The History of User Interfaces

by mjshashank • 4 years ago

205 116 4 years ago

egfx• 4 years ago

Browsing 1992 through 1995 gave me tears. Btw, where is Vista, ME, or Windows 98, or 7 for that matter? Vista had an especially unique UI with Aero and Windows 7 was an adaptation of that I believe.

linguae2• 4 years ago

I concur about Windows Vista. For all the criticism that OS received, it did bring Windows a compositing desktop similar to Mac OS X, which was a crucial milestone to the GUI experience, which brought compositing desktops to more than 90% of personal computer users.

I believe Windows 98 and ME were omitted because this is largely a presentation of the evolution of GUIs. Windows 98 and ME did not substantially differ from Windows 95 in terms of their look-and-feel; the same can be said about Windows NT 4 and Windows 2000.

theandrewbailey• 4 years ago

Windows 98 and ME did not substantially differ from Windows 95 in terms of their look-and-feel; the same can be said about Windows NT 4 and Windows 2000.

The only differences I remember are quick start icons in the taskbar, and gradients in window title bars.

mngnt2• 4 years ago

Non-inclusion of Vista is really strange given how influential it was.

I used to be among those Linux users that wanted to make the GUI look cool™. I spent a LOT of time browsing gnome-look.org and at the height of Vista popularity, the Aero knockoffs were everywhere.

eesmith3• 4 years ago

What's the theme here?

That is, even in the context of desktop graphical UIs I expected Englebart's oN-Line System (NLS), Sutherland's Sketchpad, X Windows, NeWS, and/or NeXTStep.

Broaden that and there's smartphone UIs.

Or Raskin's The Humane Environment (THE).

EDIT: OPEN LOOK tried to "fill the need for an easy to use desktop for Unix workstations, similar" long before KDE 1.0. There's also the Common Desktop Environment.

kristopolous5• 4 years ago

random fact, CDE is open source these days and you can run it on Linux, for entertainment I guess

(HPUX's SAM not included ;p )

https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/

There's also a 4DWM clone as well https://docs.maxxinteractive.com/

memetomancer3• 4 years ago

minor nit - this is a very poorly named site. A better name might be "the history of workstation and personal computer graphical user interfaces", a very far cry from blanket coverage of all "user interfaces".

Even foregoing simple UI such as the handle of a hammer, or even the mechanical interfaces of yesteryear such as the differences between a Curta calculator and the original Burroughs adding machine, or a Jacquard loom and so forth...

Limiting ourselves to just binary digital computers we're still missing a lot at this site. IBM 1401 card punch machines... the IBM 360 operator console... the VAX DCL, the original UNIX sh, etc., etc.

yreg• 4 years ago

www.the-history-of-workstation-and-personal-computer-graphical-user-interfaces.io ?

bhandziuk• 4 years ago

The URL isn't taken!

linguae2• 4 years ago

This is a nice collection of graphical user interfaces. This reminds me of the well known Toasty Tech collection (http://toastytech.com/guis/), but with a narrative tying together the evolution of these GUIs.

Some feedback:

1. All interfaces presented were graphical user interfaces for desktop personal computers. However, there's a wide world of user interfaces for computers beyond conventional point-and-click GUIs. A command line interface, for example, is still a user interface, and in fact there has been much diversity of command line interfaces besides Unix and MS-DOS. For example, I remember reading in The Unix Haters Handbook critiques of the Unix shell, comparing it to the CLIs of other operating systems such as VMS. It would have been cool to have learned about the history of various CLIs and how they evolved. Regarding other user interfaces, there are touchscreens and voice, and even among GUIs there have been models that were not heavily influenced by the Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows, such as Symbolics Genera, Project Oberon, and Plan 9's 8 1/2 and rio GUIs.

2. Some highly influential GUIs are missing. For example, as influential Windows 95's UI was, its look and feel clearly shows influences from NeXTSTEP, the first GUI to introduce the gray, 3D, beveled look that Windows 95 embraced.

jamessb• 4 years ago

There is also the GUIdebook Graphical User Interface Gallery: https://guidebookgallery.org/screenshots

(the panel on the right lets you select a "component" like "Notepad" and see how it looked in each system)

eesmith3• 4 years ago

That GUIdebook appears to be the source of many of these images.

