HN user

bloak

2,599 karma
Posts28
Comments1,334
View on HN
www.theguardian.com 5mo ago

'P-gate': why inject acid into your p, and what are the health risks?

bloak
3pts0
www.theguardian.com 7mo ago

'The admin': why it's not easy to rename streets called after Prince Andrew

bloak
4pts2
www.theguardian.com 1y ago

Kate Bush joins campaign against AI using artists' work without permission

bloak
1pts0
securityonline.info 1y ago

Severe unauthenticated RCE flaw in GNU/Linux systems awaiting full disclosure

bloak
6pts0
www.theguardian.com 1y ago

Briton dies before clearing name after 38 years for murders he denied

bloak
2pts0
www.theguardian.com 2y ago

Craig Wright's claim he invented Bitcoin a 'brazen lie', court told

bloak
5pts3
trademarks.ipo.gov.uk 2y ago

George Orwell and the thoughtcrime of trade marks

bloak
4pts1
www.theguardian.com 2y ago

‘Biggest act of copyright theft in history’: Australian books used for AI model

bloak
2pts3
www.theguardian.com 2y ago

Proust, ChatGPT and the case of the forgotten quote

bloak
3pts0
www.theguardian.com 3y ago

US urged to reveal UFO evidence after claim that it has intact alien vehicles

bloak
568pts1113
www.gov.uk 3y ago

National test of the UK Emergency Alerts service

bloak
4pts0
freerepublic.com 3y ago

Dilbert.com has been taken offline

bloak
5pts2
en.wikipedia.org 4y ago

Kane Tanaka

bloak
3pts1
www.theguardian.com 4y ago

‘Virtual reality is genuine reality’ so embrace it, says US philosopher

bloak
5pts1
www.theguardian.com 4y ago

Lost in translation? The one-inch truth about Netflix’s subtitle problem

bloak
1pts0
www.theguardian.com 4y ago

The Guardian view on changes to copyright law: book lovers beware

bloak
5pts2
www.linkedin.com 5y ago

Use Gender Pronouns on LinkedIn

bloak
1pts1
www.theregister.com 5y ago

Nvidia teases Arm-powered supercomputing chip Grace

bloak
1pts0
www.newstatesman.com 5y ago

The Voice in Your Head

bloak
2pts0
www.theguardian.com 5y ago

Netflix weighs up crackdown on password sharing

bloak
1pts1
britastro.org 5y ago

Star Count 2021

bloak
2pts1
www.timeanddate.com 5y ago

Earth Is in a Hurry in 2020

bloak
2pts0
www.bbc.co.uk 5y ago

Tamam Shud Case

bloak
1pts0
www.theguardian.com 6y ago

Was the oldest woman in the world a fraud?

bloak
5pts0
www.theregister.co.uk 6y ago

Stack Exchange embroiled in 'he said, she said, they said' row

bloak
1pts1
www.bbc.co.uk 7y ago

Proposed law to stop items for men and women from being priced differently

bloak
5pts4
lists.debian.org 7y ago

Potentially insecure Perl scripts

bloak
2pts0
www.economist.com 8y ago

Data from half a million people show that natural selection has not stopped

bloak
3pts1

There are so many different options, it's confusing. But a "proper" 7 kW charger can cost over £2000 to install if your house isn't wired in a convenient way, while installing an ordinary socket outside might cost about a tenth of that and give you 2.3 kW. You might get about 4.5 miles per kWh, so potentially more than 80 miles from an 8-hour overnight charge from an ordinary 230 V socket, which can deliver 10 A for a long time if it's a modern one and properly installed though you need to be a bit careful because it's not normal to take that much current from an ordinary socket and you'd be doing this at night so you should worry a bit about something overheating and catching fire. Worth getting someone competent to take a look at the wiring, I'd say.

Basically, as far as I can tell, you can take 10 amps off lots of places in an ordinary modern house, but to get 32 amps for a "proper" EV charger you probably need to go back to where the power supply enters the house and start there afresh with new and rather more expensive equipment and cables.

(US readers note that I'm talking about GB where domestic wiring is all 230 V.)

I'm being pedantic here, of course, but "nation-states" is perhaps not the right expression to use for that era. Nation states are primarily a thing of the nineteenth century (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation_state). The article seems to talk about "imperial states" and "palace states", and I'm not sure I've ever seen the expression "palace state" before.

I used to have a device with a physical button which, when you pressed it, would beep and add 30 seconds to the time. However, sometimes it would beep and not add 30 seconds, and sometimes it would add 30 seconds without beeping, so you always had to squint at the dim display to discover whether it had worked or not. I thought this must be a peculiarly bad design ... but since then I have lost count of the number of purely software buttons that somehow seem to replicate this broken behaviour: whether the button changes colour on the screen is somehow only loosely correlated with whether the action requested will take place. Why? How, even, have they implemented this?

Not necessarily. Which country were you in and when was this?

(I don't much like this Internet confusion where half the time people don't know what country they're reading about. At least this article has "Canadian" as the first word of the title. Here in Britain I think rabies in bats is a recent thing and even today rabies is very rare in bats.)

I think the problem with Russian names in particular is that a Russian name has three parts (e.g. Nikolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky) and different parts get used in different contexts, depending on who's speaking, level of familiarity and so on. So it's like in an English novel where someone might be referred to as Smith by the narrator but John in dialogue, but with an extra 50%, at least, of confusion.

The AirPods Effect 1 month ago

Yes, I agree, but really we shouldn't even be comparing "arrests" and "fine". The latter is a punishment, and the former is a practical measure to prevent a future crime (such as destruction of evidence) or to prevent someone from evading justice (by destroying evidence, hiding or leaving the country, for example). Obviously some police forces do use arrests and searches and confiscation of "evidence" as a form of extrajudicial punishment but that shouldn't be allowed.

