Framework Raises DDR5 Memory Prices by 50% for DIY Laptops

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Framework-50p-DDR5-Memory

by mikece • 7 months ago

242 201 7 months ago

Yikes, I hadn’t realized this was that big of a problem. The same exact G.skill z5 64Gb ram I bought 4 years ago is well on its way to being double the price. Does this have more to do with Crucial ending consumer product lines or tariffs?

adastra223• 7 months ago

It is because OpenAI bought 40% of the world’s production capacity overnight. RAM is like toilet paper during Covid now.

embedding-shape8• 7 months ago

And also because Korean companies apparently fear US retribution if they start producing DDR4. I don't feel like "OpenAI bought half the supply" tells the entire story when the companies that used to produce DDR4 with the left over machines no longer dare to do so. Probably the prices wouldn't spike as they're doing right now if the ones who used to produce the older RAM generations actually continued doing so.

prmoustache• 7 months ago

The toilet paper thing didn't really happen though because there is so much shit people can produce at a time and the demand never increased if you scaled it to a 2 weeks period. There was enough stock in warehouses that 3 days later every store had a full stock again and the prices never increased.

nancyminusone• 7 months ago

I just last week sold some DDR5 I bought in April for triple what I paid for it.

TacticalCoder• 7 months ago

You should look into 0 DTEs options. They 3x more often than RAM do 3x!

esseph3• 7 months ago

Crucial was shut down so they could focus on selling more ram to hyperscalers. That happened because of the state of things.

Prices are not expected to recover until 2028.

CryptoBanker• 7 months ago

The state of things...meaning AI companies buying up the world's supply of RAM

eikenberry2• 7 months ago

What is this estimation based on? I'd think once the bubble pops pricing would start to return to normal levels and the general consensus seems to think the bubble won't last that long.

Sohcahtoa82• 7 months ago

The same exact G.skill z5 64Gb ram I bought 4 years ago is well on its way to being double the price.

The RAM I bought last year has more than tripled. 2x32 DDR5 kits, $240/kit, now $820.

crote• 7 months ago

The end of Crucial is a symptom, not a cause. Crucial is merely Micron's factory brand. Nothing is stopping OEMs like G.Skill or Kingston from buying DRAM chips from Micron and putting them on consumer RAM sticks.

Well, that's the theory at least. In practice it's more accurate to say that Micron had cut down their consumer allocation that not even their factory brand can get enough chips to survive.

j452• 7 months ago

It seems easier to purchase from hardware vendors that have already locked in their prices for RAM.

esseph3• 7 months ago

That will quickly run dry.

teeray2• 7 months ago

Especially given the arbitrage opportunity that presents.

j452• 7 months ago

That might be just fine - there have been shortages the past few years and recovery again, and if someone is looking for their next device for the next few years it should be possible within reason.

hurturue• 7 months ago

like Backblaze was purchasing HDDs from retail store, so will (small) AI providers

walterbell2• 7 months ago

https://www.trendforce.com/news/2025/12/05/exclusive-memory-...

Lenovo has begun notifying clients of coming price hikes, with adjustments set to take effect in early 2026.. Dell is expected to raise prices by at least 15-20%, with the increase potentially taking effect as soon as mid-December.. Dell COO Jeff Clarke warned that he’s “never seen memory-chip costs rise this fast,” .. Lenovo [cited] two key factors: an intensifying memory shortage and the rapid integration of AI technologies.. TrendForce has downgraded its 2026 notebook shipment forecast from an initial 1.7% YoY growth to a 2.4% YoY decline.

https://hanchouhsu.substack.com/p/overview-of-the-memory-mar...

The full-year price increase for Samsung’s storage products supplied to Apple in 2026 has been finalized, with DRAM prices rising by 53% and NAND prices rising by 52%. Earlier rumors suggesting an 80% full-year increase for DRAM were inaccurate.. Apple negotiated the prices down to the aforementioned levels and signed long-term agreements (LTAs).. Kioxia also signed a similar agreement with Apple, with price increases consistent with Samsung’s.

ndiddy• 7 months ago

Dell now charges more for RAM than Apple for some models: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/apple-now-beats-dell-at...

Bayart• 7 months ago

The margins on memory for Apple were so absurd that they should have more ability to eat up the costs, if they wanted to. I'm assuming they would, to the extent that they're a device company more so than a service company yet.