  % curl -s https://guidebookgallery.org/pics/gui/desktop/full/lisaos10.png | sha256sum
  7f4216c0c688c8d6942ddf6457300df7c8f86106729ec4e11c0f6a7d37fd89e5  -
  % curl -s https://history.user-interface.io/img/apple-lisa/desktop-with-applications.png | sha256sum
  7f4216c0c688c8d6942ddf6457300df7c8f86106729ec4e11c0f6a7d37fd89e5  -

Other images come from http://toastytech.com/guis/index.html , eg, visually compare http://toastytech.com/guis/os211menu.png with https://history.user-interface.io/img/OS-2/cursor.png .

Both the GUIdebook Graphical User Interface Gallery and Nathan Lineback/Toasty Tech's GUI Gallery are significantly more comprehensive than the linked-to page.

SeanLuke2• 4 years ago

I was dumbfounded to find NeXTSTEP missing: it was among the very most influential GUIs in history. Much of 95's UI (and OS/2's UI) were stolen directly from it, and badly, right down to icons.

This page also seems to focus not on UIs, not on GUIs, but just on GUIs for personal computers. No discussion of the tablet->PDA->phone->small device UI evolution at all, even though that UI route has now had profound impact even on laptops. Where's the Newton?

eesmith3• 4 years ago

Did you notice how nearly all the text was copy/pasted from Wikipedia?

Though the KDE one was copy/pasted from the initial KDE email.

ArtWomb• 4 years ago

MIT Project Athena was also hugely influential: X Windows wasn't the only thing to spin out, but MATLAB and other pre-cursors of today's Jupyter style notebooks. The VAX super-mini grid could be used at night as a renderfarm ;)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Athena

kristopolous5• 4 years ago

I was honestly expecting it to start with things like arithmometers (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppXnnWAssoI), Cooke and Wheatstone 5-needle telegraphs (https://m.youtube.com/shorts/YKSCqtKZOwg), or perhaps a dictaphone (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictaphone) and what about the rich history of fax machines such as the Pantelegraph (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantelegraph). Here's a newspaper being printed by radiofax in the 1930s for instance (https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Krant_per_fax_-_Fa...)

Speaking of communications, there's things like Strowger switches (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xZePwin92cI&t=111) which I think count because that's what people were interfacing whilst using the phone (this became crossbars and relays in the 1910s and 20s respectively)

Relays and telephone tech btw is how Electro the smoking robot from the 1939 world's fair worked (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AuyTRbj8QSA)

Even if we want to limit to computers, we have batch versus time-sharing flow, teletype versus graphical terminals and along those lines you have the work of groups like Evans & Sutherland in the 1970s (such as the line drawing system 1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LDS-1_(Line_Drawing_System-1) ) or Scientific Data Systems which was later acquired by Xerox. You also have the world of analog computers, the most famous of which is the slide rule.

Even then you can go back to the 19th century Jacquard Loom, which even has a solution to "Hello World" on Rosetta Code (https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category:Jacquard_Loom)

Then you have specialty machines such as the Fairlight CMI synthesizer with the lightpen interface (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iOlPCpSmhRM&t=40) which really laid the groundwork of most DAWs to this day. For music there's lots of things. The theremin which you all know about but also things like Nikolai Voinov's "Paper Sound" https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Mmejo9WL2gY

You also have 1970s CAD computers, many of which were built by large companies like Mercedes, Nissan, Ford and General Motors (https://www.cadazz.com/cad-software-history-1970s.htm)

Then there's video compositing systems as well such as the lightpen based CMX-600 from 1971: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTUdHncIbq8

The history is way richer then this. Nobody has really given it a good general effort IMHO. Maybe I'm the guy? I hope not. That's a lot of work.

hoten• 4 years ago

pretty sure Hackernews would buy this book in bulk. Be the guy!

masswerk4• 4 years ago

There are also some interesting GUI elements in GENESYS, a parametric image animation program for the TX-2 at MIT, by Ronald M. Baecker (1969) [1,2].

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYIPKLxoTcQ

[2] Baecker, Ronald M. (1969). Interactive Computer-Mediated Animation. PhD Thesis, MIT. http://publications.csail.mit.edu/lcs/pubs/pdf/MIT-LCS-TR-06...

