Oh My Zsh

https://ohmyz.sh/

by praash • 2 years ago

159 146 2 years ago

ohmyz.sh

vorticalbox2• 2 years ago

I used ohmyzsh with powerlevel10k/powerlevel10k[0] for years though recently i've settled on fish [1]

[0] https://github.com/romkatv/powerlevel10k [1] https://fishshell.com/

cybrox• 2 years ago

Can you summarize what made the switch worthwhile for you?

I've been using zsh/omz with a customized powerlevel10k for years now and I see fish mentioned all the time but I didn't really find a compelling reason to try it out for myself.

hiAndrewQuinn• 2 years ago

My niche use case is that since fish comes out of the box with a whole bunch of very nice features (syntax highlighting on the shell, really good autocompletion) it's easy for me to stick it into the set of shell scripts I use to turn a new Ubuntu VM into a dev productivity machine. [1]

I could probably get Zsh to do all the same stuff I would want fish to do out of the box, but it would make reading through and reasoning about the shell scripts more difficult for third parties to audit, who may not be familiar with either tool before they try it.

[1] https://github.com/hiAndrewQuinn/shell-bling-ubuntu

vorticalbox2• 2 years ago

only a few things that are probally also possible in zsh

fish functions are super easy to create on the fly from a command updating $path is fish_add_path {path here} setting global variable is easy set -Ux FOO bar adding -g makes it global

most of these require me to update my .zshrc and source ~/.zshrc as far as i am aware

TheRoque• 2 years ago

You just install it and it works. I change devices, or wipe out my devices often enough that just having a familiar shell installed in one line feels comfy. I usually don't customize things a lot, I pick something with good default and rarely change anything on it. I don't want to bother downloading plugins and addons, or fonts, or themes, just for a command interpreter.

acdha• 2 years ago

For me it came down to speed and maintenance. Fish is incredibly fast and I spend almost no time configuring it, so it’s trivial to bring up on a new system and I don’t have to exercise self-control to avoid tweaking it (that’s a personal failing, not other shells).

theshrike792• 2 years ago

It's easy to install. I used to have some fisher plugins, but gave up on those since none of them were really essential.

When I set up a new computer I can just install fish and starship prompt and I'm mostly done. My fish configuration file is just aliasing and sourcing configs from other software, it's been a while since I had to touch it.

evnix• 2 years ago

I start using fish, really like its feature set, but then have to give up and switch back to zsh when I want to get anything done. Unlike zsh, Fish isn't compatible with bash syntax, so a lot of existing scripts and software just doesn't work right. Even today people write scripts as if bash already exists and they seem to always target it. I wish fish had some form of compatibility layer.

osmsucks• 2 years ago

I've been using it for years and most things I need nowadays just work (i.e. have Fish support out of the box).

For all the rest, perhaps give https://github.com/edc/bass a try.

mulmen• 2 years ago

Can you add a shebang and make the script executable or just run the script as an argument to the bash program?

jackhalford• 2 years ago

Are sourcing bash scripts in a fish shell? If you can either run bash ./xyz or add the shebang #!/bin/bash to run scripts with the intended interpreter

eviks• 2 years ago

fish has a compatibility layer, and existing scripts still can use bash

markstos4• 2 years ago

Fish runs bash scripts just fine, as it does any script with a shebang line. IT is increasingly compatible with random CLI commands copy and pasted from the internet.

For those that don't work right away, just type `bash` to enter bash shell, run the command return back to Fish.

If a significant part of your day is spent copying CLI command from the internet, then yes, perhaps Bash is a better choice for you.

petepete• 2 years ago

I recreated my zsh setup in fish with about 10% of the config and just one plugin (fzf.fish).

Nearly everything I want, fancy autocompletion, syntax highlighting, git-aware prompt just worked out of the box.

Keyframe• 2 years ago

zsh, oh-my-zsh, p10k, fzf, and as of recently zsh-autosuggestions plugin for oh-my-zsh is what I ride on. I keep hearing about fish, and I see what it's doing but I'm not sure what it would bring to the table compared to the setup?

hibbelig• 2 years ago

So fish comes with nice defaults. It could happen that you have a complicated zsh setup, then migrate to fish and you find the defaults are fine.

