European Cloud, Global Reach

https://upcloud.com/blog/european-cloud-global-reach

242 139 1 year ago

sschueller2• 1 year ago

At UpCloud, we are committed to complying with European data protection laws and compliance with ISO 27001. This international standard not only signifies our dedication to maintaining a high level of information security but also ensures that we adhere to recognized best practices in managing and safeguarding your data.

If you want to be Europe only that includes not terminating your SSL at a US CDN provider like Cloudflare...

I just hit "Gateway time-out Error code 504" from Cloudflare trying to open https://upcloud.com/pricing

earthnail• 1 year ago

Whole website seems down. I'm accessing this from Stockholm, Sweden.

maelito• 1 year ago

Everything's working for me in France.

graemep7• 1 year ago

That is only for their public site. The US provider has a European presence (the error page is clear I am seeing Cloudflare London).

Started working for me while typing this.

breakingcups• 1 year ago

You say that, but their login page / dashboard is hosted on the same IP, also through Cloudflare.

csomar2• 1 year ago

How does that make it any better?

hnbad• 1 year ago

European presences of US providers are still US providers with all the implications of that for privacy, applicability of US laws, government interference and a potential trade war.

greybox• 1 year ago

Working fine for me

surgical_fire• 1 year ago

Could open that page here with no problem.

lifestyleguru2• 1 year ago

No problem over here at all. It's probably a problem with "German internet".

rustc5• 1 year ago

And they're also loading a script from googletagmanager.com.

confiq4• 1 year ago

I'm not expecting 100% SLO, but using Cloudflare cloud service while you are a cloud service is little ridiculous.

esher• 1 year ago

Happy to see UpCloud on HN. We are trying to consider them for a long time, just haven't found the time. https://blog.fortrabbit.com/infra-research-2024

There is also https://european-alternatives.eu/

confiq4• 1 year ago

they have terraform [provider](https://search.opentofu.org/provider/upcloudltd/upcloud/late...), that is great!

This is how they compare with AWS: https://upcloud.com/competitors-and-alternatives/aws

fer3• 1 year ago

Very disingenuous comparison. The actual main gap is being closed with this: https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/europe-digital-sovereignty...

pkos98• 1 year ago

Having worked as Cloud Solution Architect at Microsoft Germany/Azure, let me tell you:

Nope this gap can not be closed by any US company alone due to the Us Patriot Act - which forces any US company (including e.g. a German subsidiary) to allow access to all data for national security purposes.

amne2• 1 year ago

I don't get how you can advertise Kubernetes from 0 euro / month and then you have to choose a node that costs 3 euro / month.

I have no idea if it's cheap or not but how is this kind of advertising legal?

mpenet2• 1 year ago

That’s quite common, it means they host the control plane for free but not the kubelets (worker nodes).

amne2• 1 year ago

I click "Create new cluster", I see "Cluster plan -> development" for 0 (zero) euro / month with "Up to 30 worker nodes". When it says "Cluster plan" I don't read control plane, I read cluster.

Havoc2• 1 year ago

It's normal to split k8s billing between the control plane and the resources being controlled.

EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK3• 1 year ago

Upcloud: 48 cores €1364/month

Hetzner Dedi Cloud: 48 cores €288.49/month

graemep7• 1 year ago

You cannot really compare dedi to VPS pricing. Upcloud is similar to DO etc.

seper82• 1 year ago

What's the real difference in the end?

Between a VPS at DO or a server at Hetzner?

onli2• 1 year ago

Hetzner behaves pretty much like DO, with servers that can be changed in the corresponding management panel. Or what aspect do you think is different?

lwde• 1 year ago

Its still Hetzner Cloud so a VPS, not a Bare-metal server.

EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK3• 1 year ago

It's still cloud, billed by the hour, but Hetzner makes a distinction between shared cloud, where your cores can be oversubscribed, and dedicated cloud, where core is core.

rustc5• 1 year ago

This is a strange page: https://upcloud.com/products/zero-cost-egress

There's "zero cost egress" mentioned all over the page but the limits on https://upcloud.com/fair-transfer-policy are comparable to other hosts like DigitalOcean: the cheapest 7 EUR VPS has a limit of 1TB of bandwidth. (For comparison, Hetzner offers 20TB on their EU VPS for under $5.)

