Mixxx: GPL DJ Software

https://mixxx.org/

by brudgers • 2 years ago

639 132 2 years ago

mixxx.org

drdirk• 2 years ago

What does GPL stand for?

frob• 2 years ago

GNU General Public License: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License

It's one of several options for software licenses a developer or team can use when distributing a piece of software to help ensure that it and its derivates stay free and open-source.

TeeMassive• 2 years ago

I like your "no bad questions" attitude and your straightforward answer!

asimovfan• 2 years ago

Its like when Morpheus goes into the Matrix to free more people.

BlueTemplar• 2 years ago

Matrixxx (and Trinity, of course, wears a GIMP suit)

jrm4• 2 years ago

Not sure whether to be dismayed or excited at the fact that this is a question on Hacker News, but those who are new to it; definitely worth doing your homework.

It's the legal jiu-jitsu that has enabled Linux and countless other "Open Source" projects to remain free by preventing people from taking the code for free but then locking it back down.

apt-get2• 2 years ago

Been using it for the past few years, nothing bad to say about it, lovely piece of software. Vendor lock-in is very present in this field, with different brands of controllers supported by a myriad of proprietary DJ applications all more interested in onboarding you to their music subscription services rather than implement useful features or support open protocols.

Meanwhile, Mixxx allows you to write your own adapter scripts for any controller you have (as long as it outputs MIDI), and there's a built-in library featuring scripts for the most common commercial controllers and MIDI devices out there.

noman-land• 2 years ago

I tried it many years ago and this didn't work. Can Mixxx be used with the Rane mixers used with Serato back in the day?

Mashimo9• 2 years ago

Does the mixer speak midi? In that case probably.

Is there already a mapping for you device? Check the manual https://manual.mixxx.org/2.5/en/

input_sh• 2 years ago

To be fair, every commercial competitor (like Rekordbox and Traktor) also supports mapping MIDI devices that are not officially supported.

But in my experience, you'll never be able to control the jogwheel as precisely as in officially-supported hardware-software combo.

shermantanktop• 2 years ago

Is it latency? Or granularity? MIDI has upper limits on both…or is it a more subtle quality like ballistics?

bfmalky• 2 years ago

In Rekordbox's case Pioneer have restricted the jogwheel mapping to Pioneer hardware only. So, you pretty much need Pioneer hardware to use Rekordbox. And seeing as Pioneer decks are almost industry standard in clubs and you need Rekordbox to organise your playlists, they have the DJ hardware market sewn up. Which is very frustrating because Rekordbox has to be the most resource intensive (& therefore inefficient) DJ software available.

cies• 2 years ago

I've been using this for the few DJ sets I do per year. Very complete software, very stable also.

Sadly I have to use RekordBox now that I want to not bring the laptop + DJ controller, but just a USB stick. And RekordBox does not run well on Linux (tried VirtualBox and Wine, both failed attempts).

Sadly there's no RecordBox clone, or "export to RekordBox USB" feature on Mixxx.

diggan3• 2 years ago

And RekordBox does not run well on Linux

RekordBox doesn't even run well on Windows, so hard to imagine what worse looks like.

But yeah, if Mixxx (or other FOSS software) could offer writing playlists into USB sticks, I'd get rid of RekordBox yesterday because few software out there works as bad as RekordBox.

quesomaster90004• 2 years ago

I considered renting out some Pioneer equipment to add RekordBox playlist writing support, mainly because I'm in a similar situation. Mixxx does have support for reading USBs & SD cards, but not writing ;_;

Unfortunately it's far down my priority list given the cost, my unfamiliarity with Mixxx development and that I rarely do anything without Mixx.

But this is absolutely what ecosystem grants/bounties should be for.

helboi43• 2 years ago

Somehow Rekordbox seems to run much better on my Ryzen 5 8gb ram windows laptop from 2019 than on my i7, 64gb ram macbook. It seems to only like windows?

helpfulContrib• 2 years ago

GPL DJ Software

Its kind of a nuisance that, as a requirement to build Mixxx on MacOS, ones has to use foreign binaries, disable Gatekeeper, run a 'first build', and from that point on .. can treat the project as a regular CMake project. Re-enable Gatekeeper after the 'first build'.

Hmm.

What are the custom binaries for? Surely not cmake. Not having - yet - done this myself (until I can put it in a VM), I'm nevertheless kind of curious about this necessity.