The fish scripting language is nicer (more logical) than the zsh one. That's because zsh needs to be Bourne-ish for historical reasons, and fish has decided to deviate from it. Existing sh, bash, zsh scripts will continue to work just fine. You can write new scripts in fish, or keep writing scripts in zsh or whatever.

mplanchard3• 2 years ago

Yeah I tried zsh a few times and never really thought it gave me that much relative to my existing bash config.

Fish on the other hand has stuck, and I'm still discovering nifty new built in features, like the fact that if you type `kill`, you can tab-complete on process names, so like if I want to kill emacs, I can type `kill ema<tab>` and select from the following:

    > kill ema
    3296  (.blueman-applet)  3595  (.blueman-tray-w)  9324  (emacsclient)  9327  (emacs)  9557  (emacsql-sqlite)

If there's only one match it completes the PID for you, and of course if you start typing a PID and press tab it shows the process names along with the potential completions.

I use starship for prompt customization, which is nice because my config transfers just fine from bash over to fish.

wyclif5• 2 years ago

What I do is use zsh as my default shell and use oh-my-zsh, but keep a very simple config for my ~/.bashrc, something like:

    [ -f ~/.fzf.bash ] && source ~/.fzf.bash

    source /Users/wyclif/.config/broot/launcher/bash/br

This gives me the best of both worlds.

JNRowe7• 2 years ago

FWIW, that is also the default behaviour of zsh's standard completion subsystem for kill. You can try it yourself: "zsh -f" to get a shell without reading a fancy config, start compinit, "kill <Tab>".

You can even disable verbose mode via zstyle, should you be the type of person that likes a simple pid list like bash's completion project provides. To me this level of customization is the main feature zsh provides, but not everyone incessantly turns every knob they see.

cvdub• 2 years ago

fish has by far the best auto-completion out of the box. That’s what sold me.

And the website is amazing. “Finally, a command line shell for the 90s”

mrd3v0• 2 years ago

Tide is as close to powerlevel10k as one can get in Fish.

https://github.com/IlanCosman/tide

msephton• 2 years ago

PSA: simply installing this won't get you many benefits until you read about what it can do and then make an effort to use those things in your workflow.

turblety• 2 years ago

Any recommended reading? I found a cheatsheet [1] which seems useful, but there's not that much in there.

1. https://github.com/ohmyzsh/ohmyzsh/wiki/Cheatsheet

imdsm• 2 years ago

Been using it for years now, can't fault it, but I don't do too much with it

yla92• 2 years ago

Recently, I moved off from oh-my-zsh after many users, to vanilla zsh with https://starship.rs, mainly due to the loading speed (used https://github.com/romkatv/zsh-bench to measure the speed).

Still wanting to try out fish and hopefully soon!

_aaed• 2 years ago

If one of a product's main features is that it's written in Rust, it probably doesn't have anything unique compared to the competition

rpigab• 2 years ago

Which is a major selling point. We do not want anything unique.

Ripgrep accept most basic flags that grep uses and is way faster (when searching for code under VC), and that makes using it very convenient, even before considering the features on top.

I would prefer that you also write your HN comments in Rust, if that's possible, for better performance and safety. In the future, there will only be Rust. You have to accept Rust into your life.

markstos4• 2 years ago

Fish has been great for years.The Rust rewrite will help the devs catch issues earlier in development. Hardly a main a feature.

The awesome level tab-completion and auto-completion are the firs things to notice about Fish. Also, overall cleaner syntax and a several nice built-in commands that don't ship with Bash.

bitwize• 2 years ago

A memory-safe, fearlessly concurrent version of $thing is imho a huge win in and of itself.

Soon a Rust userland will be table stakes.

mplanchard3• 2 years ago

Not sure if you're talking about starship or fish, but starship is by far my favorite prompt customization tool, regardless of what language it's written in. It works across bash, zsh, fish, and others, so you can pretty easily get the same prompt in any shell on your system. It's easy to tweak as needed, but is pretty great out of the box.

theshrike792• 2 years ago

Moving to starship as prompt stopped my prompt bikeshedding habits immediately.

