PDF Tool – Modify PDFs in the browser without uploading

https://www.pdftool.org

by thunderbong • 3 years ago

522 183 3 years ago

Alifatisk2• 3 years ago

Is there a free service which covers the same features as Adobe acrobat?

acrobat does a ton of stuff. there are lots of tools that do some of the things it can do, but I don't you're going to find something that's a complete replacement for free

Alifatisk2• 3 years ago

Do you know any good free tool that is able to censor documents like Acrobat?

albert_e5• 3 years ago

So most common online pdf tools like smallpdf.com and ilovepdf.com are blocked on office networks for obvious reasons.

Can we save this page as .html file on a local folder and run it from browser -- never triggering the firewall / websense blockers etc?

Tomte• 3 years ago

You do not believe us? We know that websites on the internet promise a lot of stuff. You can try our promise by yourself. Load the webpage, disable your internet connection and start editing PDFs. You are gonna be surprised.

GavinMcG• 3 years ago

The question is about being able to load in the first place. Can it be loaded in one machine, saved, and then opened in the browser of another machine?

albert_e5• 3 years ago

Technically the app can cache files and phone home the next time we connect to internet i guess? Not aware of how WASM works.

Not paranoid but just want to know if this tool can be downloaded once and run from browser forever -- without having to disable internet.

Does it not generate any network traffic at all - zero - even when there is internet connectivity available? Whether to the home domain or otherwise? Even telemetry?

pdftoolorg6• 3 years ago

i just created an account for you :-) save it as an PWA to your machine, if you have no internet it will cache the last version - so you will be able to go fully offline and not even need to fetch the dns queries

albert_e5• 3 years ago

Thanks

I am not sure I understand this though:

i just created an account for you :-)

rvz• 3 years ago

We modify your PDF files in your browser, no upload required.

I can do all of this offline for free already with Acrobat or Preview.app on macOS.

We try to make up some of the cost that we pay for hosting this service by employing a small amount of ads on our website.

Why?

skrebbel• 3 years ago

The free version of Acrobat is bloated, full of spam, and can’t actually do all of this (eg splitting and merging)

phatfish• 3 years ago

I've found that "PDF-XChange Editor" does everything i wanted for free. At least in the version I nabbed a few years ago, not sure if they have removed options from the free version since.

Reordering pages, splitting, joining all worked in the free version, and it's not bloated. Windows only though. I think they might watermark the output when using the Save option directly, but you can get round that using Print to PDF.

Their site looks a bit "scammy", but it's actually decent software.

hellotomyrars• 3 years ago

The question of why they would use ads is answered literally in the statement about it. You can disagree with it, but it is already explained and isn't a surprising answer.

gabereiser3• 3 years ago

"uses WebAssembly" - forgive me but what? How do I know my PDF isn't going to Russia? or China? I mean, I could wireshark it but I'd like to know more about what's in the webassembly. PDF's are sensitive to some organizations. As already stated, some orgs even block online pdf tools for obvious reasons.

I'm interested in this but I would be even more so if there was source so I can audit. Since it's running locally in my browser anyway.

remram6• 3 years ago

Is WebAssembly less trustworthy than minified/obfuscated JavaScript?

WebAssembly has no implicit access to browser APIs so I wouldn't think so.

croes5• 3 years ago

Less experience in reading and de-obfuscating it.

jchw• 3 years ago

You can check the network tab. WebAssembly doesn't have magic powers like ActiveX or something like that.

reactordev• 3 years ago

yeah, I checked the asm. using golang, imports some libs and is granted access to disk (sandbox). cool.

4RealFreedom• 3 years ago

It's interesting that they don't just supply the source code. Are they hoping if there's enough interest then they can turn this into a service? This type of functionality is great but I don't like the black box approach.

Edit: After some consideration, maybe they're worried that someone else would create a service using their work.

Vt71fcAqt7• 3 years ago

You can disable network requests using tools like ublock and violentmonkey.

taminka3• 3 years ago

going to Russia? or China?

always ironic when ppl say this on websites hosted in the us, a country with the most documented cases of governmental organisation backdooring/spying :/

jkestner2• 3 years ago

True, though that's because the US has a fairly free press and the Freedom of Information Act.

csdreamer72• 3 years ago

always ironic when ppl say this on websites hosted in the us, a country with the most documented cases of governmental organisation backdooring/spying :/

That is because other countries do not let you document/publish this information. :-)

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/04/world/europe/russia-censo...