Say goodbye to unpredictable egress costs and hello to our zero egress fee initiative. Unlike other cloud providers, we don’t charge for outbound traffic (‘egress’). This gives you the freedom to distribute your content and scale your business without the constant worry of unexpected bills.

This has to be a joke.

ohgr• 1 year ago

Yeah they’re going bankrupt in a couple of months.

Iulioh3• 1 year ago

Dosen't the EU Data Act prhoibit egress costs?

BiteCode_dev• 1 year ago

OHV and leaseweb have been doing this for a decade and are fine.

diggan6• 1 year ago

Why, exactly? Cloud providers don't pay per GB themselves, since they make their own peering agreements, and the only reason we users end up paying $/GB in transfer is because people end up paying for that premium when companies offer it.

It doesn't have to be like that, and it seems like this provider agrees with the idea of not upselling $/GB transfer costs, since they themselves don't pay it like that either.

I'm curious to see how it goes, as others mentioned, they're not the first (nor will be the last) to offer this no-nonsense pricing scheme.

aborsy2• 1 year ago

The only reason you may use these EU version of services is that you are in Europe.

Otherwise EU is worse in terms of privacy. UK (while not officially in Europe) goes even beyond, requiring backdooor to iCloud and non-eu providers.

sschueller2• 1 year ago

Otherwise EU is worse in terms of privacy

Please elaborate how the EU is worse (UK doesn't count). Worse than what other country and how?

aborsy2• 1 year ago

I already provided an example with UK, which is terrible. UK is racing ahead of other countries requiring backdoors.

France has had similar proposals floating in their parliament. The latest iteration has been rejected

https://www.techradar.com/computing/cyber-security/france-re...

But the fact that such proposal is drafted and periodically brought up to this level, isn’t good, and it might be approved in the future.

Example of data collection by the German government

https://privacysniffs.com/data-retention-law/germany/

Australia's Encryption-Busting Law

https://www.wired.com/story/australia-encryption-law-global-...

What makes you think that EU governments don’t collect data from companies such as Hetzner or OVH, the same way that US collects from Microsoft or Google?

lifestyleguru2• 1 year ago

"Privacy" went down the drain long time ago. It's good to be aware of the worst offending policies of specific countries and providers. UK and Germany take inglorious lead. Is it worth considering the alternative is consolidated abuse by oligopoly of US providers? Your choice.

janmo7• 1 year ago

Thank you for pointing that out! I would add that intelligence agencies and law enforcement are almost completely exempt from all those fancy GDPR requirements.

Furthermore, in the EU, there is no such a strong equivalent to the 4th Amendment. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies can access your cloud data without needing a warrant—unless the data is stored in the US in which case a US judge would have to approve it. This is one of the reasons they are so eager to keep it "home".

The craziest thing is what happened with Encrochat and SkyECC. These two services made the critical mistake of trusting OVH to host their servers, and then OVH literally placed law enforcement and intelligence agency backdoors on them. Eventually, they even used these backdoors to send malware to users' devices, not caring whether they were located in the EU or not.

While all this was happening, the founder of OVH appeared on a popular YouTube tech channel and proudly explained that, unlike Amazon and Google, they weren’t sniffing their customers’ data. What a liar!

sofixa3• 1 year ago

Furthermore, in the EU there is not something such as the 4th amendment, Law Enforcement and Intelligence agencies can grab your cloud data without requiring a warrant. Unless the data is stored in the US, which is one of the reasons they are so eager to keep it "home

You're commenting under an article that explicitly says how US intelligence agencies and police get around the need for warrants. Many rights in the US are more theoretical than practical if someone in power decides so.

Also, there are strong expectations of privacy in the EU, as well as due process, warrants, etc. There are of course abuses, and especially "terrorism" can enable some shortcuts (to be fair, often for very good reason multiple EU countries have had tens to hundreds of dead from terrorist attacks that could and should have been prevented), but I don't have the impression it's in any way even close to as bad as the US. Do you have any information/sources to the contrary?

ivan_gammel6• 1 year ago

Your comment needs some serious fact checking. For example, Encrochat backdoor was authorized by judge, so there was a due process. And it was not an ordinary customer.

jamesblonde• 1 year ago

Many on here don't seem to understand this has nothing to do with privacy. It's about sovereignty - if DJT can turn off your digital infrastructure on a whim, you are in a very precarious position. That's why both Canada and Europe are in panic mode and looking for alternatives.

lentil_soup• 1 year ago

UK (while not officially in Europe)

You mean the EU. The UK is definitely in Europe

aa-jv• 1 year ago

Yeah, I can hear the laughter all the way to Pine Gap.