Neywiny• 7 months ago

I have 96GB of 6000 MT/s. Pcpartpicker says 64GB kits have quadrupled in price since August. So I'm almost surprised it's only 50%.

embedding-shape8• 7 months ago

Literally bought 96GB (4x24GB) of DDR5 5600Mhz (edit: RDIMM ECC) just 5 days ago, fearing the prices would go up even more moving forward. Paid 1500 EUR for it in total :/ Southern Europe FWIW.

kachapopopow2• 7 months ago

I think you got scammed by a local vendor, I got ddr5 2x48gb in europe 6400mhz (non ecc) for 320ish euro.

mananaysiempre• 7 months ago

A year ago, Framework-branded memory for DIY laptops cost, IIRC, 2x Amazon for equivalent specs (not the same modules—the ADATA ones that Framework puts their stickers on are theoretically available retail but in practice complete unobtanium in most countries). Not Apple pricing, but they definitely have some margin to eat into.

jimmaswell• 7 months ago

I feel like I got the last chopper out of 'nam buying my G.Skill 256GB 6000MT/s kit when I did. I paid $780 in July and now it's listed at.. $2700, over 300% higher. That and buying a bunch of sticks for some Tyan boards I got on a whim last year with some engineering samples I got working on them.

meindnoch• 7 months ago

cc @apple

insane_dreamer• 7 months ago

Thanks, Sam :<

esafak• 7 months ago

Horde it, Sam. For old times' sake.

chairmansteve2• 7 months ago

It reminds me of the AI paperclip problem. The AIs are eating all the memory chips and energy. And GPUs of course.

Except its caused by good old bubble capitalism.

ChrisArchitect• 7 months ago

Actual article: https://frame.work/blog/updates-on-memory-pricing-and-naviga...

sosodev• 7 months ago

Thank you for sharing this. Their point about the 128GB desktop mainboard being a bargain while their prices remain low rings true. I bought one a couple weeks ago because I've been wanting to build a beefy, efficient home server and I think this might be the last window of affordability for quite a while.

dismalaf2• 7 months ago

What's wild is OpenAI doubling down on hyperscaling when it's obvious that the gains from pre-training are coming to an end. They seem determined to just go out in flames...

mschuster915• 7 months ago

The thing is, it seems like they are planning to force everyone else out of the market. Acquire all the RAM they can possibly get, leave none for the competition, pray to survive the entire mess.

It's the inevitable peak of the venture capital pipeline, just this time it isn't individual industries (e.g. taxis with Uber, hotels with AirBnB) getting squeezed out by unsustainable pricing - it's the economy at large that's suffering this time.

And it's high time for us as a society to put an end to this madness. End the AI VC economy before it ends our economy.

zb3• 7 months ago

Was this market manipulation legal? If so, that's crazy..

riskable• 7 months ago

Perhaps we can call this type of maneuver, "The Sam Altman": Your expensive business's mid-term outlook not looking so good? Why not use all that cash/credit to corner the market in some commodity in order to cripple your perceived competition?

dismalaf2• 7 months ago

This is a huge Hail Mary... IMO they'd be better served slowing down the training pipeline, becoming profitable now, hiring a bunch of scientists and figuring out the next AI technology.

chairmansteve2• 7 months ago

These gambits never work though. In 6 months you'll be able to get memory chips and GPUs for nothing.....

There's a few historical examples here....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornering_the_market

foobiekr• 7 months ago

What other option do they have?

This is a "the horse might sing" situation for the whole market that focused on breakthrough-level results (AGI, ASI, or even just "not going off the rails after the third response").

seg_lol2• 7 months ago

So if it "works" out for OpenAI, not only do they have all the ram, power, water but they also have all the jobs.

jordanb• 7 months ago

At some point it's going to make sense to buy a computer without ram once the lack of ram pushes demand down for all other components.

Maybe this won't last that long given the RAM shortage is apparently a corner attempt by Sam Altman.

acephal2• 7 months ago

From what I've read, he's tied up RAM manufacturers through 2029. That's a lot of quartely earnings reports for many firms in the economy where they watch consumer spend come to a screeching halt.

klez• 7 months ago

One has to hope OpenAI goes bankrupt and they flood the market with used RAM sticks at bargain bin price.

thway15269037• 7 months ago

Now I'm curious: does this situation classify as force-majeure for a major firms? "Hey, you know, actually our entire consumer base just disappeared overnight. Crazy, huh?". And will various governments have to intervene to save them when/if that happens.