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/08/uks-online-safety-bill...

At least not as much as American courts will allow. The US has it's own censorship laws, but American resistance/choosing to ignore, is quite strong.

gabereiser3• 3 years ago

touche... touche... but we invented the internetz... we know what's best. right? riiiight?

whats_a_quasar• 3 years ago

Buddy I've got news for you if you think that Russia and China are more virtuous on the internet than the U.S.

irunexe• 3 years ago

You do have a point, but you probably should look into how many ATPs the Chinese government employs on MITRE. A LOT

YeBanKo3• 3 years ago

It’s most documented in the US, because in China and in Russia you can go to prison for documenting their activities.

Larrikin• 3 years ago

Isn't this true of basically every single program, in browser or not? If you're worried turn off network access

raincole• 3 years ago

What does it even mean lol. I really like how you implied that it's a problem of WebAssembly.

How is checking a web page's network connection, WebAssembly or not, harder than reading ALL the source code (if you don't read them all you can't be sure!) of a non-trivial app?

gabereiser3• 3 years ago

I was expecting something along the lines of pdf.js or something. WebAssembly was a shock, but I looked at the asm, saw golang, decompiled back to go and looked. all good. still... all it takes is an errant http.client call.

akmittal3• 3 years ago

Open website > disable internet/wifi > perform your task and close tab

h4x0rr• 3 years ago

If the website is truly malicious it could store the data in localStorage and transfer it to their servers the next time you open the site

artursapek2• 3 years ago

Very odd reason to pick on WebAssembly

askvictor• 3 years ago

Do you inspect the source of every webpage you visit, and every application you run?

adhesive_wombat• 3 years ago

The lack of a good PDF editor in Linux has always seemed strange to me, considering the relative frequency of "fiddle with a PDF" tasks like splicing pages and so on.

Sure you can do it with Pdftk (or stapler these days), and a mish-mash of pdfinfo, Imagemagick and so on but the GUI programs mostly seem pretty bad offerings considering they're a fairly thin shell around library operations.

scrollaway• 3 years ago

I use masterpdfeditor, but it’s not free nor open source. It’s still an amazing piece of software though.

rendx• 3 years ago

nip2• 3 years ago

Have a look at https://simplePDF.eu – online like PDFTool.org and with local processing as well.

It’s free and does not require an account (I don’t like websites that force you to sign up to do anything)

Disclosure: I’m the solo developer behind it

laydn• 3 years ago

It does say "edit PDF", but it doesn't really seem to allow editing any text on any PDF files.

ghgr• 3 years ago

I've been using pdfarranger for years without issue. It's even available in the Debian (and probably Ubuntu) repositories (sudo apt-get install pdfarranger)

knallfrosch• 3 years ago

There's a lack of good PDF editing in general.

Adobes OCR can't handle a simple black-white tax document. To say nothing of OCRing scans. God help you if one text field wasn't recognized, because you sure as hell can't add the missing field.

And handy functions like "combine two PDF pages into one" (for example, combining front and back scan of something) are always easier to do by Googling than by using any software, even when you pay for it.

totoglazer• 3 years ago

Preview.app is surprisingly good at a lot of this. Someone should clone it for Linux/Windows.

nemoniac• 3 years ago

xournal++

https://xournalpp.github.io/

lighttower• 3 years ago

qoppa PDF studio. we're happy paying customers 7 years. biggest obstacle to using it widely is that people are used to Adobe Suite.

KeplerBoy• 3 years ago

ms-edge is surprisingly good for quick pdf annotations and my preferred PDF reader on Linux.

It's a crazy timeline we're on.

nolok• 3 years ago

If you want to add page, remove page, split, merge, reorder, re-orient all or individual pages, ... May I recommend the glorious NAPS2 [1] ?

It's meant as a scanning tool but works just fine without scanning just drag and drop a pdf on it.

It doesn't do in-page editing or annotation, it's "one layer above" that.