Charlie_32• 2 years ago

I'm a developer of 10 years, and use the command line for Git, Brew and a few other things, though I'm normally an IDE developer. I believe the CL is as powerful as everyone says, but what are some useful things I can use it for? I use Zsh on a Mac some of the time.

PrimeMcFly• 2 years ago

but what are some useful things I can use it for?

I mean, surely you already know?

Anything where feeding input between different tasks, or where you want to use regex, or similar things the cl will be superior.

smcleod5• 2 years ago

10 years in tech and you haven’t optimised your shell?

Brajeshwar2• 2 years ago

20+ years in tech and these days, the first thing that comes to my mind is usually, “Can I walk out of this?” :-)

The idea is to be able to use any computer/system/devices easily instead of one perfectly.

pjmlp4• 2 years ago

Coding since 1986 and I touch the shell as much as I have to, If I cared that much I would still be using MS-DOS, and UNIX without X.

cnity2• 2 years ago

X years in tech and you haven't Y.

Pick any X and Y that maximises your ability to feel superior, I suppose.

reactordev• 2 years ago

Colorful prompt with context information, powerline glyphs, autocomplete, command highlighting, easy navigation through strings, plugins and a plugin ecosystem that extends your shell like crazy

pletnes• 2 years ago

Rename hundreds of files at a time. Find stupid errors in GB sized csv/json/.. data files. Automate git bisect. Automate workflows by writing a short loop or 3 commands in a row you can easily repeat. Down/upload big datasets. Convert text files any way you can think of.

jay-aye-see-key• 2 years ago

The two things you can do in the shell you mostly can’t do elsewhere is compose arbitrary commands and store custom commands.

For #1 this blog post has some good examples of quickly chaining together commands (though personally I rarely use xargs) https://drewdevault.com/2020/12/12/Shell-literacy.html

For #2 once you’ve got a command you like, maybe one that generates a metric, you can now re-run it with ease from your history, saved text file, or an alias. You could also share it with teammates.

Please correct me if there are other ways to achieve the above, shell is the only way I know

pjmlp4• 2 years ago

Programming languages REPL environments.

d0mine• 2 years ago

"Always Bet on Text"

- CLI encourages automation (shell commands are easier to repeat/parametrize then GUI steps) - shell instructions are more git friendly than screenshots (even if a process can't/shouldn't be automated. Commands are easier to document in a reusable/updatable way) - CLI can be used to run tests in a way similar how CI does it (more reproducible)

Command line tools are easier to extend/combine with existing pipelines (rg,jq,xargs): read input from stdin/write output to stdout, report on stderr, return non-zero code on error. It enables you to create adhoc tools that you wouldn't bother otherwise (unrelated: LLMs also have this property by making your skill set much broader (though very shallow with current LLMs)). Shell also has Forth-like property (compose with: retry, timeout, setuid, exec, xargs, env, ssh, etc) https://www.oilshell.org/blog/2017/01/13.html

Zizizizz• 2 years ago

Zsh autosuggestions Zsh syntax highlighting Fzf-tab

Paired with zoxide and fzf for the zsh keyboard shortcuts are all I need to be very productive.

Starship.rs is very useful as well as a theme but pure and pl10k are also great.

radimm• 2 years ago

All good until your ZSH gets heavyweight and slow. Started using fish and never looked back

kekebo• 2 years ago

ZSH + Zimfw + Powerlevel10k is probably the fastest "bling"-y shell I managed to put together. Would usually smoke Fish, but I haven't compared recently

FlyingSnake• 2 years ago

Came here to say this. Fish shell is such a fresh beeeze compared to zsh.

Now it’s even rewritten in Rust!

csmattryder• 2 years ago

You've got to install Fisher, then get z, sponge and a few others from the awsm.fish list.

Then you get trapped by the utility and struggle when you land on some remote server's bash shell.

https://github.com/jorgebucaran/fisher

https://github.com/jorgebucaran/awsm.fish#readme

cal85• 2 years ago

I've never noticed slowness in OMZ, or really any shell. Or at least, when something feels slow I've always assumed it's the application I'm using, or network congestion, not the shell itself. In what situations do you notice a shell being slow?

brandall10• 2 years ago

Initializing a new session is not instantaneous. Even on my M3 Max it probably takes a couple hundred milliseconds, which is fine.

