Moosdijk

Thank you so much for all the work you do for us.

Who are you replying to?

Like what?

it's a clickbait title

Hindsight is 20/20

That explains it. Thanks!

It feels pedantic to point it out, but it’s actually 113x faster.

Seeing the author present their results like this give off the impression that they’re biased, which I am sure they aren’t.

This is nice website.

I wonder why glm is viewed so positively.

Every time I try to build something with it, the output is worse than other models I use (Gemini, Claude), it takes longer to reach an answer and plenty of times it gets stuck in a loop.

They are produced by companies that specialise in producing ICs.

They can be placed manually or automated.

That’s users, for ya! They will always find ways to use your product that you didn’t intend to or even knew about!

Yet my phone service provider is able to cut off my internet access from the Kb I go over the limit…

I had to do this with my MacBook Pro models early 2015 and late 2017.

It seems like there was a period in time when solder just wasn’t done well, it seems like.

Is a future of what it could look like or what it will look like?

Bad bot

Bringing kintsugi into this conversation is like saying “being underwater can be quite advantageous!” and linking a video on fish, when the main topic is about people drowning in the ocean.

There seems to be a webgl render engine suitable for vega [0]. Have you tried and if so, what was your experience?

[0] https://github.com/vega/vega-webgl-renderer

Yet it is. I don’t see myself or anyone in my family effortlessly choosing and setting up a Linux distro without outside help.

Windows on the other hand is easy to install and set up. I’d argue most people in my family can do this and I’m the only one that is technically inclined.

I have, actually. It was a several-click process with few to no headaches (I don’t recall any in the last several installs I did).

The opening paragraph gives the reason why Linux is still not at the same level as windows:

“ A few months and several headaches later…”

Additionally, the first comment I read is very positive, yet it also gives insight into the same situation.

Thanks for correcting me. Can you point me to what I need to search for to understand the differences?

There are enough people that let their greediness overtake their ability to think

There's still so much room for planning/scheduling, so much hardware we have yet to target

this is nicely illustrated by this recent article:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46366998

I meant going to the likeliest output (flash) or (iteratively) generating multiple outputs and (iteratively) choosing the best one (thinking/pro)

Interesting. Instead of running the model once (flash) or multiple times (thinking/pro) in its entirety, this approach seems to apply the same principle within one run, looping back internally.

Instead of big models that “brute force” the right answer by knowing a lot of possible outcomes, this model seems to come to results with less knowledge but more wisdom.

Kind of like having a database of most possible frames in a video game and blending between them instead of rendering the scene.

Thanks, I’ll check it out

Edit: timed out

RMS = Richard Stallman, responsible for the GNU project and the free software foundation.

He had a page dedicated to his housing situation:

https://stallman.org/seeking-housing.html

Well, it’s the same author so it is kind of related.

Do you have a log available somewhere?

I’m in this one because it was at the top of the front page.