[1] https://www.naps2.com/

camel-cdr• 3 years ago

These days inkscape has pretty good pdf editing support.

blfr• 3 years ago

I have been using LibreOffice Draw to fill out forms, not interactive ones but those they expect you to print and pen in.

mmwelt• 3 years ago

My solution has been to use PDF-XChange Editor in Wine. Yes, this isn't a Linux native solution, but it works really well.

spacebeer• 3 years ago

Pdfsam and Masterpdf have native linux versions. Both are quite good. Though I use(d) Flexipdf via wine

dwrodri• 3 years ago

IMO the reason PDF tools are bad on linux has a lot to do with history.

Per Wikipedia, PDF is a standard that was originally developed by Adobe. It was a proprietary standard for ~15 years before it became an open standard.

Nowadays, the relationship between Adobe and PDF is like Google and Chromium. Other PDF tools are playing catch up, but it’s en enormous amount of tedious work that mist would only do for a good paycheck, which is hard to find outside of Adobe.

slicktux• 3 years ago

Hmm, cute, but I’ll stick with the command line for modifying PDFs..

svat2• 3 years ago

Big fan of the idea of offline in-browser tools: works on any device, and "installing" the program is as simple as visiting a webpage or opening the saved HTML file. This one uses WebAssembly, but even that isn't necessary: I wrote a couple of PDF tools for my own use that simply use pdf-lib: https://shreevatsa.net/pdf-pages/ https://shreevatsa.net/pdf-unspread/

agumonkey• 3 years ago

super minimalist design, 100% function

Timon3• 3 years ago

Me too! I try to build my web-based tools as single files to make downloading them easy. Usually this Vite plugin does the trick: https://www.npmjs.com/package/vite-plugin-singlefile

redman25• 3 years ago

I created something similar for pdf diffing since I needed “visual” diffing instead of “textual” diffing. It uses Mozilla’s PDF.js library as the rendering engine. It’s amazing how much you can do in-browser. https://parepdf.com/

shurtler• 3 years ago

Fantastic! Any tips on tools one can use to parse PDF including their structure? Much appreciated.

4pkjai• 3 years ago

Same! I’ve been meaning to make an offline HTML Cantonese dictionary with text to speech.

Tagbert• 3 years ago

I created a tool to take project plans from a tool that we use to model schedules and generate gantt diagrams from the data in a way that is better than the commercial tool. It's all just a zip file containing an html file and a couple of javascript files. Others in our company are using it now as it is easier and produces better output than the modeling tool.

When I decided on a local html for the app, I wanted something that did not require installing a language like python, did not require installing, and would work on Windows and Mac.

hahn-kev• 3 years ago

I also love the idea. However it's really hard to trust as a non IT person who understands that's possible and how to verify (via dev tools for example) that it's truly working offline.

I'm not really sure what the solution is, but I'd love to be able to navigate to a site like that and know that it's not uploading my files somewhere, without having to take your word for it.

svat2• 3 years ago

Software that does not run in the browser can do even worse things (that are not possible in a browser): it could access (and upload) arbitrary files other than just the PDF file(s) you gave it access to, it could set up things that stay running even after you close it (like a virus or keylogger), etc — so you need to verify/trust the developer or run it inside a sandbox, and the same is true for in-browser software. At least with a browser, the tools needed for monitoring and disabling network access (dev tools) are built-in to the browser (e.g. don't have to separately install Little Snitch).

One thing that seems worse with software-on-a-webpage is the risk of malicious behaviour getting added later (this is also possible with non-browser software with automatic "updates"): you could mitigate it, if you trust or have verified one particular version of such a webpage, by saving the HTML file (put it in a Dropbox folder say) and opening the file (maybe with network disabled), whenever you need to use it. But then you lose the advantage of "don't have to install anything"; it's a trade-off.

akmittal3• 3 years ago

Big fan of offline tools. I have a small collection of tools at https://www.webutils.app/ and have been meaning to add pdf tools for a while.

humanistbot• 3 years ago

Can you please explain why? I care about privacy and security, and this trend seems like we're going backwards. If something needs network access, web apps make sense. But I liked offline tools better when we called them "programs". Web apps to me seem like they turn the web browser into an operating system. I already have an OS.

circuit10• 3 years ago

There are some advantages to using the web as a platform: it’s fully cross platform, completely sandboxed, easy to use, has good backwards compatibility so will likely work forever regardless of OS/browser updates, gives you good debugging tools, and means you can use it without saving it locally if you want

akmittal3• 3 years ago

There is no guarantee traditional program does not connect to internet, or run a bitcoin miner. So technically they are not better at privacy.