When I first tried it over a decade back, IIRC on an 11" Air, each new session was probably closer to a couple seconds. I recall there were a couple plugins in particular that were major bottlenecks. Replaced those and got the init speed to about half that but it annoyed me enough to do a clean zsh setup.

jeroenhd• 2 years ago

OMZ is fast even on my phone.

It turned slow for a whole after I installed anaconda. If you use conda and your shell is slow, try commenting out the code that loads conda, because it's probably that.

nvm likes to slow things down too. Not as bad as conda, but I did add some code to delay load it.

Do you know how fish would prevent getting slowed down by external scripts in its configuration file? Or does it just not support those scripts perhaps?

mitemte• 2 years ago

I switched from nvm to fnm a few years ago and have never looked back. Zero performance issues and it supports .nvmrc files.

https://github.com/Schniz/fnm

eigenvalue2• 2 years ago

It's wild to me how slow conda is. Just in ordinary day to day use, with nothing weird, you sometimes need to wait insane amounts of time, even on incredibly fast systems. Whatever they're doing, it's wrong and bad.

Ingaz3• 2 years ago

I had exactly same experience: nvm and conda. Both are unrelated to oh-my-zsh completely: they were configured in .zshrc directly

swah2• 2 years ago

Started using fish, moved back in 3 minutes. Remembered I have this awesome shortcut in Zsh where I type what I need to do, hit cmd+G, and some ChatGPT replaces my input with an example command.

peebeebee• 2 years ago

oooh, what plugin is this?

Hamuko• 2 years ago

I just skipped over zsh since I didn't want to spend time configuring it, as fish is pretty good out of the box.

linsomniac• 2 years ago

Ditto. Added atuin.

rixrax• 2 years ago

I backtracked all the way to Bash. Because I seem to write some amounts of bash scripts, it seems living inside bash is helpful. And it's really not much I feel like I am missing in my use from zsh (or fish). Bash even supports CTRL+R for history with search nowadays.

markstos4• 2 years ago

I write bash scripts but use Fish interactively.

Yes, I've had to get clear where they differ, but the Fish experience is that much better that it seems worth it.

I've considered replacing more my bash scripts with Fish scripts, but it seems Fish has a slower start start-up time for scripting (not that it matters most of the time) and is more designed for interactive use.

Levitating2• 2 years ago

I only script in fish anymore, all my devices use fish anyway (it's even pre-installed on steam deck).

Levitating2• 2 years ago

My only issue with fish is that it has had a standing issue[1] for over 12 years where functions and blocks cannot be backgrounded. This makes backgrounding a series of commands in a script nearly impossible.

[1] https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/issues/238

Jackevansevo• 2 years ago

The defaults it ships out of the box makes the shell actually usable. Unsure I could ever go back to a regular bash/zsh prompt.

A lot of people will tell you this is slow and you've got to use X,Y,Z instead. If you're new, I'd strongly recommend just sticking with this, it's much easier to configure.

peauc• 2 years ago

I would actually recommend using fish with budspencer theme which is really great https://github.com/oh-my-fish/theme-budspencer

h4ch1• 2 years ago

zsh autosuggestions has been pretty slow for me compared to fish out of the box, switched a year or so back and have been pretty happy. maybe something has changed now :thinking-emoji:

oh-my-fish is pretty much similar in capabilities and has a good assortment of themes.

All I used that came with zsh were git shortcuts like gc -m "comment", gst for git status which i just recreated in my fish config.

wirrbel2• 2 years ago

Grml zsh is all I need https://grml.org/zsh/

argulane• 2 years ago

grml is great! It has pretty much everything you need. grml config file is also quite readable and you can learn quite a lot from just reading it.

wirrbel2• 2 years ago

I actually never used the live bootable cd of the grml project, just the zsh config

MissTake• 2 years ago

I use omz primarily with the Kubernetes addons - which are now integral to my existence.

Does fish support something similar? If so then I could be encouraged to give it a whirl.

alxndr13• 2 years ago

funny coincidence, just finished re-modding my zsh.