Also mind the use of a mouse in another video animation software from around 1970, by Marceli Wein and Nestor Burtnyk, running on a SEL 840A in Canada, three years before a mouse was used at PARC:

[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPIE_h8jf6E

teddyh• 4 years ago

Someone else already mentioned guidebookgallery.org, so I’ll just also mention the Museum of UI: https://ui.codexpanse.com/

rwmj2• 4 years ago

It also misses all the "text GUI" interfaces found on eg. MS-DOS and mainframes. These are super-efficient to navigate and use using just a keyboard, and extremely fast for data entry in comparison to modern systems.

sixothree• 4 years ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbo_Vision

epolanski2• 4 years ago

Isn't a "text gui" simply a text user interface?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text-based_user_interface

Anthony-G3• 4 years ago

Thanks for the Toasty Tech link. It looks like some of the screenshots in the featured article are actually from Toasty Tech, e.g., this Visi On Word screenshot:

https://history.user-interface.io/img/visi-on/word.gif

http://toastytech.com/guis/visionword.gif

Narishma3• 4 years ago

I think they just took random screenshots from toasty tech and presented them differently, often mislabeling them in the process.

jecel• 4 years ago

Actually, the NeXTStep style was adopted by Windows 3.1 and that made it look subtly different from 3.0. Given the timing, I think the actual direct influence on Windows 3.1 was Motif, which in turn was inspired by NeXTStep.

When the NeXT was announced I thought it had been influenced by Randy Smith's (Xerox Parc) ARK (Alternate Reality Kit):

http://worrydream.com/refs/Smith%20-%20Experiences%20With%20...

But it might just have been a coincidence.

flomo• 4 years ago

IIRC, Microsoft actually had an hand in Motif, which followed the IBM Common User Access spec. Some of this I suspect was for legal reasons with Apple suing everyone.

unsafecast• 4 years ago

Would've also loved to see Oberon and Plan 9 on there. The list just seems to be some random choices of mainstream GUIs.

jimmySixDOF• 4 years ago

Yes, CLI is missing from the study but so are alternatives like Natural and Tangible and Zoomable. NUI/TUI/ZUI/3DUIs are all very relevant for Spatial Computing and have historical antecedents worthy of note here too.

chem83• 4 years ago

Nice collection, indeed. Usually (and it seems to be the case here), UI studies/collections tend to emphasize operating systems and shells, but there's some very interesting UI paradigms brought on by applications. For example: music software like Fruit Loops and Native Instruments, skeuomorphism from audio plugins; or graphical software like the flow-based shader modeler in Blender, the quad menu in 3DSMax, the dark mode on Autodesk Flame/Flint/Inferno/Smoke; or the MS ribbon; or things like IntelliSense etc.

egberts1• 4 years ago

also OpenWin by Sun Microsystems

asiachick• 4 years ago

The list is kind of arbitrary. I don't feel the Amiga UI had any influence on anything what so ever. I was a huge Amiga fan and owned an Amiga 1000 the year it launched and then an Amiga 500 later but other than Amiga's unique multi-resolution system, which really was only something that was a product of the limits of old hardware, there was nothing special about its UX.

Similarly where's GEM?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEM_(desktop_environment)

I'm sure there's a bunch of others missing for "The History of User Interfaces"

Cockbrand• 4 years ago

I agree - given the Amiga's excellent hardware capabilities for the time, the GUI lacked quite a bit, of course especially compared to the Mac, but even in comparison to GEM.

Findecanor• 4 years ago

There was one difference between Amiga and Mac/Windows that was noticeable on the slow machines of the day: It was more responsive.

Not only did Amiga have preemptive multitasking. The window system ("Intuition") ran behaviour and redraw of apps' widgets in its own task, making them responsive even if the apps owning them were lagging. Compare that to Windows 3.11 of the day, where the entire GUI would hang while waiting for an app to redraw anything in one of its windows.

Oarch• 4 years ago

Does Ivan Sutherland's Sketchpad not deserve a mention? It was an early touchscreen / stylus interface from the 60s.

sedan_baklazhan2• 4 years ago

If only this quite interesting work could be read on a normal, no-JS webpage!

Scrolling to see more content fading in is such a bad UI practice. Completely negating all the natural reading experience.

IYasha2• 4 years ago

At least you're lucky enough to see some content at all :))

sedan_baklazhan2• 4 years ago

I had to enable some JS to see it. Insane.

sdfjkl• 4 years ago

Agreed. Also the cropping of image previews to square format. You literally can't see the portrait orientation of the Xero Alto monitor. Argh.

mngnt2• 4 years ago

For bonus points, try to visit from a smartphone. a few scrolls into the page, I got a modal begging me to subscribe and it was not closable - positioned too high so I didn't get to the x to close it, I guess.

