Apple iPad Gets Split-Screen Multitasking in iOS 9

http://techcrunch.com/2015/06/08/apple-ipad-gets-split-screen-multitasking-in-ios-9

by zhuxuefeng1994 • 11 years ago

193 199 11 years ago

Yhippa• 11 years ago

This is a feature I love on my Windows 8 tablets. Glad to see iOS will be getting this.

Maarten88• 11 years ago

Now of they would also copy the virtual keyboard from Windows. I hate the iPad keyboard, it's really sluggish and it has no arrow keys.

bhauer• 11 years ago

It's astonishing how many virtual keyboards omit the arrow keys. I was delighted to see them on the Windows 8 virtual keyboard.

sahaskatta• 11 years ago

I've loved the snapping apps to sides of a screen on my Surface for the past few years, however does anyone know whether the full-screen snapping is still around in Windows 10? It seems like Microsoft may have removed it in favor of a simply snapping apps within the desktop.

asyncwords• 11 years ago

It looks like full-screen snapping is used when the machine is in "Tablet mode", which you can turn on and off in the Windows 10 action center.

Someone12345• 11 years ago

Windows 10 has two "modes." Tablet mode, which is very similar to 8.1, and desktop mode which is a mash up between 8.1 bits and Windows 7 bits (e.g. apps in windows, no full screen Start Screen, etc).

So in answer to your question: If you're in tablet mode then it will still offer that in Windows 10.

RexRollman• 11 years ago

I've been considering replacing my three year old iPad with a Surface 3. I like the idea of a tablet that can run Foobar2000, Mame, and Putty, and Vim. (The only thing I am concerned with is the tablet's ability to run Mame with that Atom processor.)

Someone12345• 11 years ago

It is nice to see Apple has finally started taking notice of the competition (larger phones, multi-tasking, alternative keyboards/swipe, etc). It seems like Apple stalled in terms of progression there for a few years, maybe after Jobs everyone was too scared to make any significant changes to the golden goose.

I will say I haven't seen too much "innovation" from Apple in recent years. Progression, yes, but innovation no. Apple used to lead the field, and now they're just another "me too" device seller. The Apple Watch in particular is highly disappointing compared to what existed before it (e.g. Moto 360), but for what they lack in innovation they have more than made up for with advertising dollars and celebrity endorsements.

amyjess4• 11 years ago

It really feels like, with both iOS 8 and iOS 9, that Apple is scrambling to play catch-up and focusing more on copying Android's killer features than on differentiating themselves.

In the past, however, they've focused on differentiating themselves while also poo-poohing any features their competition has but they don't, saying you don't need that feature anyway.

I'm glad Apple's gotten away from the sour grapes mentality, but I hope this puts an end to the false claim that Android owes its success to copying Apple's innovations.

JadeNB2• 11 years ago

It really feels like, with both iOS 8 and iOS 9, that Apple is scrambling to play catch-up and focusing more on copying Android's killer features than on differentiating themselves.

Isn't this a good thing? If Android has a good feature, I am happy if it comes to iOS, just as I am happy when good iOS features (e.g., ask for permission on first use, rather than on install) come to Android. I would be significantly less satisfied with an NIH mentality on either system.

Eric_WVGG• 11 years ago

Scrambling? I thought they were taking their sweet old time.

The company line is that they don't release features like this (or iOS notifications, or intra-app services, or even copy/paste) until the technology is mature and they feel ready. Thus far each of these features has worked perfectly at launch. I see no reason to doubt their explanation.

gress2• 11 years ago

This comment gets made every new release and is just as false as ever.

Apple always takes it's time to do things because it does them in a way that people can actually use, rather than rushing to be 'first'.

Android does rush features out, often getting them into a few devices ahead of Apple, but because of the failure of distribution of updates for Android, Apple actually gets to deliver features to consumers well ahead of Android.

Also, Android does often end up having to copy the iOS way of doing things when it proves to have been well thought out - e.g. The new permissions model.

seanp2k2• 11 years ago

IMO they've been doing this since the iPhone launched; their MO seems to be ~take what people hack into the software through Jailbreaks + what the competition is doing + apps we like, refine / distill that, and make it part of iOS.

