Introducing Instagram Direct

http://blog.instagram.com/post/69789416311/instagram-direct

by seaghost • 13 years ago

111 96 13 years ago

blog.instagram.com

bluetidepro2• 13 years ago

I'm very interested to see how this goes against SnapChat. I think it could either ruin SnapChat for good, or not make any impact at all because of the fanbase loyalty to SnapChat. It will be interesting to see, that's for sure.

Also, I haven't seen a clear explanation on their implementation when you try to "direct" someone that has not updated their app (don't have the Direct feature) yet. Does it warn you, queue the Direct for when they finally do update, doesn't let you use the feature with them at all, or what?

AFTER UPDATING: It looks like you guys are right, it allows you to send Direct to people who have not updated, so I imagine it just queue's it for them. Also, you cannot set expiration timers, and if you do a group message everyone in the group can see who is in the group (both unlike SnapChat). So, it looks like this will not probably not harm SnapChat at all.

rajbala• 13 years ago

I don't think this will impact SnapChat at all.

I think people use SnapChat because it's a silo disconnected from Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, etc.

rickyc091• 13 years ago

Agreed, if anything, this seems to "compete" more with Kik Messaging.

fro2• 13 years ago

Just updated, and I was able to send posts to users without the update. I believe it queues messages for when they update.

salient2• 13 years ago

I think it will fail, hard - just like Facebook Poke did. And that was when Snapchat was very, very early. Now it has a ton of momentum behind it, and this is hopeless.

GrinningFool• 13 years ago

I think this is aimed more at BBM and Kik than SnapChat.

ojbyrne• 13 years ago

Hipsters drive AMC Pacers these days? How not surprising:

http://content.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1...

kayoone• 13 years ago

wanted to say the same thing. Great product and good marketing and all, but that video is so dripping of hipsterismn, they even have hipster cars in there.

spiek• 13 years ago

What is "hipsterism"?

obilgic2• 13 years ago

Twitter DM vs Instagram Direct...

uptown• 13 years ago

vs MMS

southpawgirl2• 13 years ago

vs email attachment

WA• 13 years ago

vs WhatsApp

obilgic2• 13 years ago

vs Path

smoorman10244• 13 years ago

Versus Photostream!!!!! This is almost identical to Photostream which really is an under-appreciated iPhone product.

antihero3• 13 years ago

Interesting, I've not heard of this. How do I get started with this? (I'm using Android).

antihero3• 13 years ago

Hangouts is pretty tasty now, too.

kevando5• 13 years ago

I think snapchat's timeout feature is a novelty that attracted users, but people ultimately just want to send private messages to their friends. Not everything needs to be broadcasted, and that's part of the OG instagram userbase - people that wanted an alternative to the facebook feed.

What's wrong with texting though? My friends and I have been texting and group texting images and short video for years. Why do people like having an app for this?

emhart• 13 years ago

Image editing within the same application that sends the message is a real benefit vs. just sms-ing an image.

leokun2• 13 years ago

Not having to manage and deal with all the images people send you all the time is not a novelty. Smartphones all assume that every picture you have on your phone is a prize that you want to save forever. Snapchat gives people a way to send pictures that just avoid all that.

kevando5• 13 years ago

See that's what I'm saying. Someone texts you a photo, it doesn't go into your photo list. It stays in your text convo. I'm all for data management and removing clutter, but I can think of 500 items to clear out before I consider private photo messages from my closest friends.

DanBC• 13 years ago

Why do people like having an app for this?

Cost. International availability.

kevando5• 13 years ago

Good point. My plan offers unlimited text and 98% of my friends are in the US so I often forget this.

antihero3• 13 years ago

MMS is horrendous and the picture quality is poor, plus you can't view it off of one's mobile.

Bud• 13 years ago

Huh? MMS itself is completely irrelevant to the quality of the photo you send over it. If your phone's camera is good, the photo quality will be good also.

marksbren• 13 years ago

Snapchat's timeout feature is not just a novelty, is it allowing for a whole different type of digital communication. The sender does not have to worry about where their image might show up. It frees people to take goofy photos and act more naturally (as opposed to all the posed, staged shots on Instagram and Facebook).

angryasian4• 13 years ago

I don't know why this misconception keeps getting propogated. If the motivation to save pictures is there then a person will save the pictures. I have to believe it's the fad. I mean poke had this same feature yet it never took off

kevando5• 13 years ago

I agree it frees people up to do the goofy, but as someone who's been doing the goofy my whole life, snapchat does nothing to add value in that respect. It just promotes it and now people understand the goofy.

iambateman• 13 years ago

Snapchat is the best way to have a quick conversation with someone that is photo-based. That is particularly useful for seeing someone's emotions outside of being face-to-face.

