HN user
With those numbers, there can be sound financial reasons for wanting to just get rid of the lawsuit.
Yes, of course, on Anthropic's side. Why would the other side agree to a settlement?
Anthropic agreed to pay $1.5B in a settlement to avoid losing a pretty cut and dry case.
It takes two parties to agree to a settlement. That the other party agreed to a settlement instead of taking it to court implies this was not the slam dunk you may think it was.
Does this matter? Distillation is not illegal by every definition of the word.
Correct, but it at least helps answer the question of "how do they make such good models for a fraction of the price???" The answer is someone else spends the untold billions and Chinese labs do a little tweaking.
Please post the prompts that will reproduce the pirated works verbatim. Or even halfway.
I think it's not necessarily about being the cheapest option, but a more politically acceptable one. I don't think you're going to get people protesting a data center in space considering it won't be next to their house, won't use water, and won't lead to increased electricity rates. I could see companies paying a premium to keep the political heat associated with traditional data centers off their backs.
Maybe not, but I think the concerns are a bit overblown. Just like the other poster, I've had CDs and DVDs that lived for over 10 years in an attic and a fair number of them are 25+ years old. No problems reading them!
What I use and really recommend is using systemd +/- docker
Even better, systemd+podman (=quadlets).
Quadlets are great, you basically can declare a compose file as a systemd unit with all the good and bad that comes with that.
They’re great models, but you will notice a huge difference for complex tasks.
Yes and no. I think where frontier models really blow small models away is in how thorough they are in order to infer your intentions and how best to accomplish them. So you can tell Claude "change this code to make it do X", whereas a Qwen3.6-27B or Gemma4-31B can do the same, but you have to be a lot more thorough, i.e., "change this code to make it do X, but first, let me explain the concept of X as I see it and some notes about things to avoid or pay attention to while you're doing it." So for best success with small models you really need a big toolbelt of skills and MCPs.
I think it's extremely quantization and engine specific. I run Gemma4-31B at FP8 on vLLM and it's fantastic, no issues anymore[*].
* I will say that early on there were a LOT of issues with the chat template, across all engines. I dunno who decided using crappy Jinja templates was a good idea, but clearly it has its limitations. In the latest version of vLLM (0.25) they've ditched the Jinja templates for an in-engine parser and I've seen no issues.
Knowing "what" will happen is different from knowing "when" it will happen.
So are you just repeating the parent's flawed argument? Maybe you should see what that comic looks like extrapolated out to 2026: "yo on god writing be dead, frfr no cap <100 emoji> <fire emoji>"
things were always better in the olden days, people don't make 'em like they used to.
Just because successive generations make the same observations about <X> doesn't mean that <X> hasn't actually been steadily declining, you know.
You're under the impression that your concerns matter. What matters is the end game of tying real identity to digital identity.
Smartphones are much more ubiquitous than any of those devices. Across all demographics.
Well, they really, really, really want the end game of tying (real) identity to digital identity. And they want it now, not 10+ years in the future when _theoretically_ there _might_ be some EU-friendly mobile operating system that everyone uses. Right now, Google and Apple are basically the entire smartphone market, so they gotta work with what they've got if they want these plans to come to fruition.
for example having a small widget in the footer or elsewhere on my site
And next thing you know, there'd be people complaining about "dark patterns" where the small widget is designed to be very easy to overlook and (more importantly) someone may inadvertently use the site briefly before noticing that they can turn off tracking. Whoops, you just got tracked.
A modal makes it obvious what's happening on the site and gives you a chance to opt-out before proceeding. There really is no better way to do it that's going keep everyone happy. People just don't want to admit that the only way to properly implement this feature is to annoy people.
It's not exactly like logseq but I really like SilverBullet (https://silverbullet.md/). It's self-hostable and really hackable (plugins, dynamic categorization via embedding custom queries, etc.). Browsers are the first class platform. I really dislike how logseq/Obsidian etc. try to push you towards local fat clients or web clients that only use browser local storage. I _want_ everything stored on a central server so I can just pick up on any device without having to sync.
Causing very painful social changes, however, is absolutely on the cards.
Worse than voluntarily inviting masses of incompatible cultures into western countries like we're already doing?
A billion dollars would buy a hell of a legal team. You think they couldn't scrape that up from investors who stand to lose substantially more if OpenAI gets blasted?
I'm not sure that anyone under the age of 45-50 can truly appreciate just how big of a deal Terminator 2 was and how big movie releases can be.
100% agreed. Really was a magical time.
For me what "infinite CGI" has done is completely dull the wow factor of literally any movie. Decades ago the effects of T2 and others blew everyone's minds in a way people who weren't around can't comprehend. CGI was brand new and special effects really felt like you were witnessing elaborate magic tricks (since that's what they were).
Now we've seen movies do basically everything and the answer to "how'd they do that???" is just "yeah they used CGI." And CGI still doesn't feel grounded in reality like practical effects do.
Is it a lack of knowledge from the users or do they really value iMessage integration that much?
My understanding is that the barrier to entry to using iMessage makes iMessage a LOT more secure from spam. If you want to do mass iMessages you have to register as a business with Apple, go through all sorts of checks and attestations, etc.
At any rate, iMessages are a lot more trustworthy than SMS. So being able to spam people via iMessage is very desirable. I recall a few months ago a guy posting his little spam-iMessage-as-a-Service product here on HN. You could build your little iMessage spam army using a bunch of Mac Minis...
But it _was_ a plenary session, was it not? One of only 48? That someone could easily avoid scheduling a vacation during?
Stupid parliamentary trick: Hold the vote on the day before the summer break - ensuring that many people have already returned to their home countries.
Maybe people should demand better of their representatives. Would YOUR job be OK with you not being able to perform your duties the day BEFORE your vacation starts? The time to go home is when your vacations STARTS, not one or more days before.
literally convicted of sexual assault in a court of law
It was a civil case, not criminal, and had included no physical evidence. And the claim was so old the statute of limitations had run out, but no worries, New York temporarily extended it so she could bring her lawsuit against Trump. It was bullshit, like most of these cases of women crawling out of the woodwork after decades during very critical times are.
When your standard is "believe all women, no matter how long it's been, no matter how politically convenient the timing is, no matter that there's nothing but anecdotal evidence", well, don't be surprised when it's used against your team.
You can guess where the bar is
Have you considered that maybe people don't believe these political stunts rather than tacitly approve of what the person was accused of? You're even doubtful of the Platner one. This trick has been played one too many times for people to take them at face value anymore.
In this particular case I think it's just because Trump can't resist doing every single thing Israel wants.
It's not so much "support" as "not caring." Most "regular" people, when they hear about measures like this, say "oh no, the government can see my boring text messages to grandma, who cares", much they same way they shrug off the dangers of having a robot vacuum live-streaming the inside of their house to China ("there's nothing interesting in my house, who cares").
for the children, of course.
Kind of surprised they don't just pitch it as a way to root out Russian propaganda and right-wing extremism. Public opinion would shift overnight. They'd practically demand it!
They were unarmed and the government was and continues to be scared shitless of that "attempted overthrow" (with no weapons? Does anyone really believe that had any chance of succeeding?) to this very day.
Seems to me like that Second Amendment thing could be very effective with a sufficiently motivated population.
It could keep it (disallow voting shares by law) and spend the dividends.
And if the stock doesn't yield dividends?
Is the presumption that China, the country of one child policy, will do nothing about the problem?
I don't think they're foolish enough to invite the entire third world into the country to bolster low birth rates like the west does. So that leaves doing it the old fashioned way, which is a slow ship to turn around.