I assume Van Gogh didn't paint enough hands to train from!
HN user
Oarch
I assumed the point of war these days was largely just money making. "Winning" puts an end to the grift - it's far more profitable to keep a nice long term rolling boil going.
HopingAI seems more pertinent
But popcorn sales are through the roof!
It's probably more akin to changing where the fun is in maths.
I wasn't expecting to find Hamlet in these comments...
I wonder if (this part specifically) is a solvable problem? Is it their altitude that causes them to shine? Perhaps finally a commercial use for Vantablack?
All glory to hypnotoad!
Can't you just append ".json" to the end of any Reddit link and read all sorts of these fields?
Makes me question whether de-planetizing Pluto was just a clever tax dodge
I did
I'm in Europe and I can't say this is the case at all. I've never heard anyone express such an idea.
Realistically, what can these types of commitments look like for the AI frontier companies, moving forward?
They're releasing ever more powerful models with stronger offensive capabilities. So do they have to help bolster the defense of all existing software, just... forever?
If we advance both the offence and defense with each new release, is this sustainable?
It just really didn't want To Louse the game
Classic dark pattern /s
Oh this is brilliant, I've spent the last month doing something just like this. As a challenge, no libraries allowed besides Python standard libs (so no numpy).
Started with Word2Vec, built an RNN, then LSTM and am halfway through building transformer architecture.
Slop and fraud make the perfect pairing.
I reckon that in 50 years the very idea of code existing will be esoteric knowledge, a bit like binary. We simply won't care to think at that level of abstraction anymore.
Honestly, I'm biased but I think it's the best one.
Germany has fallen.
From the title I'd assumed this was a mixed metaphor between boiling the frog and facing impending doom.
Maybe I need to stop AI doomscrolling for a bit.
I think you've answered your own point convincingly! Glad you enjoyed it.
Didn't something like this already happen in the 1970/80s with pushback against synthesisers and electronic sounds?
I'd agree on the voice transcription; it seems so much more accurate than the other frontier models I've used. I often speak to Grok and paste the transcribed output to Claude!
These days I have to check the upload date to see if I'm being duped. At 8 years ago this one passes!
We even weigh different kinds of drugs differently. So I'm told.
Every groundbreaking new AI release feels like a volley of cannonfire towards the soul. Oof.
"You've hit the message limit, upgrade to Plus for more".
Ok. I upgrade.
"You've hit the message limit, upgrade to Plus for more".
Hmm. They've charged me. There's no meaningful support. I just got scammed, didn't I...
A few years ago I had a date with a backend engineer at Meta.
I asked if they'd ever considered the societal implications of the work they did. They said "Oh wow I've never even thought about it". Probably a solid hire from Meta's perspective.
I'd argue (simplistically) that AI is largely introspection.