Not taking into account that they all be busy handing money to openAI, at least someone somewhere has to notice that something is very wrong.

pengaru• 7 months ago

I assembled a new 32c/64t 7970X threadripper with 128GB DDR5 and a 16GB RX9070XT over the summer...

This memory situation has me pondering putting it all up on ebay

embedding-shape8• 7 months ago

I started thinking about it last spring, been slowly finding the ideal setup over time. Finally bit the bullet just like 5 days ago, fearing it's about to become worse rather than better, but it hurt as much anyway :/

jszymborski• 7 months ago

If DDR5 will still be around in two years, you might want to sell half of your RAM now and use those proceeds double it in a couple years?

Or just cash out, that's always great.

abawany• 7 months ago

I upgraded my laptop from 32gb to 64gb (should have gotten 96gb) over the summer and I'm considering the same for the leftover 32gb - fear of not having spares in case of defects holds me back though.

fcoury• 7 months ago

I thought Apple would get around and improve their memory prices with time, I guess it's the opposite: all manufacturers are now becoming Apple given these raises.

I wonder what Apple's next move will be :-)

EDIT: Spelling

echelon• 7 months ago

They are not becoming Apple. They are updating the prices of their components to the underlying market costs. Framework lets you replace the memory modules.

Apple is a fashionable brand that commands a price premium. They can charge much higher prices and will charge the amount that will maximize their profits.

BMW charges to enable heated seats. They know their customers have money and will pay. Apple is the same.

Framework has to competitively price. They're being forced to update pricing to reflect the reality of supply and demand.

There's also this:

Due to [Framework's] memory pricing said to be more competitive below market rates, they also adjusted their return policy to prevent scalpers from purchasing DIY Edition laptops with memory while then returning just the laptops. The DDR5 must be returned now with DIY laptop order returns.

kjkjadksj• 7 months ago

Have you seen laptop prices these days? Macbooks aren’t even sold at a premium anymore.

threecheese• 7 months ago

I am wondering myself; this M1 is getting long in the tooth, maybe now is the time to upgrade.

wmf4• 7 months ago

50% won't be enough so they'll need to raise prices again in a month or two.

acephal2• 7 months ago

Altman should be jailed for this. Single-handedly crashing consumer spending in an entire sector of the economy. At the very least for the reason that that was supposed to happen _after_ they had the AI in hand to supplant majority white collar labor, not before.

cyanydeez2• 7 months ago

He's just one of the ringleaders of the AI parade. This certainly isn'tjust him, just like the american corruption isn't just donald trump

derektank• 7 months ago

We’re contemplating jailing people for buying manufactured goods at the market price now?

stackskipton• 7 months ago

Yes? Reports are that OpenAI is buying unfinished memory kits which they have no capacity to complete. It appears that OpenAI is just buying them to remove them from the market and damage their competitors. In United States, that used to be considered against the law if we were actually enforcing such things.

Dylan168072• 7 months ago

Didn't they sign some big contacts to lock in non-market prices?

Analemma_• 7 months ago

Yes, and I actually think it's a symptom of advanced societal decay that you think this is somehow an unreasonable proposition.

What OpenAI is doing will drive up prices for years, shredding consumer welfare, limiting competition and forcing marginally-profitable products off the market, and they're not even going to use the RAM. They're wrecking supply chains simply because they no longer have any technical advantage now that Google and Anthropic have caught up and passed them, and have to resort to dirty tricks like this and digital heroin Sora to try and justify their valuation. No functioning society would or should allow you to get away with that.

Frankly, much worse things than jail should happen to Altman for this kind of torching of the commons, and jail is the watered-down compromise position.

hodgehog114• 7 months ago

As always, it's the intent that matters.

For the sake of argument, what if Amazon decided tomorrow that they would secure exclusive contracts with all food suppliers and then hoard all the food to starve out the people they don't want to have it? Or at least, drive up the price of food so it becomes completely unaffordable? I know people can simply grow their own food so it's a bit different, but hopefully it gets the point across. It's anti-trust on an unprecedented level.

kasabali3• 7 months ago

They didn't buy "manufactured goods", they reserved 40% of the yearly wafer output for the whole world that haven't even been made yet for themselves.

sh34r• 7 months ago

The Sherman Antitrust Act has outlawed abuses of monopsony power since 1890.

