Stardew Valley developer made a $125k donation to the FOSS C# framework MonoGame

https://monogame.net/blog/2025-12-30-385-new-sponsor-announcement/

by haunter • 7 months ago

587 254 7 months ago

juujian• 7 months ago

I don't want to assume, but I don't recollect any contributions of that magnitude from large studios (spare Valve). This indy developer (is that label fair?) is putting AAA studios to shame.

MangoToupe2• 7 months ago

This indy developer (is that label fair?) is putting AAA studios to shame.

For the hundredth time. He's an extremely rare person focused on quality, value, and competency. And he clearly just loves his own game

Edit: Sorry? Pay for what, and risk what why? AAA studios simply cannot deliver good value in comparison. The donation is unrelated—or perhaps, arguably, open source makes this productivity possible.

rvnx6• 7 months ago

Beyond love, what you prefer ? Pay 100K USD, or put at risk your 500M USD project ?

Edit: if the engine is not maintained, there can be compatibility issues, it can go abandoned and lack new features, etc. It's the technical pillar of the product, like Unity.

mpeg2• 7 months ago

Stardew is probably one of the most (if not the most) popular game ever made with MonoGame

AAA studios don't really use MonoGame.

willis936• 7 months ago

Their point wasn't about MonoGame. Do AAA studios really not use any open source tools?

lostmsu• 7 months ago

Second would be Terraria (originally made for XNA).

wsc981• 7 months ago

Another one would be Bastion - code is even open source [0].

---

[0] https://www.supergiantgames.com/blog/bastions-open-source-br...

ZiiS• 7 months ago

By sales it is the 17th most popular game accross all systems and all history. But I think Terraria beats it even on Mono

fourneau• 7 months ago

Definitely indie. It was a solo project until launch.

CuriouslyC• 7 months ago

It's an epic story. Grinding on a solo project for 4 years is pretty daunting, I'm glad the universe rewarded him.

dleslie• 7 months ago

Valve contributes effort to Wine via Proton, and provides open source software like Steam Audio.

EA does something similar, and their EASTL is an opinionated and gaming-focused container and algorithms library that they maintain and made open source.

dcdc123• 7 months ago

They’ve also paid tons to Igalia to develop features for them in open source projects.

QuantumNomad_• 7 months ago

Epic Games has a program called MegaGrants where they give a bunch of money to various projects.

https://www.unrealengine.com/en-US/megagrants

For example they gave $250k to the Godot game engine project in 2020.

https://godotengine.org/article/godot-engine-was-awarded-epi...

badrequest• 7 months ago

Looks like they did literally nothing in 2024?

mjg26• 7 months ago

I wouldn't call anything Epic Games does charity: it's all empire expansion for them.

mminer237• 7 months ago

Also notably $1.2 million to the Blender Foundation.

Aurornis• 7 months ago

but I don't recollect any contributions of that magnitude from large studios

Epic has a grant program that has given out thousands of grants, including over a million dollars to the Blender project

https://www.unrealengine.com/en-US/megagrants

zoeysmithe• 7 months ago

Its hard in a corporate structure to just 'donate.' The culture and system is not designed for it very well. This is why selling books or support works out better for foss projects.

Its hard to see SDV as some niche 'indie' project and more and more pedantic definitions of 'indie' aren't helpful. This is a game with an estimated half BILLION in sales. He's extremely wealthy and could have given 50x more easily. Its a bit arbitrary on who or who hasnt done enough. Why no metrics like 10% of your income if you use the tool? "Volunteerism" doesn't work and stuff like this seems like mostly PR and a tip, moreso that "let me help you run this project." I mean does this make monogame better? It seems like a tool that's not really used by any commercial devs. This just seems like a "thank you for helping me get super rich," kind of thing. A tip, which is different than funding a project, fundamentally. You can tip a dying business that is destined to fold shortly, for example. That's not the same as funding it.

This sort of "we are and aren't a business" gray-zone these foss projects live in needs reform, imho. Expecting the kindness of strangers doesn't work. Look at how many foss projects get little to no donations. I don't have the fix here but these developers should probably roll up a LLC and market some kind of service these companies can just easily write invoices for instead of just expecting a random middle-manager to fight the execs to write a $100k check to some guy named Phil in Minnesota that maintains something-something-lib, which is one tiny part of a larger ecosystem that maintains their backend.

oefrha2• 7 months ago

I mean, this indie developer sold more than lots of (most?) AAA studios, and AAA studios have a lot more operating costs than an indie. Donating one dev year is a lot easier when you sell 50 million copies and hire no one than when you sell a couple million copies and have 100 employees plus investors. (I have 3000 hours on this game, so definitely not biased against indies or something.)