Removing omz, adding antidote and starship. feels (and measureably is) faster and snappier.

pprotas3• 2 years ago

Do yourself a favor and try to configure your shell without ohmyzsh first. You’d be surprised at how few plugins actually require it, and you save yourself from horrible performance.

BytesAndGears• 2 years ago

Yeah I have a ton of customization including a really sweet looking prompt (that includes branch name & even git remote project name). Shortcut aliases and custom functions for everything that I use often. Atuin for Ctrl+R history searching.

All without using any “plugins” or ohmyzsh. All just within my .zshrc, and a few extra files that get “sourced” depending which computer I’m on. Only occasional copy-pasting a few things I liked from StackOverflow.

Basically instantaneous speed. Don’t even notice any performance penalties from all of the customization and styling.

I did have a performance issue early on, but I profiled my zsh startup time and saw 97.5% of my shell startup was consumed by NVM (node version manager), and another 2.4% was RVM (ruby). Switched to FNM and Chruby instead, and it was zippy.

And it’s all mine, so there are no “updates” to break anything. Throw it all in source control and you can keep improving it without risk of losing your previous working config.

sshine4• 2 years ago

Customizing my prompt was a reason to stick to zsh instead of oh-my-zsh.

But lately I've become really happy with just installing spaceship.

Sure, it doesn't look exactly like I want it to. But it shows git status.

Various features just "pop up" if I install the right things on the system.

nunez2• 2 years ago

100%. This is dotfiles on super easy mode. PS1 and PROMPT_COMMAND are your friends!

drcongo• 2 years ago

Nobody is friends with PS1.

BossingAround• 2 years ago

I hate very few things, but PS1 is one of them.

Would recommend using a PS1 generator, e.g. [1].

[1] https://bash-prompt-generator.org/

d3w4s9• 2 years ago

I do myself a favor by not doing this, install ohmyzsh and start working. Seeing what other people have done with shell, vim and all sorts of things, I know this is a rabbit hole and I could spend endless time on it. That's why I use ohmyzsh, VSCode and other tools and only tweak settings when necessary. And I can be actually productive even when I get a new machine.

Performance? If you are talking about the startup performance, no it doesn't bother me. Again, nothing is slowly enough to cause noticeable delays in basic typing/editing and the bottleneck is almost never on them. (I regularly work on codebase of hundreds to thousands of files or more.) So I don't spend time worrying about saving a few seconds in total per day when I can use my brain elsewhere.

latexr2• 2 years ago

You don’t have to follow a rabbit hole, these tweaks take no time at all and you can stop whenever. I used Oh My Zsh until I got fed up with the startup slowness. I open a bunch of terminal windows during the day and every one of them had a second or two of delay before I could do anything. I decided to do myself a favour and no longer put up with it. It took me a handful of minutes to figure out which plugins I actually cared about (three) and get rid of Oh My Zsh entirely. Everything about this change is better for me: it’s easier and faster to redo the setup when I do a clean install, and it’s instant in everyday use which means it’s no longer frustrating.

JoBrad• 2 years ago

PowerLevel10k has quite a bit of functionality, and is more performant in my experience, giving me the best of both worlds.

https://github.com/romkatv/powerlevel10k

nickjj4• 2 years ago

Yep, I use zsh with 2 plugins. One for syntax highlighting commands and another for showing auto-suggestions. It's really fast. The rest is nearly a default zsh set up in terms of zsh configuration. Everything is documented in my dotfiles https://github.com/nickjj/dotfiles.

My prompt is a 1 liner that shows your git branch as well as coloring up $ to be red or not based on if the last command failed. Coincidentally I just released a blog post today on coloring up your prompt based on if the last command failed at https://nickjanetakis.com/blog/color-your-shell-prompt-red-i... , there's solutions for both zsh and bash.

JNRowe7• 2 years ago

Noting that you didn't solicit advice, but…

* Exporting shell variables such as HISTFILE isn't necessary, and can be unsafe. For example, if you decide to pop open unconfigured bash from within a zsh session it would intermingle its history on write.

* There is a smart keyboard subsystem that neatly manages terminal differences¹, making it much nicer compared to inserting {system,term}-specific escapes in to your config.

Hoping this comes across in the helpful spirit it was intended, not as nitpicky unwanted code review.