What we should really be asking is, why did we ever stop jailing wanton criminals like Scam Alt-Man?

heavyset_go2• 7 months ago

People go to prison for market manipulation all of the time.

back_to_basics2• 7 months ago

A gross mischaracterization, really.

1. Said "consumer" is effectively hoarding Supply, and thus distorting the Market. 2. Said "consumer" has no effective means to either Deploy nor Utilize said products as neither the Data Centers nor the Energy required to power them are in existence. 3. Said "consumer" has articulated his belief that the Taxpayer should "backstop" his endeavors in some capacity, as well.

If you don't find this offensive in the least and possibly criminal at worst, then I don't understand your thought process.

pmdr2• 7 months ago

This is a dystopia no one really thought about. A handful of people anointed to spend borrowed money on a (so far unprofitable) quest to destabilize the world's economy, alienate the working class and make everything we've enjoyed the past 15-20 years a luxury.

beeflet3• 7 months ago

a dystopian world in which computer memory is sort of expensive, god save us

lovich2• 7 months ago

No? Lots of philosophers and writers thought about the problems that happen when capital concentrates to the level that individuals can move nations.

It’s like a whole fucking genre.

What we call capitalism now is just reverting back to monarchism where the handful of rulers decide everything and we stop getting the market to be responsive to reality. Prepare for more absurd and random shortages as our betters play around with their toys

dontlaugh• 7 months ago

How so?

The drive towards monopoly, tendency of the rate of profit to fall, over and under production and cyclical ever worsening crises are aspects of capitalism well studied and understood over a century ago.

jdprgm2• 7 months ago

It certainly feels like this should fall somewhere along a spectrum of antitrust behavior. It's astounding the degree to which they are able to operate as if money isn't real. Strange circular deals and infinite VC money really fuck with markets and these past few years we've been venturing down a particularly concerning branch of capitalism.

beeflet3• 7 months ago

Won't someone think of the gamers?

neogodless• 7 months ago

Eh my (anemic) work laptop from 2019 probably won't get replaced for an extra year because my employer won't authorize the big laptop order at inflated prices.

heavyset_go2• 7 months ago

We need to normalize tar & feathering again.

energy123• 7 months ago

That contract had little to do with this but I get why it's an easy, neatly packaged, personified scapegoat.

The ram price appreciation began 3 months before October 1st and his contract was about future capacity that has nothing to do with the current equilibrium price in consumer DRAM.

Palmik• 7 months ago

Jailed for what? Apple routinely buys out majority of TSMC's production capacity (at the bleeding edge), should Tím Cook go to jail?

Der_Einzige• 7 months ago

A surprising amount of people are gleefully happy to have their perceived enemies put in jail or worse even if and especially if there was no legitimate justification for it.

A lot of people on HN dislike Tim Cook for various reasons and many would literally “sacrifice” him just to get Apple to stop being so anti-consumer.

LetsGetTechnicl• 7 months ago

Great, another thing AI is ruining

WorldPeas• 7 months ago

There's an errant thing at the back of my mind, I can't help but wonder if this ram shortage could revive the ram dimm as a concept as so many manufacturers were adopting the soldered-ram approach. I'm sure though this won't come to pass

wmf4• 7 months ago

Retail DIMMs are more expensive than soldered RAM so that just makes things worse.

zrm2• 7 months ago

The price difference in terms of manufacturing cost is immaterial. But if people can't afford a machine with 32GB anymore then they're going to suffer one with 8GB knowing from the outset that it's not enough and then have a strong preference for the ability to upgrade it later when prices come back down or they get more money.

hopelite• 7 months ago

It seems the only thing that could break this is the off chance that the SCOTUS rules that the tariffs are illegal and/or Congress strips the Presidency of the power they gave it in utters incompetence many decades ago.

I’m thinking with sufficient pressure by all tech interested people it could become an issue in the midterms and even force Trump to sign agreements not to tariff RAM by Korean producers who could ramp up production.

Frankly, I wouldn’t even be surprised if we start seeing RAM smuggling. In not sure of drug prices, but would smuggling RAM not be at least just as profitable, especially without the high profile and risk?

