Rate/Review my startup - mixturtle

http://www.mixturtle.com

by louislouis • 18 years ago

49 88 18 years ago

Hey guys, I've just launched my new site (mixturtle.com). It's a music search engine and player. It uses Ajax for the interface so you can search and play music simulataneously. Playlists are created automatically and you can access it by right click mouse. (thank you jQuery!) Any comments appreciated.

Thanks Louis

breck2• 18 years ago

Great design and UI. The logo is awesome. The auto complete works very well(except just for artists, eh, not for song titles?).

It's a lot like Songza, except I like yours better. The white background is much superior to red, also your fonts are easier to read.

It also works very fast and have had good luck with finding good songs.

I like the ability to create playlists.

Occasionally the search would slow down on me.

Great job.

EDIT: Oh wow, just figured out you can save playlists. Very cool.

breck2• 18 years ago

Suggestion: Create a favicon.ico

tptacek2• 18 years ago

That turtle scares me. Otherwise, awesome.

mpc2• 18 years ago

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMNry4PE93Y

tptacek2• 18 years ago

http://www.gaianation.net/org/animalia.html

lakeeffect• 18 years ago

Need a visual for pausing and playing. Looks and works well.

danielha• 18 years ago

Damn that turtle is bad ass.

ivankirigin• 18 years ago

Seriously. Tipsy might have to run and hide to get a redesign again. http://tipjoy.com/static/images/logo2.png

izaidi2• 18 years ago

At least Tipsy seems trustworthy. I'd give him my money voluntarily; Angry Mohawk Turtle would take it from me at gunpoint, then kill me anyway.

paulgb• 18 years ago

Looks good. I'm confused about how playlists work though - I can add songs to it, but how do I play it or view it? A killer feature that songza is missing is the ability to create and share a playlist without logging in.

edit: Another problem: since you are getting the music from remote sources, they can stick in HTTP authentication headers. I got hit with a few of those. Not sure if there is a practical technical solution to this though.

The auto source-finding works way better than songza's trial-and-error approach.

louislouis5• 18 years ago

The playlist can be viewed with right-click mouse button. Just added that to the site text :)

boucher4• 18 years ago

Even if you read about and then discover this feature, its still pretty inconvenient. I'd suggest making the playlist always visible somewhere on the site, and if you want you could add a hotkey to jump to it.

lacker2• 18 years ago

Would be nice if this worked on macs with no right click.

hugh3• 18 years ago

I'm confused as to what I'm doing. I search for music, I add songs to my playlist, and then... what?

ambition2• 18 years ago

It plays music for me.

hugh3• 18 years ago

Oh, I see, I've got it to work now. I was just clicking "add to playlist" and nothing was happening, but if you click on the name of the song it starts playing.

In which case, very impressive. I'm particularly impressed that it even finds mashups, and the interface (apart from the difficulty I had with getting it to play) is very nice.

I hope you've thought through the legal issues. It could really use a FAQ with answers to questions like "So where the hell is all this music coming from?"

louislouis5• 18 years ago

I'm guessing you have javascript turned off? Otherwise the songs should just play instantly.

Hexstream4• 18 years ago

Why, oh why does such a site require Javascript?!

edit: I'm not against requiring Javascript for those parts of your website that absolutely, positively require it, but everything that can work without JS should gracefully degrade.

webwright• 18 years ago

Didn't automatically play for me-- I was able to add songs, but had to right click to show my playlist and left click to get started. FF3/Win.

whatusername• 18 years ago

search works well. Found 3 tracks for Sounds Like Chicken - my reference Obscure band.

but major FAIL in usage terms.. * I start saving out a playlist - then realise there's nowhere to play it. * Normally I'd leave, but I figured I'd sign up. * Signup worked fine - and then I clicked on My Playlists * And I'd lost my playlist!

Love the design though.

stanley• 18 years ago

I like the idea.

