HN user

bchjam

1,078 karma
Posts114
Comments139
View on HN
dustintran.com 9y ago

Deep and Hierarchical Implicit Models

bchjam
2pts0
journals.plos.org 10y ago

Measuring the Bright Side of Being Blue: Analytical Rumination in Depression

bchjam
2pts0
mindhacks.com 11y ago

Computation is a lens

bchjam
2pts0
scottberkun.com 11y ago

Why Isn’t Remote Work More Popular?

bchjam
5pts1
www.economist.com 13y ago

Edward Snowden: Whistleblowers and the economy of esteem

bchjam
3pts1
business.time.com 13y ago

Game Over? Why Video-Game-Console Sales Are Plummeting

bchjam
1pts0
www.cnn.com 14y ago

Opting out of vaccinations could get tougher in California

bchjam
1pts0
blog.zillabyte.com 14y ago

Sales for Engineers

bchjam
1pts0
healthland.time.com 14y ago

Humble People Are More Helpful to Others and Perform Better at Work

bchjam
2pts1
www.raphkoster.com 14y ago

Do auction houses suck?

bchjam
2pts0
psychcentral.com 14y ago

Math Anxiety Has Neurological Basis

bchjam
2pts0
www.forbes.com 14y ago

The Big Lie About Big Data

bchjam
3pts0
www.raphkoster.com 14y ago

An atomic theory of fun game design

bchjam
1pts0
www.informationarchitects.jp 14y ago

Can Experience be Designed?

bchjam
1pts1
blogs.hbr.org 14y ago

Is America a Failing State?

bchjam
4pts0
www.edwardtufte.com 14y ago

Project Management Graphics (or Gantt Charts)

bchjam
23pts2
research.microsoft.com 14y ago

Infer.NET, a framework for running Bayesian inference in graphical models

bchjam
2pts0
www.guardian.co.uk 14y ago

Dennis Ritchie: the other man inside your iPhone

bchjam
4pts0
www.slate.com 14y ago

Does evil exist? Neuroscientists say no.

bchjam
2pts1
blogs.msdn.com 14y ago

Writing F# 3.0 Type Providers - An Intro Guide and Samples

bchjam
3pts0
www.reuters.com 14y ago

Americans get too much healthcare, their docs say

bchjam
6pts0
richardminerich.com 14y ago

Imperative Pseudocode to Pure Functional Algorithm with Gale-Shapely and F#

bchjam
1pts0
tech.fortune.cnn.com 14y ago

HP board may oust Apotheker for Whitman

bchjam
2pts1
gigaom.com 14y ago

No, licensing journalists isn’t the answer

bchjam
2pts1
counterparties.com 14y ago

What is Counterparties? (financial news, curated by Felix Salmon)

bchjam
1pts0
www.nature.com 14y ago

Inside IBM's cognitive chip

bchjam
68pts13
blogs.scientificamerican.com 14y ago

A Call for New Measures of Asperger’s and Schizotypy

bchjam
1pts0
www.nber.org 14y ago

Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from the Human Genome

bchjam
1pts1
blogs.reuters.com 15y ago

A great divide holds back the relevance of economists

bchjam
1pts0
www.nytimes.com 15y ago

Sigmund Freud’s Cocaine Years

bchjam
2pts0

No experiment could ever possibly hurt scientific knowledge

what about one with a falsified result?

fwiw I think convexity and understanding are relatively orthogonal, but how could one employ the former without the latter? However the author's position seems to be more that gaming systems works better than exploring their contexts. Sometimes you might make more money in less time, but the money is all you'll get out of it. In practice, maybe understanding and convex payoff functions are both useful at different scales.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brouwer%E2%80%93Hilbert_contro...

Brouwer's career suffered as a consequence of his disagreements with Hilbert.

EDIT (with links to the political aspect): Letters written more about the politics of publishing than the math itself are referenced in a book called "The War of the Frogs and the Mice" (PDF) http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.224... (see bottom of pg 9 as displayed for the letter Brouwer wrote to Hilbert's wife)

I've come to think of machine learning as an engineering approach for building more scalable statistical systems. Computational neuroscience seems like it does more math modeling for understanding of brain function, but still might use machine learning methods as part of its research.

Also, good is subjective, and we don't have wetware in our engineering toolchain anyway. Loosely coupled metaphors seem to be popular and effective due to ambiguities like this.

Meaning is a process of its own creation, not a measuring stick. Often when people speak of meaning as though it were quantitative, they usually are referring to how much they help other people. Meaning is also interactive, it rarely happens in total isolation. If everyone around is constantly conflating meaning with monetary success, it's easy to feel confused and despair. Don't blame money, but rather look for bits of beauty in life and share them with people you care for. At least that's what seems to work for me

working from home entails a personal responsibility for effectively scheduling your time. having a separate space from "normal" household activities can really help staying focused and avoiding overwork / burnout.

over time, the worst part of working from home is lack of eye contact. engaging with others outside of home can help, but there's still an awkward quality to getting to know people without seeing their reactions

"smart" is often interpreted as a measure of skills with symbol systems, rather than any general capacity to cultivate understanding. it wasn't that long ago that this sort of reactionary logic was used to justify enslaving large populations of humans. bias borne from the relative locality of individual existence is hardly a solved problem for humanity. In future I'd hope for greater understanding and less disgust

Speed reading techniques often try to break written word streams down into visual chunks and let the wetware do the rest. Unsurprisingly, results vary widely. Ironically though, this sounds a bit like a very high level description of segmentation as in computer vision