Any Mixxx/MacOs devs care to describe the contents?

bri3d• 2 years ago

You can just read the source? mixxx-deps come from a build process sourced from:

https://github.com/mixxxdj/vcpkg

The same binary-backed build process is present on Windows, too, presumably to keep people from needing to go through dependency hell to contribute to the project.

hlzhs6• 2 years ago

That is exactly the reason. Also, some libraries we are using are not on homebrew (and we cannot easily pin a specific version).

Another reason that we'd like to reduce the maintenance burden by using a similar setup for windows and macOS deps. Our dev team is small, and almost all of us use Linux. For macOS in particular we don't have anyone on the core team that uses it as their daily driver, which may also play a role when talking about the DX in macOS.

brudgers2• 2 years ago

Can you recompile Gatekeeper to allow compatibility with Mixxx?

djaychela4• 2 years ago

Used mixxx to do the djing for my wedding last year. Created a collaborative music voting site for the guests, then got all the music and made a mix which worked really well, even going between genres. Had a lot of fun playing with it getting everything ready and it worked with a couple of DJ controllers bought cheaply without any issue.

I even made a little program to read the now playing track from the sqlite database which then allowed the lights to follow the music (for complex reasons I don't have time to explain).

Most importantly it worked on the night without missing a beat.

jesprenj• 2 years ago

Can you share the program that reads the now playing track? We use Mixxx at a student radio station and we could maybe try using something like this to show the now-playing track on the website.

djaychela4• 2 years ago

I will see... Not being evasive but I'm experiencing terminal illness at the moment so I'm all over the place. It wasn't a complex bit of code though, but I'll see what I can find.

Mashimo9• 2 years ago

* https://github.com/erikrichardlarson/unbox

* https://github.com/ViktorNova/mixxx-now-playing

Sn0wCoder• 2 years ago

I have not used Mixxx nor do I have it installed, but might download to check it out.

But..... If its always in a SQLite DB you should be able to use DB Browser for SQLite to inspect the DB Schema and then write a bash/python (whatever) script to pull the info out.

RESULTS=$(sqlite-utils "data.db" " SELECT song, artist, duration, FROM my_table WHERE song = 'CURRENT';")

RESULTS=$(sqlite3 data.db <<EOF SELECT song, artist, duration, FROM my_table WHERE song = 'CURRENT'; EOF )

I have no idea what the schema looks like but those are just some examples of how straightforward it might be. Run it on CRON (whatever) update as needed. https://cronitor.io/guides/python-cron-jobs

Once you have the Schema an LLM could most likely do the rest if you are not a programmer, but still need someone to get it added to the site.

raphman• 2 years ago

Not sure whether that's the correct way but it seems to work. AFAICT, there is no "now_playing" field in the sqlite db - but tracks that start playing are added to the `PlaylistTracks` table. That means that if you started two tracks and then pause one or the other and restart it, no row will be added. Only adding a track from the library and then playing it will add to the PlaylistTracks list.

(Is there a simpler solution I missed?)

  import sqlite3
  import time
  from pathlib import Path
  home = Path.home()
  
  con = sqlite3.connect(f"{home}/.mixxx/mixxxdb.sqlite")
  cur = con.cursor()
  
  def get_track_name():
      global cur
      trackid = cur.execute("SELECT * FROM PlaylistTracks WHERE id=(SELECT max(id) FROM PlaylistTracks);").fetchall()[0][2]
      trackname = cur.execute(f"SELECT * FROM library WHERE id={trackid};").fetchall()[0][2]
      return trackname
  
  now_playing = get_track_name()
  print(now_playing)
  
  while True:
      if (np := get_track_name()) != now_playing:
          now_playing = np
          print(np)
      time.sleep(1)

Edit: FWIW, unbox [1] uses the same approach. Edit 2: yes, I should have cleaned up my SQL statements.

[1] https://github.com/erikrichardlarson/unbox/blob/2182f227a0fc...

btown• 2 years ago

What did you use for the collaborative music voting - or did you make something yourself? For different use cases, I've seen everything used from collaborative Spotify playlists to Google forms, to those "pay a dollar to bump your song request" kiosks in bars! The parallels to ranked-choice voting in politics are relevant too - as well as how you give people a feeling of agency, even if you as the DJ inevitably have veto powers.

