Logseq 2.0 Beta (DB version) is here

https://github.com/logseq/logseq/releases

by karencarits • 9 days ago

101 85 9 days ago

Valodim4• 9 days ago

It pains me to say, but it's probably too little, too late. Logseq remained a buggy mess, is now on an unmaintained (thus insecure) version of electron.

And now after several years of complete stagnation, the supposed improvement is a database format to fix their technical issues, so I can no longer keep all my data as markdown files? At a time when half the edits are done by Claude and tracked with jujustu, this is just not useful for me.

All I wanted was the original vision, but with less bugs and more quality of life features.

j_maffe• 9 days ago

Yeah I felt the same about the decision when they decided to move to database structure. If it had this structure from the start it could've built up an ecosystem like Obsidian's but now it's hard to justify going for it.

Valodim4• 9 days ago

Even if it was something people wanted, and it wasn't clear that it was even before the advent of CC, abandoning the mainline product for years was a terrible move.

Hopefully they at least got something out of it for themselves from that VC money.

AbstractH249• 9 days ago

I love the concept of logseq, but the userbase is just too small and in turn the speed of change is too slow. .

Over the last few weeks, with the help of Claude Code I've finally been able to dive into Obsidian and build out the second brain I've always wanted. With the power to auto-sort small thoughts jotted down on my phone with minimal interruption and some automated maintenance & sorting.

CC has really reduced the friction to getting started with Obsidian that's held me back for years.

hack1312• 9 days ago

How are you using Obsidian (and the LLM part if you want to expand on that) to build a second brain? I’m using Obsidian but more as a replacement for Apple Notes because it supports Markdown. My vault is just a collection of notes somewhat organized into relevant folders. I know there’s a lot of functionality I’m not utilizing.

j1elo2• 9 days ago

I'm just in the toying and evaluation phase with Obsidian and so far I like it, but I'd like to understand why an AI is needed or even useful to begin with it? So far I just see a powerful text editor, what did you benefit from with AI use?

wenc• 9 days ago

I still use Logseq and conceptually it’s still a great method for building a second brain. It fits the way my brain works.

But it has been dormant for years and early attempts at syncing didn’t work well. I paid to support the sync effort but we saw nothing for years. That’s a painfully long time.

thefunnyman• 9 days ago

I agree, I truly love logseq as it fits the way my brain works in a way the few other tools seem to be able to replicate. Unfortunately my notes being in plain text is a non-negotiable for me. This will probably be the push I need to transition over fully to org-roam. My logseq files are already stored in org format anyway.

jauntywundrkind• 9 days ago

I'm somewhat willing to entertain the possibility of using FUSE to access my files again as such (as files), but man, what a downgrade!

It also means the file based syncing I use is not going to work anymore, which... On the other hand... Is maybe right out for me.

setopt• 9 days ago

I also went back to Org-mode some years ago (most recently via Howm-mode). I loved what Logseq had to offer, and setup monthly donations for a while, but after the long period of apparent stagnation I lost faith and jumped ship.

It’s sad because Logseq felt like a more focused tool than either Emacs or Obsidian, and really nailed the UI/UX that I wanted. But the interface was slow and buggy, and both the Org and Markdown backends are sufficiently non-standard that I didn’t want to continue writing my notes in that unless I believe Logseq is going to be around for a while. And I’m not at all excited by the large investment in the database backend, given that being backed by plain text is their largest feature from my point of view.

freedomben• 9 days ago

Sadly, these are my thoughts as well. I've got so much already in logseq though, and I really like the model. Right now I'm thinking I'll just stay on version one as long as possible. Not being able to use Claude or codex anymore to write or update pages is a real deal breaker for me.

Does anyone know of a fork a version one that plans to continue?

j45• 9 days ago

Some people have placed their LogSeq DB inside a Obsidian Vault and .. moved on.

While I like using .md files, I can understand the perspective of needing database level syncing.

I haven't kept up with it, not sure why the existing Logseq didn't quietly start using a database internally, and also output .md files too to have both worlds.

Syncing text files can, does and most often will break given enough complexity and multi-device usage, especially with the most basic use case of using a daily note on multiple locations at the same time.

cromka• 9 days ago

I wanted to use Logseq to replace NotePlan's workflow on Linux, but it's nowhere close that. What's worse, I was barely able to setup something remotely close with Obsidian.

arikrahman• 9 days ago

I became so old waiting for usable non-lazy loading for long form notes that I ended up using Emacs for everything

sigmonsays• 9 days ago

i begrudgingly switched from logseq to obsidian.

Groxx2• 9 days ago

Well. Time to look for a new editor again. Ain't no way I'm giving up my dumb file syncing that works for decades.