Imustaskforhelp• 1 year ago

Love the fact that hacker news comments are absolutely pulling up on this website.

They are blatantly lying in many of their offerings ( zero cost egress see the rustc comment) and so much more.

Wha? Why are you lying. Why are you being deceptive.

How can I trust a company which is this level of deceptive.

IanCal3• 1 year ago

They are blatantly lying in many of their offerings ( zero cost egress see the rustc comment)

But the linked pages in that comment say they do have zero cost egress. If you cross their "fair use" amount they drop the upload speed to 100mbps for the rest of the month.

rustc5• 1 year ago

Why not just say that 1TB is free and the rest is chargeable? The only reason to use "zero cost" every time and then hide the limits behind accordions is to mislead.

piokoch• 1 year ago

This is missing the point. Everything they offer is storage, VPS, Load balancer, one managed key-value store and two managed databases. For the price a little higher than, say, Digital Ocean. But where is managed cache, message broker, e-mail service. It is not enough to be European, they need to offer something competitive.

I guess they can win some clients, given current hostility of Europe against Trump, but what if in two years Trump will be off the news, people would not care anymore about being anti_USA or what if in 4 year Dems will figure out why they lost in 2024 and find someone less lame, who will win election, whom Europe will like again?

jajko2• 1 year ago

The changes happening in US are not going anywhere, and they haven't even properly started with them.

Nobody knows the future but one thing is clear and set in stone - trust has been broken. If you have any life or relationship experience, you know trust is always hard to build and easy to lose. Its extremely hard and lengthy to build again once it has been shattered (which it has been already).

Stab in the back is remembered for decades, spit in the face even more. Quadruple that for matters of national security.

perks_12• 1 year ago

trust has been broken

By what? Tariffs?

We have known about NSA spyops for more than a decade now, with actual impact on our tech. Nobody cares. But now that trump is in office, we suddenly have an issue with the US? Ridiculous.

seper82• 1 year ago

We have a saying in Dutch. Trust leaves on horseback but comes back on foot.

Snoddas• 1 year ago

The trust is gone. Even if the dems win the next election, we now know that the US isn't stable enough to handle one rouge president.

With the massive cost of shifting infrastructure, those scared away by the current US administration is mostly gone for good.

sofixa3• 1 year ago

Everything they offer is storage, VPS, Load balancer, one managed key-value store and two managed databases. For the price a little higher than, say, Digital Ocean. But where is managed cache, message broker, e-mail service. It is not enough to be European, they need to offer something competitive

And don't forget managed Kubernetes. You can get pretty far with the services they provide and the Kubernetes ecosystem.

For a more complete offering, check out Scaleway - French, regions in a couple of locations, and a wide array of services, up to e-mail service, message broker, quantum computers, AI inference.

snorremd• 1 year ago

Scaleway is indeed the closest thing we have to AWS, Google Cloud and Azure by a European company. They are fast building out a comprehensive managed cloud with IAM, managed databases, containers, etc. I do hope they succeed. I've only used them for hobby projects, so my experience is limited to lighter workloads. But the UI is pretty good, and they have APIs and CLI for all operations.

palata4• 1 year ago

given current hostility of Europe against Trump

This is akin to Trump talking about the hostility of Ukraine against Russia. The US are the bullies here, not the other way round.

but what if in two years Trump will be off the news, people would not care anymore about being anti_USA

Time will tell, but this is the first time in the life of all living Europeans that the US threatens them militarily. And many US citizens not only seem to not care, but they seem to find it okay (and even say that the Europeans are the ones being hostile to the US).

IMO, something has been broken this time. Europeans see the US as a national security concern. At this speed, this feeling will just get stronger in the next two years, and honestly I am not convinced that any results in two years could "just repair the damage" immediately. The trust has been broken now, it will take time to come back (assuming the US do come back from this).

ivan_gammel6• 1 year ago

I don’t think it will ever come back. EU and USA are different ideologically, if we look beyond the naive notion of democracy. It’s social market economy/social democracy vs libertarian capitalism. A lot of differences, even in how our cities are designed. Europe may liberalize a bit, but I cannot imagine America having universal healthcare or abandoning suburbs. This sets us apart and with ongoing ideological polarization those differences will be exploited and amplified by the people like JD.