Ironic - a website about user interfaces has a UI so bad that I could but glimpse the content.

game-of-throws• 4 years ago

For extra bonus points, read this blog post by the author of the site: https://user-interface.io/why-you-probably-shouldnt-put-form...

And all the screenshots are stolen, as mentioned in other comments. This guy is just a hustler.

floren2• 4 years ago

Good news, a lot of the screenshots are just pulled from http://toastytech.com/guis/index.html, which works perfectly well without JS.

sligor• 4 years ago

Wow the Xerox Alto was so crazily ahead of its time

IYasha2• 4 years ago

<body> <div id="app"></div> </body> I love your interface. Such pure white.

masswerk4• 4 years ago

Minor nitpick: The "Alto GUI" is really Smalltalk, there was no such thing as a general GUI for the Alto. Also, image 10/10 is a screenshot of the Xerox Star.

(The merits of Xerox SDD in turning the experimental odds and ends of Alto developments into a consistent user interface are generally underappreciated.)

kypro2• 4 years ago

I really miss Windows 95/98 era UIs. They were so much more practical and less noisy than current generation UIs.

Opening the start bar on my Windows 11 I literally have no idea what's going on.

All the "apps" at the top of my start bar are things I've never used and I don't think I've ever even installed. Stuff like Tiktok and XBox.

Then below that I get recommendations, but I don't want recommendations, I just want to find the programs and settings I'm looking for.

I'm not even sure if can get to setting from the start bar anymore, and if I'm looking for the programs I've installed it's behind another click.

I guess it looks nice with all the tiles and transition effects though.

hunterb123• 4 years ago

But the start bar is completely customizable...

You can turn off recommendations, remove the default apps, add any other app including settings, set the size, etc.

Once you spend a couple minutes setting it up, it's less cluttered than any previous Windows OS.

kypro2• 4 years ago

Yeah, I spent some time on my other Windows computer doing just that. It does help, but it's still not as clean as the Windows 98 start bar imo.

It's not just the start bar though. There are similar things all over the OS. For example, if you right click a document in Windows 11 one of the most common things you might want to do, "copy" isn't there. Well it is there, but now it's behind this little anonymous looking rectangle icon at the top* of the context menu and is no longer clearly listed as "copy" in the menu.

Maybe I'm just getting old... But I find UIs are just generally getting more confusing and assume more of the user. For example, back buttons on browsers don't say back anymore, but are just an arrow, because everyone knows what that arrow does, right? And that's probably fair, but even still, I like the explicit text label so I know for sure what I'm clicking is what I'm looking for. The three dots for accessing a menu might be a better example as my parents actually do get confused by that

* The icon can also randomly appear at the bottom of the menu because who cares about predictability when designing UIs anymore.

throwawaylala1• 4 years ago

You can turn off recommendations

Not really. When you turn off recommendations, the app icons are hidden but the space for recommendations stays there! Yes, just a big ol' block of whitespace with a prompt to turn recommendations back on. It takes up like 30%+ of the start menu.

It's a dark pattern.

irusensei• 4 years ago

The start menu is an ad platform now. No business looking for useful programs there.

rwmj2• 4 years ago

Late 80s / early 90s Mac OS was a sweet spot too - simple, clean, interfaces.

Actually using it was a pain because it was so unstable, if only it had been combined with a proper preemptive multitasking OS.

scyzoryk_xyz3• 4 years ago

I feel like what you’re describing boils down to a change in priorities for designs and how the user behavior is measured. Today, it seems to be mostly about recording what users do and then endlessly modifying the UI to extract the desired behaviors. This results in these kinds of layouts where a clean choice takes a back seat and user manipulation takes the front.

This is less so the case with actual tools and UI’s used for productivity.

Of course when you look at recordings of user behavior for interfaces you realize how dumb the majority of all users really is. And how without those tiles advertising “Xbox” and “TikTok” those users would probably fail to find those even if they were looking for them. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

mikelevins• 4 years ago

An old friend of mine and I used to amuse each other by writing press releases for a fictional computing company that we called Infernosoft. Its tag line was "Software from Hell," but it also supposedly made hardware.