And I would say that for most people, this strategy has been very successful, even though e.g. jailbreakers might get a more advanced version of something that eventually gets integrated many months in advance. It's basically free R&D and proving out concepts for Apple.

I wonder sometimes if they actually know about other channels for jailbreaks, but don't close them all at once due to the value this provides. Of course, they could never admit to this / have a paper trail for it, software is hard / complex, and jailbreakers are amazingly talented, so maybe I'm crazy, but that's what I would do in their position.

untog7• 11 years ago

I will say I haven't seen too much "innovation" from Apple in recent years. Progression, yes, but innovation no.

Agreed. The iPhone was groundbreaking. The iPad somewhat. Since then they've done some great work on their laptop line, but that's about it. They were even late to the game with smartwatches.

Of course, the problem with complaining about things like this is that I have no idea what I actually want Apple to do, except surprise me.

ceejayoz2• 11 years ago

Agreed. The iPhone was groundbreaking. The iPad somewhat. Since then they've done some great work on their laptop line, but that's about it. They were even late to the game with smartwatches.

They were late to the game with smartphones (Palm, BlackBerry), tablets (Gates was pushing them in the 1990s), and MP3 players ('No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.'), too. Seems to be their MO.

Someone12345• 11 years ago

I'd say that things like the integrated fingerprint reader (2012) on the home button was pretty innovative/bleeding edge. It was a bit of a gimmick, but ultimately they pushed the boundaries of what anyone else had done. Ditto with Siri (2011), while Windows Vista had basic speech recognition in 2006, Siri was able to merge the latest speech recognition with the user's data, to give the user compelling results.

So I don't think Apple needs another iPad/iPhone to be called innovative, it can be new software features, or little hardware features. I just genuinely cannot remember the last time I've legitimately been jealous of an Apple exclusive feature. Maybe Lightning's reversible-ness in 2012? What since then? That was three years ago.

skrowl• 11 years ago

Sadly, watching a post Steve Jobs WWDC is basically just watching Google I/O from 2-3 years prior.

For example the Samsung Galaxy Note 2 launched with splitscreen multi-tasking in October 2012. All of the Sammy stuff since then has had it.

digi_owl11• 11 years ago

The iPhone was not much of a smartphone at launch. Only with jailbreaking did we get the whole app thing going. At launch Jobs was all hot and bothered about "web apps" that was nothing more than fancy bookmarks.

Damn it, the phone was basically impossible to use outside of the Californian weather.

DannoHung• 11 years ago

Seriously? Tell me any given example of an Apple product and I will show you something that came before it that had the same set of functional capabilities.

Apple has never led in terms of raw innovation, but what they do is take cool shit and make it work together really solidly.

digi_owl11• 11 years ago

It stalled because until recently Apple was making products for one guy, Jobs himself. The default iPod equalizer was supposedly set to the idiosyncrasies of Jobs ears.

tammer• 11 years ago

The biggest innovation miss Apple's had recently (and it's pretty enormous) is the fact that the watch is marketed with an analog face.

Sure it does 10,000 things. But the image of the watch face, that ubiquitous emblem of trudging monotony, is what people see first and what gives them an impression of the device.

Instead of a new concept for navigating your day you've got $350 worth of pixels doing mostly the same thing as your $40 swatch. Apple had the perfect opportunity to reinvent timekeeping and they missed it. Luckily for them it's a software problem only - perhaps they'll figure it out.

comex• 11 years ago

First of all, a lot of people really love the image of an analog watch - some of them pay a hell of a lot more than $40 to get mechanical watches that work worse than the $40 swatch. Nothing wrong with Apple embracing that aesthetic.

And it's not marketed only with an analog face. For example, on my phone, the first image I get when I go to http://www.apple.com/watch/ uses the Solar face, which shows the position of the sun as a point on a graph along with a printed time. Personally, since I have depression with some link to whether the sun is out, I find that quite a useful way to think about time, although of course mine is a relatively uncommon scenario.

bane3• 11 years ago

This topic came up today at my workplace while we were discussing WWDC. If you really look back at Apple's products, they really tend to be "fast followers".