When you click [+] it would make sense for it to change to a [-] in case I want to remove it (right-clicking is not obvious). The ability to pause a song and change the volume would also be nice.

You should add some kind of visual tutorial (but keep it simple) at the top of the page so new visitors know what to do.

greendestiny• 18 years ago

Needs a volume slider. Hate the turtle but thats just me.

yago• 18 years ago

looks awesome. two questions: 1) which technologies was used? 2) how do you handle high loads?

louislouis5• 18 years ago

1) php,mysql,js,flash 2) Not very well. My server is dying. I'm about to upgrade but I'll have to take the site down for the nameservers to propogate to the new ips. Anyone know how long this takes?

I considered using amazon for scaling but the article below this one says amazon is down, hehe.

izaidi2• 18 years ago

I'm not an expert on this stuff but if you're just changing the IPs and not the actual NS records for the domain, the changes will be pretty much instantaneous, depending on how quickly your DNS service registers updates. I use DNS Made Easy and they usually take about ten or twenty minutes to accept a changed IP; once it goes into their records it's reflected everywhere immediately.

froo• 18 years ago

re: nameservers, it depends, most newer systems have it updating within about 4 hours, that being said, some ISP's DNS cached can be borked, so it can take up to 24-48 hours.

You should really leave up your old site in parallel with the new one while you're moving it, I'd say go for a period of 7 days just to be on the safe side.

Hope this helps your needs.

tss• 18 years ago

Great visual design. Throw together a "getting started" or a "features" page with screen shots of the functionality that the website offers.

In my opinion this is something that Wordpress does especially well: http://wordpress.com/features/

demandred• 18 years ago

are you using the songza api? i tried a few searches, and its clear, while your search is good, theirs is much better.

great execution, but where's the differentiation with Songza, Seeqpod, Streamzy, et. al?

nickb• 18 years ago

And don't forget this app: http://listen.grooveshark.com/ It was posted here by someone (author I guess) and I ended up using it for some time because it has playlists. I now check it when I'm looking for something specific. But most of the time, I just use last.fm or Pandora.

Most of these apps just do a search on Youtube and play the audio portion of videos. Only prob is that audio quality is not so great but on my laptop speakers I can't even tell the difference so all is good.

I like MixTurtle. It's a nice app! Good job louislouis! Add a queue/playlist and I'll use it as a default music search app.

omouse• 18 years ago

The suggestions that pop up when you're typing in a name is very helpful. That's one they differentiate. It isn't Flash-based either?

misuba• 18 years ago

The differentiation from songza is in the brand - which, in a market like music, may in fact matter a good deal.

(also the differentiation is that songza's more usable. but yeah.)

plaggypig2• 18 years ago

It's pretty good - one of the better music index services I've used. Others here have commented on a few small issues but overall it seems well executed.

However, is this really a viable business? I assume you intend it to be, based upon your description of it being a startup, but please correct me if I'm mistaken. Otherwise, I'm afraid I'm going to have to piss on your parade a little bit.

I have considered developing something similar to this in the past, but I've always stopped myself - simply because if it becomes any sort of success and is seen to be either (i) taking in revenues or (ii) encouraging others to develop similar services then the RIAA will give the slightest of gestures.. a wince of the lip perhaps.. to direct a battalion of lawyers to march upon your place of business and annihilate it with a bombardment of 4,000lb bombs stuffed with subpoenas and the internal organs from children and puppies.

Although many (including myself) argue that what you're doing is probably legal, it is not really open and shut - the RIAA would argue that you're encouraging and cooperating in the acts of copyright infringement. It's going to cost you a fortune to defend yourself.. and even if you manage to generate enough revenue to successfully defend yourself once, they will keep coming after you time and time again, from many different angles.

If the CoS can sue the IRS into submitting to its demands for tax exemption then the RIAA can shut down your little operation. The law can be cruel if you can't afford it.