I'm not surprised that startups haven't tackled this, as you inevitably run headfirst into licensing issues - but I'm curious what exists in the open-source world for this!

djaychela4• 2 years ago

I made something custom. I can't share the code for it (see my other reply for why), but here's the general deal:

Wedding website was a django site, with accounts for everyone I invited. I had a separate part of it where the guests could choose an RGB colour, and then choose tracks by searching. I used a spotify API for this, so when they chose a track, if someone chose a similar one (say a specific mix) then they could see this and vote for that. Each guest could choose 10 tracks. I used some HTMX for this as well (first time) and it generally worked pretty well. Database stored the spotify ID/UUID/whatever for each track

Once everyone had voted, I then bought all the tracks which we were going to play - reason being that I couldn't rely on WiFi on the day, and wanted to be 100% sure it would work, plus I couldn't "DJ" from spotify tracks.

All of the tracks were then renamed including their spotify ID/UUID/whatever, so the system knew who had voted for a specific track.

I then made the playlist up in Mixxx, and trimmed tracks to fit better, and made it work musically (my wife is excellent at this, she made it really work, mix wise). Made sure it all played OK.

The other part of the system was a custom light setup, with sound-reactive LED bars I made up (using ESP8266 and WLED firmware with 150 LEDs per 'stick') with them all being controlled by a custom controller. This system read the track from the Mixxx system (via HTTP request to a flask app I wrote that read the sqlite dB from mixxx to know what track was playing), and then coloured the lights with the colours of the people who had voted for the tracks. Also if you went onto the dancefloor you could 'swipe in' via an RFID label which was in the wristbands, which also reacted to lights and were colour-controlled over DMX.

The light patterns were sometimes random, or if one was good for a specific track then I programmed that into the system.

It was all spaghetti code, and the first time I used FastAPI. The code is terrible, and I'm only making it public as I thought it might be useful to someone.

https://github.com/djaychela/wedding_controller

I've just had a terminal cancer diagnosis and am no longer doing anything other than trying to stay alive. So please, no grief about the code! I'm sharing this to try to help someone else if they ever want to do something like this...

quesomaster90004• 2 years ago

I'm really happy that 2.5 added 'beats until next marker', which together with a USB controller from Numark I have pretty much feature complete DJ setup for under $500 (including cost of laptop & controller) without having to rely on Windows, Mac, subscription licenses or feature-crippled 'lite' versions.

And it's surprising how quickly people adapt to it when they're used to other setups, within an hour a few people have gone from 'oooh, can I have a go' to showing me their own tips, tricks and different styles.

Especially combined with a youtube & soundcloud downloader running on a different workspace, I can get pretty much any track into the library within a minute or two.

perfmode• 2 years ago

Which controller do you have?

starkparker• 2 years ago

Mixx is sneaky good as a TTRPG soundscape mixer. You can queue layer multiple ambiance tracks over tempo-matched music, build soundboards, and hook it all to hardware controls.

It's overkill, but a lot of similar tools either lock you into a media ecosystem, lack some power-user functionality, have a subscription, or don't work at all on Linux or macOS.

VagabundoP• 2 years ago

I've been looking for something like this.

Is it possible to stream it for an online game? I do both and need something for my creepy Call of Cthulhu game. Music and sound effects work really well with 1920s Call of Cthulhu.

E: I did look at it before but got intimidated by the screenshots.

apt-get2• 2 years ago

Mixxx can stream to an icecast output or similar, you'll need to setup the stream server separately though.

iammrpayments• 2 years ago

I thought this was Donald’s Knuth Mix computer at first

brudgers2• 2 years ago

If only he had wanted to DJ organ music.

treve• 2 years ago

Also works great with my Traktor mixer. Traktor doesn't have linux support for their software, so I was glad my mixer didn't brick after the switch

sim7c00• 2 years ago

thanks for commenting this. all i needed to know :D

tmountain• 2 years ago

I've been using this to make mix tapes at home (bought a vintage tape player). It has awesome cross fading capabilities, and it does volume normalization out of the box, so it's a very nice piece of software for those features alone. Playlist and library management is also solid. My only complaint is that the UI isn't very intuitive for a non-DJ, and it took me some time to figure out how to do basic stuff, but it's all there in the docs, so you can certainly figure it out.