In general, Apple likes to sit back, wait for somebody else to innovate and open up various market opportunities, pick one and then execute the hell out of it and push the envelope where other companies have execution weaknesses (and exploit those weaknesses). This has a side effect of "settling" a diverse market around pretty much whatever Apple has chosen.

It's beautiful strategy for the most part and it's too easy to look at an Apple announcement and say "welcome to 2-5 years ago Apple, thanks for finally catching up" without thinking about the context of their actions.

johnatwork• 11 years ago

I don't want them to be first, I want them to be the best.

zyxley• 11 years ago

Note that as of the moment, this will only be available on the iPad Air 2.

zippergz• 11 years ago

Probably because of memory limitations; I would be surprised to see it ever come to older devices because they were already pretty memory-constrained.

markque2• 11 years ago

The only reason to do this is increase the sales of the latest iPad, there is no technical reason. Again apple treats it's customers like shit

frik2• 11 years ago

Afaik, all iOS devices except the Air2 have 1GB RAM (or less - e.g. iPad2 and iPadMini1 have 512MB). So only Air2 can run two full apps side by side, makes sense.

JohnTHaller2• 11 years ago

Only the iPad Air 2 has 2GB of RAM. Every other iOS device only has 1GB, which is a severe restriction to true multi-tasking. iPhones only have 1GB of RAM as well, so they couldn't do it even if they wanted to. It's a bit surprising as it limits future functionality. Comparably priced Android phones have 2GB to 4GB of RAM currently and comparably priced Android tablets have had 2GB of RAM for a couple years. Granted, Android OS seems a bit more hungry for tasty RAMs than iOS does.

digi_owl11• 11 years ago

Android is more ram hungry because it has a different policy on process lifecycle management.

If you hit home on iOS the app you are currently using is expected to pack up and be ready to get evicted from RAM.

If you do the same on Android the app will stay in RAM until there is a capacity crunch. Then the GC will go round waking up the oldest processes and ask them to free up pages. And if that is still not enough, start shutting them down.

This sadly result in slowdowns as the GC churns.

devindotcom2• 11 years ago

One of the few features from Windows 8 I was hoping Apple and others would adopt. 8 really did have some interesting innovations in the 'productive tablet' world, it was just... well, we all know what it was.

Think they'll bring in a "charms" thing for quick actions, maybe from the left side?

fpgaminer2• 11 years ago

I remember watching a video awhile back that noted how Steve Jobs, being keen on eastern religions, brought Zen principals into his surrounding environment. In that particular case, they showed how his home was very spartan, eliciting an expression of focus and elimination of distractions from the task at hand. The point they were making was that this showed through his products. On the iPad, you can only do one thing at a time. You have to focus on that one thing, and are not able to be bothered by distractions such as other windows/programs.

Of course, having multiple apps open on the earlier iPads would have been quite challenging anyway, so this was either a happy coincidence or an excuse/interpretation made after the fact. But the idea was cool none the less. It made me think about how distracting and unfocused work on a normal desktop can feel like compared to an iPad. The downside, of course, is that while this inability to have multiple things open side-by-side is fine for casual usage and entertainment, it makes a lot of tasks related to creation and work quite difficult.

So it will be a relief to finally have this feature on iOS. It certainly was a pain point. But that concept of focusing on a single task without distractions is still something worth remembering.

Untit1ed• 11 years ago

It's an interesting contrast to OSX, which most people I know use by keeping a stack of odd-sized windows on screen such that at least a bit of each is always visible.

devindotcom2• 11 years ago

That's my way too. A single click is always simpler than navigating a task switching interface, so I just have "big window" on left, "mid size window" peeking out at its right edge, and then "little window" - usually textedit - poking through in back. It's like a little sideways pyramid. I can also alt-tab through them super easy. Never found much use for Expose or Mission Control, i consider having to use them an organizational fail state for my process.

JoshTriplett4• 11 years ago

That concept seems ingrained in OSX application window management as well. For instance, OSX's equivalent of "maximize" works more like "size window to content", and as a result I see many people on OS X with an active window they're paying attention to that takes up only half the width of the screen, with other windows or the desktop showing through on the sides.