Havoc2• 1 year ago

current hostility of Europe against Trump

Seriously?

bjarneh4• 1 year ago

(GDPR) is the best-known European standard. After all, it’s hard to miss the opportunity to reject cookies on European websites. But there’s far more to data security.

We should not be bragging about that "security", those cookie pop-ups are just a pointless annoyance. At least I guess we can all agree that there is far more to data security :-)

palata4• 1 year ago

GDPR goes further than the cookies, though.

bjarneh4• 1 year ago

Yes, it has tons of regulation which at least from my experience is very difficult to implement. I used to work for a company that basically barely knew what info they stored about anyone; and they also had long relationships with tons of clients. It was virtually impossible to follow GDPR in that company, but for some reason they wanted to show everyone that they were "best in class", since they handled a lot of financial info etc. It basically just ended up with some fancy web-pages proclaiming that we were serious about GDPR, but nothing else materialized.

The cookie-banner just seems like a very strange "security" measure; but GDPR seems very strange as far as I can tell. It was sparked by the "forget me" campaign a few years ago I guess, and most people probably agree with the intent, but it has led to very strange set of rules.

chgs2• 1 year ago

Nor does it mandate those stupid cookie-cutter cookie boxes.

o_m• 1 year ago

What they don't mention is that some of their data centers are delivered by Equinix, an American company, so it doesn't matter that it is in Finland (same with Sweden and Poland). It is inherently insecure if you are trying to get away from USA.

https://upcloud.com/data-centers

sofixa3• 1 year ago

Equinix only provide the physical space and power, and things can be set up with them not even having physical access to your room/cage, other than forcing it (which would be visible). While they could be an attack vector, with modern hardware even having physical access is not a guarantee to having access to the data (TPM2 and disk encryption are trivial to set up).

The risk is much lower than e.g. AWS.

Aeolun• 1 year ago

Sorta, but it’s like saying that using Chinese equipment for your telecommunications infrastructure is fine.

It’s not a great thing to have your infra hosted anywhere that can be legally compelled by a US government.

Iulioh3• 1 year ago

One of the best "facility tours" i saw recently

(LTT - Equinix data center in Toronto )

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wumluVRmxyA

ahofmann3• 1 year ago

Your argument oversimplifies the issue and ignores critical nuances. While it's true that Equinix is a US-based company, the physical location of the data centers and the legal jurisdiction they operate under matter significantly. A data center in Finland, Sweden, or Poland falls under EU regulations, including the GDPR and local data protection laws, which impose strict requirements on data handling.

Equinix may provide the infrastructure, but US intelligence agencies can’t simply access data in these jurisdictions, unlike in the US, where providers are directly subject to laws like the CLOUD Act.

Even if we assume hypothetical US access to the hardware, modern encryption can somewhat ensure that raw data remains protected. The real risk isn’t just physical access—it’s legal and architectural control. A European provider using strong encryption and operating under EU law still offers far better privacy guarantees than a US-based alternative.

If your threat model includes avoiding US influence entirely, then yes, you might want a provider with no US ties whatsoever. But for most users, especially those seeking GDPR-compliant hosting, a European provider using Equinix infrastructure is still a meaningful step up from hosting directly with a US provider. Dismissing it as "inherently insecure" is unhelpful and disregards the real-world protections offered by EU jurisdiction and encryption.

The goal isn’t perfection but practical improvement. If you have better alternatives, share them constructively instead of undermining efforts to move away from US-dominated cloud services.

voytec• 1 year ago

Blabbering about GDPR, they're serving spyware from googletagmanager.com without consent.

JimDabell• 1 year ago

And their cookie pop is non-compliant.

ArtTimeInvestor• 1 year ago

I restrict my usage of infrastructure providers to publicly listed companies. The transparency is just so much better. You can get a lot of info on how they run their business and where they are going.

For now, that limits my choices in Europe to IONOS and OVH.

OVH's interface is pretty chaotic. But the services themselves seem reliable so far. IONOS seems pretty solid in all aspects, but a bit cheesy in their constant battle to upsell you more services.

scandox• 1 year ago

There's a lot of negativity and nit picking here. Upcloud are OK, Hetzner are better in my opinion for a lot of things.