One of its fictional products was the Infernosoft Auto-optimizing Keyboard. As you use it, it measures your usage and optimizes itself in response. It makes frequently-struck keys larger and moves them closer to the center of the home row.

If that sounds like a good idea to you, then you undoubtedly have a bright future in today’s software market.

wizofaus5• 4 years ago

"how dumb the majority of all users really is" - you could throw in how "dumb" grammar rules are too, given that "the majority of all users" might logically seem like it's singular and hence "is" would be correct, but I'm 90% sure in all cases that you say "the majority of X's", it acts as a plural noun phrase. I.e. it definitely should be "really are".

BeFlatXIII• 4 years ago

Of course when you look at recordings of user behavior for interfaces you realize how dumb the majority of all users really is. And how without those tiles advertising “Xbox” and “TikTok” those users would probably fail to find those even if they were looking for them

It's a shame that there are so many stupid users that it's profitable to cater to them rather than leave them behind and cater to the experts.

kevincox• 4 years ago

but I don't want recommendations,

You seem to have this assumption that the Windows 11 start bar is made for you. I'm pretty sure the truth is that this menu is intended to drive sales and maximize profits for Microsoft.

Once you have the right set of premises you can see why it behaves this way and the design is actually fairly decent. (Not great, but don't worry, they are improving it every release)

dkersten• 4 years ago

I agree. Win 95/98 UI was pretty ugly, but it was consistent and followed a good design language: eg everything that was clickable looked like a button: buttons, table headers, scroll bars etc. Once you learned the basics of the UI, you could mostly figure things out.

Nowadays buttons look like plain text labels half the time and every app has its own inconsistent style and even I, someone who has used computers for a long time and use them daily, sometimes have trouble seeing what’s what on a UI.

Narishma3• 4 years ago

Win 95/98 UI was pretty ugly

I disagree. I find it much better looking than modern UIs.

rochak• 4 years ago

I don’t think it was ugly. It was the most consistent UI Windows has ever had and nothing comes close.

wizofaus5• 4 years ago

Settings is the gear above the "power" icon? The apps at the top of my start menu are ones that were most recently installed. TBH 95% of the time I just type in the name anyway.

shakna• 4 years ago

Icons are ambiguous. Everybody violates expectations about what an image does. The older UIs had text. More than that, settings was a folder just like every other folder, so you knew what would happen if you clicked on particular section.

Things were fairly unified, even though the standards didn't integrate everything. You knew what would open a new dropdown, and what would open a new window, at a glance. There was no need of any implicit knowledge.

Ansil849• 4 years ago

I really miss Windows 95/98 era UIs. They were so much more practical and less noisy than current generation UIs.

This. I miss the practicality of these designs. It feels like designers today make changes to justify having work to do to maintain their jobs, and don't actually care about user experience, and in fact many are actively user hostile (see 'dark patterns').

DebtDeflation• 4 years ago

Same thing has happened with Ubuntu Desktop/GNOME. I used to know where things were. Now it wants you to just click Activities and type in your search (for an Application, Setting, etc).

Stratoscope2• 4 years ago

After you hit Start, just start typing the name of the app you want to run. You don't need to hunt for it in the menu.

Don't worry if there isn't a text box to type into, or if the text box at the top of the menu isn't selected. You don't need to click on it, just start typing. This has worked ever since Windows 7 (or maybe Vista).

dredmorbius3• 4 years ago

If only there were some way to present the user with a form that could be used to type in applications to run.

And maybe to help find those applications.

And offer a streamlined mode for applications where you just need a quick response where the application doesn't open a new window but just provides a response in the same invocation-dialogue.

Maybe apps could even take modifiers or specifications when invoked, so you don't have to hunt and peck around in menus and additional dialogues after launch.

Maybe there's a place for this?

nathias2• 4 years ago

it would be interesting to see an overview of the web UI, going from user-centric to ad-centric in 20 years

ctas• 4 years ago

Agreed. If anybody knows such a site, I'd like to see it.

I just recently collected old screenshots of Facebook, Twitter, and other popular sites from 2010 and before. Looking back, all of them have a certain charm I would like to bring back in future personal projects.

jethkl• 4 years ago

A version of that exists: https://www.webdesignmuseum.org

nathias2• 4 years ago

thanks, this is great

jeffalyanak• 4 years ago

Am I wrong in thinking that the photo of the Alton keyboard is actually a corded input device and that a keyboard was also included?

masswerk4• 4 years ago

Snow Leopard (OS X 10.6) really needs a representation of the brushed metal appearance in the image gallery. (There had been two presentation styles, the general one seen in the images, and a brushed metal one for utilities.)