Text is dry. Snapchat lets me quickly message someone what I'm feeling.

It has almost nothing to do with disappearing messages.

Alex_Jiang• 13 years ago

I agree with this. At the risk of sounding nebulous, snapchat 'feels' different. It feels personal like the handwritten notes you pass in classrooms.

A text is more like someone handing a a slip of paper with a typed message.

An email is like someone handing you an 8.5x11 piece of paper.

Snapchat lets you be really gestural, for instance I draw on >95% of my snaps. In instances where I want to add text I draw it on with my finger.

The last snap I sent was to my girlfriend, it was an image of our dog with a ripped up shoe, I scrawled "How mad are you?" on it.

raverbashing3• 13 years ago

"What's wrong with texting though?"

Cost

toomuchtodo4• 13 years ago

Who is still paying for text messaging?

jkkorn• 13 years ago

Where is Twitter with Vine Direct?

ts330• 13 years ago

it's coming. soon.

presty• 13 years ago

the blog's hosted on tumblr? hm..

bluetidepro2• 13 years ago

What's odd about that? Tons of companies use Tumblr for their official blogs?

salient2• 13 years ago

The alternative was a Facebook Page, probably, so...

southpawgirl2• 13 years ago

"I am going to write an app that allows the user to send pictures to their contacts!"

I guess one must have a fair bit of userbase karma + mystique to successfully reinvent the wheel, to make a funnier-to-use wheel that actually gets used.

personlurking• 13 years ago

Slightly related.

I don't really think we need social networks as they're now understood. About 10 years ago when MSN Messenger was popular, I had the idea of having an interactive contact list for one's cell phone. One where I could see that my friend is "in the shower, out in 10" or where I could send a picture to a contact, etc.

cwe• 13 years ago

Everyone is comparing this to Snapchat or Twitter, but what about FB Messenger? Competing with another Facebook entity, but I guess FB wins either way now?

fro2• 13 years ago

The best thing about this update might be that we finally get pull-to-refresh on the home feed.

state• 13 years ago

Does anyone use the shared photostreams in iOS 7?

ddoolin• 13 years ago

I do. Quite often, actually. Seriously the best way to share albums if both parties are on iOS. The only downside is it can definitely take up space as the device stores a copy of each image from each stream.

smoorman10244• 13 years ago

Photostream is really the end game for what sharing photos should be. You serve it on space that you rent privately from Apple. You have comments, likes, and filters. You can post photos of any size. Your social network is not being analyzed because Apple is selling you the space (iCloud) and the device (iPhone).

smoorman10244• 13 years ago

Reasons to continue using Snapchat.

1. They are the brand that reinvented the sharing model. They are more likely to stick to their core values 2. Facebook/Instagram can use the information about who you send to to expand their already vast profile of you. 3. Based on Snapchats word, your images are truly deleted from their servers after they've been viewed.

That said, I'll be testing out Instagram direct to see if it is truly a superior product but I imagine if they think of something good Snapchat will copy it and I will go back to my brand du jour.

terhechte2• 13 years ago

Does anybody know if they're planning on making this available via their third party API?

I've checked the current API docs [1] as well as the Google Group [2] and the StackOverflow Posts [3]. There's nothing mentioning it yet.

This would be an awesome feature to have available in third party apps, so that one could have it in other chat clients apart from the official iPhone app. Adium is one example, but there're probably even better solutions. After all, one of the most annoying things about WhatsApp is that I have to use my phone to answer messages or read messages. It just feels stupid to tap away on a small screen to send a digital message while I have a 27" screen and a full keyboard right in front of me. That is something where iMessage and Facebook messages are way better.

Also, there were, for quite some time, third party Instagram messaging solutions [4], and I'm really happy that they're finally implementing this straight into Instagram. Beforehand, you'd see people having discussions that were bordering on being private by continuously posting comments to an image. This happened all the time. Now these discussions can move into private space.

[1] http://instagram.com/developer/endpoints/

[2] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/instagram-api-develo...

[3] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/instagram/

[4] http://instamessage.net/

gjulianm• 13 years ago

I'm pretty sure they won't make it available. They still don't allow uploading images to their service using an API, so I doubt they will allow to send messages.