I can't function that way. I'm currently typing this on a 2560x1440 monitor, in a maximized Firefox window. Occasionally I put two windows half-maximized side by side, but only if I'm actively looking at both simultaneously (for instance, presentation slides and notes I'm taking, or a document in LaTeX and the rendered PDF). Otherwise, I maximize everything, even if it "wastes" space or makes the window wider than the "natural" size of the content, just to avoid distractions

drivenow• 11 years ago

But isn't it still about doing one task but using multiple apps? I guess there will always be people who, when given a gun(or any powerful tool), will always shoot themselves in the foot.

joshdance• 11 years ago

I like using one app at a time, until I have to copy data between 2 apps. Then multitask becomes awesome.

goatforce5• 11 years ago

But that concept of focusing on a single task without distractions is still something worth remembering.

Apple has a habit of pooh-poohing any idea that they don't currently support right up until the moment that they do support that idea.

vezzy-fnord2• 11 years ago

Gonna have to side with this. The parent poster is effectively trying to rationalize what is a technical regression by most interpretations under a veil of woo and mysticism.

digi_owl11• 11 years ago

Yep. I recall Jobs was all "nobody reads" right until the iTunes store gained a ebooks section.

fpgaminer2• 11 years ago

Certainly, and I tend to agree with your point. Which is why I said "so this was either a happy coincidence or an excuse/interpretation made after the fact". Apple is good at their marketing; pooh-poohing ideas they don't currently support is part of their reality distortion field.

But my last point, which you're replying to, is that regardless of whether this was part of their reality distortion field or not, I still think the idea has value. After a long slog of work, I'll often fullscreen a video/movie to force myself to relax and focus. It's like going out and taking a walk. It forces you to stop juggling your clutter of thoughts and tasks, and just focus on the simplicity of a single effort (in this case, walking).

s73v3r2• 11 years ago

They also don't like putting resources towards a feature unless they feel they're able to implement it in the best way possible. They're not interested in throwing features in just to say they have them.

chongli2• 11 years ago

You have to focus on that one thing, and are not able to be bothered by distractions such as other windows/programs.

The issue with this philosophy is that the one thing you need to do might not exist as a monolithic application. This is where the unix philosophy shines: lots of small, simple tools interacting over streams of text.

alexk72• 11 years ago

And that's why they added fullscreen mode to OS X. Both ways of working excel for different situations. It's great that they are now making the enhancements in sync on OS X and iOS.

derefr• 11 years ago

Indeed. It seems like the new features are all about focusing on single workflows that involve multiple apps, rather than being anything about "multi-tasking" (trying to get multiple orthogonal things done concurrently.)

* Split Screen is obviously for things like taking Notes from a page in Safari. One input app, one output app. No more switching. (Interestingly, together with its enhancements, this makes Notes.app a real competitor to Evernote.)

* Side Frame is obviously for "watching" one app for (slow, asynchronous) updates you care about, while doing your regular stuff in the main pane. Like keeping an eye on a Slack conversation that you're not actively a part of, while working. Side Pane could also be for building "accessory" apps that give you extra controls for another app. I could imagine running your Unity game in the main pane with a Unity editor/debugger/inspector in the side pane, for instance. Instead of every Unity game having to ship those controls in a hidden way, they just run a socket server that the other app attaches to.

* Picture in Picture is just a combination of the above, specifically for video content. Listening to a presentation while taking notes on it or doing other things, looking down at it whenever it seems something interesting happened in your peripheral vision. Would be great for iTunes U, where a lecture can be in PiP and the course's iBook can be in the main view.

I will note that Side Frame greatly resembles a similar Windows 8 feature, which didn't turn out well, though. If Apple wants their version to live up to their expectations, they'll perhaps have to limit apps from having Side Frame view-controllers unless it actually makes sense to be using that app as part of a workflow. Otherwise, we'll get the W8 "Email inbox in the Side Frame" design that is just constantly distracting people, instead of encouraging them to set up filters and proper notifications.

mplewis• 11 years ago

I don't think I buy that line of thought.