Zetaphor• 7 months ago

These studios have profit margins in the multi-millions, they could afford a symbolic $100k donation. Instead they choose to push their developers through another crunch cycle.

didip• 7 months ago

Because no middle managers will get promoted for doing this. All large corporate structures are the same: What's the incentive for the mini warlords to expand their mini empire? Nothing else is worth doing (to them).

firefax• 7 months ago

I don't want to assume, but I don't recollect any contributions of that magnitude from large studios (spare Valve). This indy developer (is that label fair?) is putting AAA studios to shame.

Despite all the talk from libertarians about how private donations are the solution to the world's ills, open source software very rarely gets substantial donations.

Steve62• 7 months ago

Libertarians don't claim that they have "the solution to the world's ills". Just that the government is causing worse problems than it solves, and generally those problems can be handled by a free market.

We're already being taxed like crazy while that money subsidizes things almost everyone disagrees with. The libertarians believe that if people weren't taxed as much they could voluntarily spend money on things that are valuable to them. Some people would donate more and others wouldn't donate at all, and that's okay. I believe we would see a lot more voluntary donations without the burden of high taxes.

Claiming "libertarians haven't solved this yet" while continuing to take everyone's money is not a fair argument.

To stay on topic, this thread is about a private individual donating to a project he supports. That's something everyone should be happy about. And he did not do it as a political statement.

jayd16• 7 months ago

AAAs use their own engines, or increasingly Unreal Engine, though. They usually prefer to get a contract and a neck to wring as far as vendor tools go.

selfawareMammal• 7 months ago

How much money does he have in order to make such a big donation? Has stardew valley made that much?

cdelsolar• 7 months ago

Solo developer who’s sold millions of it, yeah I think so

rvnx6• 7 months ago

Half a billion USD (40M+ units sold), so 125K USD to have the core engine of your product be actively maintained by an expert for the price of +/- one developer is a very good deal

bhaney• 7 months ago

https://steam-revenue-calculator.com/app/413150/stardew-vall...

giancarlostoro8• 7 months ago

This should really put any AAA studio to shame. A single developer sold half a billion dollars on Steam alone.

rachr• 7 months ago

And over 8 million copies for the Switch.

MrZander• 7 months ago

69 million dollars in refunds!? That's 12% of the gross, seems crazy high. Is this pulling from actual Steam numbers?

giancarlostoro8• 7 months ago

It was a labor of love by a single developer. Assuming he never really hired that many more people, he can probably afford it.

doug_life• 7 months ago

“In Feb. 2024, Stardew Valley reached 30 million copies sold, and if we assume each copy sold for $15, that means that the game could have generated a revenue of $450 million. A modest 10 percent profit margin puts ConcernedApe’s earnings at $45 million, a number that is likely to increase in the future.” Source: https://dotesports.com/stardew-valley/news/how-much-money-di...

benoau6• 7 months ago

TBH the profit margin on this game is probably closer to 100% than 10%, it was a solo-dev game so never much overhead, I think one guy was hired to work on it.

pwdisswordfishy3• 7 months ago

Why would 1 unit of this game have a "profit margin" of 10%? It's a video game. He's not selling canned goods.

SXX3• 7 months ago

There are regional pricing and sales. Good chunk of those 30 millions sold way below US price. He certainly earned what you say though.

clejack• 7 months ago

Stardew valley was apparently solo developed, and if Google is accurate it has sold over 40 million copies. Even if he sold it for a dollar, the dev would be very successful by most standards.

jasongill• 7 months ago

Stardew Valley is in the top 5 selling indie games of all time, with 50 million units sold. It's owned and run entirely by one person (the donor in OP's link) - he ended his relationship with a (small) games publisher a few years ago, and runs everything himself.

big_toast• 7 months ago

Additionally there is a concert series that's quite good and other merchandise.

throwaway638637• 7 months ago

Does this mean he does the mobile games himself now? I remember he had outsourced those for a while.

chrisntr• 7 months ago

Couldn't have seen this donation go to a more dedicated group of folks I have worked and interacted with in the past and love seeing these contributions back! :)

barrenko• 7 months ago

A true Christmas story! Somewhat unrelated, could someone provide insight into the following -

"MonoGame is a "bring your own tools" kind of framework, which means that it provides the building blocks to build your own engine and tools, but it isn't quite an engine itself.