If anybody else (with legal training) can enlighten me then I'd love to have my doubts assuaged.

lacker2• 18 years ago

You could have made the same case to the founders of Youtube. If everyone listens to arguments like that, then the RIAA has already won.

cstejerean• 18 years ago

Luckily for the founders of YouTube they were bought by Google. And given the current fight with Viacom I don't know if I would ever want to be in a similar situation.

BenS• 18 years ago

I hear the example of youtube thrown out a lot, but I don't think it's a good comparison. YouTube had an incredibly useful function beyond sharing copyrighted material. It was also miles ahead of competing services (e.g. google video) in usability.

johnyzee• 18 years ago

Hopefully these initiatives will be the 'death by a 1000 cuts' of the RIAA.

plaggypig2• 18 years ago

I think you're absolutely right, and eventually the RIAA will have to adapt to accommodate services like these. It's an inevitability.

I'd like to see a single global licensing body with a harmonised and simplified model covering every component; record labels, publishers, performers, writers, download rights, artwork, etc. There could be ways for them to support small broadcasters - by providing access to a large catalogue of digital music, waiving fees in exchange for delivering ads, etc. From this we'd see some really innovative services bubbling up to the top.

However, I still stand behind what I said - if you want to turn a service like mixturtle into a viable business then you have to play their game, which is very difficult. I know it makes me unpopular, but it's just a reality we have to live with (for now).

I had discussions with PPL and MCPS-PRS here in the UK a long time ago - their model is pretty complex - and if I wanted to have users in other countries then I'd need to get licensed with their representative bodies too. Not to mention the issue of download rights and artwork - all that has to be negotiated directly with the copyright holders. I'd wanted to build an ad-based model, but in the end I couldn't see any alternative to subscriptions, so I gave up - I couldn't afford the £10,000 advance fee.

lux3• 18 years ago

Search is a bit slow ATM, but selection seems good already. I didn't think I had to click 'Save Playlist' after clicking the pluses, maybe it would be better to auto-save the first one or create a default 'Untitled' and ask you to name it.

That was also totally not self-explanatory to a non-registered user, but it did keep the playlist selection after signing up which is good.

For the results, it would be cool to see the album and year, or if it's live a 'Live @ Foo Stadium' in the album spot and the year still shown.

Also wasn't 100% clear on how to play the track, and the 'Try next source' should look like a link, not like any other text.

Otherwise, pretty cool. Got it playin' in the background as I type :)

lux3• 18 years ago

One more thing (minor bug report): I selected a song in a 2nd search but it added one from my first search instead when I saved the playlist (I clicked songs from 2 searches for my first playlist).

louislouis5• 18 years ago

Thanks for the comments and suggestions. I'll have to look into those bugs you found. I do admit though it's far from perfect atm and there were lots more features I wanted add before launching, but hacker news has taught me to just throw it out there and get a response, so my server is taking a pounding for it I type.

lux3• 18 years ago

While I'm at it, a few feature suggestions:

* Export playlist in standard format for external players.

* Need a way to share playlists with friends (sharethis.com or addthis.com?).

* Post playlist onto other sites (Facebook app for example).

* A way for artists to add themselves to the search.

* Continue playing current song in iframe while I'm searching for others (see thesixtyone.com for example).

Good luck!

ambition2• 18 years ago

Why hide the search request with Javascript? Since the URL is always http://mixturtle.com/, I can't easily send a link to a search to a friend.

It's great instant gratification to play songs on the search results page, but I can't then access the source. You don't give anything back to the music sources, so if you they find about you (like when you get big), they'll fight you.

Is this legal? Great application, but I can't help but feel that the RIAA will crush you if they find you.

volida• 18 years ago

I tried it from explorer first it didn't work (search for avril lavigne), and it just showed the picture for loading. the same with firefox and then returned can't open file

am I doing something wrong?

mpc2• 18 years ago

This is great but with the RIAA suing 12 year olds and all, I'm pretty sure they'll shut you down for allowing me to listen to the beatles and metallica for free.