Web applications are sandboxed, available on almost all the platform desktop and mobile and does not require installation.

YeBanKo3• 3 years ago

Depending on which OS system you use, your programs can connect to internet and leak your data. As far as I know, neither Windows nor macOS have any built in firewall for outgoing connections. For mac Little Snitch or Lulu are indispensable. A JS app running in the browser sometimes maybe even easier to monitor. You can at least, see the network traffic by the built in devtool.

dartharva• 3 years ago

Too much fragmentation in native OSs and APIs. Making web apps is just too convenient for cross-platform implementation.

cxr• 3 years ago

Looks like a copyright violation since the obfuscated payloads have been totally scrubbed of dependencies' license notices (but care has been taken to add the statement "© 2022 WebUtils. All rights reserved" in the footer...).

mr_o47• 3 years ago

Nice Work,

I was literally trying to create something like this

Anyways good job

BaculumMeumEst• 3 years ago

"Keep your sensitive data to yourself. Wether you are modifying banking statements, prescription or other critical documents, we have no access to it."
Source not available, no acknowledgement or explanation as to why
Hacker News upvotes it to the front page

wrong159247• 3 years ago

Press F12.

dharmab• 3 years ago

It runs an opaque WASM.

Rexxar• 3 years ago

Browsers need a "block all outgoing request from this page from now" button.

quaintdev• 3 years ago

We need this button!! Someone from Firefox team please make this happen.

mikea1• 3 years ago

You can quickly go offline via dev tools. In Chrome, it's very simple[0].

[0] https://developer.chrome.com/docs/devtools/network/reference...

fauigerzigerk2• 3 years ago

Not just browsers. (Other) Native apps have the same problem. For some reason we have elaborate permissions for all sorts of things but nothing remotely user friendly for various kinds of network activity.

anamexis3• 3 years ago

Making the source available wouldn't give you any guarantees about what is running at that site, so I don't see how that would help.

amno3• 3 years ago

I don't see how that would help.

Perhaps with the source you could setup an offline server on your own computer so you don't have to upload your data anywhere?

fareesh• 3 years ago

I use Xournal++ for this on linux - works pretty well for my use-cases, which is mostly annotation

mikpanko• 3 years ago

Does it allow adding text and drawing signatures? This is a very common use case but I can’t figure out how to do it with this tool.

7839284023• 3 years ago

On Linux I like to use:

https://github.com/pdfarranger/pdfarranger and https://gitlab.com/scarpetta/pdfmixtool for such tasks.

__aru• 3 years ago

Just wanted to say thanks for this, I've been looking for good PDF editor apps on Linux, and these fit the bill so far.

They also have flatpaks available on flathub, which makes it easy to install + keep updated.

mildmotive2• 3 years ago

If it’s offline, bundle it with Electron, release the source code and make the build process public!

pdftoolorg6• 3 years ago

have you tried installing it as a PWA, much less work :-) but i will write it in our product backlog

mildmotive2• 3 years ago

I have not. I will look into it later.

The issue that many people were raising is with regards to privacy (not saying your app infringes upon it in any way). If PWA deployment can ensure that the app truly stays offline, then that’s a good thing.

I personally like open source better, as it is easier to examine the inner workings of the app. It also helps tech-savvy users fix bugs and verify that it doesn’t do anything they don’t want it to do. Etc etc

Also, Electron apps can be sandboxed using Flatpaks for instance. Flatpaks aren’t perfect of course, but they do provide some guarantees. You can even use Flatpaks while keeping the source code closed.

laurensr• 3 years ago

Does anyone know a decent open source tool to edit PDF form fields (create them, assign a name, ...)?

duckmysick• 3 years ago

Or even fill the forms of the existing PDFs... I'm struggling with many PDF forms, usually from various government agencies. They all seem to require Adobe Reader and can't open them anywhere else. And the few that I can open and input the values have broken field calculation (for example they won't add values from field A and B into field C).

therein• 3 years ago

There also seems to be two ways to fill a field. I notice this when I fill fields on a PDF in Chrome and save it. And then open it in Preview.

Preview doesn't show the values I put into the fields in Chrome.

Also kinda unrelated but also worth mentioning, if you have a PDF document with a version less than 1.7, opening and reexporting or even reprinting it in Preview.app as PDF will not actually manage to get you a document that's PDF1.7 or above.