Maybe this time I'll find one with a sane extension system, so it isn't open-season for malware.

wosk5• 9 days ago

I've been using Logseq DB (this new version, as a nightly, for a year) and it's a really great concept, way better than anything I tried for notes and organisation. You can apply tags to blocks, which make them a kind of thing (a project, an author, a quote, a thought). It is very fast, and easy to learn.

I switched to it from Apple Notes + Obsidian (I've used logseq MD in the distant past). I have to say though that there are still some rough edges in the current developments and many concepts are still half-baked (Assets, Library).

I still use it because with it, I take more notes and retrieve them better, which is really convenient. The barrier to jotting something down is very low. I think the dev have really hit a sweet spot so I hope they can polish this application as it should be.

Valodim4• 9 days ago

I'm curious, do you do version control, sync, or work with AI agents? If so, how does that work (for you)?

wosk5• 9 days ago

there is a CLI that gets installed when you install logseq, I just past the documentation (https://github.com/logseq/logseq/blob/master/docs/cli/logseq...) and codex knows what to do. Then I can summarize my journals over months and all.

I do version control by exporting the .edn (a serialized file that contains all nodes) and using git.

All of that is very alpha (to be honest, I don't understand them releasing a beta now). You need to hang in the discord from time to time to make sure you do not miss a thing. I think my note app being open-source is pretty important to me that I still deal with that.

Though because of this tagging thing, it seems very "AI-ready" in the sense that queries are naturals as some block have an identity.

An example: I have a tag called job-application which has a status (like a checked box) for applied, in-process, awaiting-input, discarded, ... and I have a tag for the pages that corresponds with my research projects, with status (published, chased, forgotten, ...) and some information (GitHub, collaborators, ...).

there are views that summarize this (all projects, all jobs application)

When I mention a person in my journal, it's very easy to see how my last meeting with them went and all.

I don't use sync, I've been told it works really well.

EDIT: I forgot to say you can enable a markdown-mirror and have one way sync (DB->MD) which is very convenient for agent, or if you like markdown.

Groxx2• 9 days ago

You can apply tags to blocks, which make them a kind of thing (a project, an author, a quote, a thought).

Possibly worth pointing out that this is a Logseq thing in general, and not specific to the DB version. And I agree it's pretty great - I don't use it often, but it is very handy when I do. Much more usable than YAML frontmatter, which requires dedicated pages for everything.

canadianwriter2• 9 days ago

I think they are talking about the new newtags feature: https://discuss.logseq.com/t/introducing-newtags-with-exampl...

ezst7• 9 days ago

You can apply tags to blocks, which make them a kind of thing (a project, an author, a quote, a thought)

FWIW, needing typed notes is what settled me on Trilium Notes after a foray into a bunch of alternatives, including Notion, Anytype, Obsidian, etc

I realized that efficient note taking and knowledge management generally means (to me) having "dimension lists" (collections of places, people, projects, ...) being referred to in topical notes/journals/events, generally organized as a hierarchy (but not always). Once you come to that realisation (and that your notes system is essentially a glorified RDBMS), you want a system that ensures that "notes of the same type remain as consistent as possible", which Trilium makes easy via Templates and/or Inheritance (attributes can be inherited in the OOP sense, or composed like traits), collections to represent, manage and edit large amounts of notes at once, and emacs-levels of scripting if that's your jam.

https://triliumnotes.org/

phil422• 9 days ago

Any good outliner alternatives out there?

I originally came from Roam and was really happy to find an offline alternative in Logseq. I've since moved to Obsidian, though. Obsidian works well, but I still feel like my brain works best with the outliner-style workflow that Roam and Logseq offer.

I have heard of https://outl.app/ but when I tried it out, it still seemed in a very early stage (and heavily vibe-coded, which I also don't enjoy).

Tomte• 9 days ago

Workflowy.

phil422• 9 days ago

That's what I started with originally, but it's not offline and stores all data on their servers. Something like Workflowy but offline or self-hosted would be brilliant.

AbstractH249• 9 days ago

Workflowy's never-ending delays for an API make Logseq look fast.

Truth is, it's been nearly a decade since I used Workflowy and nothing has ever been as good. But the inability to email notes to it or otherwise push data to it from other sources was such a deal breaker. Particularly as mobile became a larger and larger part of my life.

Then there was Moo.do, the next best infinite-outline tool I could find. Their rebrand as Legend was strange, made it hard to find the app, and, from an SEO perspective, was an odd choice.

One of these days I should return to either Workflowy or Legend. My issues were silly and now are much more surmountable.