ThatMedicIsASpy• 2 years ago

I've been setting up a few radio stations with playlists for azuracast for home use. The auto DJ with auto cue is amazing. Next stop is create a radio with a raspberry pi maybe with an amp hat as well.

radley2• 2 years ago

How does the auto DJ compare to something like Pacemaker?

bramgn• 2 years ago

What does GPL actually do?

sho_hn• 2 years ago

In this space, probably the biggest effect might be that HW vendors of DJ kit cannot fork this software to bundle with their HW and avoid sharing their improvements back, so people using other HW can still benefit.

sirlone• 2 years ago

It's interesting to me that there's no screenshot on the front page (they're buried on other pages). Not only is there no screenshot, the main image on the front page is an image of code.

Not a complaint, just an observation. I'd expect a DJ software site to show DJs the interface as the very first thing.

As examples, all of these have an image of their UI as centerpiece

https://www.native-instruments.com/en/products/traktor/dj-so...

https://rekordbox.com/en/

https://www.ableton.com/en/live/

weinzierl• 2 years ago

I use it simply as an audio player. I like the way I can queue up songs and then let the Auto DJ play. I know other audio players can in principle do that but in Mixx it is very explicit. I also like to see key and BPM just to satisfy my curiosity.

wayvey7• 2 years ago

Never thought of this, I use it mostly for live mixing but I probably never tried the Auto DJ feature. I need to give it a try, it would probably be a lot more inspiring to play my collection that way instead of in a traditional music player. Great tip!

profsummergig3• 2 years ago

I want to do scratching by pushing a button on my laptop keyboard (instead of dragging the spinning record with my mouse-cursor).

Can Mixxx do this?

wayvey7• 2 years ago

Not sure if that's mappable, but I don't think that would provide enough control to get satisfying results.

profsummergig3• 2 years ago

The ideal interface of course would be to use an external turntable and use one's hand to rotate a physical plate or record.

I find the mouse-cursor drag very clunky.

chromatin2• 1 year ago

How about a USB knob?

https://binepad.com/products/bnr1-v2

ericzawo• 2 years ago

RekordBox is a well known piece of s** and it's great to see someone try to enter the arena. Now we need a legit competitor to the DJM / CDJ's which cost, all told, >$10k for a standard, club-ready setup.

wayvey7• 2 years ago

I didn't know it was well known but that's exactly how I felt when I recently tried to use it. My local bar bought an integrated 2 deck Pioneer DJ player, but turns out it doesn't store analyzed BPMs or waveforms and to get that you need to use RekordBox to analyze your tracks and export that to your USBs. When I tried to install the software it requires signing up for an account and a subscription and what not. I still couldn't get it to work and abandoned it. I won't be going back to it the experience isnt worth it. I'm instead having more fun just beatmatching by ear with the pitch fader :)

Mashimo9• 2 years ago

When I tried to install the software it requires signing up for an account and a subscription and what not

No it does not. It will try to push it on you, but you can export to USB without account or subscription.

Create a playlist with your tracks, insert USB, right click on the playlist and export to USB.

helboi43• 2 years ago

Beatmatching by ear is great fun but you get rekorbox for free with any pioneer controller, which you should want for practicing anyway?

rounce2• 2 years ago

Mixxx has been around for over a decade, I was mixing with it back in 2011. Back then I also made a controller out of an old HDD, a cheap hall sensor IC, and an arduino and it worked well as a small portable CDJ knock off. I’ll try and resurrect it when I get some time later this year and post the GitHub link. I’m sure it could be made a lot fancier for even less these days.

helboi43• 2 years ago

It's never going to work. It would require all clubs in the world to throw away their expensive Pioneer gear.

HelloUsername• 2 years ago

I very much like the website itself, built to work without Javascript, and doesn't make any external calls as far as I can tell

hlzhs6• 2 years ago

Thanks, we wanted to honor our user's privacy when we redesigned the website.

officeplant2• 2 years ago

Been using Mixxx since 2015, I haven't liked every update they put out, but its always been solid software.

wayvey7• 2 years ago

I have also probably used it on and off for 10+ years, but don't recall any bad updates. What did you encounter that you didn't like if I may ask?

officeplant2• 1 year ago

I forget when exactly but somewhere in the 2.x updates they seemingly changed how the default interface's looping settings worked. I mostly use mixxx to make screwed & chopped cuts, vaporwave material, etc. It used to be easier to juggle my loop length live while also jumping between set loop points. Just with a mouse and keyboard. I wanna say I used to install 1.6 or 1.8 to get the defaults I wanted back, but later releases ran better after a while.

msephton2• 2 years ago

I currently use DJ.Studio so I'm interested how Mixxx compares.

hlzhs6• 2 years ago

Just try it, it's completely free: https://mixxx.org/download/#stable

Mixxx is entirely community driven: There is no company behind it, everything is done by unpaid volunteers.

