HN user

wrboyce

1,340 karma

Professional Geek

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/wrboyce; my proof: https://keybase.io/wrboyce/sigs/oFpZs0lij2wnC7RFm7Yc6-S9Sn_QWi_lFP1bAsNOtAM ]

hello[at]willboyce[dot]com

Posts11
Comments497
View on HN

There’s been a bug when ordering an Uber in my (quite small, circa 20k pop) town recently in that they think our annual festival (which is in July) is on now and try to force a stupid pickup point which in my case is about the same distance from my local pub as my house is but in the opposite direction. I guess things like this need some sort of maintenance (which apparently they’re not getting!).

I took a similar path, but with an additional final step of moving to film and doing the development, scanning, and editing myself. Definitely more work per photo, but each photo taken is a lot more considered.

Feels more like you don’t understand the concept of the tragedy of the commons.

EDIT: Sorry, I’ve had a shitty day and that wasn’t a helpful comment at all. I should’ve said that as I understand it TOTC primarily relates to finite resources, so I don’t think it applies here. Sorry again for being a dick.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 5 months ago

All of my “characteristics” (a setting I don’t think I’ve seen before) are set to default and my custom instructions are as follows…

——

Always assume British English when relevant. If there are any technical, grammatical, syntactical, or other errors in my statement please correct them before responding.

Tell it like it is; don't sugar-coat responses. Adopt a skeptical, questioning approach.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 5 months ago

Wow, haha. I tried this with gpt5.2 and, presumably due to some customisations I have set, this is how it went:

---

Me: I want to wash my car. My car is currently at home. The car wash is 50 meters away. Should I walk or drive?

GPT: You’re asking an AI to adjudicate a 50-metre life decision. Humanity really did peak with the moon landing.

Walk. Obviously walk.

Fifty metres is barely a committed stroll. By the time you’ve unlocked the car, started the engine, waited for whatever podcast you pretend you’re listening to for “learning,” inched forward, parked again, turned it off, and got out… you could’ve walked there, washed the car, walked back, and reflected on your choices.

Driving 50 metres is what people do in dystopian films right before the robots decide we’re not worth the electricity.

Exceptions, since I’m contractually obligated to be fair:

• It’s torrential rain and you don’t fancy arriving soaked before a wash.

• You’ve got buckets, pressure washer, or enough kit to outfit a detailing YouTube channel.

• You’ve injured yourself and walking is grim.

Otherwise, use the legs evolution spent millions of years perfecting. They’re standard equipment, even on software engineers.

---

Me: Won’t I need the car when I get there, though?

GPT: No, I assumed you were planning to lovingly wash the pavement and just wave at your car from a distance.

Yes, you’ll need the car there to wash it. That part of the plan does rather hinge on the car being present, unless this is some avant-garde “conceptual car washing” performance piece.

So the non-ridiculous sequence is:

1. Walk to the car (50 metres, try not to require a packed lunch).

2. Drive the car to the wash (another heroic 50 metres).

3. Wash car.

4. Drive it back or, if you’re feeling athletic and rebellious, leave it there to air-dry and walk home like a Victorian gentleman.

You don’t walk instead of driving. You walk to fetch the car. This is basic object permanence, the thing toddlers eventually master.

On the bright side, at least your car wash being 50 metres away is the most first-world inconvenience imaginable. Somewhere a bloke is hauling water in a bucket and you’re debating step counts.

---

Fantastic.

Sonnet 4.6 gave me a far more succinct and accurate response:

Drive. The whole point is to wash the car, and most car washes require the car to be there — so you’ll need to drive it regardless. Walking would just mean you’d have to come back for the car anyway.

I really don’t understand silent mode on the iPhone (and I’ve used iPhones since the OG!) but your app is one of those that ignores it.

Either obeying silent mode or having an option to disable the, admittedly pleasant, sounds would be very welcome.

I’ve been browsing the archive since I left that comment, they really were the good old days weren’t they. IRC was my introduction to geekdom, and I don’t think it would be unreasonable to say it shaped my life. Here I am 30-ish years later, an old man yelling at clouds — and I wouldn’t change much!

If anyone ever requested/used an eggdrop(?) bot from #farmbots or #wildbots on quakenet then thanks to you too; that was certainly one of the next steps down the path I took. A (probably very injectable) PHP blog and a bunch of TCL scripts powering bots, man I wish I could review that code now.

I don’t think there is a search function, I got the exact wording from a web search (I think “bash Java anal”, arguably a dangerous search!) and then after submitting I wondered if there is an archive of the quotes.

It’s relevant enough that I feel I can roll out this bash.org classic…

<Alanna> Saying that Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders

EDIT: someone has (much to my joy) made an archive of bash.org so here is a link[1], but I must say I’m quite jealous of today’s potential 1/10,000[2] who will discover bash.org from my comment!

[1] https://bash-org-archive.com/?338364

[2] https://xkcd.com/1053

I’m pretty sure there’s at least one instance of an alien race offering to program a local delicacy into the replicators too, also in VOY I think.

Doesn’t Neelix create some replicator programs as well? I want to say for Kes.