Nothing is perfect and European providers need to start somewhere. We all know there are tradeoffs and limitations but there's no need for a pile on.

rustc5• 1 year ago

I wouldn't call pointing straight up lies as "nit picking".

This is from their FAQ: https://upcloud.com/products/zero-cost-egress

What exactly does zero-cost egress mean?
We are eliminating any concerns over data transfer fees. This means you’ll enjoy Internet traffic from our cloud services without any fear of accumulating costs.
How does this differentiate UpCloud from competitors?
By pioneering the zero-cost egress model, we’re not just changing the game for UpCloud; we’re challenging the entire cloud industry to reevaluate their pricing models and spearhead the industry towards predictable budgeting on cloud computing costs.

While the actual bandwidth limit (https://upcloud.com/fair-transfer-policy) is the same as DigitalOcean and at least an order of magnitude lower than other EU providers like OVH and Hetzner.

bittermandel4• 1 year ago

What do you mean? It is still free, just at a lowered speed. Calling it lies is hyperbolic.

ivanr• 1 year ago

Your comment doesn't match what's written on the very page you quote: https://upcloud.com/fair-transfer-policy

Even if you exceed your monthly share, don’t worry, there are no excess fees. We will simply notify you of reaching the fair transfer policy and may reduce the bandwidth of your Cloud Servers to 100 Mbps for the rest of the month.

EDIT For completeness, there is also:

If you believe to require more transfer per month than the Fair Transfer Policy provides, you may opt in to a paid transfer model at €0.01/GB. This affords you completely unlimited egress with no restrictions.

ahofmann3• 1 year ago

You're misrepresenting UpCloud's offering. Their "zero-cost egress" is completely truthful - they don't charge extra fees for data transfer, unlike other providers.

The fair usage policy you linked sets reasonable bandwidth allocations (just like DO), but crucially, they don't charge as much as AWS/GCP. And this is the main selling point here: the egress fees of the big cloud providers are straight up bonkers. UpClouds isn't.

Calling this "lying" is dishonest. They're transparent about both the policy and its industry context. If you want higher baseline allocations, that's fair feedback. But it's a different discussion than accusing them of deception.

musha68k• 1 year ago

Swiss https://www.exoscale.com/ also needs an obligatory mention here.

voidr• 1 year ago

Our 100% SLA ensures uninterrupted services, empowering businesses worldwide to thrive.

Avoid ANY company that makes this claim.

I'm European and European providers need to start by not being dishonest, we can't just give 'em some slack just because they are "ours". I'm not putting my data into a company that can't even be honest about their actual reliability.

rglullis3• 1 year ago

Apologies in advance for the thread hijacking, but I wonder if there would be enough interest in a turn-key solution for a fully suite of open source SaaS alternatives, hosted in a European cloud (Hetzner and/or OVH).

The idea would be to take any existing commonly used service at a startup and set up the FOSS equivalent, unify them with SSO via OIDC and charge by the a flat rate based on the amount of resources.

I've already built something similar for social media platforms, so I think I would just have to expand my catalog to do it.

sam-cop-vimes3• 1 year ago

Yes absolutely. I would consider using it.

rglullis3• 1 year ago

Ok. That's good to know. If you don't mind some follow-up questions:

- What services are you/your company relying on and you'd like to switch to an open alternative?

- How much are you/your company spending on these services?

- What is the threshold of pain (retraining, missing features, known issues) would you/your company be willing to accept for solutions that are not 1:1 replacements for the current systems?

cheeseface• 1 year ago

Haven’t used Upcloud for any larger workloads, but had a customer VPS there for multiple years. Worked well and the UI for managing servers was great.

usr11062• 1 year ago

Available since 2011 at least. Not sure whether that would qualify for a [2011] in the submission.

matsemann• 1 year ago

With the staff of PCLOB getting dismantled, it's been brought up if the US even fulfill their part of the agreement and thus using US cloud based stuff might soon be illegal in the EU.

hap_stark• 1 year ago

UpCloud works well enough. In our experience, the available features work very reliably (for half a decade now). There are a few rough edges here and there during configuration. On the other hand, some things went smoother and faster than on one of the big hyperscalers. Simplicity can be a feature in itself...

One thing not mentioned yet: We had very good experience multiple times with technical support, being available 24/7, doing proper hand-offs and getting back to us if an issue wasn't resolved, and being technically knowledgeable.