Hey! … hey, you! You want to have some fun?

wmf4• 7 months ago

Tariffs aren't the problem.

jpgvm• 7 months ago

They are indirectly.

DDR4 fab capacity should have stayed constant as DDR5 was brought online.

The mechanism that powers that is usually the top tier brands selling their used fab equipment to China who then keep mass producing the legacy DRAM while fabs in Korea are converted to manufacture the new standard.

Instead all of those machines have been warehoused because Korean firms fear US sanctions/punitive tarifs if they were to offload that equipment to China.

So what has happened is DDR4 capacity has actually shrunk massively when it shouldn't have, DDR5 capacity was only barely meeting demand and then huge deals were cut that cornered the market.

Tarifs wouldn't help DDR5 a huge amount but without them DDR4 would be dirt cheap right now.

arjie3• 7 months ago

I bought a couple of terabytes of RAM and now I feel like one of those crypto-whales haha. It's just sitting there in the corner. One was a lucky one, too, because I tried to negotiate a guy to sell me a system with less RAM but he wouldn't discount it much. Now it pays for most of the cost of the damn thing.

These spikes do happen. I remember one for hard drives after a storm. The surprising thing for me is how cheap a super-powerful Epyc is these days. But then you need to fill the 12 RAM slots and that becomes more costly. Funny times.

craftkiller• 7 months ago

You don't NEED to fill the 12 ram slots. My personal 1U has an Epyc 9124 and only 4 of the 12 ram slots filled. I figured, ram will only get cheaper with time so I can fill the remaining 8 slots in the future. Turns out I was wrong, but regardless, the server runs fine on 4 sticks.

arjie3• 7 months ago

Haha the 'need' is a joke need. Like I need to upgrade my 9654s to the 9755 I have sitting in a box.

jdprgm2• 7 months ago

Are you actually selling some of the RAM though?

I was curious with this spike and while the amazon listing for 2x48GB DDR5 that I bought a year or so ago has indeed almost tripled the ebay resale value for similar packages sold recently is all over the map with some close to what I originally paid and some as much as double but probably on average 30-50% increase which is nowhere near the amazon listing.

arjie3• 7 months ago

1 GB RAM = 1 GB RAM man. I am HODLING!

Haha, if I did sell I'd probably sell on /r/homelabsales which is a much more pleasant place to interact.

PeterStuer• 7 months ago

Ultimately this is OpenAI and their (circular) investors doubling down on a US sovereignty wet dream and "too big to fail".

They might pull it off , but hell off a way to bet the economy dominos all on black.

SchwKatze• 7 months ago

My question is, will the ram price go down at some point or is it a point of no return?

wmf4• 7 months ago

Yes, it will go back down eventually.

cheraderama• 7 months ago

The situation is really sticky, since allegedly fabs are anxious to ramp up production, fearing the AI bubble will burst and they will be left with useless stock. So the usual supply chasing demand doesn't apply here and we might wait for a really long time...

gpm3• 7 months ago

Yes, we're just hitting the limits of current manufacturing not some fundamental limit like the availability of raw materials. Either demand will wane and the prices will go down, or manufacturing will scale up and prices will go down, eventually. That "eventually" does some work, but it's not remotely a case of "a point of no return".

In fact long term this might well make RAM cheaper than it otherwise would be, because we'll make more of it and get better at producing it than we would have without the demand spike. I.e. Wright's Law in action - which is usually pretty good at producing the long term direction of prices of products like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experience_curve_effect

pratyushnair01• 7 months ago

Correct if I'm wrong, but without any new entrants, the market effectively cornered by a few players and high demand from data centers, how will the prices come down? Just like the GPU prices post COVID and bitcoin demand, how will there be any incentive to bring down consumer prices? The only scenario I can think of is chinese firms catch up and swoop in to corner the market.

glaslong• 7 months ago

They'll come down some day, but between the massive ai co purchases, and how long Micron says it will take to bring up new production capacity... most estimates I've seen are that it stays high (or grows higher still) until at least 2028.

https://www.tomsguide.com/computing/ram-prices-are-exploding...

FuriouslyAdrift• 7 months ago

Work is skipping server, desktop, and laptop buys that were planned for 2026. Guess I am going to be fixing and patching a lot more often next year.

quentindanjou• 7 months ago

Original article from Framework Blog:

https://frame.work/blog/updates-on-memory-pricing-and-naviga...

dustymcp• 7 months ago

I just bought 32gb ram at 650DKK 2 months ago and now the same ram goes for 3200+...