I had to use postscript to do it.

chenster• 3 years ago

I use Wondershare PDFElement (free, Windows or Mac) and use its Pro feature to edit PDF, and finally Print to PDF to save. You are welcome.

croes5• 3 years ago

Still not trustworthy.

Works as advertised.

Gains trust

Changes app

Steals data

And I doubt that everybody always disables the internet connection while they use the app.

yigitkonur35• 3 years ago

If you know how to use Dev Tools, then you can be sure.

croes5• 3 years ago

Everytime you use the app?

That's the point of gaining trust.

pdftoolorg6• 3 years ago

valid point, but this is not our intention. hold us accountable - shame us directly and reference this comment. sincerly, simon

croes5• 3 years ago

I don't question your intentions, it's more a general trust problem with every app with internet connection.

YeBanKo3• 3 years ago

Honest question: how are you monetizing? I don’t see a single ad on the website, but I have not tried to use it to edit any document. Are they being injected at the time of edit?

ahmgeek2• 3 years ago

I prefer https://humantools.io/

ahmgeek2• 3 years ago

also from same devs: https://pdf-annotator.repeat.day/

ezfe2• 3 years ago

For Mac users, most of these things can be done in the default Preview.app

ramraj07• 3 years ago

In the most unintuitive ways possible.

dmje• 3 years ago

Been using Preview for years and only the other day did I realise you can redact stuff. It's the gift that keeps on giving.

SCUSKU• 3 years ago

Right, you'd think for a company that is all about intuitive UI/UX they would invest more in apps that come installed on all of their computers :/

SamBam• 3 years ago

The fact that you can have a wonderful signature stamp, but the only way to get the image into the system is to hold an image up to your webcam is insane to me.

I have a perfect png signature with transparency, but there's no way to import it.

ezfe2• 3 years ago

Page deletion: select the page from the sidebar and press the delete key

Page addition: drag a page from another PDF sidebar into the Preview sidebar

Merging: same, but for a whole PDF

Encryption: File > Edit Permissions > Require Password to Open Document

Decryption: If you have the password, then the same flow

Redaction/Markup/Signatures: All from the Markup menu

aurelius193• 3 years ago

Love it! By briefly viewing, only thing I might be missing is adding a signature

rjoonas• 3 years ago

Machine translations for Finnish seem to be quite shoddy. The rotate tool is called ”A PDF is spinning” etc. Even the language name is wrong in the language selector.

pdftoolorg6• 3 years ago

Thanks for your feedback! We just published a new version. I hope it is now fixed.

newhotelowner• 3 years ago

I'm mostly use NAPS2 scanner app on Windows. It can scan optimize , split, join PDF.

tbarbe• 3 years ago

I created a similar offline tool during covid because I didn't want to upload sensitive data to random servers, it's open source if that can be useful to someone else : https://timothebarbe.github.io/pdfModer (Im not a front end dev, the UI is not very good)

wesleychen• 3 years ago

Does anyone know of a good way to tile large PDFs (i.e. split a single PDF into smaller pages)? Adobe reader only allows you to do this when printing and you can't save the tiled PDF as its own file.

matsemann2• 3 years ago

Can you print to pdf, perhaps?

But I've done it with Illustrator previously, at least.

dspillett• 3 years ago

Some time ago I had success with https://github.com/rrthomas/pdfjam for that purpose under Linux. It used to be included in the standard Debian repositories but that no longer seems to be the case which might mean it is an unmaintained project that has build issues. Worth trying though, if it builds on a modern system.

It might also be worth trying if the PDF reader in a Chrome/Chromium can use its “pages per sheet” option when using a print-to-PDF driver (included by default with Windows these days IIRC, likely available as an option at least on other OSs). You may lose some fidelity on things like images this way, depending on the options selected in the print to PDF driver.

benoliver999• 3 years ago

on arch it comes with extra/texlive-binextra

kwstas• 3 years ago

I use pdftk on linux to do most of this type of stuff. For example if you want pages 1 -10 :

` pdftk {{input.pdf}} cat {{1-10}} output {{output.pdf}} `

If you want to do multiple files you may want to burst them and recombine. If you are doing it for file size purposes there may be better options though, as I dont think there is any way to split in 500kB chunks for example.