EDIT: WOW, Workflowy has really gotten with the times! Seems to be iterating much faster and even has an MCP server.

bossyTeacher3• 9 days ago

Workflowy is not free. If you are willing to pay, Obsidian > Workflowy. If you are not willing to pay, Obsidian > Workflowy.

campak2• 9 days ago

For anyone wanting Workflowy but open source and self-hostable, I’ve created Dotflowy

https://app.dotflowy.com

Invite: jesus-saves

swah• 9 days ago

Same, was trying this again today. I like the parity of web and TUI.

lab14• 9 days ago

Workflowy is awesome.

bogdan• 9 days ago

Am I missing something? I get 100 bullets per month unless I subscribe? There are so many alternatives that are free. I'm using Capacities right now which seems way more feature rich and I haven't hit any limits on the free plan.

xienze• 9 days ago

It's not exactly like logseq but I really like SilverBullet (https://silverbullet.md/). It's self-hostable and really hackable (plugins, dynamic categorization via embedding custom queries, etc.). Browsers are the first class platform. I really dislike how logseq/Obsidian etc. try to push you towards local fat clients or web clients that only use browser local storage. I _want_ everything stored on a central server so I can just pick up on any device without having to sync.

flkiwi4• 9 days ago

Same. And it's been fascinating to watch the genuine gap between people in our camp and people who really, really want "local-first" (which, to me, translates to inconvenience and otherwise unnecessary sync requirements).

ezst7• 9 days ago

It can be both: I love being able to use Trilium "as a website" to check out my notes on other's (e.g. employer's) devices, and as a local first/fully offline/totally synced app during e.g. a flight trip or in case of an outage. The two just coexist and sync like a mesh.

https://triliumnotes.org/

wosk5• 9 days ago

You might want to try this new logseq though, if the devs have not burned all your goodwill. You can use it with a markdown mirror (it's a feature under settings) so you keep you same notes in markdown as well.

It's open-source, really well designed, local, you can even self-host sync...

But: the devs make questionable decisions that makes the development roadmap quite bumpy. It should ease up.

AbstractH249• 9 days ago

The devs have burned enough goodwill to be a “early adopter” of sorts, but not enough for me to be later on the adoption curve

So I hope others dip their toe in it builds momentumn

yes_but_no• 9 days ago

bike, if you are on macos https://www.hogbaysoftware.com/bike/

dogmayor• 9 days ago

Take a look at Kosshi. I like it so far.

https://kosshi.app/

chrisweekly3• 9 days ago

Obsidian's "Outliner" plugin is really pretty good. Esp. assuming "Editing view" and "Live Preview" editing mode, (which combine for WYSIWYG).

I appreciate the standard, intuitive keyboard shortcuts for creating/removing bullets, indenting/outdenting, moving lines up or down, etc.

Also, you can use the built-in syntax for block references to kinda-sorta recreate the Roam block-based setup.

packetlost2• 9 days ago

I've found it lacking, especially with kinda buggy interaction with the vim keybindings.

Obsidian's data model, a huge selling point to some, really hinders it too. Logseq's new db format let's you treat any block as a page, metadata and all which can be super helpful.

campak2• 9 days ago

Been creating an open source Workflowy alternative called Dotflowy and it’s available for testing now

https://app.dotflowy.com

Invite code: jesus-saves

Think Workflowy outliner meets plugin extensibility of Obsidian, meets the beauty of Linear, meets the markdown feel of Bear notes

lardissone• 9 days ago

I’m using Capacities and I love it. Great team.

vmesel• 8 days ago

outl contributor here! we are early stage still, but we’ve been advancing it pretty quickly.

we now have the local P2P sync that enables you to sync all notes through all of your devices and many more features to come

utilize18083• 9 days ago

The writing is on the wall for PKMSs the moment LLMs are powerful enough to drive agentic workflows.

ezst7• 9 days ago

What does that mean?

utilize18083• 9 days ago

It means there is little point in providing a notes organiser when the notes can organise themselves (via LLM).

ReluctantLaser• 9 days ago

I really dislike this style of development: abandon the current version and start a perpetual beta that you're expected to use as your daily driver, as that's the only version that's also getting updated and QoL improvements. If you stay on the older version, expect breaking changes when/if they release a non-beta version, and have bugs unfixed. Or expect bugs/breaking changes if you use the perpetual beta and perhaps some of the previous bugs fixed (see: finamp, linksheet, and lawnchair, as a few examples). Applications that follow this development model are hard to recommend.

Despite enjoying logseq a lot it has stagnated for so long (and the mobile app is atrocious) that I ended up moving to obsidian. It was frustrating to see "new" versions get updates, bug fixes, and QoL improvements that I couldn't use unless I was willing to run an unstable build (plus they didn't update the mobile app during the beta, so it felt half-baked anyway). Even now, it's still a beta. Its such a shame.

ThouYS• 9 days ago

I am still on a very old version of logseq. Why update?

canadianwriter2• 9 days ago

Significantly better performance if you have a lot of notes. Better sync if you use that.

NewTags is pretty sweet: https://discuss.logseq.com/t/introducing-newtags-with-exampl... <-- MASSIVELY improved my meeting notes.

Bunch of reasons.

