instead of throwing it away, perishables from restaurants and fast food joints can be taken home by employees at the end of the day, and even donations to charities of said goods, or farms for produce unfit for human consumption is encouraged/regulated.

Donating to charity is cheaper than destroying.

You're arguing in favor of destroying unworn clothes instead of donating to charity or discounting them as somehow being good for business? The point of this is to control against wasteful business practices, not a ban on producing or selling clothes.

The EU is a $23 trillion economy, hardly a slouch even though it is underperforming.

The VW example is actually something you probably don't understand - they're failing because they're an inefficient business, not because of EU regulations or Germany not having a "good economy". Toyota produces almost twice as many vehicles per employee.

beep-boop, [citation needed] on that "95%".

People love nitpicking about scientific articles, it kind of exploded with the pandemic. Especially when the conclusions of the paper don't align with the expectations of the reader.

The way I see these is "these persons invested a lot of time putting this together and all I have to counter it are personal vibes", so unless my LLM of choice can find plenty of conflicting papers, I tend to assume it's reasonably valid work.

There was a recent Twitter post from Tibo @ OpenAI asking someone to share how to run GPT on Claude Code so they don't seem to be against it.

Is the prompt generated by the LLM to send to a sub-agent really your data?

Isn't AOSP a thing?

In the past they received a lot of hate for not comparing to the competition.

5.6 Terra (mid tier model) as good as Fable on DeepSWE while cheaper than Opus API pricing. Seems like a homerun.

Hy3 DeepSWE - 28%

GPT5.4 xhigh DeepSWE - 52%

A lot of contaminated benchmarks in the blog post about Hy3, needs real testing though I have a distinct feeling it's benchmaxxed like a lot of Chinese models.

You should be relieved that they're sending robots instead of you to get blown up by a drone.

Assuming these concerns were real you could just turn the app into a website.

It looks like some of these systems do work, why shouldn't we try these systems too?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002243752...

How would these laws prevent me from just side loading my own open source client?

They do not.

This will not get triggered by blind spot checks and most new cars have these inside the mirrors, so you won't even need to look over your shoulder.

Personal freedom to fall asleep at the wheel or look at your phone while driving?

It works, but there are mechanisms to also track your head position if it can't see your eyes.

The GDPR protects people from companies keeping their data and using it recklessly.

Perfect is the enemy of good. If it prevents some people from falling a sleep and causing an accident that's excellent.

Preventing car crashes and people dying in said crashes isn't an unhealthy obsession with safety.

Better in what way? Does it follow the goals better, does the code produce have higher quality in a testable/maintainable sense or is it just closer to how you would usually program something?

I've seen this with GPT, and I usually ask it to put together a more easy to understand document for a specific target audience or reading level and it seems to do okay.

This is because GPT-5.6 is just a more posttrained version of GPT-5.5, not a bigger model than GPT-5.5.

What is this very confident assumption based on?