¹ https://zsh.sourceforge.io/Doc/Release/User-Contributions.ht...

alright2565• 2 years ago

Someone's made a benchmarking system for zsh: https://github.com/romkatv/zsh-bench#premade-configs

Of course, their config is the best according to the benchmark (and ohmyzsh is the slowest option), but DIY configs are also covered, particularly possible performance optimizations.

wesapien• 2 years ago

Just pull down the extensions from the source repo and source them in your zshrc.

ivanhoe• 2 years ago

OMZ and zsh are great in many ways, but I still miss my CTRL + W from the bash, deleting the whole word regardless of the chars...

vault• 2 years ago

works perfectly fine for me. maybe you have misconfigured your terminal application?

JNRowe7• 2 years ago

Like practically everything zsh, it can be configured. The select-word-style zle widget¹ ships with zsh, and has a bash compatible setting(among others). The interface is super powerful, and given that you can change it in individual zle widgets you can make it context aware if you wish too.

¹ https://zsh.sourceforge.io/Doc/Release/User-Contributions.ht...

poochkoishi728• 2 years ago

One time, I was cowboy coding and ended up writing `grhh` (`git reset --hard`) and hit enter before I realized that it was a mistake.

ivanjermakov• 2 years ago

Reflog to the rescue: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-reflog

enw• 2 years ago

The following goes a long way:

    setopt PROMPT_SUBST
    HISTFILE=~/.zsh_history
    HISTSIZE=100000
    SAVEHIST=100000
    PROMPT='%B%(?..%F{red}%?%f )%F{blue}%~ %F{green}%#%f%b '
    RPROMPT='%B%F{red}$(git branch --show-current 2> /dev/null)%f%b'

And if you want autosuggestions:

    brew install zsh-autosuggestions

Then add the following to your ~/.zshrc:

    source /opt/homebrew/share/zsh-autosuggestions/zsh-autosuggestions.zsh

Brajeshwar2• 2 years ago

Hey, I must have copied something similar from somewhere but yes my first base setup of my shell is

  PROMPT='%{%F{red}%}%~ %{%F{yellow}%}% › %{%F{reset_color}%}%'

Anything after (besides the path and the GPG setup) that is an add-on that I can remove and still function well. I've learned to live without Git info. But this is very personal and I have not been into active development for quite a while.

dsego• 2 years ago

One neat alternative is ohmyposh.dev

dogmayor2• 2 years ago

ohmyposh is a prompt theming engine, not a plugin manager. But it is a great way to find a good prompt or create your own.

blentrop• 2 years ago

One option I really like liquid prompt[0]. Simple design which just shows the info I need without getting on my way

[0] https://github.com/liquidprompt/liquidprompt

nunez2• 2 years ago

Note that most of ohmyzsh can be done in pure Bash

flaxton• 2 years ago

Loading time is not an issue for me. I run tmux so my sessions stay alive and performance is very quick. M2 MacBook Air with 16GB RAM, using Warp terminal. Using OMZ with Dracula Theme and mosh for remote servers.

andirk• 2 years ago

Am I the only one with almost nothing custom in my bash/zsh?

al_borland• 2 years ago

I add in a folder to my path where I keep scripts I wrote, that’s about it.

encom• 2 years ago

No, I've used vanilla Bash for two decades now. The only thing I change is make autocomplete not case sensitive, and set up an ls alias

    alias ll='ls -lvX --almost-all --group-directories-first --human-readable'

I can sit at any machine and feel right at home.

rnd0• 2 years ago

I don't either. -hell, since I found out that "set -o emacs" gives me history and autocompletion I go even further and usually only use /bin/sh on NetBSD.

I'm not sure what the use case for zsh and fish are, but I'm guessing it's different than mine.

(edit/update: apparently, judging by a quicky netbsd 10 vm install, you don't even need to explicitly "set -o emacs". /bin/sh does it by default)

joejag• 2 years ago

I followed this advice and my shell went from 1530ms to 35ms startup time.

Main culprits were language switchers (nvm, jabba, pyenv). Which I moved to lazy loading.

If I drop the ohmyzsh plugins startup time is 11ms. But, I want some quality of life.

