HN user

bossyTeacher

474 karma

https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dang

Posts0
Comments759
View on HN
No posts found.
GPT‑Live 14 days ago

Literally the only important thing in life, the basis of all value, the formation of self-identity, comes from communication with other human beings.

Is this sarcasm?

Cloudflare Drop 14 days ago

It could be fun to use a temporary Mediafire/Rapidshare/Megaupload service. Especially if you need to transfer something between an Android and an iPhone.

Yep, sounds like the usual time pressure tactics. Perhaps because no one's actually trying it.

For your average user, Sonnet is more than enough. Opus will be rarely used. Fable is really something professionals will use and even then with low frequency. The model is really good but the token economics don't make it so appealing to the amount and breadth of people you need to get people talking about Fable the way people talked about Chatgpt in 2022. AI fatigue is here and Anthropic and the like are fighting hopelessly against a rising tide.

This makes sense. By default, foreigners stick with their fellow countrymen pretty much everywhere. Not having them around gives foreigners a reason to socialise outside their bubble. I believe this is the reason why Denmark has the so called guetto laws.

Relative to South America, Germany is going to feel very unfriendly. I think it's a matter of perspective. Also, countries that are very homogeneous (ie everyone looks the same) are probably going to have some ethnic ideas built in their idea of citizenship so your citizenship will be question if you don't look like them or behave like them. South America and Germany are very different regions culturally sitting at opposite ends of most cultural traits so her experience isn't surprising.

This would be much more interesting if it detailed how the prompt/skills were reverse-engineered

That would enable Anthropic to block the technique.

Myself and almost everyone in my social circles under the age of 50 seem well-primed to participate in such organized resistance, were it to come to life.

You are assuming it hasn't. And besides, are you a revolution to come by way of your instagram/tik tok/Facebook feed? It won't. It's like a relationship, if everyone expects everyone else to make the first move, everyone loses.

The Internet back then was a grab bag, a hodge podge, a diaspora, and a most importantly a place to be who you wanted to be instead of a place where your “real” identity followed you everywhere.

Exactly. This is what made the Internet back then. Ironically, we have now done a reversal and the real world is the way to escape

I've learned that for both humans and models: system > willpower. The key is entirely in designing the environment.

Tons of self-help books could be summarized in those 2 lines.

Jolla depends on the AOSP. Graphene depends on the AOSP and Google Pixel phones. If Google Pixel phones ever got their bootloader locked, Graphene would die immediately. If AOSP ever went private, both would die. The risk space is bigger for Graphene.

IQ remains relatively stable through life: that’s what makes it a good measure of general intelligence, when tested appropriately.

This is pointless if IQ tests can be gamed. It's like those leetcode tests. Smart folk can pass them. But so can anyone that practices for them or anything adjacent to them.

Thus you don't need to be smart to pass the leetcode tests, just have enough time and resources to practice them over and over until you pass.

And thus, it becomes a proxy for people who have the will and resources to practice enough till they pass.

Different aims have different risk profiles though? Saving up 3 months to buy a car you can replace in 8 months if it breaks down is very different from deciding to quit your lucrative career to become a low paid artist which is different from giving up 18 years of your life to make a human who might need assistance from you for longer than 18 years and from other people once you die. Mortgages are also a different risk profile.

Aim at something yes. But don't be reckless or overly optimistic.

using them for data labeling would be a waste of resources

Is work such as changing the styling of a button on the Instagram app any more useful than that?

Mining work was unglamorous and dangerous but was needed. Labeling work is the mining of the AI era.

You don't become a Big Tech company by being ethical. It's like trying to become a world champion boxer by refusing to punch. Not happening.

The reality is that most of these self described rational and super intelligent devs who see themselves as good people refuse to accept that joining big tech and joining an ethical company are mutually exclusive by definition. Hence all the companies saying "We make the world a better place by doing x". Everyone knows it's not true. But it helps swallow the fantasy and selling your ethics for a big fat pay check every month.

The issue here is the Google-only remote attestation nonsense. It seems pointless to me. A device passing Google's attestation check tells you nothing. The device could well have malware on it and you won't know it. Integrity is a misnomer. The integrity scope is tiny.