If you want to focus on a single task without distractions, don't open Multitask.

founderling2• 11 years ago

One reason that I do not use my iPad as a productivity device is that I do not understand the security model. I would need a terminal app with ssh capabilies. But how do I know if the maker of the app is sending my SSH credentials to his server or something? Does apple check that? Is the process how apple prevents this documented somewhere?

At the moment, I only use software that is in the debian repos. At least I understand the security model of debian to some degree. And it is open and verifiable to everybody.

I wonder why the Linux distros are so slow to adapt to tablets.

amyjess4• 11 years ago

I wonder why the Linux distros are so slow to adapt to tablets.

Tight hardware integration. Most tablets have locked-down bootloaders that make it difficult to replace the default OS.

You've also pretty much got to start over when it comes to drivers. Linux used to have terrible driver support back in the day -- I remember carefully choosing motherboards and laptops because I wanted a Linux-compatible chipset -- those days are over on the desktop (except for a few esoteric peripherals), but it's going to hit hard on mobile. Imagine booting your tablet onto Linux but not being able to use the GPS or some other piece of connectivity.

And then, you've got to take all your established GUI code and throw it in the trash and start over. Nothing from the desktop world is going to be usable in a touch environment. The big desktop environments all have heritage going back to the late '90s. You can still see some KDE 1 and GNOME 1 layouts used in their modern KDE Applications and GNOME 3 descendants, and the stuff that was replaced was replaced one app at a time. Throwing everything out and starting over is harder than it looks.

But, still, we've got some attempts at this. Look at Ubuntu Touch, Sailfish, and Plasma Active, for example. In the past, we had Maemo 5, which was amazing, and it was everything I wanted in a touch-based Linux distro, but the only company that had pockets deep enough to fund its development turned away from the platform, and the closest thing it has to a successor (Sailfish) has been a disappointment. Also, even that required the distro developer be an established hardware manufacturer: Maemo 5 couldn't have worked if it was just an OS that could only be installed on third-party devices.

gtk40• 11 years ago

I'm running Ubuntu on my Windows tablet (Acer Iconia W700) now, typing from it in fact. Interestingly enough, I had no driver issues (everything as far as I can tell worked perfectly with a fresh Ubuntu install), but I've had more software issues with touch support. I thought Ubuntu was supposed to be better with that, and while multitouch gestures seem to work with Unity, there are very few places where they are implemented.

walterbell7• 11 years ago

The Jolla/Sailfish Linux (with Android compatibility) tablet is on the way, http://techcrunch.com/2015/03/03/jolla-tablet-hands-on/, still available via 5X-oversubscribed crowdfunding for $249, https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/jolla-tablet-world-s-firs...

mark_l_watson3• 11 years ago

I use the Prompt app that provides a SSH enabled terminal. I don't lose any sleep worrying that the app might not be secure, but maybe it should. I also like Juice on my Android. Being able to SSH from my mobile devices is a useful feature.

gress2• 11 years ago

Do you actually read all the sources of all the software you use?

zimpenfish3• 11 years ago

You'd have to read the entire stack down through the compiler, the libraries, the kernel, and eventually the (whatever is the equivalent of the BIOS these days).

To quote "Reflections on Trusting Trust",

The moral is obvious. You can't trust code that you did not totally create yourself. (Especially code from companies that employ people like me.) No amount of source-level verification or scrutiny will protect you from using untrusted code.

https://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/712.fall02/papers/p761-thomp...

vbezhenar2• 11 years ago

But how do I know if the maker of the app is sending my SSH credentials to his server or something?

You have to ask the maker to open source his app and you have to check whether he built app from the same sources (probably with some repeatable build scheme). It's not something I ever saw, so you'll have some things to research, but it's not something impossible.

Does apple check that? Is the process how apple prevents this documented somewhere?

They probably do have some kind of firewall monitoring network requests of the app when they check it. But of course they don't read sources, they don't reverse-engineer the app. So their abilities are pretty limited. You shouldn't trust that any app from the AppStore is guaranteed not to be harmful.

iOS has a sandbox model which should limit app abilities to read data from other apps. But you shouldn't trust this sandbox model too. Every iOS version was jailbroken which means that crackers can find vulnerabilities to elevate privileges.