Mashimo9• 2 years ago

Two different applications. Like most DJ software this is for .. well for DJIng live. While DJ.Studio is more of creating an "offline" mixxx.

msephton2• 2 years ago

Thanks, that's all I need to know.

mjsir911• 2 years ago

I've had a lot of fun setting mixxx up for DJing on my steam deck, with fully scriptable (in javascript) USB hid bindings, I've been able to reverse engineer the steam deck's control schemes to be able to mix quite portably.

kristopolous• 2 years ago

Been using it since ~2006 ... it's pretty great software. Hooking it up to a cheap sub-$100 MIDI controller is amazing.

Just looked it up - I had no idea it's from 2001 - this puts it in a small group of long-active FLOSS

cpach• 2 years ago

What are good controllers for using together with Mixxx?

suranyami• 2 years ago

I dunno whether "good" really applies to this, but I've gotta say I've been loving the cost, portability and reliability of the Numark DJ2Go Touch ($AU120):

https://www.numark.com/product/dj2go2-touch

I've got a cute little portable setup using it, a Raspberry Pi 5 with a 1TB m.2 SSD, 15" portable USB-C monitor and a Keychron low-profile keyboard and bluetooth mouse. Works amazingly well.

I'm betting that just about any controller would be worth a shot.

hlzhs6• 2 years ago

Check the https://manual.mixxx.org/2.5/de/hardware/manuals for a list of built-in mappings shipped with Mixxx. There are also additional user mappings on the discourse forum: https://mixxx.discourse.group/c/controller-mappings/10

Personally, I use the Roland DJ-505: https://manual.mixxx.org/2.5/de/hardware/controllers/roland_...

quesomaster90004• 2 years ago

Depending on how much space you have, I'm using a Numark MixTrack Platinum FX, with the mapping from the forum.

Everything works! Even the display in the middle of the jogwheels, that comes with the '4 deck' version, which shows BPM, time left, rotation indicator, shift amount/mode.

At this point almost all buttons & knobs on it are in regular use, although some of the deeper menu combos accessible via buttons aren't fully intuitive but don't seem to matter.

poopsmithe• 2 years ago

I used mixxx to DJ my brother's wedding. I think it was 2013 or 2014. The moment I got the signal to switch to a specific track for the bride's first dance with her Father, mixxx locked up my laptop. Guests were staring at me, one offered a hushed, "they're waiting!" Completely unresponsive, I had to hard reboot my locked up computer and boot back into Ubuntu. Then I opened VLC where I played the tracks for the rest of the evening. Probably not mixxx's fault, but I will never forget that moment.

mixmastamyk• 2 years ago

Yep, that can happen when computers are involved, and why one needs to practice with a new setup beforehand. Goes for performances or rocket launches.

During my DJ sessions (and while dabbling in digital audio files from a computer), I usually brought an old Sony Discman loaded with my best tracks on a burnt CD. Kept ready at moments notice in case disaster struck. Sadly crashes weren't uncommon at all in the bad old late 90s when consumer OSs were unstable crap.

I guess a smart phone could do that duty today, but you'll still need to have an adapter plugged into the mixer beforehand/ready to go to minimize disruption.

encom• 1 year ago

I guess a smart phone could do that duty today

Not since they bravely killed off the headphone plug.

hlzhs6• 2 years ago

Mixxx dev here. I'm sorry you had a bad experience. We are spending a lot of effort on making Mixxx rock stable.

Considering that this was more than a decade ago, I'm pretty sure that this bug has been fixed by now.

sambf• 2 years ago

I do have a similar story with the 2.4.1 or 2.4.2 version unfortunately. Didn't take the time to debug it or fill an issue yet but when the library (between 100 and 200G) is on a USB stick it regularly hangs for 10-15s when browsing. It always came back to normal but made me sweat every time.

chromatin2• 1 year ago

That stinks. I know professional DJs often have a backup music player for this very reason. Even hardware can fault.

magicalhippo• 1 year ago

Went to a concert recently where the supporting band was a two piece which relied on a MacBook for live sequencing the drums as well as some MIDI inputs for various effects and such.

Two and a half songs in the MacBook died and wouldn't come up after reboot, and that was that.