There supposedely is a windows version [here](https://www.pdflabs.com/tools/pdftk-the-pdf-toolkit/). I haven't used it though.

foul• 3 years ago

mutool poster -x 2 -y 2 input.pdf out%d.pdf

beAbU• 3 years ago

Semi related:

I have been looking far and wide for a tool that replicates Acrobat's /fill and sign/ feature, allowing me to fill out NON-form-fillable PDFs.

Something where I can fill it out, save, and then open up later to edit and add/remove previous additions.

Adobe as a business, their pushiness about creating an account and the fact that they bundle McAfee's shitware with Acrobat never sat well with me, so I'd love an alternative.

Surprisingly there's a few decent options on Android, but nothing worth while I could find for Windows or Linux.

Maybe someone here can help a guy out with a pointer?

l0b02• 3 years ago

Xournal++ does the job, with a recognizably 90s interface. It stores a separate file with the overlay you create, and can produce a new PDF which combines the original file with your overlay. I use it any time I need to do something official.

ale422• 3 years ago

To me, at a first glance the interface looks like more like ~2005-2007 ;-)

gibspaulding• 3 years ago

I've used LibreOffice Draw for this with fairly good results just inserting text boxes on top of the necessary fields. It's not the fastest, and probably is a bit overkill for the job, but it does work!

simonra• 3 years ago

I’ve found Inkscape to work very well for editing most PDFs in any way I’ve wanted to so far. If you just want to add or alter text the interface is reasonably simple while retaining the power to change mostly anything in the document, and in my experience it’s well supported and easy to set up on Linux, Windows, and Mac.

Osiris• 3 years ago

I use https://www.ilovepdf.com/ . They have a ton of tools. Their Sign PDF includes the ability to add text, dates, a signature from a PNG, etc. I am not affiliated with or have any relationship with them other than as a happy user.

lotsofpulp• 3 years ago

I do not understand why Microsoft still does not offer something similar to macOS’s Preview app.

dvlsg• 3 years ago

They kind of do. You can add signatures to pdfs with edge, oddly enough.

qohen• 3 years ago

FoxIT's free PDF reader[0] has a Fill & Sign feature. And, it also allows you to type text anywhere on a PDF, in case that's what you actually want.

It's available for PC, Mac and Linux. (While the Linux version isn't as full-featured, I'd expect/hope all the versions have these 2 features...though I see that the feature-matrix on their website shows the Linux version doesn't have the Form Filling feature that the other versions have, FWIW, so it might lack one or both of the features I've mentioned).

The Fill-and-Sign feature is accessible from the Home tab -- there's a tool right end of the ribbon called "Fill & Sign".

The text-typing feature is also accessible from the Home tab: you choose the Typewriter tool from the ribbon, move the cursor where you want the text to show up, click there, then start typing -- the text will show up in a faint box (which disappears when you e.g. click somewhere else).

Later, you can click the Typewriter's arrow cursor on the text and the box will reappear -- you can then delete the box and its text, if you like, or you can double-click inside the box and get a text-cursor, which you can use to delete/add text.

I've used the Typewriter a bunch -- it works pretty well. (I think I've used Fill & Sign in the past, but not as often).

[0] https://www.foxit.com/pdf-reader/

blackqueeriroh• 3 years ago

sigh the amount of bad mojo and discouragement that shows up on posts here is exhausting. Very cool tool, OP — congrats!

yetanother-1• 3 years ago

I find pdfsam to be the perfect offline tool for me on Windows.

https://pdfsam.org

And it's open source as well: https://github.com/torakiki/pdfsam

jichang• 3 years ago

For anyone want to build a tool like this, you can try my WIP library here, it's based on Pdfium and Wasm, you can build a tool support editing and previewing with it.

https://github.com/jichang/unionpdf

UncleBill• 3 years ago

There is also a tool for zip. https://www.ziptool.app/

kevinlinxc• 3 years ago

Seems like none of these tools have free pdf text editing which is the main reason I'm saddled with acrobat

vinsat• 3 years ago

Does this or any other tool avoid detection of tampering, keeping the structure/properties intact?

rldjbpin• 3 years ago

shout out to another tool someone promoted at HN earlier this year: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34722432 (https://pdfux.com/)

i've used it for basic things and had a positive experience thus far.

zikohh• 3 years ago

Finally had a use case, used it to split a PDF AMAZING JOB!!!

PDF Tool – Modify PDFs in the browser without uploading

Related Stories