Overall AppStore is safer than more liberal proprietary app sources. You are not likely to catch some wide-targeted malware there. But it's not a panacea.

new299• 11 years ago

There are open source ssh clients (I wrote one called hterm a while back). So you could compile it yourself. I agree that being able to check signatures would be nice though.

higherpurpose• 11 years ago

Google's, but especially Sundar Pichai's, stubborness to make Android more PC-like to the detriment of Chrome OS meant that Apple gets to do multi-windows natively before Android - which should've had it at least two or three years ago.

Sure, Android M is likely to get multi-windows as well when they announce the final version (maybe), but we've still moved from Android getting some features two or three years before iOS, to Android and iOS launching very similar features about the same time.

This is a big problem for Google because Apple can release the new OS with the new features to 50% of its users within a week and to 85% of its users within a year. It takes a certain version of Android to do that at least 3 years.

If Google can't release its major Android features years before iOS anymore, then it needs to make upgrading Android devices by itself an even bigger priority, rather than leaving it to others.

founderling2• 11 years ago

Why do Android users update slowly? I have a few Android devices and I think they pop up with a message from time to time "new os version ready to install". But I am not sure. That shows how much I care :-) But I guess it is that way and then why would anybody not update?

ryan-c• 11 years ago

Most Android users can't update. Their device gets updates for maybe 12-18 months, then nothing. They have to replace the device to update it after that.

untog7• 11 years ago

Why do Android users update slowly?

Because Telcos and/or device manufacturers hold the keys to updates - and don't bother to release them.

mikeash5• 11 years ago

Android users update slowly because Android updates depend on the OEMs, and the OEMs update slowly or not at all.

With iOS, Apple releases an update, and then everyone with an iOS device made in the past N years (where N is 4 or so at the moment) can download it more or less immediately.

With Android, Google releases an update. Then the OEMs slowly start working on updates for their various devices. If they feel like it. Often they just don't bother. Then if you're lucky your OEM finally gets their job done and you can update. And by the time that happens, you're lucky if it's only one or two point releases behind what's now the latest.

smhenderson• 11 years ago

I stopped updating my Xoom because I started to notice performance hits from updates. Hardware only lasts so long against modern software that is only or mostly tested on new hardware.

nacs• 11 years ago

Because most can't.

My Android tablet still doesn't officially have anything beyond Android version 2.3 and I had to root/jailbreak and install Cyanogen to upgrade to the 4.X releases.

frik2• 11 years ago

Device manufacturer like Samsung release dozens of smartphones per year. The reality is beside their flagship devices the support is sub par, after a single digit months you won't receive any updates. If you use a leased smartphone from TelCos, you will have to wait for OTA updates which can take additional time.

Google migrates this by almost forcing updates over the Google play store framework. And one can decide to buy the device from another Android device manufacturer, ones that are known to support the device for several years.

vbezhenar2• 11 years ago

Because Google decided that the Android version must be coupled with the Linux version. And Linux is not able to run old drivers, so vendors must update drivers for old devices to new Linux version.

So either Google should support old Linux kernels with new OS releases or Linux should provide stable kernel API (which is considered nonsense in Linux world) or some kind of compatibility layer.

ja27• 11 years ago

Why do Android users update slowly?

Because a lot of phones are locked down by carriers that are slow to issue over-the-air updates. Even non-cellular tablets need manufacturers to issue updates before most users will apply them.

Another big reason is that you don't need to be on the latest core Android version to get a lot of the newer functionality. To get the latest iOS Mail app, you need to update your whole iOS. To get the latest Android Mail app, anyone with a reasonably modern Android version can download the latest app.

arpit• 11 years ago

Most of Google's stuff seems to come across the year, not waiting for I/O with updates to core apps like Maps, Mail happening almost every Wed. For example apps like Keep, Spotlight Stories, Inbox, etc. A lot of the APIs come packaged as Play Service updates.

I/O literally feels limited to underlying platform performance improvement announcements.

notatoad• 11 years ago

Sure, Android M is likely to get multi-windows as well when they announce the final version

i remember people saying the same thing last year during the L preview.