If you are expecting a scene editor (like Unity or Unreal), MonoGame is not that.

If you love coding and understanding how things work under the hood, MonoGame might be what you are looking for. And fear not, getting a game running with MonoGame only takes a few minutes."

orthoxerox2• 7 months ago

Yes, this is basically correct. When you start writing a game with MonoGame, all you get is basically a class with two methods, Update() and Draw() that MonoGame will be calling in a loop, plus a bunch of libraries for input, graphics, audio, content loading etc. you can use in your code. It's a step beyond something like bare raylib or SDL2, but it's a far cry from Unreal, which lets you think in terms of game entities from the very start: "here's the map, here's where the player will spawn, here, add some buildings and you can run around them".

With MonoGame/XNA/FNA, LOVE2D, libGDX, HaxeFlixel you are getting a bunch of tools instead, which is probably not bad if you like coding and your game doesn't fit into one of existing popular genres.

mikepurvis2• 7 months ago

I think a lot comes down to whether a game is art-first or code-first, and almost all modern games are art-first, so it makes sense to have your platform be one that artists and designers are immediately productive in, and the software people are basically writing behaviour modules and plugins for that established system.

But it's good that code-first engines still exist. There are always going to be projects that are more experimental, or don't have a clear pattern of entities, or are dynamic enough that that kind of thing doesn't make sense.

larusso• 7 months ago

When ever I hear and see Mono Game I think back at the time I decided to dig a bit into XNA. I was a huge Xbox 360 fan and liked the idea of the indie platform they tried to setup. At the time the decision moving from Flash was either XNA in c# or Unity. Back then Unity used JS as a scripting engine. I wanted nothing to do with that. I also thought that MS is a saver bet. Well XNA is dead but the legacy lives on in parts in MonoGame. Unity well, would have been a better choice. But in end I had to work with Unity anyways be it not as a game developer implementing game logic.

pepperball2• 7 months ago

As many, I got into programming as young boy thank to video games.

I remember one year, someone bought me an old book on game development. It was a book using DirectX 3.0. To this day, that was probably the most intimidating programming books I’ve ever read. I remember hearing about XNA at the time and it just made so much more sense to me.

I’ve tried a few times to get back into game development, but I don’t like most big engines. The opinionation of them doesn’t square with how my non-game dev mind wants to model things, and I’m too retarded for the math/physics involved in rolling your own engine.

I did briefly toy with monogame though during a period where I was unemployed. It certainly had me the most comfortable as someone who’s career prior had been enterprise .Net crap.

At this point though, game dev seems extremely tedious. I have much more interest in game design. I’ve considered picking up genetic coding just to try it out for that purpose.

drakythe• 7 months ago

This reminds me of Relogic (Terraria) donating 100k to Godot and FNA after the whole Unity pricing change debacle a couple (few?) years back.

Really glad to see mega successful devs giving back to the tools that they use.

sph• 7 months ago

Also Mega Crit, devs of Slay the Spire, which are making the second one in Godot. They’re one of the largest sponsors to the project now.

unpopularopp• 7 months ago

I'm sorry but why C#? Isn't the big tech (Microsoft) in this case is a very big downside?

Why not LÖVE (Lua) for example? https://love2d.org/

There is also libGDX (Java) but not sure Oracle is any better than Microsoft. https://libgdx.com/

rahkiin• 7 months ago

Lua is awful for anything large. It is untyped, refactoring does not exist, etc. C# is an amazing language with amazing tools and very good libraries.

benbristow• 7 months ago

C# is open source now and has been for a while. Same as .NET

Only proprietary bit is the debugger (vsdbg) but there are open alternatives.

seabrookmx• 7 months ago

C# is very popular in game dev.

Unity, Godot, and the XNA successors (Monogame, FNA etc) all use it.

It's higher level and more productive for the average programmer than C++, but still has static typing and much more mature libraries than Lua and other dedicated game scripting languages (of which there used to be many).