Awesome app though. It looks like a great starting point.

thorax• 18 years ago

I like it-- just a few more bugs to work out. I did a search (for my wife) of "Tori Amos honey" and it took a solid minute to return anything.

Created an account and the playlist I saved there. Cool stuff.

Heh, nice touch with it saying "Welcome" in the search box when I login.

I would be a bit sad using your site a lot because I use right-click frequently to go back/open-in-new-tab, etc. But your service is cool enough that I'd live with it, surely.

Be careful with the music industry-- you may want to make it clearer where the source is coming from somehow so you don't land yourself in hot water.

The few songs I tried don't work on the iPhone, but I wouldn't have expected them to. If you made an iPhone app like this, I'd definitely buy it, but I imagine a lot are youtube/flash/etc.

t0pj• 18 years ago

Instant access to Barry Manilow; Mix Turtle Rox!

...i write the songs...i write the songs.

Hexstream4• 18 years ago

The Login and Signup... "links" don't even feel like they're clickable because they're not underlined, the cursor changes to text editing instead of a hand, and there's no hover effect at all. Same for the X's to close the login and register popups.

boucher4• 18 years ago

You should autofocus your search bar onload.

boucher4• 18 years ago

Several times the song has started, but then whatever method is used to determine if its working caused it to stop and keep looking for another source.

boucher4• 18 years ago

having three different X's in the playlist view gets pretty confusing. perhaps use "clear" for the clear playlist feature and a trash can for the remove item feature.

nickmolnar• 18 years ago

It would be pretty cool to export finished playlists to Muxtape. I mean, you can create your own playlist sharing system, but might as well play along with the marginally bigger dogs.

geuis• 18 years ago

need audio controls. Pause, play, stop, next, back, etc. Ability to build a playlist and then just have it loop through your playlist, or shuffle through it.

hibri• 18 years ago

dude you're smoking crack if you think you can run a biz by export your itunes library, parse the meta data, and stick it online with a google-like search interface. I say this while I'm listening to some Ozzy from your site (works great, but taking over right-mouse button is rude). This is cool as your personal web front-end to your library, but if it gets any traction (free music tends to get traction) you're in for a smack-down. Good luck , rock on :)

senthil_rajasek• 18 years ago

this is sick... mainly because I was able to find what I wanted right there...

wondering how long before someone else copies this idea and takes it mainstream... also the elephant in the room, DRM.

bhb• 18 years ago

While I like the sparse design (and badass logo), a huge problem is that I get to site and within the first ten seconds I don't know what it does (or even why I should care). I decide to figure out more by typing an artist and click 'music search' but now it's taking forever. If I was a random visitor, I'd be gone by now.

While I expect the load time after typing will be better as you work on scaling (and work out the bugs), I still think you'd be a lot better off with a little text explaining why I should even type something in and hit 'music search'. Will I get to play music? Will I get to download music? Will I find the cheapest prices for buying music? Who knows. Just my 2 cents.

eznet• 18 years ago

Good job - I like. Functionally streamlined, clean design and creative branding hook - I'll be checking back in the future.

justInTime• 18 years ago

Amazing!! 5 stars!! Will definitely buy again :-)

jacobbijani• 18 years ago

I'll be honest, my first reaction was to talk shit but it is actually pretty solid. The only thing I was a little confused of was how to start the playlist. I right clicked and then played it inside the playlist, but is it possible to play it in the main view? Maybe you could just have a big play button in the corner of the page.

brandonkm• 18 years ago

by far, the most badass turtle i've seen.

wenbert• 18 years ago

this is awesome! ^_^

curiousgeorge• 18 years ago

I really, really like the simplicity of the interface. The slow-typing/auto-complete was irritating until I realized why it was taking so long, and then I liked it for finding new music.