Are we talking about this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Looking_for_Alaska#Author's_re...

(I've not read it, of course, and don't know whether I'd consider it inappropriate for school libraries. However, it sounds like it was not intended as pornography and therefore isn't pornography according to some narrow definitions of that term. In any case, school libraries have such tiny budgets and there are so many uncontroversial good books in the world I can see why they might want to give this one a miss.)

Someone should make a list of all these weird overreactions. Didn't they turn one flight around because a passenger found something scribbled in Arabic script inside the inflight magazine (I think a previous passenger had written out a prayer)? And another one because there was an abandoned mobile phone that had presumably dropped out of someone's pocket?

What Gets Kept 2 months ago

Yes!

"Of the five pay-checks I mentioned above, no less than three are rubber-stamped with the words 'death stoppage'. When a miner is killed at work it is usual for the other miners to make up a subscription, generally of a shilling each, for his widow, and this is collected by the colliery company and automatically deducted from their wages. The significant detail here is the rubber stamp."

Apart from The Economist, I don't know anyone who says "the Americas".

If you asked a random person what Columbus discovered, what would they answer? Round here I think most people would say that Columbus discovered America. By landing in San Salvador and then Cuba.

By the way, I don't strongly object to people using "America" as an abbreviation for "The United States of America" in contexts in which it is obvious that a country is being referred to, and "American" is even less objectionable in an appropriate context. At the same time, "American" obviously doesn't mean "of or pertaining to the USA" if someone is talking about "American species of conifer" or "American dialects of Spanish" or "American tortilla recipes".

I have personally been baffled by some Scottish and Indian speakers of English, particularly when I was younger and less experienced. And Singapore English is said to be particularly hard for someone with no previous experience. And I know of a case in which someone from London sat at a table with some in-laws who were speaking a traditional native dialect of southern England to each other and found they understand almost nothing, though that was a few decades ago and the dialect in question is perhaps only spoken by old people today.

When you say you "never had a serious problem understanding people", do you mean you could understand them when you overheard them speaking to each other? Because that, of course, is the real test of how intelligible their language is to you. They may well speak a bit differently when speaking to an outsider. Also, you may be particularly skillful at understanding spoken English. I feel I have got better at understanding British dialects as I got older and gained experience of them. I was terribly confused by some dialects as a child.

With compulsory education almost everyone today has some knowledge of a standard language besides whatever dialects they have learnt. If you want to find someone who only speaks dialect X of language Y you might have to look in places where Y is neither official nor widely taught, or among very old people who never went to school.

We have a similar thing on this side of the Atlantic where people argue about whether it is acceptable to refer to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as "Britain". I feel it is, as an abbreviation, and it is my preferred abbreviation, along with "GB", because I like to look forward to the time when we won't have a monarchy any more and I therefore don't like the abbreviation "UK", and also, despite not having any strong Irish connections, I tend to feel that Ireland ought to be reunited. This may seem like the opposite of my opinion on the US/America question, where I prefer "US", and I suppose it is, but I have my reasons!

Cantonese is a language, yes, but mutual intelligibility and similarity to other languages is hardly relevant unless the languages are very similar indeed.

For example, there are spoken varieties of English that are mutually unintelligible, while speakers of different Slavic languages are often capable of having a good conversation by speaking slowly and listening carefully.

In practice the main criterion for being a language as opposed to a continuum of dialects is the degree of standardisation. So an example of something that may or may not be a language might be something like Swiss German (but I'm not an expert so I can't guarantee that's a good example). Another type of borderline case is when you have two standardised languages which differ only slightly, for example US English and GB English, or DE German and AT German.

The thing you're complaining about doesn't even mention the word "dialect" and it says underneath: "Some Census categories combine multiple languages or language groups". So they're probably just doing the best they can with the data that is available to them.

I think you're right that Cantonese should be (and usually is) referred to as a "language" but the categories "dialect" and "language" are not mutually exclusive. For example, Dutch is both a language (for most purposes) and a dialect of West Continental Germanic (for some linguistic purposes).

It seems that he wrote that in a book published in 1953, but it's weird, I find, that he was imagining a robot driving a car. I would have thought he would have imagined that cars would become robots well before there would be humanoid robots wanting to drive them. So by the time you have a humanoid robot wanting to drive a car it's just one robot talking to another robot, electronically. And knives and forks are for eating, which humanoid robots presumably don't need to do, and is it likely that humanoid robots will need chairs in the same way that humans do? Altogether, a bad set of examples, I find. Perhaps the thesis would be more convincing with some better examples.

Round here (GB) the standard, as reflected in decorative calendars and the like, seems to be:

Spring: Mar, Apr, May

Summer: Jun, Jul, Aug

Autumn: Sep, Oct, Nov

Winter: Dec, Jan, Feb

Works for me.

I listened to the start of the Swahili course and it mentions that Swahili was the first one to be "commissioned", which I understand to mean that someone asked for it and paid for it specifically. It also said there was information about commissioning on the web site, but I couldn't find it. So it's a bit mysterious.

Commissioning a language course might be spare change for some government agency but I don't know whether they're allowed to spend money that way. They might be forced to put it out to tender and prefer domestic bidders or something like that.

"Valet" and "cadet" is an interesting pair: they rhyme in French (/va.lɛ/ and /ka.dɛ/), but rhyming them in English would be ... unusual.

If there were just French words pronounced in a French way and English words which came from French and are now pronounced in an English way that would be bad enough but in fact we have a whole spectrum of bastardisation.