A lot of game development is Windows centric, and many C++ game devs prefer Visual Studio (the full fat one, not VS Code). I'm guessing MS is seen more favourably in gaming circles than it is in web dev.

Windows and the Xbox are both tier 1 platform targets for game devs as well.

orthoxerox2• 7 months ago

Because it was Microsoft that developed XNA a long time ago. It was XNA that inspired all the other frameworks you mentioned, and when Microsoft invariably abandoned it there were enough people using C# to make games to create demand for an open-source reimplementation.

tredre3• 7 months ago

I'm sorry but why C#?

Because Stardew Valley is written in it. Probably half of modern games are written in C#, too (Unity). It's not exactly an odd choice.

Isn't the big tech (Microsoft) in this case is a very big downside?

No, a language being backed by big tech is a plus as long as the stack is fully open-source (which .net now is).

Why not LÖVE (Lua) for example?

Because Stardew Valley uses MonoGame, not LOVE.

There is also libGDX (Java) but not sure Oracle is any better than Microsoft.

Other than Minecraft, can you name one successful game written in Java?

bspammer• 7 months ago

Other than Minecraft, can you name one successful game written in Java?

The other major one would be RuneScape.

whou• 7 months ago

Slay the Spire!

klardotsh• 7 months ago

Others have mentioned big names, I’ll mention a medium ish name: Mindustry.

to11mtm• 7 months ago

C# has been favored by a lot of game devs for some time. You've got Godot, Unity, I think you can do -some- things in unreal engine with C#...

In contrast to java it has added a lot of helpful constructs for high performance code like game dev; things like `Span` and `Memory` plus ref structs make it easier to produce code that avoids allocation on the heap (and thus lower GC pauses, which are a concern for most types of game dev).

At least for now I'd rather trust Microsoft than Oracle, esp since both CoreCLR and Mono are under more permissive licenses than Java and have been for some time.

whit537• 7 months ago

He should join the Open Source Pledge (disclaimer: I run it). The minimum is $2,000/dev so I'd say he qualifies haha

yakattak• 7 months ago

Stardew Valley is one of a few indie games that seems to be known outside the usual “gaming” circle. I have a few friends who’ve never engaged with any games but absolutely loved Stardew Valley. It’s the pinnacle of cozy, I suppose.

ConcernedApe has done something special with game development to achieve that. I always look to him as an example as I take to game dev as a hobby. This is yet another way I want to take after him for sure. Looking forward to Haunted Chocolatier!

Also I’d never heard of MonoGame somehow, def going to take a peek now!

tempest_3• 7 months ago

I love Stardew and played a bunch when it was first released.

He really had perfect timing with its release. The original developers and the rights holders for harvest moon had so badly fumbled for so long with bad releases or only in Japan releases etc. Someone was bound to show up in that space since there was a clear demand for that type of game. It also helps that he aped (heh) harvest moon from the super nintendo / game boy generation so it basically runs on a potato and no one needs to buy dedicated hardware.

bombcar• 7 months ago

“Harvest Moon but for every platform ever created” was such an obvious need it was surprising it took that long to arrive.

Just like it’s somewhat amazing to realize it took until 2009 for “digital Lego” to catch on with Minecraft.

Mobius01• 7 months ago

Definitely a perfect timing situation, though with substantial risk. Considering the time the game was in development, an alternative could have showed up in the market.

However, I believe Stardew Valley’s appeal wasn’t simply of fulfilling a void in the market. It is great because there is genuine passion for the subject in the execution, and the content in the game is truly compelling for a wide audience. An amazing story.

mindcrash• 7 months ago

Not without reason:

Stardew Valley, which has been sold to millions of gamers, has been created using the free MonoGame engine. So ConcernedApe is giving back to the open source software which made his commercial success possible, like commercial parties should.

sneak8• 7 months ago

Gifts do not confer obligation. Copying deprives the original party of nothing. Absolutely nothing about free software requires or even implies any responsibility to “give back”. This idea that anyone making money with free software somehow owes the original authors anything (or “should” donate a portion of their profits) is ridiculous.

If the authors wanted money for their software, they would have sold it instead of giving it away for free as a gift.

By releasing software under free software licenses you are explicitly stating that you do not expect or anticipate payment for it. The licenses (that they freely chose) are clear. Free software, in addition to being free as in speech, is also always free as in beer.