TrackerFF• 7 months ago

A 32GB DDR5 Kingston cost around 1000 NOK (~100 USD) earlier this summer.

Currently they are selling for 8000 NOK (~800 USD).

Byron_t_Bulb2• 7 months ago

In my opinion we are witnessing the market influences of a new type of public-private "Phoebus cartel" except at a total global scale where anti-terrorism laws require pricing businesses and individuals out of owning their own compute forcing them to rent compute from multinational hyperscaler cloud businesses who are integrated with military intelligence operations. Computing technology after all is a weapon of mass destruction and the peaceful are being punished for the non peaceful. It is too dangerous for governments around the world to allow individuals to posses the immense power of computing technology. Call me chicken little but we are witnessing the end of publicly available private general computing. Market changes influencing cost effectiveness analysis to favor public cloud is a deliberate goal to secure national critical infrastructure. I also think this coincides with the limits of MOSFET scaling and RISC-V permissive licensing. My only credentials for this is 15+ years working in fintech I&O for a US Fortune 500 company.

stoltzmann• 7 months ago

It certainly feels like we are being squeezed from all sides. I think the push to require ID verification for websites is also part of the plot - it all feels too coordinated, like governments all over the world have the same exact agenda to destroy our privacy. At some point you will have to verify your ID to use any computer system, and it will act just as a terminal to the cloud.

I guess we will get the future that was seen in Sun Microsystems with their Ray thin clients after all, but in a way that will provide complete control over population rather than mobility.

What is in cards for us is complete slavery to digital systems.

Byron_t_Bulb2• 7 months ago

Anti terrorism laws will compel society into smart cities, continuous attestation of very high confidence subject/applicant identity. It is the only way to accomplish the mission. You can see it has already happened with "Know Your Customer" rules in banking. Mobile banking adds continuous "Know Where Your Customer Is". As our digital twins are distilled from social media via age verification this adds "Know What Your Customer Has Done". Then as we interact with AI chatbots with very high confidence identity this adds "Know What Your Customer Is Thinking". The fusion of these data points will enable our digital twins to be simulated into "Is My Customer A Terrorist" and then we will all have to deal with the quality and reliability of these systems. There will also be an unprecedented opportunity to optimize banking and marketing. The only problem I see is consent of the people however this is what we have collectively decided as a society long ago with United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953) allowing the state to ultimately not require our consent or even awareness of its actions. Without having all the information it is impossible to come to any rational conclusion. We are out of the loop! Total Digitization is happening for better or for worse.

scottLobster• 7 months ago

Don't worry, on the other side of the AI bubble pop the market will be flooded with used DDR5 sticks from unprofitable datacenters.

beAbU• 7 months ago

Nope. Check again. All the manufacturers are switching to HBM, the market will be flooded with useless soldered on memory that nobody can use outside of running local inference.

The rest of us 'normal' memory plebes are fucked.

GlitchInstitute• 7 months ago

MacBooks will kill the market because of these memory price hikes

faefox• 7 months ago

Late-stage capitalism in action. We have companies that are so insanely rich (despite losing equally insane amounts of money) that they can single-handedly corner worldwide markets for critical components in a brazen attempt to hurt the competition, and nobody will do a single thing about it.

jjkaczor• 7 months ago

Placed an order from Lenovo on November 21st - 96gb of RAM in that machine, it still hasn't shipped yet - am wondering if/when they will try to "renegotiate" the deal... (supposed arrival date on that system is 01/02/2026)

pmdr2• 7 months ago

Ah yes, the abundance ushered in by the "AI era" is overwhelming us all.

Is anyone's salary here projected to go up 53% in 2026?

bicepjai• 7 months ago

Given that major memory manufacturers are abandoning consumer RAM production to focus on HBM for AI data centers, can we make a prediction that HBM prices will eventually fall enough to make it viable for consumer hardware?

Suppafly• 7 months ago

It's not like Framework is choosing to do this just to screw consumers, their suppliers are raising the prices on them, so those increases have to pass through to the consumers.

Framework Raises DDR5 Memory Prices by 50% for DIY Laptops

Related Stories