t0bia_s

Yes, society adopts constantly. Yet, more people die from cold than hot.

It was not once.

HOT WEATHER. Many a man has mopped his brow during the summer months of 1884, declaring it was the hottest weather the world ever knew, which, of course, would not be true for the extreme heat in the records of the past, which has not been approached during the late summer.

In 627, the heat was so great in France and Germany, says the London Standard, that all springs dried up, water became so scarce that many people died of thirst.

In 879, work in the field had to be given up; agricultural laborers persisting in their work were struck down in a few minutes—so powerful was the sun.

In 993, the sun's rays were so fierce that vegetation burned up as under the action of fire.

In 1000, rivers ran dry; under the protracted heat, the fish were left dry in heaps and putrefied in a few hours. Men and animals venturing in the sun in the summer of 1022 fell down dying.

In 1132, not only did the rivers dry up, but the ground cracked and became baked to the hardness of stone. The Rhine in Alsace nearly dried up. Italy was visited with terrific heat in 1139; vegetation and plants were burned up. During the battle of Bela in 1200, there were more victims made by the sun than by weapons; men fell down sunstruck in regular rows. The sun of 1277 was also severe; there was an absolute dearth of forage.

In 1303 and 1304, the Rhine, Loire, and Seine ran dry. In 1615, the heat throughout Europe became excessive; Scotland suffered particularly. In 1625, men and beasts died in scores. Meat could be cooked by merely exposing it to the sun. Not a soul dared to venture out between noon and 4 PM. In 1718, many shops had to be closed; the theatres were never opened for several months. Not a drop of water fell during six months.

In 1753, the thermometer rose to one hundred and eighteen degrees. In 1779, the heat at Bologna was so great that a large number of people died. In July 1793, the heat became intolerable; vegetables were burned up and fruit dried upon the trees. The furniture and woodwork in dwelling houses cracked and split up; meat became bad in an hour.

In Paris, in 1846, the thermometer marked one hundred and twenty-five degrees in the sun. The summers of 1859, 1860, 1869, 1870, 1874, etc., although excessively hot, were not attended by any disaster.

https://books.google.cz/books?id=Cr9XAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA473

Equal to what?

Not yet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_year-round_heat_and_drough...

Freezing during winter kills about 8 times more.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48524696

Do you consider governance of majority to minority as a part of free society?

Free and open society means others doing things that I don't agree with. Including private CEO donations or leaving service because of politics. By definition, it is attribute of democracy.

Thats what comrades tried many times in history, allways with deadly costs.

Yes, it's summer.

Currently in middle of Europe we have about 25°C. There was few days where we had about 38°C. Nothing deadly.

We never know, because it depends on what your source of information is instructed to propose. Like public opinion polls that created false illusion of what majority wants. But it's just a sample with manufactured questions manipulated to answer specific options.

Personally, I don't fell lawmakers proposing laws that I want. Firstly, because I don't belive that laws are solutions for problems.

It all still exists in dark web. Anonymity, small communities, exploration, etc.

money is never truly lost

In fact, money is printing every day more and more. So technically there is more of them every day. Which decrease their value and then we have inflation.

Not true. You have blacklist as regular user.

I asked a simple question. Your conclusions just proove how religious topic it could be for some. You completely ignorong a point and talk about your dogmatic opinion. Insulting others that not even agree/disagree with your pushed opinion does not makes you right.

Climate change denialist or alarmist is labeling. You belive in something and other don't.

Your arrogance to opposite opinion does not bring anything new to dialogue.

Such as? If there is dependency on proprietary software, you can install it on GOS if you want and consider it more "safe".

By your rethoric, do you consider yourself as climate alarmist?

Maybe try to be honest to yourslef first and then you'll understand, why it is really just about opinions that vary. No need to labeling opposition.

Why would you use app for actual insuranceb or even healthcare?

Problem with stock Google camera app is that it made horrible HDRlike images even with HDR turned off. You cannot adjust amount of reduced highlights and increased shadows which makes images unrealistic with lack of depth.

Effectiveness is on of topics that they studied or should learn on uni. Not hypocrisy.

It's more like happening. Effective would be to abandon using services of company that I don't agree with. Which most of protesters probably don't. It's like going by diesel car to protest against oil production.

Would be interesting to see how many of them actually use services of company that this CEO represents.

There is easier method. Set up local account during creating Win bootable install device via Rufus. During actual Win install it skips all steps about crating local account. Done.

You would be surprised how many people on Earth experience extreme cold and die because od it. It's much more deadly than heat. Spreading fear over heat looks like propaganda to frighten people's mind.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...

https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/pdf/10.1289/EHP9835

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-022-01872-6

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393512...

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660652...

https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/pol.20180594

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-09049-4

Great approach. Please, do other languages. I would appreciate Czech!

It's medium used in wrong way. If you want getting information efficiently, read carefully writen text. If you want immersive story, watch feature film. If you want dialogue, use audio.

Instead we use audio for info, text for stories and video for dialogues.

Or... Don't use Google services.

Fighting over that might kill my grandparents.

Incoming new management works only because some willing to fight for greater good, safety... whatever establishment propagate.

Not sure why you mention Sudetland?