My friend bought me lunch. I used that energy at my job. Do I owe them part of my paycheck?

kwanbix2• 7 months ago

It is the moral thing to do.

prisenco• 7 months ago

Copyleft removes legal obligation but we're free to confer a social obligation.

wilde• 7 months ago

If your friend keeps taking you out to lunch and you never return the favor, he’s probably going to stop.

poly2it• 7 months ago

This ignores the practical economics of open source. I'm not sure what you suggest by jumping around definitions like this.

sanex• 7 months ago

You have a social obligation to buy your friend lunch sometime.

bevr1337• 7 months ago

Gifts do not confer obligation.

Remind me, which Ferengi Rule of Acquisition is this?

There's not much argument to be had. You've created a logical justification for a myopic, misanthropic world view.

My friend bought me lunch. I used that energy at my job. Do I owe them part of my paycheck?

Many find reciprocation important in a relationship.

rvnx6• 7 months ago

It's nice to give back to people, no matter the amount.

https://framerusercontent.com/images/9GsFxfDtmRFpfgGlNH61QsX...

He also needs that tool to stay alive for the future, even if not considering the past.

It's a bit better position for everyone.

Sajarin• 7 months ago

I think this comes off a bit too strong (as well as the replies to this to be fair)

The example isn't quite accurate. If a friend bought you lunch, the social norm of reciprocity would incline you towards buying them lunch in the future (i.e part of your paycheck)

Free open source software is a public good. While there is no obligation to give back, giving back helps that public good become more useful to other people (including your future self). I'm against making contribution an obligation, but I'm not against light social pressure upon philanthropists who have the means (which is what the parent comment was doing).

ralusek• 7 months ago

Absolutely nothing about free software requires or even implies any responsibility to “give back”

You're correct about that. The free software itself doesn't confer any responsibility. But the free software exists inside other contexts. Social/moral context. There're also future contexts for you or humanity. For example, if developing free software proves to be a sustainable model for people to do, you might get other projects LIKE the Blender Foundation to crop up in the future. You might benefit from them directly, or benefit from them by enjoying the things people produce with them. Also, if it's a tool that you like to use, maybe you just want that specific tool to continue to improve.

qmmmur• 7 months ago

My friend bought me lunch. I used that energy at my job. Do I owe them part of my paycheck?

No but you owe him lunch next time. Wait till you find out that you have to share your birthday cake on your birthday.

Kye• 7 months ago

What is this, the lawyer planet from Farscape? You shouldn't need a contract to be prosocial.

drnick1• 7 months ago

There is no obligation, but since they find the project useful and are making money from it, they want to make sure it is not abandoned. The best way to ensure that is to fund its development.

This also gives them direct access to the devs and can request new features or bug fixes that impact them to be prioritized. Everyone benefits. It's probably much cheaper to make a contribution than to do that in house and upstream the changes.

hnbad• 7 months ago

Not under capitalism, sure. But traditionally gift economies worked exactly because people understood that gifts also imbue a burden of responsibility. Not necessarily in repayment but to honor the gift and pay the good deed forward instead of simply enriching yourself.

MildlySerious• 7 months ago

There really is no prize for being technically correct on this one.

Someone built this and is letting you have it. For free. There is no legal obligation or law of the universe here, sure, but if you're in the top 1% of benefactors of this pro bono work, you have the opportunity to do some good and make sure that others, like you, get the chance to benefit from this free work in the future.

There is a pretty straightforward argument to be made that this falls under the "with great power comes great opportunity" umbrella of moral reasoning, since this work empowered CA to create the game that earned him a lot of money.

TomatoCo• 7 months ago

What do you think about putting the shopping cart back in its corral?

miiiiiike• 7 months ago

Upvoting because you’re correct. Commenting because you’re wrong.

Donate to the F/OSS projects that you used to make it big.

andy992• 7 months ago

I agree with this - I have often seen people get upset because someone used a project that was explicitly licensed to allow them to do whatever they wanted with it, with no obligation, in a way that they don’t like, or without doing something that’s apparently expected of them. This happened e.g. with whatever Amazon services wrapped open source projects.

The only way anyone knows your intent as a developer is in the restrictions and terms you release under. There are open source contributors that really want nothing. It makes no sense to say you want nothing and then get upset when you don’t get something.

If someone doesn’t like Apache 2.0, MIT, or BSD, there are lots of other options they can release the source under, or they can start a proprietary software business.