Felt bad for them, but using a laptop as critical infrastructure is usually a bad idea.

ghomem• 2 years ago

Mix is absolutely awesome. One of the most carefully organized open source projects that I've seen.

Some years ago I made a Mixxx demo video with a DYI "integrated controller". It demos Linux boot to Mixxx, touch screen, beatmatching and some modest effects:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjHvW4OsQ2Y

Mixxx devs: if you are reading this... cheers :-)

joemi• 2 years ago

I used to use Mixxx a lot about a decade ago when I was DJing weekly in some bars and also had a weekly radio show. It was great. I'm glad to see it's still around and going strong.

igor47• 2 years ago

Love mixxx! I use it regular for DJing with an ancient ddj sb2 controller

alabhyajindal• 2 years ago

I used Mixxx as a teenager to feel like a DJ. Great to see it here!

sneak• 2 years ago

c++, GPL2

jcelerier• 1 year ago

and Qt :D

Hypnosis6173• 2 years ago

I use it as my main software for my Traktor Kontrol S2.

Some Lights are buggy and the fix is not yet out.

Also Highlighting Tracks based on a fitting Key is only availible in the Alpha Branch of the software, which obivously has lots of other issues.

Besides that its an easy software which can handle all of my other feature requirements and it runs really nice.

So i would really recommend it ;)

marssaxman• 2 years ago

I was a DJ for a good few years, and once I discovered Mixxx I used it exclusively. High quality software, compatible with basically every controller, Linux support, and an open-source license - what more could you ask for?

Music has fallen out of my life since then, but I am glad Mixxx is going strong.

brcmthrowaway• 2 years ago

How does mixx compare to rekordbox?

scyllax• 2 years ago

Mixxx is great! I used it with a Nano Korg Kontrol 2 when I just started learning DJing a few years ago.

rhizome31• 2 years ago

Rock solid DJ software. I've used it for IRL events, streaming, radio shows. Higly recommended.

Octo-Shark• 2 years ago

I heard about mixxx back in 2013 from someone who managed to make his Linux lighter ( replacing the kernel or something? ). Then he compiled mixxx without all the unnecessary functions he didn't want. He managed to lower down latency response to 4ms or maybe below I remember. His DJ sets where amazing!

ctm92• 2 years ago

I stumbled across Mixxx many years ago when I wanted to get started with digital vinyl systems (timecode vinyl records). It was the really hot shit back then and Serato and Traktor were the market leaders.

Back then Mixxx didn't feel like a finished product, everything was not ready to actually use it in a "production" setting.

Then I found xwax [1], which uses the same timecode library as mixxx iirc. Very unspectacular UI, no mouse support, but super stable and easily as good as the commercial Serato Scratch Live. Just needed a 4i4o audio interface for around $100 and it was good to go, awesome software!

[1] https://xwax.org/

Mashimo9• 2 years ago

Impresive that xwax still gets updated.

noisy_boy2• 1 year ago

Hijacking this thread on a tangential - can folks share some guides on the basics of getting started mixing music? For a total noob who would like to explore this field. Obviously those using open source software (or atleast software that works on Linux) would be the most useful to me.

qwertygnu• 1 year ago

You're looking for a DAW (digital audio workstation). Ardour is open source and works on Linux. It's not one of the "main" players but I'm sure it has all the important features. You can google "how to mix music" and apply pretty much any tutorial to any DAW.

j12a• 1 year ago

Eagerly waiting for the Ableton Link support.. seems to be just around corner (or a couple).

LWIRVoltage• 1 year ago

I DJ for partner dances and have used Mixxx after i discovered DJ software

It was cool getting to explore features like the ability to stream to radio websites that others would follow a link to, to hear the music( something done in the first few years of COVID to facilitate DJ'ed music for 'online ' dances, which were a thing for a while.

I tout it heavily and enjoy it, and it is pretty incredible that it provides all that it does for free and in a open source manner . I hope it continues to grow. I run into a few others who use Virtual DJ and hope that Mixxx eventually picks up the few things they do it does not yet do

paulcapewell• 1 year ago

Genuinely curious: when people submit URLs like this to HN - rather than say a specific link to an article or blog post - without comment or actually submitting responses to the conversation, are they just posting it to say 'hey, take a look at this if you haven't heard of it'? Or am I missing something? (Possibly their descriptive text to go with the URL isn't obvious/visible to me somehow?)

Mixxx: GPL DJ Software

Related Stories