EddieRingle• 11 years ago

The difference this year being that you can enable the multi-window feature in the M Preview.

See: http://www.androidpolice.com/2015/05/29/android-m-feature-sp...

walterbell7• 11 years ago

If Apple introduces a larger iPad Pro with multitasking, this will shine more (blue) light on human eyes and create a need for platform-wide color temperature adjustment in iOS. At present, this is only available in a few apps. On desktops, it is available via fl.ux.

spython• 11 years ago

f.lux is available on jailbroken ios devices.

walterbell7• 11 years ago

Anyone who uses iPad at night would benefit from blue light control in iOS. This is a larger group of people than those who are willing and able to jailbreak their iPad.

walterbell7• 11 years ago

Parent comment was upvoted three times in the last two hours, each followed soon thereafter by a matching downvote.

Someone(s) out there likes blue light :) They should read http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/12/no-ipads-i...

"When subjects read on the iPad as compared to the paper books ... people reported feeling less sleepy at night and less alert the following morning ... empirically, they also took longer to fall asleep on the iPad nights and spent less time in the REM phase of sleep. And the blood tests showed that on average, the brain's melatonin secretion on those nights was delayed by an hour and a half."

angkec• 11 years ago

Why is this comment downvoted? Flux is the thing that I misses the most on my iPad. Moving from my Mac to my iPad at night is a painful experience due to the sudden influx of blue lights.

adeptus• 11 years ago

Congratulations, Windows 3.0 level achieved!

nkoren• 11 years ago

Great feature. I used to love doing this with my Amiga.

ytdht• 11 years ago

it is pretty crazy how computers are going backwards lately

mark_l_watson3• 11 years ago

I will wait until this ships, but I don't think that I will like it more than quickly switching apps with a sideways swipe. For example: I write a lot on my iPad, keeping a text editor open to a markdown file and a PDF open in an adjacent app. I sometimes quickly swipe back and forth when making edits.

I recently bought a keyboard cover for my iPad, which I don't often use, but an iPad Air with a keyboard cover overlaps some laptop use cases, and the split screen might be useful.

walterbell7• 11 years ago

Which iOS tools do you use to generate PDFs from Markdown?

mark_l_watson3• 11 years ago

leanpub web service, reads manus rope from dropbox and put generated pdc, kindle, and I book files back into dropbox.

udev• 11 years ago

I wonder if this will lead to wider screen formats long term.

freehunter2• 11 years ago

I really hope not. I have a Thinkpad Tablet 2 with a wide screen and it's nice to watching movies or having apps running side by side but it's awful to try to hold one-handed. It's far too long.

acd• 11 years ago

BSD 4.4 was released 1994 it has multitasking which the Darwin kernel in OS X and also ios are based upon. Talking about 1994, NT also has had preemptive multi tasking since 1993. Multics the father of UNIX had multi tasking in 1965.

csixty4• 11 years ago

I know the headline is talking about something different, but I always think something along the same lines when someone talks about iOS multitasking. Does the kernel have a Process Control Block? Is there interrupt-driven preemption? Well, then it's a multitasking OS in the technical sense.

But using the term "multitasking" to mean two applications on screen at the same time goes back to the Amiga days, maybe even earlier. I've just accepted it at this point.

BinaryIdiot• 11 years ago

If only they allowed the iPhone 6 Plus to do some of these neat iPad features. Surely some of them would work at least in landscape mode.

codezero4• 11 years ago

Nobody has really implemented landscape mode in their apps on iPhone 6 plus. I expect the same will be true for this feature.

wingerlang3• 11 years ago

Well if the iPhone6+ is in landscape, it would fit two "portrait" mode apps side by side.

listic• 11 years ago

I was expecting an OS X-toting, keyboard-wielding Surface 3-like iPad Pro instead.

Now when Apple squeezed multitasking into a regular one, I am not so sure whether to expect the iPad Pro. Maybe in autumn, with/instead of the supposed iPad update? I wouldn't rule out the secret homebrew CPU that could replace the x86 Core M.

tjl2• 11 years ago

If there's going to be an iPad Pro, they'll announce it at an iPad event like they've done in the past.

jowiar• 11 years ago

All the features they announced (including force touch trackpad) seemed to indicate "iPad pro is coming". At this point, I'd say better-than-even money that they will announce it to coincide with the actual release of the OS.