The donation here is great obviously, “paying it forward” is great, but so is using software under the terms its writer told you you could.

AussieWog93• 7 months ago

A lot of people arguing the philosophy here, but I'm willing to bet that sneak simply had very strong negative experiences around gift giving growing up.

For a lot of people, a gift is not a gift but an invitation to abuse, and it's hard to be rational or pro-social about it when you were on the receiving end of that as a child.

bean469• 7 months ago

Gifts do not confer obligation.

Technically not, but giving back is a nice thing to do

account423• 6 months ago

There are different kinds of gifts and different kinds of obligations. When you continuously rely on gifts without giving anything back even though you could afford to then you are behaving parasitically.

Or in other words: Bruh, we live in a society.

GabrielBRAA• 7 months ago

Pretty cool, I think the industry benefits a lot with more game engines or frameworks at disposal.

mirekrusin• 7 months ago

MonoGame has great logo.

mips_avatar2• 7 months ago

As someone who has been solo developing an app for months concerned ape is such an inspiration. He literally spent 5 years on stardew valley with zero income. It's such a beautiful game and reminds me what you can do when you follow what feels right.

gmueckl4• 7 months ago

The sad truth js that for every solo devs that becomes successful, there are an untold number of solo devs that don't find an audience and fail. The reality is pretty brutal in games.

mips_avatar2• 7 months ago

Yeah but how often do you finish a AAA game and want to cry at how beautiful it is. You get that feeling pretty often with an indie game. Like something really important is being done by indie devs.

zulban• 7 months ago

If you only count developers who finish a quality game, polished, with completed endgame, and free of major bugs then the numbers are far lower.

Maybe it's more of a lesson in how hard it is to finish a game, than how hard it is to make a somewhat successful one.

tick_tock_tick2• 7 months ago

The book Blood, Sweat, and Pixels has a good chapter on the development of Stardew.

Honestly though it only reads as inspirational with the success coming at the end. 9 times out of 10 that story is actually how someone "wasted" 5 years of his life, ruined his relationship with his girlfriend that was basically supporting him the whole time, and had difficulty getting a normal job after.

eswat• 7 months ago

IIRC he has a supportive partner that took care of being the breadwinner during that development period though.

embedding-shape• 7 months ago

Makes it almost more impressive, both the faith and trust between them. Wholesome all around, reflected in a video game :)

thrownawaysz2• 7 months ago

MonoGame is free to use on all platforms from the public repository, but the code for supporting console platforms is only accessible to authorized console developers.
These platforms are provided as private code repositories that add integrations with the console vendor's APIs and platform-specific documentation.

https://docs.monogame.net/articles/console_access.html

How can something be open source and closed at the same time? Is this basically MIT license? (Project page says Microsoft Public license)

jmalicki• 7 months ago

It's a common business model - have an open source core, but have separate closed source extensions to support enterprise features.

thrownawaysz2• 7 months ago

It's a common business model

But no one is paying MonoGame in this case? Maybe I'm just thick but X developer pays for MS/Sony/Nintendo to become authorized > and then they ask permission to use MonoGame per the page.

1. Apply to the vendor developer program (required for publishing).

2. Through the program, request access to the MonoGame console repositories

MonoGame gets nothing in the end.

kuylar• 7 months ago

In the same page,

The MonoGame Foundation cannot directly give anyone access to the private console repositories without prior approval from the vendor due to NDA requirements set out by each vendor.

Blame here goes to Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft (though I'm not so sure about Microsoft)

This also applies to Godot, another open source game engine, which doesn't have any code for console support on its upstream repository.

zinekeller• 7 months ago

though I'm not so sure about Microsoft

GDK is open-source (https://github.com/microsoft/gdk), but to be fair there is a possibility that there are some parts under NDA.

renewiltord2• 7 months ago

Indie devs doing this is pretty cool. I think the Sidekiq guy gave $250k/yr for years to Ruby.

spicyusername• 7 months ago

As an aside, Monogame is a really great way to create video games.

999900000999• 7 months ago

Nothing wrong with a self interested donation.

He donates, the engine remains a high quality tool, he doesn't have to write the whole stack himself.

Theirs a Flat Red Ball fork that can even build C# to Web. Hopefully these solutions can be shared with Godot so theit C# web export works.

Stardew Valley developer made a $125k donation to the FOSS C# framework MonoGame

Related Stories