You don't have to, though. If the old version works, just keep using it :)

jellyroll422• 9 days ago

No mention of a migration guide from V1 to V2, even in the "Big Update" post? What the heck

justusthane2• 9 days ago

I would assume that it “just works”. I’ll try it tomorrow and report back.

justusthane2• 7 days ago

Apologies for my tardy response. I tried it and am disappointed to report that it does not, in fact, "just work", but migration is easy anyway - there's a "File to DB graph" import option. Point it at your existing Logseq folder and it sucks the content into a new graph.

I agree that the migration path should be clearly documented.

jellyroll422• 7 days ago

Ok that sounds close enough to "just works" to me. Thanks for checking. I'll give it a try.

j1elo2• 9 days ago

Funny because a couple weeks ago a colleague showed me his Obsidian based note taking for work, and I decided to start trying that and Logseq out, side to side, learning their ins and outs as replacement of Keep for Android note taking.

So far I liked them both, Logseq is quirkier but I can live with quirky in FOSS. Confusingly enough though, now a new rework is announced and switching away from Markdown... One improvement I want from Keep is to have notes synced to my Linux PC and grep over them, so this news make the decision easier I guess.

flkiwi4• 9 days ago

After Logseq moved to an app focus and abandoned the "edit anywhere" convenience of being browser-based, I lost interest. I liked the original Logseq/Roam/Athens model, and I couldn't find anything similar elsewhere, so I just wrote my own. Markdown, git for versions, remote backup, themes (using the Tinted Themes repository of base16 themes), optionally encrypted notes. Lives in a browser, editable from anything with a browser and an Internet connection. Absolute note-taking heaven (for me). No more fooling with sync solutions or not being able to install an app on certain devices.

I'm sorry to have said goodbye to what used to be a great community project, but they've been following the classic enshittification model, albeit slowly, for a while now.

wosk5• 9 days ago

https://test.logseq.com is the new version in browser, I think they plan to keep it around

flkiwi4• 9 days ago

Aside from not wanting to take notes on a test subdomain, it's still local to the machine. I can fire up my notes from literally anywhere, any device and see a consistent state without having to sync anything.

ezst7• 9 days ago

I needed the "edit anywhere" capability, too, had a keen interest in logseq as a result, and now can't recommend Trilium more.

https://triliumnotes.org/

flkiwi4• 8 days ago

For me, Trillium is far too busy, and it’s not an outliner. It’s great software though. (Believe me, I have tried the whole universe of these apps.)

curtisblaine• 9 days ago

Logseq is a mystery to me. They used to have a web version that they discontinued to "concentrate on the product", and that's where they lost me. I assume they "concentrated" on the app and the desktop version, presumably to get some revenue from their sync service, which is understandable, but it could have been executed better. Fast forward a couple of years and I see they're incomprehensibly pivoting to split the product in two. If it's strategy, I can't understand it.

AbstractH249• 9 days ago

People's obsession with privacy and desktop only in this space is a little lost on me.

I'd much rather have my information on the go in the cloud. None of this is so important I'll need it in 10 years or so secret I can't let the cloud service see it.

Barrin92• 9 days ago

None of this is so important I'll need it in 10 years or so secret I can't let the cloud service see it.

then you're a pretty unusual note taker because personal notes frequently cover anything from medical, financial, work-related or simply dates, addresses or other personally identifiable information none of which I would ever remotely trust with an online cloud service. In particular not in an ecosystem of haphazardly abandoned and rebooted projects that are maintained in a Discord channel.

gareim• 9 days ago

I donated $15/month for from mid-2022 to early-2023 to try Logseq Sync when it was in beta. I thought I'd support them while they got it over the finishline then pay for the feature. It's still in beta. What a joke.

niam• 9 days ago

I'm sympathetic to Logseq here. My guess is that many things are true but do not sum attractively to an audience right now.

The db probably is the cleaner place for Logseq's note storage, but invites comparison to Obsidian, whose fundamental unit of information is already a document, where Logseq's is more like a bulletpoint. Logseq being open source where Obsidian isn't could maybe blunt the edge of moving to a less-portable format, but a user can also understandably look at the status of two-way sync and see an unsexy "In-progress" and figure that's not good enough. Logseq also carries some baggage wrt instability, and the argument that the db is the pro-stability move unfortunately needs to be proven over time. Overall seems like a rough spot to be in.

I dunno. I like Logseq and wish them a good launch.

abhilesh7• 9 days ago

For the people commenting on the inability of using LLMs for managing their graphs due to the more away from markdown files, the DB version comes with a fully-fledged CLI bundled with the desktop app that can be used to interact with the logseq graph using Claude code or codex

gegtik• 7 days ago

This is a huge downgrade for me.

Transparent native markdown was maybe my top ranking feature.

Logseq 2.0 Beta (DB version) is here

Related Stories