There's a nice benchmarking command in the article if you want to test yours:

for i in $(seq 1 10); do /usr/bin/time $SHELL -i -c exit; done

wrboyce• 2 years ago

That benchmark command isn’t great: https://github.com/romkatv/zsh-bench#how-not-to-benchmark

eigenvalue2• 2 years ago

I use and like omyzsh, but find it super annoying how it deals with updating. It either nags you constantly to update, or if you set it to "auto," then it's constantly spamming you about how it's updating, and when you create a new shell session (say, in tmux), it causes significant lag before you can use the new shell and pollutes the console with tons of output. There has to be a better way, like some optional mode that just runs an update service in 3am silently using systemd.

cbarrick• 2 years ago

I never understood how omz was useful.

Zsh already has a module system (autoload), a prompt framework (promptinit), and Git integration (vcs_info) builtin.

I have a pretty extensive Zsh setup in vanilla Zsh: https://github.com/cbarrick/dotfiles

Ingaz3• 2 years ago

You're correct: omz adds not a lot to vanilla zsh.

It consists of: - collection of plugins/themes - auto update - way to customize them

Everything could be done directly in .zshrc, it's just a bit more convinient

sshine4• 2 years ago

I used zsh for a few years before oh-my-zsh became a thing.

I have to admit that I don't find it more convenient.

It takes an ecosystem where things have a way of working, and establishes new conventions on top of those using a new set of environment variables. So if you know zsh, you don't know oh-my-zsh.

A vanilla zsh will feel very bare.

A vanilla oh-my-zsh will feel very feature rich.

If you end up configuring zsh anyways, I don't see the point at all.

sshine4• 2 years ago

For comparison, here is my Zsh configuration in NixOS:

  {
    programs.starship = {
      enable = true;
    };

    programs.zsh = {
      enable = true;
      enableCompletion = true;
      enableBashCompletion = true;
      enableGlobalCompInit = true;
      syntaxHighlighting.enable = true;
      syntaxHighlighting.highlighters = [ "main" "brackets" ];

      histSize = 100000;

      # See `man zshoptions` for more details.
      setOptions = [
        # Remove duplicates continuously from command history (preserve newest entry).
        "HIST_IGNORE_DUPS"

        # Instantly share command history between all active shells.
        "SHARE_HISTORY" # Alternative to: "APPEND_HISTORY", "INC_APPEND_HISTORY",

        # Disable ^S and ^Z for less accidental freezing.
        "FLOW_CONTROL"

        # Save timestamp and duration of each command in command history.
        "EXTENDED_HISTORY"
      ];

      shellAliases = {
        rm = "rm -iv";
        ls = "ls -F --color=auto";
        gs = "git status";
        gd = "git diff";
        gdc = "git diff --cached";
        gap = "git add -p";
        gl = "git log";
        gpr = "git pull --rebase";
      };

      interactiveShellInit = ''
        bindkey '^[[7~' beginning-of-line
        bindkey '^[[8~' end-of-line

        bindkey '^R' history-incremental-search-backward

        eval "$(starship init zsh)"
      '';
      };
  }

My .zshrc used to be bigger, but I've slimmed it down to see what I actually use from it.

mbrumlow• 2 years ago

Just use fish.

dogmayor2• 2 years ago

I prefer sheldon[1] for the few plugins I use

[1] https://github.com/rossmacarthur/sheldon

KolenCh• 2 years ago

Zprezto is a good alternative which is also faster. I eventually migrated to zim because of its minimalist approach.

I think starting from Oh My Zsh or zprezto can be a good choice. Once you get a feel of what zsh can accomplish, eventually probably you’ll one day find it too slow and/or too complicated and then would switch to something like zim to only load the things you know is useful from then.

firexcy• 2 years ago

These days I stick to a minimal profile for the default shell (zsh on macOS and bash on Linux), adding no further than some aliases. When I need more “friendly” interactive features I launch fish which is… friendly and interactive, and exit when I’m done. Thus I get the best of both worlds.

highmastdon• 2 years ago

Do yourself a favour and install fish-shell with starship.rs and call it a day. Make sure to put everything prompt related in a `if status --is-interactive` block. Blazing fast versatile fancy prompt and interactive human friendly shell. What does a man need more?

Oh My Zsh

Related Stories