jedimastert

I mean you could probably say that for most crud applications, the difference is somebody else is already done the work of setting everything up and it looks nice

I'm seeing surprisingly few comments about OP getting homeopathic treatment

The blog post itself has pretty a pretty strong un-copy-edited ChatGPT vibes.

That's a pretty strong assertion just throw out like it's obvious

These kinds of policies are exactly what I meant by "distractions", those policies tend to help the wealthy far more than workers, and then those same policies are turned towards the workers when there aren't any more immigrants to hurt

I would call that holding steady worldwide in the last decade, which honestly is still unacceptable with how much more wealthy the world has gotten

And yet we are also living in some of the strongest wealth inequality in the last 100 years at least.

https://ourworldindata.org/economic-inequality

Additionally, it often happens that the interests of people in one country are antagonistic to the interests of people in another country.

I find this honestly kind of difficult to believe, except when it comes to distractions by the people who want to stay in power

The idea that the answer to this question would not be intuitive to pretty much anyone that participates in an economy is a genuine shock.

The term "millennials" referred to a specific cohort of people that all share similar experiences and therefore culture because they were born around a specific time (early ninties).

So yes, it would be an evolution to refer to them as college student age today

As it was fortold in the prophecy:

Relevant xkcd <https://xkcd.com/1053/>

The usage of the phrase has evolved past carrying about the actual generation (kind of like how people still talk about "millennials" like they're college students).

Also, Hoffman very intentionally opened the door to talking about generational differences, this kind of feels like the commenter may have touched a nerve

Fair, the youths very much much get blamed for smoking and gambling back in the day as well. Sort of pivotal to the story of Pinocchio, for example

Even if it's not the same resolution there's still benefits, a bit one that it will likely be WAY less expensive, both upfront and in maintenance, even after building the water tank. It might also replace a fair amount of routine ultrasound usage because of the reduction of operator skill.

Also, there's plenty of people who can't be in MRI machines, and likely a lot safer for everyone else.

A kind of literal translation would be that he cannot match the amount of love and support that his wife shows, both in amount or in intensity.

A rewording might be "she is more supportive than I could ever be, and better at being supportive than I could ever be"

I appreciate the AI disclosure, I hope that becomes normalized

Open source it all, I double dog dare you

I mean, the numbers are pretty significant, but like there really isn't a great argument when they're already talking about second non-primary homes. Like no one is forcing them to own them, it's not a necessity

Edit: I've done a little research, and it looks like they might only be changing the valuation method for the super expensive homes

It was, the 40 hour work week was hard fought for.

Also, 996 is apparently a thing

But when they get into the business of slowing down technology adoption to protect workers, that's when they get into the territory of giving unions a bad name.

I would consider the emputus more on companies to not roll out new technology in a way that harms workers.

I'm curious if there has ever been an instance where people have been able to "tame" a technology to consider a broader, societal good, or if we've always just been at the whims of how any particular tech naturally concentrates or dissipates power.

One example that comes to mind is cloning. It's technically fully possible to clone a human right now (as in make an embryo with one person's DNA), but it's wildly taboo.

it's worth considering why it hasn't totally taken over "naturally".

Because is advantageous for employers to keep workers as close to the brink of burnout as possible as a method of control

This looks awesome, and I've been waffling about moving from Notion to something local/markdown based for a while. My only issue is that I really like using "databases"/tables, specifically for moving through processes ticket-style, in Notion. Does anyone know if there's something similar elsewhere? I'm not familiar with the knowledge-base/wiki space, I just kinda fell into notion.

I would say "open source markdown knowledge-base similar to Obsidian" but I'm not a marketing guy

So this is my art degree coming out, but I feel like invoking the name of Dogma 95 and the "vow of chastity" without what appears to be any of the original people involved or blessing feels a little lame, especially when the actual rules are pretty different from the original. At least, I don't see any indication of like a real personal connection to the original.

I feel like they probably should have come up with a different name and just noted the connection in the manifesto

I feel like people are reading this as "this is how the under signers think all movies should be made, and we are judging movies not made this way as a moral failing", when I think a better reading would be "as directors/film makers/story tellers, this is how we think we can maximize our own creativity and joy when we make movies".

Nothing like rules for spurring creativity.

I feel like it's pretty well known in creative spaces that constraints breed creativity.

That's not really a computer helping you though, that's just a computer allowing a human that's far away to help you right?

So I did the (imho) only sensible thing, and run Obsidian in a sandbox (bwrap). By doing so, I also made sure it runs in a separate networking namespace. For now, I disallow any internet access.

The amount of rage I see here is a bit strange

Serious question: do you think it is actually obvious and technically accessable to everyday people to have the thought "I should run this in a sandbox" and do it?

Like no this is not some super elite haxxr tool, it's a text editor pretty explicitly advertised as being non-technical-person-friendly.