This is much better than Baidu's MP3 search. You should run this in China and make some serious cash.

axod• 18 years ago

Slow enough to be useless here. A search took a few minutes :/

arthurk• 18 years ago

First off, I probably wouldn't have tried the service without such a badass turtle on the frontpage. Good artwork.

1. There's no indication of what the service does — "The Music Search Engine" is written too small and in a horrible font.

2. After entering my favourite artist and waiting nearly 1 minute there's still nothing happening. MAKE IT FASTER.

3. The font in the footer also looks horrible (Mac user).

4. I _hate_ it when someone changes the default right-click menu.

agentbleu• 18 years ago

louislouis great start.

I'm some competition...lol

http://www.myplaylist.biz/

I would recommend Linode for hosting/scaling. you need controls, SEO advice, legal statement - have a read of this: http://thenextweb.org/2008/01/30/the-music-wars-continue-war...

Good luck with the app, it looks great.

mediageek• 18 years ago

The site is pretty slick. Though, I have to admit that there are many sites that do pretty much what you have done. Nevertheless, I guess it’s a huge market and there is room for many players. Question to agentbleu( I have used myplaylist.biz, interesting!) • How do u monetize such service- Google ads? • How do handle the legal issues with music companies. This scares the shit out of me. I was reading about Michael legal issues with music comp and how they were targeting his car, house and everything. • Though u don’t store any music files, why would legal folks come after you

sallywu• 18 years ago

A bit slow, but steadily I find I can find what songs I want and build up those playlists. Feels good - http://webpoet.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/mean-green/

mstefff• 18 years ago

still searching after 2 minutes...

dandelany• 18 years ago

I'm not sure what possessed you to design a music player UI without a Play/Pause button! Other than that, looks great.

run4yourlives• 18 years ago

Where are you grabbing the tunes from? Isn't RIAA going to go ballistic and shut off your supply?

randome• 18 years ago

great design, so far it is still searching and its been like 3 minutes ... so I don't know what to say

j2d2• 18 years ago

Sometimes I get annoyed when my cat is particularly vocal and won't respond to, the usually effective, shhhhhh. I can only imagine the frustration the people at the RIAA feel with so many smart people trying to figure out how to take them out of the picture. Including many musicians!

noonespecial• 18 years ago

A good implementation of an idea I've seen before.

The really impressive part of this is "mixturtle". I remember it and its easy to type. You've got time to improve the interface. The name is very clever: WIN on branding.

pchristensen• 18 years ago

Please change the blog so I can subscribe to it. I'd love to see how this develops over time. Plus, if I'm ever feeling timid, I can just go check out that turtle :)

jonnytran• 18 years ago

If you're going to do something that is as jolting to the user as hijacking the right-click menu, you'd better get it right. As in, get it _perfect_.

When I right-click near the right edge of the browser window, the playlist pops up off-screen and hidden, creating scrollbars. Novices won't get this at all, esp. since it's not the interface people are used to.

mds• 18 years ago

Needs controls to play/stop/pause, and a volume slider please!

I also hate having my right-click menu hijacked. Please re-think that...

rmason• 18 years ago

I liked it. For my search it brought back some very obscure artists so I am not sure where you're getting your data. But I discovered some music I liked by some new artists so that was great. Memorable URL.

gscott• 18 years ago

Now on cNet WebWare http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-9995938-2.html

dkordik• 18 years ago

I just lost my music hard drive to the click of death, so this is really hitting the spot right now.

Two things that would have made my first 5 minutes better: 1. Giant play button 2. Giant playlist link, or playlist always visible in a column, or something.

Have you considered hooking into a service to pull more thorough album information so stuff could be organized a bit better than just a list of songs?

I'm really enjoying this. Thanks.

jayjay69• 18 years ago

don't understand what the fuss is about, there are plenty of website like that around, in particular i use www.melodyshot.com, its the same concept, only difference is you can download and there a way way more results.

Rate/Review my startup - mixturtle

Related Stories