And there are always humans on the other side which can be talked to. (Looking at you, MS for org validation for trusted signing ...)

mischa108• 1 year ago

What difference does it make if 99% of your devices are still running on Microsoft Windows?

I'm a European DevOps engineer who specializes in Microsoft Azure, and I'd like to switch to European alternatives. But I struggle to see how we can ever become independent of Microsoft of all devices are still running Windows and 365 / Office.

diggan6• 1 year ago

how we can ever become independent of Microsoft

Guess it depends on the context? If you need to run Windows Servers and run Microsoft services then well, you're better off with Microsoft, most likely.

But for other workloads, it won't matter what the client software is, but again, really depends on the context.

sam-cop-vimes3• 1 year ago

Time to adopt Linux and other OSS? In some ways the experience is worse, but in some ways better. No Telemetry and none of the annoying ads being shoved into your face all the time. I still see software companies choosing to build on top of M$ tech stack and I cannot understand why. Why keep throwing money at M$ when a free OS is available!

edit: I understand why you would want to build on Windows if your user base is there. But why use it on the server side? The only reason I can think of is people who have only worked on Windows will keep using it, but at some point one has to get rid of this addiction.

Yeul• 1 year ago

The Chinese set up their own intranet because history taught them the lesson to never trust a white man.

For Europe 100 years of globalisation cannot be undone so easily.

egorfine• 1 year ago

Go Beyond Compliance

So, even more KYC? Blood sample is required, as well as at least three independent proofs of residence and subscription available only for select cities in the EU?

If we want to compete with the US, we have to fix the main problem with european services: relax regulations, not tighten.

bittermandel4• 1 year ago

I didn't expect the comments in here to be so negative.

It's a decent service in itself and a good alternative to many other traditional VM-based hosting companies, which Europe is absolutely full of. They are not really competing with the hyperscalers, nor even Digital Ocean in my opinion, but rather providers that likely sell pre-committed OpenStack clusters and such.

I don't believe they are fully clear of American-owned companies in their entire dependency chain, nor do I believe that it's possible to do that today. Companies like Equinix provide a damn good solution for homogenized infrastructure that is invaluable for cloud providers.

diggan6• 1 year ago

I didn't expect the comments in here to be so negative.

Wait until the US properly wakes up and you'll see what negative can be on HN :)

nor do I believe that it's possible to do that today.

Why not? Granted, a lot of the internet infrastructure is maintained by US entities, but it doesn't have to be that way, afaik. I'm fairly sure there are companies doing worse/better in this regard, but at least it's moving in the right direction.

bittermandel4• 1 year ago

We're definitely heading in the right direction!

Our company's biggest remaining problem is finding a reliable IdP that isn't primarily for individuals, self-hosted or based on Active Directory. There are some alternatives, but they are mainly country-specific (like Freja) or not well integrated enough with e.g. OAuth. We've considered at some point to pivot our company to focus on a fully European IdP, as we feel it's a fundamental missing puzzle piece!

bittermandel4• 1 year ago

Odd, why was this post removed from the front page? There's older and less active posts there.

cpach• 1 year ago

Amusing to see all the comments complaining there is no 100% European tech stach covering everything from servers, CPUs, motherboards to laptops and office/word processing suites.

That is true, but none of those are 100% from US (or China) either.

It’s almost as if our global economy is a complex beast with lots of interdepencies…

My advice: Go read the seminal “I, Pencil” essay from the 50s. Now do the same exercise witha computer system that involves both hardware and software.

ksec2• 1 year ago

Can someone ELI5 what is Cloud Native ?

ksec2• 1 year ago

Interesting to see on Front page I tried submitting UpCloud to HN so many times I gave up on it.

One of the best part of UpCloud is their flexible plan. You could have something like 64 Core and 8 or 16 GB Memory with very little storage and the whole thing is charged by the hour. You can have a 64 Core server that is under $700 USD a month. If you only care about CPU core that is reaching dedicated server pricing without long term commitments while having the flexibility.

Edit: I cant remember if they are real CPU core or vCPU as one 1 thread. Some vendor in the past few years started to use vCPU as single Core only. Some dont.

silexia• 1 year ago

The EU has censorship laws that will control what you can publish.

prometheon1• 1 year ago

In case anyone else has trouble finding info on RBAC, roles, users, IAM: this is called "subaccounts"

European Cloud, Global Reach

Related Stories