CoastalCoder

Not sure, but I would 100% buy a copy of your family cookbook.

Just imagine the titles you could use.

The "stupid" question is generating a lot of interesting conversation.

Yeah, I really like Slashdot's approach to both regular and meta moderation.

I don't understand why it never caught on elsewhere.

Honest question:

If you have no evidence, then why do you believe it?

It does now, apparently.

One of the comments provides an archive link to the story.

I was kind of able to read that on my Android phone, but something on the page made panning really janky so I gave up.

Most of us who build weapons of war live with some awful dilemmas. One of them is:

We want to perform our work skillfully, effectively, and professionally. But we never want our tools to actually be needed.

(Another is that we can't effectively create a shield without the risk of it being used as a sword.)

If you think Milspec is expensive, you should see the cost of not having a Milspec supply chain while still being risk-averse.

I don't do web stuff, but I wonder if one could easily create a browser extension that hides AI-centric submissions?

Thanks, I wasn't aware of that.

I have the urge to grab a pitchfork, but I know better than to make assumptions about why that functionality was added. Time to do some homework I guess.

Some of the comments here talk about the risk this poses for multi tenant vm providers.

Wouldn't this also be a risk for people using VMs to sandbox untrusted code running on trusted hosts?

I'm just starting to read up on capabilities-based security in Linux.

Would they potentially be a solution to sudo's all-or-nothing granularity in this domain?

Chuck Norris will pass his torch to Jim Keller.

Jim won't have a say in the matter.

I really dislike the complexity of modern C++ language specs, but does it obscure much detail about FP ops?

TL;DR:

A vast majority of the programmers I've worked with don't understand the nuances of FP in general, nor the various extents of IEEE-754 support in different programming languages.

So for important numerical programming, I think clarity regarding the FP operations being performed can be crucial. I'm just unclear if modern C++ is a significant factor for that.

I feel like I'm ignorant of some classical fable here.

Is this an allusion?

Any reason he couldn't try advancing it somewhere like China or India, which (I assume) are less vulnerable to that kind of interference?

Sounds like we have the basics of an oscillating system now!

I wonder what it's resonant frequency is.

The closest I can think of is the bronze age collapse.

No idea about your question, but I'd love to hear more about this part.

Ask your local unemployment benefits office if Nope™ is right for you!

That's an interesting point and worth discussing.

I'm not sure why you got down voted. Maybe people are perceiving some subtext that I'm not.

Shouldn't it be the exact opposite here ? The burden of proof is the other way around

That's the rule for criminal court in the US, but each of us is free to pick his own standard for his own purposes.

It sounds like one potential interpretation of his behavior is that he values his own time more than your time.

I wonder if that's occurred to him.

You're just parroting the GP.

There is nothing to secure, because there is no SQL query.

Yet.

Does that meaningfully restrict which foods / ingredients you can get?

My kids heard it in Narragansett.

Why even reduce an easy to exploit attack surface when there could be holes elsewhere?! Because, you know, it makes things much more secure even if imperfect.

I'm still trying to calibrate my take on this view.

If attacks are randomly chosen from the set of all potential vulnerabilities, without the attacker knowing which ones had been patched, then that logic clearly makes sense.

But in an adversarial situation where the attacker can guess which vulnerabilities you still have unpatched, or can try many different attack vectors, then having already patched some other vulnerabilities doesn't matter so much.

I guess reality is more complicated though.

I share your worries.

Unfortunately, this may be akin to the situation of "The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."

I am curious of that allows the new President, while in office, to assassinate the previous one and insta-pardon himself.

It's amazing how much of America's political stability might rest not on the law, but rather on the self-restraint of each cohort's leadership.

Algernon for Flowers.