HN user

Oarch

981 karma
Posts9
Comments329
View on HN

Realistically, what can these types of commitments look like for the AI frontier companies, moving forward?

They're releasing ever more powerful models with stronger offensive capabilities. So do they have to help bolster the defense of all existing software, just... forever?

If we advance both the offence and defense with each new release, is this sustainable?

Oh this is brilliant, I've spent the last month doing something just like this. As a challenge, no libraries allowed besides Python standard libs (so no numpy).

Started with Word2Vec, built an RNN, then LSTM and am halfway through building transformer architecture.

I reckon that in 50 years the very idea of code existing will be esoteric knowledge, a bit like binary. We simply won't care to think at that level of abstraction anymore.

From the title I'd assumed this was a mixed metaphor between boiling the frog and facing impending doom.

Maybe I need to stop AI doomscrolling for a bit.

If This Road 3 months ago

I think you've answered your own point convincingly! Glad you enjoyed it.

Grok 4.3 3 months ago

I'd agree on the voice transcription; it seems so much more accurate than the other frontier models I've used. I often speak to Grok and paste the transcribed output to Claude!

Auto Polo 3 months ago

These days I have to check the upload date to see if I'm being duped. At 8 years ago this one passes!

ChatGPT Images 2.0 3 months ago

Every groundbreaking new AI release feels like a volley of cannonfire towards the soul. Oof.

"You've hit the message limit, upgrade to Plus for more".

Ok. I upgrade.

"You've hit the message limit, upgrade to Plus for more".

Hmm. They've charged me. There's no meaningful support. I just got scammed, didn't I...