After the Twitter example, APIs are not attractive to these kind of startups. If you give full capabilities to 3rd party developers, they're going to create clients for other systems and the startup will lose control over its content and how it's shown to users (ads).

constantinum• 13 years ago

did any one notice this "Instagram for Android version 5.0 is available today on Google Play." Android 5.0 ??

drcube• 13 years ago

"Instagram for Android" is the name of the app, the version is now 5.0.

mlyang2• 13 years ago

This will have a huge impact on Snapchat, IMO. Instagram Direct allows you to keep a conversation going with close friends, which is much more engaging and fun. Snapchat does not allow for that. One of the reasons that I'm not as prolific on Snapchat is that I just can't know what the hell I'm going to take a picture of next in response to someone's Snapchat. This addresses that issue by allowing just one picture to be the instigator for a conversation. Obviously loyal Snapchat fans will still stay there but I think the less prolific Snapchatters will opt to send a picture this way rather than thru Snapchat.

saltyknuckles• 13 years ago

queue the mandatory hipster video ...

mikelbring• 13 years ago

Had to double check to make sure I wasn't on The Onion.

techaddict009• 13 years ago

Will this create an impact on WhatsApp ?

arsemouflon• 13 years ago

Thanks but no thanks. I'll just keep tweeting those pics of my arse.

elwell• 13 years ago

so if facebook can't buy snapchat for 3 billion they'll just make their own

skeletonjelly• 13 years ago

I suppose they already have the userbase. And it's not like there's much effort in copying a simple flow like Snapchat has. I'm pretty sure they (SC) have a patent on an app that goes straight to camera, amongst others though. Crazy.

halcyondaze• 13 years ago

Introducing Nothing New. All they did was copy half of Snapchat's functionality and add the instagram ability to "edit" pictures. I don't get the point of all of this stuff sometimes. Is this what super smart and savvy people are working on in tech? Another way to send pictures to friends that isn't text, fb messenger, snapchat, kik, whatsapp, etc?

Edit: I am really wondering if I'm missing something here with my above post, not just trying to be a dick for no reason.

kika2• 13 years ago

People are doing this too. It looks dumb, but inside there're lots of interesting technical challenges.

Some of the awe inspiring breakthroughs are often extremely boring technically. I started my career in the computational chemistry and was looking over the shoulder of the guys doing some really bleeding etch research on organic compounds simulation. Oh, man, do you know how boring it is for a programmer? You're looking at the handwritten prototype of the research paper, filled with quantum physics formulae and encode all this greek language into FORTRAN-IV. Then you run it for a week and either go collecting Nobel prize or finding bugs in your "program".

dopamean• 13 years ago

Is it bleeding etch or bleeding edge? I cant keep up with stuff anymore.

neakor• 13 years ago

Completely agree. They are not doing anything even remotely innovative. Added direct messaging means nothing when the simple direct messaging channel has already evolved beyond just a picture/video. A techchrunch article said they are like Apple, not doing it first, but doing it the best. That's complete BS as well. It doesn't look or feel any different or better than FB messenger, iMessage, whatsapp, snapchat or any other messaging apps for that matter.

alashley2• 13 years ago

I feel the same way. I often wonder with all the bright minds and current innovations in tech, why we still continually try to come up with novel ways to send cat pictures over the internet. Surely there are more interesting uses for the vast technological resources available to this generation.

adventured2• 13 years ago

You're missing the most important question in all of this: interesting according to whom?

It's equivalent to someone that prefers non-fiction scientific educational TV shows, claiming that it's outrageous all of the money goes toward sitcoms or the next Avengers movie.

adventured2• 13 years ago

That's exactly right, and it's a great move on their part.

Instagram itself wasn't some grand innovation. It's an experience product, that's meant to be easy to use and fun. It's not here to cure cancer, it never pretended to, and it doesn't need to attempt to.

cenhyperion• 13 years ago

Instagram's beauty was its simplicity. You took photos, edited them, and shared them with friends.

Post-facebook acquire they've introduced "features" that add very little to the service, copy competitors, and degrade the overall experience of Instagram.

brianbreslin• 13 years ago

Actually this might have a minor impact on kik. Lots of Instagram users use kik to communicate, so this messaging tool could affect them more than snapchat. Snapchat still has the decaying images feature as it's main selling point,

ahassan• 13 years ago

So it's kinda like Snapchat, except your images can be viewed forever?

Introducing Instagram Direct

Related Stories