egorfine

So we're tossing that "innocent until proven guilty" idea out the window, huh?

We sure do. Legislators who pushed this "strict liability" thing forward were playing "tough on crime" for the audience of naive voters. Now anyone who tries to change this will commit political suicide and achieve the "pedo supporter" title.

pulled the bill immediately

This is weird indeed. These bills are mostly put forward in order to appear tough on crime and secure votes of the naive population ("think of the children"). Pulling the bill is detrimental as it may lead to "pedo supporter" conspiracy spreading among the district.

I don’t want anyone to have the capability

I don't want anyone to have the capability to rape women.

I have asked local Qwen 3.6 What happened in Tiananmen Square in 1989 and it refuses to answer no matter how I ask. This is why.

On a more serious note, I am immensely grateful for Qwen and I'm rooting for chinese models as opposed to American models - due to the general direction where US models are going.

It's something else that claims some level of compatibility with SQLite.

It has nothing to do with SQLite.

turso is not an sqlite remake.

at all

There is no turso sqlite

The cult mentality of rust rewrites. Religion above all reason.

Be careful. People are known to be lost once they start allowing poisonous thoughts like "most of the world's C code should be rewritten".

Problem with C++ is that it allows an overcomplicated code.

Someone recently had a fun side experiment [1] that ended up killing a product.

[1] https://bun.sh/blog/bun-in-rust

I'm an exclusive Apple user for a couple decades so I'm not fighting here :) just acknowledging the fact that Apple has some deficiencies

I'm being sarcastic here.

But I still strongly believe that Apple hates pro users because they don't make as much money and because they get in the way of serving laymen. The Aperture fiasco, the Final Cut Saga, the Xcode war of attrition and the never ending chain of failures with MacPro - all suggest that I'm right.

(Developer of a major plugin for DaVinci here)

Could you please point me out which current Mac model has enough storage for full feature video editing job? Thanks.

Apple is quite hostile to professional users, so no.

going full psychosis mode with LLMs is not going to save you

People in AI psychosis don't know that.

it's an attempt to hijack popular software projects

Exactly. And this is why those projects are typically called "XXX in Rust" or "XXX-rs". Because the creators get to do their favorite thing - coding in their loved language - while skipping all the hardships of designing, accepting real feedback, involving users and getting traction - all while simultaneously hijacking the existing brand.

As of now I know of a single project that changed their name after being called and the project surprisingly got some traction.

impossible to replace years of experience

People with no experience don't have enough experience to realize what exactly they are missing here.

build a better version of Postgres

Faster is quantifiable. How do you measure better?

Temporary chats.

Everything. The current implementation is unusable. If you see differently then probably you are looking at Codex chats, not chats.

Zero information on the knowledge cutoff. The model itself responds it's June 2024 which is weird given that GPT-5.5 has knowledge cutoff at August 2025.

Intent understanding

This will totally make it brain damaged over a certain tasks. Sort of like the same brain damage that prompted OpenAI project managers to destroy ChatGPT.app today.

What they did to ChatGPT.app is incredible. It was a truly useful app, but the replacement is brain damaged in terms of UI/UX beyond repair.

Incredible, really.

I have updated Codex and it's now ChatGPT. And the chat in Codex is badly broken and doesn't support the one feature I use in almost every chat.

Good job.

Then why use someone else's established brand for your toy project?

suddenly single channel is 'ok'

Single channel RAM surely beats any disk-based swap.

This is an incredibly nice technology that absolutely will be used to prevent you from using your computer as you wish.

This is a good point, actually. Might well be the reason.

It's pure virtue signaling.