SwellJoe• 11 years ago

I've always thought tiling window managers were the future (as they're just flat out superior to windowing systems for many, many workflows). I just didn't know it would be Apple that would make it popular. But, maybe tiling will become the de facto UI for everything in the next few years. I'd like that.

vezzy-fnord2• 11 years ago

A tiling WM still likely uses a "windowing system" (a display server like Quartz in this case, I think?) underneath, though some like rio do overlap.

It's also funny to note how tiling is the future, given that it was already the past. Tiling was how some of the earliest GUIs were done because it's the simplest compared to stacking and particularly compositing. Windows 1.0 was tiling, IIRC.

Cantremeber2• 11 years ago

A vague tiling like functionality has been available in Windows since 7. In 10 it looks they're finally expanding this to have more options then just halves, something I've been doing with a third party program for awhile now (it has halves, thirds, and quarters).

This is not a true tiling WM but I've personally found their use a bit limited as there are times when it makes sense to have multiple windows overlapping, at least in my own work.

digi_owl11• 11 years ago

It is funny then that the original Xerox GUI would default to tiling, but allow the user to move the windows around as floating ones afterwards. Even Windows 1.0 was tiling. Floating only came with 2.0.

petecox• 11 years ago

I've been wanting an excuse to learn Haskell, XMonad could be the reason. :)

jug• 11 years ago

It makes sense especially in light of widescreen displays. We have much more horizontal space today than we did when modern windowing systems were innovated.

dwarman• 11 years ago

Many years ago - 2010 to be precise - I installed Desktop for iPad by Aqua Eagle. I don't think it ever got updated. It is still installed, still works on iOS 7.1.2, but is no longer in the store nor, interestingly, does it show up in my list of installed Apps. It implements split screen multitasking, albeit with their own versions of each App. I never use it.

rebootthesystem2• 11 years ago

Not going to make any difference. The plain fact is that iOS sucks for any real work and the OSX UI is a disaster that came out of not wanted to let go of an idea that worked OK on a little 9 inch Mac screen.

The second assertion is the easiest to prove. Setup a Mac to drive a wall of six or nine HD or better 65 inch monitors and see how quicly you end up at the doctor with carpal tunnel and intense shoulder and arm pain. Not so with most Linux platforms, Windows and even going back to Irix and Solaris.

On he iOS front, well, it's mostly good for games, browsing and very simple tasks (like credit card scanners). Anything beyond that where there's far more user involvement the whole touch thing falls apart very quickly. Try entering a few thousand transactions into an accounting program, maintaining a large codebase or working with a non-trivial Excel file. It's a great "fun and games" interface, but that's about it.

Apple Watch. Dead as a doornail.

I am getting the feeling that Apple is noe entering into the downward slope that ultimately happens once all the smoke and bullshit clears out.

Context: We develop for all platforms and have been using Macs since the Original 9 inch CRT models.

rebootthesystem2• 11 years ago

The thing about down-votes is that they don't change reality one bit. They might provide the voter immediate satisfaction but the truth of the matter isn't modified in any way.

Let's see how this Apple thing plays out over the next few years. I run into more and more people every day that are sick and tired of their i-device and I have yet to hear anyone at all say they have any interest whatsoever on the Apple watch.

So, down-vote or not, whether you agree with me or not is immaterial at this stage. The only thing that matters is whether or not my opinion today will hold true a few years from now. I think it will. And, of course, I could be wrong. That's the way it goes.

zimpenfish3• 11 years ago

Thing is, people have been saying "Let's see how this Apple thing plays out over the next few years" since 2007 and they keep growing.

"I have yet to hear anyone at all say they have any interest whatsoever on the Apple watch"

A million pre-orders on day one would suggest you might not be representitive here.

The watch definitely interests me - smart notifications on the Garmin 920XT have convinced me of the utility.

Apple iPad Gets Split-Screen Multitasking in iOS 9

Related Stories