Edit: Interestingly, there's no representative image of this to be found in image searches, but here's a screenshot of a third party tool: https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.infor...

dingosity• 4 years ago

meh. dude forgot Engelbart's augment project (from the mother of all demos). the unix shell (which is the exemplar of a class of UIs) and Raskin's Canon Cat keyboard based interface. Or PLATO, which was doing remote graphical rendering before Y or X.

preezer• 4 years ago

I'm just at 1/4 of the article. But I have to say that the design and the ux of the site is just perfect. Well done!

doodpants• 4 years ago

I strongly disagree. Content fades in moments after scrolling, and there's no content at all if JavaScript is disabled. The author clearly values style over usability.

Anthony-G3• 4 years ago

Two things I noticed from looking at the screenshots:

1. The MS Windows 7 Task Manager look very similar to the KDE 1 version (from the late nineties): https://history.user-interface.io/img/kde-1/task-manager.jpe...

2. In 1990, Microsoft referred to plain text files on the local system as “on-line documents”: https://history.user-interface.io/img/windows-3.0/notepad.pn...

Narishma3• 4 years ago

Regarding 2, back then online was often used to mean something in the computer, as opposed to outside of it. For example online help vs paper manuals.

memetomancer3• 4 years ago

The KDE 1 task manager looks _very_ similar to the Windows NT 4 task manager (from the mid nineties): https://guidebookgallery.org/screenshots/winnt40 (scroll down to 'task manager' and click the faint tab control marked '3' in the upper left of the specific screen shot)

Until Win10, the NT OSes had that same basic task manager with the cool looking green graphs. WinNT 3.51 had a much more crude looking task manager

Anthony-G3• 4 years ago

Thanks for the info and the tips on how to view the screenshot of the “Performance” tab. I would have been using Windows 95 or 98 back then but I don’t remember it displaying resource usage like that. I started using Red Hat Linux 6 in 1999/2000 so wouldn’t be very familiar with Windows 2000 or XP.

floren2• 4 years ago

I always thought KDE of that vintage was extremely attractive and pretty damn usable... Shame it got too "shiny" after KDE 1.

TheRealNGenius• 4 years ago

one gripe is that it is like 15 years outdated

larsbrinkhoff• 4 years ago

PLATO forgotten again.

foobarbecue• 4 years ago

My user experience on this site: scroll to cool picture, click cool picture, click back button expecting to go back to text. Back button takes me back to hacker news, urgh. Click link to site again, scroll to where I was. Click next cool picture and forget that back is broken. Click back. Urgh! Actually I've tried to use the back button four times now and I guess it's best if I just don't finish reading the site.

The back of the internet is broken...

Very cool site though.

memetomancer3• 4 years ago

While looking up a reference image for another comment in this thread, I came across another cool GUI site:

https://guidebookgallery.org/guis

This seems much more comprehensive, has screenshots of specific UI elements and controls to view different tabs within those screenshots.

jccalhoun• 4 years ago

My first reaction is that it is disappointing that GUIs haven't changed all that much from Xerox. However, on second thought, how different is the user interface on a car from the 30s from a modern car? So maybe it isn't surprising that the GUI hasn't radically changed

epolanski2• 4 years ago

how different is the user interface on a car from the 30s from a modern car

A lot I would say, even on a much smaller time scale.

The features are completely different besides the very basic odometers which anyway look very different and present much different information. A modern car not only has much more features, but even the way of consuming the old ones is radically different, and not just because of the switch from analog to digital, e.g. steering wheels have seen a massive amount of analog buttons and levers.

2002 Mercedes Benz E class interior[1]

2022 Mercedes Benz E class interior[2]

[1] https://autotech-miami.com/images/watermarked/3039zg.jpg

[2] https://imgcdn.zigwheels.my/large/gallery/interior/17/481/me...

dredmorbius3• 4 years ago

The MOAD got a lot of things right.

There's only so much efficiency and clarity that can be squeezed out of a GUI.

Familiarity and consistency are themselves powerful elements of UI/UX.

