Tomte

Like "Non-violent communication"

https://www.tipp10.com/en/index/ is my recommendation.

Workflowy.

No surprise, since she is a physicist.

Flag it. Seriously. It‘s against the rules.

CoMaps starts maximally zoomed out (showing the whole world). Organic Map starts showing my neighbourhood.

That‘s the simple reason I‘m using Organic Maps and not taking a fifth look at CoMaps (and I downloaded CoMaps yesterday after the HN thread).

I have downloaded many maps and not paid anything.

"A straightforward, honest, zealous officer doing his duty in the most laborious manner—that’s my style. No Frills. No fancy work. Just honest perspiration. Stolid and a bit stupid—that‘s my ticket."

Agatha Christie, 1936

Yours is a common misunderstanding about antitrust being about prices. That is a distinctly American view, and not useful for analyzing European antitrust decisions. Read https://www.newyorker.com/business/adam-davidson/teddy-roose...

Their process is a well-known template other organizations look at when creating their own:

https://opensource.google/documentation/reference/releasing

Even worse, I assumed for years that the primary meaning of gimp was bullfinch. See, in German the bird is called a Gimpel. Never bothered to look it up until reltively recently.

BTW: Wikipedia is great for translating technical jargon: the language links invariably lead you to the correct disambiguation of a lemma.

That‘s interesting! Do you have a paper or blog post or so at hand that shows examples of raw and RL‘ed output?

In a parallel universe LLMs have learned that (a) the training material contains many different orthographic errors and (b) that humans follow a non-obvious pattern when "deciding" which error to make, so that their generated output contains such errors, as well.

In our universe LLMs seem to have learned that those errors do not follow patterns in the aggregate and that they should not be emulated.

It used to be 18 dollars in the ANSI webstore for quite some time.

Also, you can look at smaller European countries putting their national cover page on it, and selling it cheaper. It’s the same standard, in English.

The C standard is only a bit cheaper at the Lithuanian agency: https://eshop.lsd.lt/public#!/product/info/0a640332-9273-166...

Sometimes it‘s much cheaper: the Germans sell IEC 62443-4-2 for 400 Euros, the Estonians for 40 Euros:

https://www.dinmedia.de/de/norm/csa-iec-62443-4-2/331021994?...

https://www.evs.ee/et/evs-en-iec-62443-4-2-2019

Kerbal Space Program, Civilization 6, Hogwarts Legacy. All games nobody ever played…

Okular.

It‘s working great on Windows, as well.

LaTeX, Chrome's print-to-PDF, most export tools don't produce tags

LaTeX is actually one of the best ways to create tagged PDF: https://latex3.github.io/tagging-project/tagging-status/ and https://www.overleaf.com/learn/latex/An_introduction_to_tagg...

BBEdit.

That‘s your USP? Every registrar I‘ve used in the past did that.

That‘s cool, since it establishes a brand. If one was done well, the others probably are, too, so even if it‘s not your language of choice, it will be interesting.

I‘m out of the loop: we‘ve had Python, Clojure and possibly something else recently. Is that a series by the same people working through several languages? Is it happenstance? Is it a trend, and every programming language is now scrambling to get their own video documentary?

I‘m always a bit envious when I see those branchless styles. In my day job I have the obligation to hit 100% modified condition/decision coverage, and I‘m daydreaming about having just one control flow through everything, in order to save module tests that only test the umpteenth condition combination.

Obviously, readable code wins, but at least once I had the computing time budget to be able to have a central function go straight through by calculating all five or so variations (it was about several kinds of encodings of the output values) and just pick the correct one in the end. That felt good.

You rely on the security companies scanning the packages.

The NYT has always used the em dash.

This is a style article about it, from 2019, long before ChatGPT: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/14/style/em-dash-punctuation...

You don‘t ask, you configure it: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/settings#attribution-setting...

What is the lamp, the one that‘s like a paper globe?

That was everywhere in my childhood.

That was my impression, as well, but I recently met SFC people and they assured me that the judge is taking the third party beneficiary doctrine very seriously, it‘s not off the table. Funnily, because Vizio objected to the tentative ruling, it has little meaning now.

The trial in August will handle the TPB stuff, as well. It will be streamed, btw.

Yes: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/grouping-content.html...

GPL itself does not forbid you from dynamically linking

GPL does not contain the words "dynamically linking". That‘s just a common interpretation as a shortcut.

In this case there are arguments for the program-plugin communication to be "intimate" and as such falling under "derivative work". But it‘s easy to take the other side, as well.

FSFE distanced itself from FSF at one point: https://fsfe.org/news/2021/news-20210324-01.en.html