This seems exaggerated. I recently moved to iOS 26 from iOS 16. They work exactly the same in my experience.
Except for the fact that you can’t scrub on the native video player by swiping anywhere, you now have to use the time-bar. Drives me nuts.
HN user
This seems exaggerated. I recently moved to iOS 26 from iOS 16. They work exactly the same in my experience.
Except for the fact that you can’t scrub on the native video player by swiping anywhere, you now have to use the time-bar. Drives me nuts.
Reminds me of my first websites. I had a book with HTML tags and I tried to add a form with a submit button. It didn’t work, I had no backend, I don’t think I had a concept of what a backend was at that point. I’m not even sure what I expected to happen with that form.
I use this one as well. It took me a few moments to learn it, but it almost instantly became muscle memory.
I just tried to do the old fashioned knot, it might be the first time I've tied it in two decades.
It marketing by showing behind the scenes content.
So does Thailand but we also have Yakult ladies here, they just sell the drinks though.
I’m going the opposite way. I had a smaller keyboard (60% maybe) but I got one with the F-keys recently. Because I can assign one or more macros to each dedicated button.
I am considering a second keyboard exclusively to be a macro pad, but my KVM setup is already at its limits.
Thank you!
I’ve used SourceTree for a decade, Fork is the only one I’ve switched to partially (at work).
I probably will switch back to ST even at work because I dislike:
- I want the split view of ST where I can simply see the changes and not lose the commit log.
- “see only current branch” is super useful in ST to see only the current branch’s commit log.
(Partially writing this in hopes of someone pointing out ways to do this in Fork)
I don't think the business events is realistic. It would have to be huge, generic, and have a huge amount of people be very specific with their wants-and-needs, on top of the technical issues I brought up earlier.
Speed dating is called speed dating for a reason, you're supposed to be forced to meet everyone. Probably takes more time to setup yet another dating profile than it takes to simply go through the process.
From what I read on 222, their entire purpose is to get away from algorithms, apps, and whatnot.
Timeleft has, according to their landing page, six people per activity.
I don't mean to discourage, by the way. It's neat tech, I personally just don't see where it could best be used.
EDIT: I could see speed dating have some sort of "prompt" build on top of this. Say the app is rebranded to "SpeedDater" and the organizers said to download it. Then while in the event itself, the apps could give prompts or fun stuff to talk about in realtime, and then later you could eg. say yes/no after the fact, at which point the matches are unlocked. Not sure this requires the local-thing though.
To properly make this work you need to download the app, enter a bunch of information, go to settings to disable sleep mode, not touch your phone and also not have it accidentally swipe away from the app.
Seems like the (only?) target audience for this would hardcode networkers going to network events. And honestly, I think people who go to a event like this don't have this problem of missing a connection they wanted.
Why would people who want to hack not have iPhones?
I grew up with VHS tapes on CRT screens. It was totally fine, I watched more movies back then than I do today.
Does filling the entire landing page with only "punchy" sentences actually work? It feels like I am reading a trailer.
I have had a handful of people request additional licenses (at a discount) for the purpose of running my software on multiple.
might be the only ones actually turning a profit on all of this
I don't think this is true at all. How many such influencers are there, really, a dozen? I'd guess there are a million people making everything from absolute bank, down to pocket money. Most of them are probably not even aware that these influencers exists.
I use the mouse a lot. I am using a home made [0] app that gives me dropzones when I move a window. The dropzones show up AT the mouse, I can more or less flick the window to where I want it without moving it anywhere or using the keyboard. Although I have not set it up on my newest macbook yet, and I find the default behavior OK.
I do use hot corners extensively to switch between apps and app windows. Can NOT live without them.
[0] It's actually a modified version of an old Rectangle version
Yes, and Dropbox could have been a handful of unix commands.
I don't think I would use an app for this, but as far as I can tell, it aims to crowdsource silent locations, something a shortcut couldn't realistically achieve.
POP mails stopped being imported from my hotmail since some time. I noticed it recently but could not make it work again. Switching to the new (to me, anyway) "gamilify" option from within Gmail settings - I experienced a similar avalanche. Probably two-three weeks ago, but these emails were from decades ago until recent. They did not go to junk, but they were labelled as "email/x/x/junk".
He is quite active on YouTube, sharing progress and behind-the-scenes of his games.
I’m not a native speaker either..
And no, I don’t think the content is good and meaningful in 99% of the cases.
I’m sure it’s possible, ChatGPT is trained on people after all.
There’s more But it’s clear to me from the first word “Look — …“. No one starts a comment like that, except ChatGPT who does it all the time.
I frequent subreddits where AI use is super common and the vibe is always the same.
Clearly an AI generated comment, should this be banned?
Why do you need both an identifier and a text? I have this test name 'testAddingNewCardDataResultsInProperlyCombinedCardDataButNoNewCardsUnlocksBecauseWeStillHaveUnlearnedCards', and even though it is much longer than my other ones, it is still perfectly readable, and even if it wasn't, the only time I actually have to read it, is if it fails.
There is probably around a decade-long leap between XIB and SwiftUI. XIB files are only found in legacy code nowadays. It might have worked fine in smaller projects, but I think there are good reasons why it was left behind.
In my experience, most XIB files were either so small and easy that it was simply easier to replicate it in ten lines of code. Or so giant an impenetrable that it took thousands of lines of code to replicate it with, and at that point most people prefer to work with code over a dense XIB file.
Is this a real origin story or a fake one? (Obviously written by AI)
Like, I can work at a FAANG, coast, make no real contribution to society and collect a 400K/yr check.
99% of the world is not able to just go work at a FAANG. That 99% also earn way less than 250K a year.
Here's mine from 14 years ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G05M_Y6NQVM
It's very simple to implement a basic setup like this, and I agree that the results are super cool.
It's a view of cards, so I want to pull them left and right, I guess.
And.. well, I personally probably won't play it to be honest. Maybe if I had kids and the experience was a v1.0 instead of v0.2 I would be interested. Even then, it would be relying on my nostalgia around the Backpacker games. I'd definitely recommend getting feedback from people expressively interested in it.
Try to submit your articles to email newsletters within your topic. Example: https://iosdevweekly.com/