Upshot: stop fucking with the interface.

Apple, renowned for design, has essentially only ever offered two GUIs, "Classic Mac" (1984--1999) and "Aqua" (1999--2022) Note that the second has been in use longer than Classic, by over 60% (23/16 ~= 1.64).

Good UIs don't change.

Apple have tweaked at the edges, changed some of the styling and colours, and added features (e.g., workspaces / virtual desktops). But a user of the Classic Mac could sit down at a modern OSX system and figure it put pretty quickly.

(I'm actually not a fan of the interface, though I generally use one based on a precursor / ancestor of it, WindowMaker, based on NeXTStep from the NeXT Machine.)

aimor• 4 years ago

The Windows 95 icons were so good. I'm comparing those to what I see in Windows 10 and it's kind of funny. Examples I think are much worse: Keyboard, Mouse, Accessibility Options/Ease Of Access, Network, Passwords/Credential Manager. What happened?

Windows 95: https://history.user-interface.io/img/windows-95/settings.pn...

Windows 10: https://i.ibb.co/SQkQNJw/Windows10.png

xrayarx• 4 years ago

To me it seems this is just to start a newsletter. At least one is promoted prominently. Maybe they are gauging interest…

AlbertCory2• 4 years ago

I generally avoid slipping in overt promotion of my book [1], but this cries out for it. Find out how it really went down, what the debates were like, and what it was like to be there.

This is a quickie, copy-and-paste job from publicly available sources. Mostly accurate, except for calling the Alto keyset "the Alto keyboard." As some of the comments point out, it's quite incomplete.

[1] https://www.albertcory.io/inventing-the-future

b06timmer• 4 years ago

When payday rolls around again I'll get this, thanks for pointing it out.

AlbertCory2• 4 years ago

Thank you!

jerryjerryjerry• 4 years ago

Xerox PARC: the birthplace of many many many PC related technologies. It's so sad that the legend is gone.

ss48• 4 years ago

Great job.

I liked seeing the hardware in the first two pictures. It gave an idea of what it was like interacting with the computer. Do you think you could add this for some of the other interfaces, even multiple form factors if they existed for the operating system?

scelerat2• 4 years ago

Cool site!

The title promises more than is delivered: computer user interfaces existed before the GUI, and interfaces to physical machines in general have existed for centuries, and a lot of those antecedents have influenced present-day computer interfaces.

scelerat2• 4 years ago

"It [Amiga] uses a workbench metaphor (in place of the more common desktop metaphor) for representing file system organisation."

Is "workbench" truly a different metaphor from "desktop," or is it just a different word used to avoid legal hassles?

stereocodes• 4 years ago

Didn't see Last Call BBS on there.

joaomoreno• 4 years ago

Hi author! Cool site. It was odd getting a "hi hacker news would you like to subscribe to my UI mailing list", but OK. But it was really not great seeing this [0] when I clicked "no", given the whole thing is about UI.

0: https://gcdnb.pbrd.co/images/wH0ONKrFlqSI.png?o=1

beefman2• 4 years ago

I'd love to see GEM, Canon Cat, NeXTSTEP, and BeOS here

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEM_(desktop_environment)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_Cat

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NeXTSTEP

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BeOS

tablespoon• 4 years ago

I'd love to see GEM, Canon Cat, NeXTSTEP, and BeOS here

That would be good. I'd also like to see something that's at a much lower level, basically an catalog of specific ways of accomplishing specific basic tasks in a particular UI, current or historical. I've switched between different OSes, and each time I sorely miss some very particular thing (e.g. Windows' very useful line-based Home/End key behavior vs. Mac OS's totally pointless document-based behavior). I'm sure even dead-end OS's had very good ideas like these that have been subsequently lost.

My weird dream is that some day someone could use a catalog like that to combine all the best ideas into something that's as close to perfect as possible.

beefman2• 4 years ago

In the case of Home/End, are you missing ⌘ + ← and ⌘ + → ?

sys_64738• 4 years ago

Came here to say GEM too.

samstave• 4 years ago

Another interesting software to look at the UI/UX of is 3D design/animation software.

From Softimage, ALIAS|Wavefront through Maya to Blender etc... This UI model is interesting.

I personally started on Softimage on the SGI (Also, I didnt see IRIX in the list).

But Softimage had one of the most novel UIs of its time.

The History of User Interfaces

Related Stories